Wufpack17 said:
Civilized said:
Wufpack17 said:
grantwolf said:
b-but hillary?
It's not about Hillary. Its about the clear hypocrisy that the left partakes in on a daily basis.
No, it's about the moral inequivalencies the right partakes in on a daily basis to cope and excuse the fact that they're going to vote for a sex-assaulting, election-overturning nepo-baby felon that can't string two cogent sentences together longer than about three words each.
You realize calling out those who will "vote for a rapist" while being someone who voted for a person who defended her rapist husband, even going as far as to threaten the victims, is what moral inequivalences looks like, right?
You have selective outrage and really don't care about morals. If you really cared about rape, you wouldn't have voted for Hillary Clinton, or anyone associated with the Clintons.
You only care about getting the Dems latest pet in the white house. For instance, you don't care that Kamalamadingdong faced multiple ethics violations as AG and DA. She claims to be "African-American" while doing everything within her power to unjustly imprison African-American males.
Vote for her, vote for Hillary. I don't care. However, stop claiming to have the moral high-ground when you are voting for people you claim to despise. Stop screaming about morals, you legitimately don't care about them with regards to political candidates, if you did, you'd never vote!
Just own up to it.
My outrage isn't selective, I just have a brain and am capable of parsing obviously different situations.
Stop being so obviously morally confused.
Defending your spouse isn't a crime. Any therapist would tell you it's expected and 100% understandable.
And, no, "Defending your spouse" (which virtually all spouses reflexively do) isn't remotely the same as committing the crime your spouse is accused of.
It's not even on the same planet.
If your wife was accused of murdering someone, and you defend her, are you ethically the same as a murderer? That's literally what you're saying.
Who on the planet thinks this?
The equivalent to me voting for Trump would be if Hillary had raped somebody and was accused by two dozen other people of sex assault and had been married three times and cheated on all her spouses and said inexplicably sexual stuff about her daughter.
So, no, voting for someone that has not raped anyone, has never been accused of sex misconduct, has never (that we know of) cheated on her one husband, and has never made sexual comments about her child is not on the same planet as voting for someone that has done all those things.
You want to hold Harris' feet to the fire, do it. How many ethics violations is she accused of having in her years as a DA and AG?
Now hold her opponent to the same standard. How many ethical missteps has Trump had over whatever sample size you want to use for Harris?
