Harris 2024

305,669 Views | 3245 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by Oldsouljer
TheStorm
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:08a, 11/27/24
https://www.foxnews.com/media/sharptons-pay-to-play-scandal-ricocheting-around-halls-msnbc-insider-says-cant-be-acceptable

I laugh my ass off when a liberal network tries to pretend they aren't complicit when something like this gets out... arrangements like this are the rule rather than the exception between these "news" outlets and the DNC.

They get exactly what they pay for too.
Reply Quote
2
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GuerrillaPack • 8:18a, 11/27/24
GuerrillaPack said:
Did the Democrats think that by picking this effeminate goofball that it would actually help them with male voters? Most men are repulsed by this sissy boy who acts like a closeted homosexual.

Tampon boy only appeals to "woke", far Left men and feminazis…who the democrats already had in the tank.

When you think about it, the Kackling Hyena and Tampon Tim were about the worst possible candidates to pick (from the perspective of a democrat)….or the best from the perspective of a Republican…as they are so goofy, incompetent, and unlikeable.

By picking these two clowns, it's almost like they wanted to lose. Or maybe it's because the communist democrat party just naturally attracts these sorts of extremely low IQ, incompetent, clueless degenerates and rejects, that these sort of loser candidates are par for the course for them.

He's lucky Bill Clinton instituted "don't ask don't tell", otherwise he probably would have been rousted from the ranks long ago.
Reply Quote
1
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:56a, 11/27/24
A senior advisor to the Kamala campaign admits that their internal polling showed her losing the entire time and never taking a lead over Trump, and that they were "surprised" by the public (Lamestream media promoted) polls that were showing Kamala "winning".

More proof, as Trump supporters have been saying for 8+ years now, that the "officially recognized" polls promoted by the far Left Establishment Lamestream media are typically fabricated/doctored "push polls" designed to manipulate public opinion, by falsely showing that the Democrat candidate is "winning" or has a larger lead than they actually do -- eg, basically adding 5-7 points to the Democrat, on average.

And this has been blatantly obvious, just looking at the track record of the "polls" from the 2016 and 2020 race -- where the Establishment "polls" were claiming that Hillary and Biden had these "huge ~8-10 point leads" in the days leading up to the election, but then the actual election results only had Trump "officially" (with massive vote fraud, especially in 2020) losing the national popular vote by 2-4 points. And then here with the 2024 election, you had many of these polls claiming that Kamala was leading nationally by 2 or 3 points in just the few days before the election, and she ends up losing by about 1.5 points.


https://instagr.am/p/DC4EU5NxpyO

Quote:
Senior advisers who worked on the Kamala Harris campaign have admitted that the vice president had no pathway to victory.

Speaking on the Pod Save America podcast, several campaign advisers to the Harris campaign shared some hard truths they could not admit during the presidential election.

"We were hopeful. I don't know how optimistic we were, but we thought, OK, this is tied, and if a couple things break our way [we could win]," David Plouffe, a senior adviser to the campaign, said Tuesday.

Plouffe also admitted that internal polling also showed that Kamala Harris never took the lead over Trump, even admitting that public polls showing Harris in the lead left him surprised.

"We didn't get the breaks we needed on Election Day," he said. "I think it surprised people, because there was these public polls that came out in late September, early October, showing us with leads that we never saw."

Plouffe was also joined by campaign staffers Jen O'Malley Dillon, Quentin Fulks, and Stephanie Cutter.


"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
5 edits
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GuerrillaPack • 9:12a, 11/27/24
The goal has been for 80% to want Biden-Harris out of office and I think that goal was reached as the 79% poll of those unhapping with BIden-Harris and wanting change indicates. I don't think the vote actually got there but I think it was close. I'll guess 75-25 to 70-30, omitting the millions the illegally cast votes, was the vote if the actual #'s can accurately be retrieved. It is the digital fraud that's so massive.

Reply Quote
1
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:56a, 11/27/24
Tampon Timmy and the cackling commie hyena with a new post-election message to their supporters.

Tampon boy talks about the "joy" over and over, and says Kamala is an "incredible leader"...LOL. Kommie-mala talks about how their campaign raised $1.4 billion dollars.

Trump apparently only raised around $388 million for this campaign. As I said before, this shows that money and advertisements are WAY overrated. Let's say that during the last few months of the campaign, due to this big disparity in money, a typical voter heard/saw a total of 100 Kamala ads (on radio, YouTube, television, etc), and only 30 Trump ads. Did hearing a few more Kamala ads than Trump ads really affect much of anything, and influence many people to vote for Kamala?

Probably 90-95% of voters are ideologically entrenched and cannot be swayed by ads whatsoever. And of that 5% who are truly "undecided" or can be swayed, I highly doubt that a slight advantage in the amount of ads really makes much of a difference. At best, Kamala having a big money and ad advantage might have got her a 0.5 or 1 point swing.

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reply Quote
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 2:33p, 11/27/24
packgrad said:
Historically bad candidate. What an embarrassment.



Can you imagine being dumb enough to actually vote for this lady? America dodged a bullet.
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TheStorm • 2:38p, 11/27/24
TheStorm said:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/sharptons-pay-to-play-scandal-ricocheting-around-halls-msnbc-insider-says-cant-be-acceptable

I laugh my ass off when a liberal network tries to pretend they aren't complicit when something like this gets out... arrangements like this are the rule rather than the exception between these "news" outlets and the DNC.

They get exactly what they pay for too.


Democrats gonna democrat.
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 5:37p, 11/27/24
Gulfstream4 said:
packgrad said:
Historically bad candidate. What an embarrassment.



Can you imagine being dumb enough to actually vote for this lady? America dodged a bullet.
Many did…
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:59a, 11/28/24
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:03a, 11/28/24
Pelosi's daughter, a great little foot soldier.

Reply Quote
1
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 12:27p, 11/28/24
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ
Reply Quote
3
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 12:46p, 11/28/24
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.



Reply Quote
1
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 1:00p, 11/28/24
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.
Reply Quote
4
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 6:26p, 11/28/24
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Lol. Take the L.
Reply Quote
4
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:51p, 11/28/24
Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 9:20p, 11/28/24
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.

LOLOL

How does that work, again?
Reply Quote
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 9:28p, 11/28/24
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.

LOLOL

How does that work, again?


I don't have to explain it to you. You already know. You just can't admit it and I understand.
Reply Quote
5
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 9:33p, 11/28/24
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.

LOLOL

How does that work, again?


I don't have to explain it to you. You already know. You just can't admit it and I understand.


He said they would be idiots to have trusted their internal polling as opposed to Nate Silver. lol. Swing and a miss. But he'll never admit it. He's a good sheep. He still thinks the AAP is an apolitical organization.
Reply Quote
5
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 9:14a, 11/29/24
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.
Factor in the cheating in many Democrat areas and it wasn't that close…
Reply Quote
2
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 9:37a, 11/29/24
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.

LOLOL

How does that work, again?


I don't have to explain it to you. You already know. You just can't admit it and I understand.

You can't explain it to me, because it's fake.

It's more right wing victimhood that's untethered from reality.
Reply Quote
1
Wlfpk81
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:58a, 11/29/24
i dont think polling is going anywhere but i would like to see some changes. if it within the MOE then it should be referred to as a tie and i think all polling data should be released with the questions asked. i think that the framework of the question is where the inaccuracy is coming from.

im not sure i understand the idea that polling is designed to encourage democrats and discourage republicans. my candidate is losing so im going to stay home and pout is very contrary to the what the current leader of the party is trying to portray. also, people in general tend to rally towards an underdog. weird theory.
Reply Quote
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 10:24a, 11/29/24
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.

LOLOL

How does that work, again?


I don't have to explain it to you. You already know. You just can't admit it and I understand.

You can't explain it to me, because it's fake.

It's more right wing victimhood that's untethered from reality.
Perhaps you're living in a left-winged victomhood void of reality? Civ, these accusations, by everyone, are not encouraging and creates the vitriol we have. Listen, I recognize this applies to both views and would much rather debate ideas and opinions, without the demonizing of counterpoints and/or opinions.

So, I challenge everyone to try a new tact…
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wlfpk81 • 10:47a, 11/29/24
Wlfpk81 said:
i dont think polling is going anywhere but i would like to see some changes. if it within the MOE then it should be referred to as a tie and i think all polling data should be released with the questions asked. i think that the framework of the question is where the inaccuracy is coming from.

Fake polls produce a narrative that allows the digital steal. Tell #daSieve & #daGobber over and over again that its 51-49 BIden over Trump and then Biden pulls it out 50.1 to 49.9. Not hard.

What people don't understand is that the people that have been running the show are a lot F'n smarter than the minions. Not only that...... throw in a few trillions of dollars and they're damn near unbeatable.

Thus, how did Trump and the 'good guys' pull it off? Think my friend, think?
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:54p, 12/24/24
#Sieve, you keep hanging on buddy, impressive. And you're not even #embarrassed yet! Still quite a bit of testing to do, going forward. The **** coming out, my friend, and it is gonna be disturbing to say the least. Hey, you'll remain #proud?

#Sieve, unfortunately for you my man, #devolution must continue. It's #boomerang time, my friend.

It's the #GreatAwakening, #WWG1WGA, except for you, #Nappy and #daGobbler
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Reply Quote
2 edits
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:44p, 12/25/24
#Sieve, remember #boomerang. Also, from a classroom perspective, you might say it's #Devolution101.

No need to try 2 figure it out as it might be too tough a task.........and It will be spelled out for you in the end.

Reply Quote
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 7:05a, 12/26/24
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Werewolf said:
Whether it ever reached 80-20 or not, I don't know and doubt as far as the votes. There is easily 80% that are happy to be rid of Biden-Harris although some of those don't like Trump and are caught up in the matrix of MSM lies. I still say the vote was close to 75-25 Trump nationwide and maybe and worst case at 70-30. The military has the real #'s.



BUT THE POLLS, MAN….THE POLLS!1

-Civ

LOL, what does this even mean?

The polls were accurate this cycle.

Internal polling is one data point and not the end-all be-all. It's not like internal polling is widely known to be more accurate than public polling aggregations.

And the race was close, one of the closest popular vote margins in 150 years.

How would/should Harris' campaign messaging have changed if she was up 49/47 or down 47/49? Both those are very tight races and well within the margin of error.





Polling is dead and has been since 2016. The only purpose is to encourage democrats and discourage republicans.

LOLOL

How does that work, again?


I don't have to explain it to you. You already know. You just can't admit it and I understand.

You can't explain it to me, because it's fake.

It's more right wing victimhood that's untethered from reality.
I'd be interested in your definition of right wing. As the American people as a whole seem to be feeling victimhood these days by their votes and by their financial reality, the two seem to be conflated. Either that, or the majority of people in this nation and right wing are one and the same.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.