Harris 2024

177,410 Views | 2649 Replies | Last: 16 min ago by Civilized
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't think anyone is surprised that you completely support her decision to be on this podcast.

Tone deaf. Ignorant. She bombed the interview, like usual, too.


FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

LOLOL

She's half-right. Trump has prioritized sex plenty, but we all agree he's a little lighter on the relationship piece.

But yeah, Harris just went on the most popular podcast in America for women listeners because women's reproductive rights is central to her appeal and electoral chances.

Not sure what's at all surprising or imprudent about that decision.
I dont think its imprudent, but I do think it was stupid. That podcast audience is already voting for Harris. It reaches exactly zero of the groups shes struggling with. Id equate it to Trump going on something like Pardon My Take. It was also taped early last week, before she went to any of the areas affected by Helene. I just think it was an own goal move for her

Why would you assume Alex Cooper's audience is already voting for Harris?

That's no different than saying all of Rogan's audience is voting for Trump, which would be a big miscalculation even if his audience leans right.

Like Rogan, she's got millions of listeners, and undoubtedly a fair portion are independent or right-leaning.

I can't think of a single better outlet to target hundreds of thousands or millions of women that skew younger AND are potentially right-leaning or undecided than going on the most-listened-to podcast in America for women.
My point was more along the lines of she isnt struggling with women as a demographic, its men shes falling way behind on. I cant imagine men make up too much of the audience for Call Her Daddy.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

LOLOL

She's half-right. Trump has prioritized sex plenty, but we all agree he's a little lighter on the relationship piece.

But yeah, Harris just went on the most popular podcast in America for women listeners because women's reproductive rights is central to her appeal and electoral chances.

Not sure what's at all surprising or imprudent about that decision.
I dont think its imprudent, but I do think it was stupid. That podcast audience is already voting for Harris. It reaches exactly zero of the groups shes struggling with. Id equate it to Trump going on something like Pardon My Take. It was also taped early last week, before she went to any of the areas affected by Helene. I just think it was an own goal move for her

Why would you assume Alex Cooper's audience is already voting for Harris?

That's no different than saying all of Rogan's audience is voting for Trump, which would be a big miscalculation even if his audience leans right.

Like Rogan, she's got millions of listeners, and undoubtedly a fair portion are independent or right-leaning.

I can't think of a single better outlet to target hundreds of thousands or millions of women that skew younger AND are potentially right-leaning or undecided than going on the most-listened-to podcast in America for women.
My point was more along the lines of she isnt struggling with women as a demographic, its men shes falling way behind on. I cant imagine men make up too much of the audience for Call Her Daddy.


Yes she's weaker than Biden was with men but stronger with women than he was, and stronger with PoC and those without a college degree and younger Americans. Her path to a potential win isn't going to mirror Biden's exactly. If she's weaker than Biden was with some demographics (men), she better make up for that in others (women, others) which it seems like she's doing.

Call Her Daddy's audience skews quite young relative to the normal mainstream talk show circuit, and there is clear opportunity there to get out the vote - the potential reach of some independents and right-leaning listeners aside.

But from 30k feet the weirdest aspect of critiquing her being on the pod is that it's not like there's a limit on the number of pods/interviews/shows she can do.

If she thinks there are votes out there in the CHD audience from young, right-leaning, and/or independent voters why wouldn't she go on to try to get her message out to those potential voters?


SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

LOLOL

She's half-right. Trump has prioritized sex plenty, but we all agree he's a little lighter on the relationship piece.

But yeah, Harris just went on the most popular podcast in America for women listeners because women's reproductive rights is central to her appeal and electoral chances.

Not sure what's at all surprising or imprudent about that decision.
I dont think its imprudent, but I do think it was stupid. That podcast audience is already voting for Harris. It reaches exactly zero of the groups shes struggling with. Id equate it to Trump going on something like Pardon My Take. It was also taped early last week, before she went to any of the areas affected by Helene. I just think it was an own goal move for her

Why would you assume Alex Cooper's audience is already voting for Harris?

That's no different than saying all of Rogan's audience is voting for Trump, which would be a big miscalculation even if his audience leans right.

Like Rogan, she's got millions of listeners, and undoubtedly a fair portion are independent or right-leaning.

I can't think of a single better outlet to target hundreds of thousands or millions of women that skew younger AND are potentially right-leaning or undecided than going on the most-listened-to podcast in America for women.
My point was more along the lines of she isnt struggling with women as a demographic, its men shes falling way behind on. I cant imagine men make up too much of the audience for Call Her Daddy.

So you're saying Trump should have gone on Call Her Daddy instead? Or is second guessing his strategy not as much fun?
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Civilized said:

LOLOL

She's half-right. Trump has prioritized sex plenty, but we all agree he's a little lighter on the relationship piece.

But yeah, Harris just went on the most popular podcast in America for women listeners because women's reproductive rights is central to her appeal and electoral chances.

Not sure what's at all surprising or imprudent about that decision.
I dont think its imprudent, but I do think it was stupid. That podcast audience is already voting for Harris. It reaches exactly zero of the groups shes struggling with. Id equate it to Trump going on something like Pardon My Take. It was also taped early last week, before she went to any of the areas affected by Helene. I just think it was an own goal move for her

Why would you assume Alex Cooper's audience is already voting for Harris?

That's no different than saying all of Rogan's audience is voting for Trump, which would be a big miscalculation even if his audience leans right.

Like Rogan, she's got millions of listeners, and undoubtedly a fair portion are independent or right-leaning.

I can't think of a single better outlet to target hundreds of thousands or millions of women that skew younger AND are potentially right-leaning or undecided than going on the most-listened-to podcast in America for women.
My point was more along the lines of she isnt struggling with women as a demographic, its men shes falling way behind on. I cant imagine men make up too much of the audience for Call Her Daddy.


Yes she's weaker than Biden was with men but stronger with women than he was, and stronger with PoC and those without a college degree and younger Americans. Her path to a potential win isn't going to mirror Biden's exactly. If she's weaker than Biden was with some demographics (men), she better make up for that in others (women, others) which it seems like she's doing.

Call Her Daddy's audience skews quite young relative to the normal mainstream talk show circuit, and there is clear opportunity there to get out the vote - the potential reach of some independents and right-leaning listeners aside.

But from 30k feet the weirdest aspect of critiquing her being on the pod is that it's not like there's a limit on the number of pods/interviews/shows she can do.

If she thinks there are votes out there in the CHD audience from young, right-leaning, and/or independent voters why wouldn't she go on to try to get her message out to those potential voters?



I dont see any issues for her if she thinks it can reach voters. You say there isnt a limit on the amount of pods/interviews/shows she can do, so why is she being so selective about doing them? Shouldnt she be on them all the time if thats her goal?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:


Trump must be pretty stressed about her going on that podcast if it was made the Flying Monkey Outrage of the Day.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realsouthwolf said:

Bas2020 said:

Kamala is losing.....
Not in North Carolina unless the Republican Legislature rigs the election for Trump.
The mountain people won't be able to vote.
She has a 16 point lead with independents.

Harris wins 60-40 if its a fair election.
Not sure I follow that. A lot of Indies (and liberal hippie types) live in the mountains too. And I'd like to examine some numbers if she has a sixteen percent lead, I've not heard that reported anywhere else, just the opposite actually.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Realsouthwolf said:

Bas2020 said:

Kamala is losing.....
Not in North Carolina unless the Republican Legislature rigs the election for Trump.
The mountain people won't be able to vote.
She has a 16 point lead with independents.

Harris wins 60-40 if its a fair election.
Not sure I follow that. A lot of Indies (and liberal hippie types) live in the mountains too. And I'd like to examine some numbers if she has a sixteen percent lead, I've not heard that reported anywhere else, just the opposite actually.
Asheville is probably more left wing than Chapel Hill. I'm not sure about the areas outside of Asheville; however, that city is a left winged cesspool. Please make sure you understand that description is not meant to describe the conditions, on the ground, at this moment.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Throttled

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She is truly an idiot. The minions will obviously still vote for her. Anyone with a bit of objectivity can see she is simply not fit for office. I think this is going to end up being a landslide victory.

Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kamala is clearly in desperation mode right now as you can see by all of these interviews suddenly.



Her internal polling is tanking.


Trump is winning.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Throttled




Yikes. It gets worse.

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again it won't matter to the minions, but godalmighty. They depend on their constituents being brain dead minions. What an embarrassing time to be a Democrat.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How obvious the bias is cannot be overstated. It's outright propaganda, it's not news.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

How obvious the bias is cannot be overstated. It's outright propaganda, it's not news.
And our resident propaganda expert would know!
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bas2020 said:

Kamala is clearly in desperation mode right now as you can see by all of these interviews suddenly.



Her internal polling is tanking.


Trump is winning.

More dream casting.

Yes, I'm sure the internal polling magicians magically know something that all the other professional pollsters don't.

Makes complete sense.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

packgrad said:

Throttled




Yikes. It gets worse.


Lmao
Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Bas2020 said:

Kamala is clearly in desperation mode right now as you can see by all of these interviews suddenly.



Her internal polling is tanking.


Trump is winning.

More dream casting.

Yes, I'm sure the internal polling magicians magically know something that all the other professional pollsters don't.

Makes complete sense.
Campaigns depend on internals for actual data describing the true state of the race. It doesn't make sense that campaigns would hire anything but professionals to get them the information they need.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You can bet your boots they know how badly they trail, it's not close. Look for something big to happen and don't rule out a fake "alien invasion". Yep, that's what I said, faked and propagated by the FAKE NEWS politburo.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

You can bet your boots they know how badly they trail, it's not close. Look for something big to happen and don't rule out a fake "alien invasion". Yep, that's what I said, faked and propagated by the FAKE NEWS politburo.
We've got a real alien invasion going on on the southern border.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
An EMP is not out of the question. Tucker Carlson has warned about it recently. I began preparing for it 2 years ago.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

Civilized said:

Bas2020 said:

Kamala is clearly in desperation mode right now as you can see by all of these interviews suddenly.



Her internal polling is tanking.


Trump is winning.

More dream casting.

Yes, I'm sure the internal polling magicians magically know something that all the other professional pollsters don't.

Makes complete sense.
Campaigns depend on internals for actual data describing the true state of the race. It doesn't make sense that campaigns would hire anything but professionals to get them the information they need.

It also doesn't make sense that internal polling deviates substantially from polling aggregate averages.

But if it does I'd damn-sure be betting on the aggregates of dozens of polls being more accurate than a single consultant hired to conduct internal polling.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.