Harris 2024

227,390 Views | 3099 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Bas2020
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

packofwolves said:

It's complicated!




She says Trumps name 26 times in her town hall. Like our liberal friends here on IPS, they can't talk about her job or policy it's just hate for Trump.

At least she can talk about her policy at all.

Trump wants to talk about throwing the Bidens and Hillary in jail and sharks and Arnie's dick and eating cats and dogs and Hannibal Lechter, and when he does try to talk about something else it's his nonsensical "weave" bull*****

If you were to run their policy explanations through AI and ask it to grade them both based on grammar, fluency, clarity, brevity, or whatever objective standards you wanted to use, what do you think the response would be?

Anyone claiming Kamala's policy explanations or coherence are deficient is very clearly not grading Trump by any sort of similar objective standard.


Your candidate can't even handle standard interview questions. She's an incompetent nitwit but you're too mentally ill to see it. Bububut Trump and I grew up middle class zzzzzzzz.

What an embarrassing candidate Dems decided not to elect democratically.

LOLOL. I appreciate your vivid imagination.

Sure, a former attorney/AG/Senator/VP is somehow less competent and more embarrassing than a massively insecure nepo-baby small business owner and reality TV star with a penchant for sex assault and banging and paying off porn stars/Playboy models and throwing huge violent parties at the capital and trying to overturn an election.

What is embarrassing, by comparison, about Harris, again?

How about she slept her way to the top of California politics?

She did?

How exactly can you can sleep your way into DA, AG, and Senator positions that are all elected and not appointed?

And who did she sleep with that you know of?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

packofwolves said:

It's complicated!




She says Trumps name 26 times in her town hall. Like our liberal friends here on IPS, they can't talk about her job or policy it's just hate for Trump.

At least she can talk about her policy at all.

Trump wants to talk about throwing the Bidens and Hillary in jail and sharks and Arnie's dick and eating cats and dogs and Hannibal Lechter, and when he does try to talk about something else it's his nonsensical "weave" bull*****

If you were to run their policy explanations through AI and ask it to grade them both based on grammar, fluency, clarity, brevity, or whatever objective standards you wanted to use, what do you think the response would be?

Anyone claiming Kamala's policy explanations or coherence are deficient is very clearly not grading Trump by any sort of similar objective standard.


Your candidate can't even handle standard interview questions. She's an incompetent nitwit but you're too mentally ill to see it. Bububut Trump and I grew up middle class zzzzzzzz.

What an embarrassing candidate Dems decided not to elect democratically.

LOLOL. I appreciate your vivid imagination.

Sure, a former attorney/AG/Senator/VP is somehow less competent and more embarrassing than a massively insecure nepo-baby small business owner and reality TV star with a penchant for sex assault and banging and paying off porn stars/Playboy models and throwing huge violent parties at the capital and trying to overturn an election.

What is embarrassing, by comparison, about Harris, again?

How about she slept her way to the top of California politics?

She did?

How exactly can you can sleep your way into DA, AG, and Senator positions that are all elected and not appointed?

And who did she sleep with that you know of?


Hey civ,

Since Kamala has such extensive experience arguing cases as DA and AG and representing her state as a United State Senator, why does she have such difficulty answering simple job interview questions like "what is your biggest weakness"? Or why does she have such difficulty answering questions on her position on topics like the wall or what she would do differently than the Biden administration?

Did she ever argue cases in her role as DA or AG, or did she backseat drive?

Hard to believe someone could be so incompetent in interviews with such experience.

Do your best to answer without Bububut Trump, buddy.
PackProwl63
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump's ad about definition of INSANITY destroyed her voters ! More of the same !
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This gun is for hire, #Sieve. Impressive, he's the Boss has still got it.

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeez, this woman is an absolute disaster.

Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Jeez, this woman is an absolute disaster.




Everything she does is fake and for the cameras.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Everything any of them do is fake. Godalmighty, this is embarrassing.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Everything any of them do is fake. Godalmighty, this is embarrassing.


Won't be long until #daSieve is on the football thread lobbying for this to be our new QB Coach and OC. Touchdown Timmie will immediately be wanting to play receiver for all our TE's.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, remember the word, #devolution.

#boomerang

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Sieve, what a deafening roar!

#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Impossible. Crime, jobs, and now border crossings? The party of lies. Vote Democrat if you're a blind sheep.

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Lie to your husband. Vote Kamala for president". Dems value marriage about as much as they value the lives of babies.

justaguy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

"Lie to your husband. Vote Kamala for president". Dems value marriage about as much as they value the lives of babies.



This is honestly demeaning to women
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lolol. America deserves 4 years of this

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She is Michael Scott.

Truly the worst candidate of my lifetime. So embarrassing.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another white dude for Harris!

Look at this goofy little pot-bellied beta male spaz. Typical of the caliber and kind of white "men" that support the communist DemonRat party...an ugly genetic reject who knows he's a loser at life, who hates himself and has become a nihilist who wants to degrade society and others down to his pathetic level.

https://instagr.am/p/DBtl99xsMia
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Another white dude for Harris!

Look at this goofy little pot-bellied beta male spaz. Typical of the caliber and kind of white "men" that support the communist DemonRat party...an ugly genetic reject who knows he's a loser at life, who hates himself and has become a nihilist who wants to degrade society and others down to his pathetic level.

https://instagr.am/p/DBtl99xsMia


Talk about unhinged. Also committed a federal crime putting something in the mailbox. He should be fined.
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IF you are going to read anything this month... read this and remember it for
life. I came to this conclusion a long time ago...but once you realize the scam everything becomes much clearer.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.