Wufpack17 said:SmaptyWolf said:Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.hokiewolf said:the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?SmaptyWolf said:Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.hokiewolf said:
Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?
Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.
If Biden is "one of the most successful president of the last century", then why was he run out of town and why is Kamala running to "fix everything" (her words not mine)?
Dems have been running the show for 18 of the last 20 years. All issues we have in the country can be completely pegged on them.
But ignore all of that…
He was replaced because he was too old to continue. You knew that. And Kamala is talking about fixing long standing problems... you know, the kind of problems brought on by decades of "trickle down economics", union-busting, and shipping jobs over seas (a.k.a. Republican stuff) which caused the populist MAGA revolt in the first place. Biden made a ton of progress, but there's way more to do.
Anyway, your math is a bit off. Since Clinton's first term starting in 1993, here's the scorecard:
House Control:
- Republicans: 11 times
- Democrats: 5 times
- Republicans: 9 times
- Democrats: 7 times
- Republicans: 2 times
- Democrats: 3 times
- Republicans: 3 times
- Democrats: 2 times
Never mind that for decades Republicans have controlled most State governments, which directly impacts most people lives more than a President. The idea that Dems have been "running the show" is just more of this persecuted fantasy you guys live in. You made the weather, and now you're crying that it's raining.