Harris 2024

300,184 Views | 3242 Replies | Last: 22 days ago by Werewolf
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Cthepack said:

Got to love a poster calling others stupid in a post he needed 4 edits to make!!

Sometimes it takes a few edits to find the words to describe you. It's not easy.


It's real easy to describe you. A unc fan that trolls message boards.

You got your ass handed to you today several times and have once again been proven to be the jackass fool we all know you to be.

Again… I'd relish feeding you your teeth.

Always gotta deflect from your dirty little secret, right? I bet it's been pretty hard for you since your favorite UNC board closed down.

That reminds me, are you ever gonna join Elite+? You should put all of that money that you're obviously not spending on bipolar meds to good use.
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bas2020 said:


Yes, some wackos set up an anti-Walz booth and the Minnesota State Fair asked them to take it down. I guess this is their tamer version. Congratulations, someone in Minnesota doesn't like Walz.

https://tennesseestar.com/the-upper-midwest/minnesota-state-fair-asks-conservative-booth-to-remove-disrespectful-image-of-gov-walz/admin/2021/08/28/
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bas2020 said:


And some dumbass around here was calling him "America's Dad" just less than two weeks ago...
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That and quotes from the unc guy bragging about him being a true American or some other BS….
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If there was still a question of who has been running this country for the last 3.5 years with Biden in the puppet role, all you have to do is look at the recent list of speakers at the DNC... Obama's and the Clinton's.

Hell, they even trudged out good ol' Oprah Winfrey last night, lol... nothing can get your constituency more fired up than that! Surprised they didn't have her tag-along Gayle King make a speech...
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man sought for threatening presidential candidate Donald Trump, deputy says

https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/man-sought-for-threatening-to-kill-presidential-candidate-donald-trump-cochise-county-sheriffs-office-deputy-says-ronald-lee-syvrud-arizona

- - -
Today's democrat party.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Bas2020 said:




No details on how they are going to fix the problems they created but just four days of TDS.
Took Obama all of about 30 seconds into his speech to go B-b-but Trump!


True. My favorite was when Mrs. Obama says "be suspicious of those who take more than they need".

This from a lady worth 100 million and has three mansions throughout the country.

Do these people not know how disconnected they are from reality?

Michelle Obama roasted for lecturing Americans about 'need' when she owns three houses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13767011/amp/Michelle-Obama-roasted-lecturing-Americans-need-owns-three-houses-astonishing-net-worth.html
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Bas2020 said:




No details on how they are going to fix the problems they created but just four days of TDS.
Took Obama all of about 30 seconds into his speech to go B-b-but Trump!


True. My favorite was when Mrs. Obama says "be suspicious of those who take more than they need".

This from a lady worth 100 million and has three mansions throughout the country.

Do these people not know how disconnected they are from reality?

Michelle Obama roasted for lecturing Americans about 'need' when she owns three houses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13767011/amp/Michelle-Obama-roasted-lecturing-Americans-need-owns-three-houses-astonishing-net-worth.html

She also did a speech I believe for 3/4 of a million. So my question to her is, did she " need " it? What is funny, is they say Trump is a trust fund baby, didn't they give a trust to theirs? I can't stand when rich folks try to tell the common everyday people how to live and spend their money. It's like preaching about global warming but the rich buy a house at the beach and fly private to get there. Give me a break. BTW, I'm all for making as much money as one can the legal way, no hate here.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Bas2020 said:




No details on how they are going to fix the problems they created but just four days of TDS.
Took Obama all of about 30 seconds into his speech to go B-b-but Trump!


True. My favorite was when Mrs. Obama says "be suspicious of those who take more than they need".

This from a lady worth 100 million and has three mansions throughout the country.

Do these people not know how disconnected they are from reality?

Michelle Obama roasted for lecturing Americans about 'need' when she owns three houses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13767011/amp/Michelle-Obama-roasted-lecturing-Americans-need-owns-three-houses-astonishing-net-worth.html

She also did a speech I believe for 3/4 of a million. So my question to her is, did she " need " it? What is funny, is they say Trump is a trust fund baby, didn't they give a trust to theirs? I can't stand when rich folks try to tell the common everyday people how to live and spend their money. It's like preaching about global warming but the rich buy a house at the beach and fly private to get there. Give me a break.


It just shows how detached these liberal elites are from reality.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Bas2020 said:




No details on how they are going to fix the problems they created but just four days of TDS.
Took Obama all of about 30 seconds into his speech to go B-b-but Trump!


True. My favorite was when Mrs. Obama says "be suspicious of those who take more than they need".

This from a lady worth 100 million and has three mansions throughout the country.

Do these people not know how disconnected they are from reality?

Michelle Obama roasted for lecturing Americans about 'need' when she owns three houses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13767011/amp/Michelle-Obama-roasted-lecturing-Americans-need-owns-three-houses-astonishing-net-worth.html

She also did a speech I believe for 3/4 of a million. So my question to her is, did she " need " it? What is funny, is they say Trump is a trust fund baby, didn't they give a trust to theirs? I can't stand when rich folks try to tell the common everyday people how to live and spend their money. It's like preaching about global warming but the rich buy a house at the beach and fly private to get there. Give me a break.


It just shows how detached these liberal elites are from reality.
Detached, or about control?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Bas2020 said:




No details on how they are going to fix the problems they created but just four days of TDS.
Took Obama all of about 30 seconds into his speech to go B-b-but Trump!


True. My favorite was when Mrs. Obama says "be suspicious of those who take more than they need".

This from a lady worth 100 million and has three mansions throughout the country.

Do these people not know how disconnected they are from reality?

Michelle Obama roasted for lecturing Americans about 'need' when she owns three houses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13767011/amp/Michelle-Obama-roasted-lecturing-Americans-need-owns-three-houses-astonishing-net-worth.html

She also did a speech I believe for 3/4 of a million. So my question to her is, did she " need " it? What is funny, is they say Trump is a trust fund baby, didn't they give a trust to theirs? I can't stand when rich folks try to tell the common everyday people how to live and spend their money. It's like preaching about global warming but the rich buy a house at the beach and fly private to get there. Give me a break.


It just shows how detached these liberal elites are from reality.
Detached, or about control?


Hmmmm….
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

ncsupack1 said:

Gulfstream4 said:

TheStorm said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Bas2020 said:




No details on how they are going to fix the problems they created but just four days of TDS.
Took Obama all of about 30 seconds into his speech to go B-b-but Trump!


True. My favorite was when Mrs. Obama says "be suspicious of those who take more than they need".

This from a lady worth 100 million and has three mansions throughout the country.

Do these people not know how disconnected they are from reality?

Michelle Obama roasted for lecturing Americans about 'need' when she owns three houses

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13767011/amp/Michelle-Obama-roasted-lecturing-Americans-need-owns-three-houses-astonishing-net-worth.html

She also did a speech I believe for 3/4 of a million. So my question to her is, did she " need " it? What is funny, is they say Trump is a trust fund baby, didn't they give a trust to theirs? I can't stand when rich folks try to tell the common everyday people how to live and spend their money. It's like preaching about global warming but the rich buy a house at the beach and fly private to get there. Give me a break.


It just shows how detached these liberal elites are from reality.
Detached, or about control?


Hmmmm….
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.

But there are "liberals" who would crawl on broken glass to vote for her for no logical reason other than manufactured emotion. They would literally vote for anybody with a D on their jersey and spin any crazy reason in their head to do so because the media has told them so.

This is the same brainwashing that takes place every 4 years... the only shock of this cycle is they have yet to manufacture a Michael Brown style "race riot"... but im sure that is coming as we still have a few months left to go.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bas2020 said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.

But there are "liberals" who would crawl on broken glass to vote for her for no logical reason other than manufactured emotion. They would literally vote for anybody with a D on their jersey and spin any crazy reason in their head to do so because the media has told them so.

This is the same brainwashing that takes place every 4 years... the only shock of this cycle is they have yet to manufacture a Michael Brown style "race riot"... but im sure that is coming as we still have a few months left to go.
Lol, no, many people would vote for a poison ivy bush before they would vote for Trump, because he's the MOST UNFIT CANDIDATE FOR POLITCAL OFFICE IN AMERICAN HISTORY. It's pretty logical.

The fact that that's not obvious to you guys is a "you" problem.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://instagr.am/p/C--ly-Wuo7W
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.


It's only been 33 days. Give her some time.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.


I know you'll never admit it but the more she talks actual policy the more votes she'll lose.

Thats why I want her in-front of the camera and that's why you don't.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.


I know you'll never admit it but the more she talks actual policy the more votes she'll lose.

Thats why I want her in-front of the camera and that's why you don't.

Lol, whatever you say. She's in front of the cameras every day.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.


I know you'll never admit it but the more she talks actual policy the more votes she'll lose.

Thats why I want her in-front of the camera and that's why you don't.

Lol, whatever you say. She's in front of the cameras every day.


There is a difference in being in front of the camera and actually taking questions and explaining your position on issues.

Again, I know you'll never admit it.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.


I know you'll never admit it but the more she talks actual policy the more votes she'll lose.

Thats why I want her in-front of the camera and that's why you don't.

Lol, whatever you say. She's in front of the cameras every day.


There is a difference in being in front of the camera and actually taking questions and explaining your position on issues.

Again, I know you'll never admit it.

I explained exactly how I feel about it. Feel free to read my last couple posts quoted above.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://instagr.am/p/C--61yog8bT
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Something is very very off putting about Walz. IF Trump did this it would be labeled child abuse and talked about nonstop for days.

Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pretty funny.
Wufpack17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.


If Biden is "one of the most successful president of the last century", then why was he run out of town and why is Kamala running to "fix everything" (her words not mine)?

Dems have been running the show for 18 of the last 20 years. All issues we have in the country can be completely pegged on them.

But ignore all of that…
Wufpack17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

SmaptyWolf said:

hokiewolf said:

Fun fact: There are exactly ZERO policy platform positions on Kamala Harris' website.
Fun fact: There's ZERO chance you would vote for her, so why do you care? It's hysterical how much you guys bawl about this.

Just like how you guys strategize about whether or not Trump should debate Kamala, it could actually be a good strategy for her to not give you ammo. It really doesn't matter what policy position she would announce... you know you'd use it to howl about OMG PRICE CONTROLS and OMG SOCIALISM! So you sure you're not just mad that she's not giving you a chance to steal a new cycle?

Don't worry, we're very aware of where she stands. And anyone who doesn't I'm sure will listen to her speak.
the only policy she did roll out she's rolled back because it was so thoroughly rejected. I doubt we'll seen anything substantial from her, other than joy and freedom. How's that worked out the last 3-1/2 years?


Also, I was going to sit this election out, but I've definitely reconsidered. Trump stinks, no doubt, but Harris is the worst candidate ever presented for President. And it's sad that she's probably going to win because people are going to vote their feelings rather than reality
Pretty well, actually. I'm sure your news sources talk about America being a burned-out hellscape nonstop, but most Dems consider Biden to be one of the most successful Presidents of the last century. Despite the lunatics running the House and a divided Senate, he absolutely crushed it.

Kamala didn't roll back anything. The "liberal media", who is normally bored to tears by policy, and who hasn't mentioned any of Trump's lunatic policy ideas in years, decided that they needed to put an end to Kamala's honeymoon period, so suddenly they were all policy wonks, regurgitating right wing talking points that way overstated her position. So yeah, I wouldn't blame her for keeping her cards close from here on. Fu** them.


I know you'll never admit it but the more she talks actual policy the more votes she'll lose.

Thats why I want her in-front of the camera and that's why you don't.

Lol, whatever you say. She's in front of the cameras every day.


"Don't upset the delicate genius! The delicate genius has a policy!"
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's as if Harris is running against the current administration of which she is part of. If she knows how to fix the problems why aren't Biden and her not doing it now?
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

It's as if Harris is running against the current administration of which she is part of. If she knows how to fix the problems why aren't Biden and her not doing it now?
Especially since they both were and still are taking directions from the same exact people...
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

ncsupack1 said:

It's as if Harris is running against the current administration of which she is part of. If she knows how to fix the problems why aren't Biden and her not doing it now?
Especially since they both were and still are taking directions from the same exact people...


Agree.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.