She failed with her duty on the border. She was once the most lib Senator, care to comment on that? That's what I'm speaking more to. I don't look at Cali anymore than a circus.Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Come on. Your better than this.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
It's a perfectly reasonable question.
If you want to blame her for San Francisco, the onus is on you to explain how San Francisco's current state has something to do with her.
What "San Francisco" policies is Harris responsible for that signal the death of America if she's elected? How was San Francisco today damaged by her tenure as DA 15 years ago?
This is nothing more than attack-the-lib whack-a-mole.
And if she was so terrible in California and in the Bay Area, I'm sure people there have the pitchforks out, right?
Look y'all, here's a good example of all those Dems that hate Harris from her home city. They saw up close how terrible she was and now they're super pissed!
VP Kamala Harris Sparks New Excitement Among San Francisco Democrats
Harris 2024
305,670 Views |
3245 Replies |
Last: 4 days ago by Oldsouljer
She was a public officeholder in and from ruined California. That should cover it.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Come on. Your better than this.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
It's a perfectly reasonable question.
If you want to blame her for San Francisco, the onus is on you to explain how San Francisco's current state has something to do with her.
What "San Francisco" policies is Harris responsible for that signal the death of America if she's elected? How was San Francisco today damaged by her tenure as DA 15 years ago?
This is nothing more than attack-the-lib whack-a-mole.
And if she was so terrible in California and in the Bay Area, I'm sure people there have the pitchforks out, right?
Look y'all, here's a good example of all those Dems that hate Harris from her home city. They saw up close how terrible she was and now they're super pissed!
VP Kamala Harris Sparks New Excitement Among San Francisco Democrats
Lol. Harris sparked excitement in a gay Democrat club and a "LatinX" Democrat club. No Hispanic calls themself a "LatinX" unless they're a woke loser.
Civ going to spread that propaganda. Why would you think he is better than this? lol.
Its not what shes responsible for in SF that worries me, its what shes in favor for at the federal level, which includes:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Come on. Your better than this.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
It's a perfectly reasonable question.
If you want to blame her for San Francisco, the onus is on you to explain how San Francisco's current state has something to do with her.
What "San Francisco" policies is Harris responsible for that signal the death of America if she's elected? How was San Francisco today damaged by her tenure as DA 15 years ago?
This is nothing more than attack-the-lib whack-a-mole.
And if she was so terrible in California and in the Bay Area, I'm sure people there have the pitchforks out, right?
Look y'all, here's a good example of all those Dems that hate Harris from her home city. They saw up close how terrible she was and now they're super pissed!
VP Kamala Harris Sparks New Excitement Among San Francisco Democrats
Green New Deal
End the filibuster
Banning fracking
Banning off shore drilling
Not prosecuting border crosser
Abolishing ICE
Defund the police
Mandatory Gun Buy Back
Eliminating private health insurance
The bold is an easy answer…. Idiots!Civilized said:hokiewolf said:it won't be durable because shell layout her politics and attack Trump aggressively and that will cost her the race just like it did with HillaryCivilized said:Oldsouljer said:Reuters one of the more reputable? Here's their numbers…. sampling 426 Democrat voters vs. 376 Republicans and 341 Independents.Civilized said:
Y'all are seeing what you want to see if you think "the polls" are showing Harris underperforming. Underperforming, relative to what? Polls and betting markets both have her outpacing Biden, which is all the Dems thought they would get. There's no ace in the hole that's going to all of a sudden start whooping Trump.
There are few high quality polls since she became the presumptive nominee.
And Reuters is one of the few. It has swung towards Harris from Biden by 6 points since last week. She's now leading Trump in the popular. Even if this was accurate she probably still loses given the Pubs' electoral college advantage but if her fundraising and party support keeps up, who knows what happens.BREAKING:
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) July 23, 2024
Kamala Harris has pulled ahead of Donald Trump in the latest breaking Reuters/Ipsos poll.
Harris leads Trump 44 - 42%.
This poll was conducted on Monday and Tuesday. pic.twitter.com/esYZmcpL5K
The polls we all want to see are the swing state polls. They mean a lot more electorally than the general.
We should all wait a week and then start talking about polls again.
I can see why it's a dead heat. The numbers manipulators are back!
I don't even know what this means.
All pollsters weight the political composition of their respondents but regardless it's the relative shift (week over week) that's interesting.
The next couple weeks of data will be interesting. Kamala will absolutely get a fresh face bump relative to Biden and it will be interesting to see how durable it is.
Hillary wins in 2016 but for the Comey letter.
What demographics is Harris going to fare worse with than Clinton?
And since then there's been what's viewed as an attack on reproductive rights by the right, and Trump is more susceptible now than in 2016 when he had much less negative pub to campaign against. The left is more unified against Trump than they were then.
Trump is going to look old, angry, and bumbling next to Harris.
I'm really interested to see this evolve.
So in other words, a current Democrat.FlossyDFlynt said:Its not what shes responsible for in SF that worries me, its what shes in favor for at the federal level, which includes:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Come on. Your better than this.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
It's a perfectly reasonable question.
If you want to blame her for San Francisco, the onus is on you to explain how San Francisco's current state has something to do with her.
What "San Francisco" policies is Harris responsible for that signal the death of America if she's elected? How was San Francisco today damaged by her tenure as DA 15 years ago?
This is nothing more than attack-the-lib whack-a-mole.
And if she was so terrible in California and in the Bay Area, I'm sure people there have the pitchforks out, right?
Look y'all, here's a good example of all those Dems that hate Harris from her home city. They saw up close how terrible she was and now they're super pissed!
VP Kamala Harris Sparks New Excitement Among San Francisco Democrats
Green New Deal
End the filibuster
Banning fracking
Banning off shore drilling
Not prosecuting border crosser
Abolishing ICE
Defund the police
Mandatory Gun Buy Back
Eliminating private health insurance
FlossyDFlynt said:Its not what shes responsible for in SF that worries me, its what shes in favor for at the federal level, which includes:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Come on. Your better than this.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
It's a perfectly reasonable question.
If you want to blame her for San Francisco, the onus is on you to explain how San Francisco's current state has something to do with her.
What "San Francisco" policies is Harris responsible for that signal the death of America if she's elected? How was San Francisco today damaged by her tenure as DA 15 years ago?
This is nothing more than attack-the-lib whack-a-mole.
And if she was so terrible in California and in the Bay Area, I'm sure people there have the pitchforks out, right?
Look y'all, here's a good example of all those Dems that hate Harris from her home city. They saw up close how terrible she was and now they're super pissed!
VP Kamala Harris Sparks New Excitement Among San Francisco Democrats
Green New Deal
End the filibuster
Banning fracking
Banning off shore drilling
Not prosecuting border crosser
Abolishing ICE
Defund the police
Mandatory Gun Buy Back
Eliminating private health insurance
All California blue state policies.
ncsupack1 said:She failed with her duty on the border. She was once the most lib Senator, care to comment on that? That's what I'm speaking more to. I don't look at Cali anymore than a circus.Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Come on. Your better than this.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
It's a perfectly reasonable question.
If you want to blame her for San Francisco, the onus is on you to explain how San Francisco's current state has something to do with her.
What "San Francisco" policies is Harris responsible for that signal the death of America if she's elected? How was San Francisco today damaged by her tenure as DA 15 years ago?
This is nothing more than attack-the-lib whack-a-mole.
And if she was so terrible in California and in the Bay Area, I'm sure people there have the pitchforks out, right?
Look y'all, here's a good example of all those Dems that hate Harris from her home city. They saw up close how terrible she was and now they're super pissed!
VP Kamala Harris Sparks New Excitement Among San Francisco Democrats
You're talking about something else. I was responding to Gulf's nonsensical statement that voting for her is "a vote for SF policies."
I know the words "most liberal" scare y'all and make you think she's coming for your guns and wants to abort 2-year olds but her policy positions on major issues don't deviate consequentially from Biden's and he was far from the "most liberal" Senator.
So basically for one year she didn't sponsor any bipartisan legislation and got this ranking that will make for good Trump campaign ads. OK.
Quote:
GovTrack told Wisconsin Watch it stopped doing single-year ratings and removed them from its website after determining a single year did not create a "reliable portrait."
Ah yes, her "duty" on the border as the non-proclaimed "border czar." Historically VP's have definitely fixed lots of major problems facing the country from their position of extreme power and influence. Trump unwinds decades of imperfect border policies and did nothing in particular to fix it but yes, let's pretend like that was somehow her "duty" to fix that as the VP.
The Trump Administration handed the Biden Administration a collossal mound of chicken **** at the border and now wants to blame them for not making delicious chicken salad.
lol at civ trying to blame Trump for Biden/Harris border failures. What a deranged sheep.
Man, you can smell the fear in this thread.
By the way guys, you don't have to worry about Kamala passing the Green New Deal... Biden already passed it, part of his historic infrastructure bill. That ship has sailed.
Go home.....SmaptyWolf said:
By the way guys, you don't have to worry about Kamala passing the Green New Deal... Biden already passed it, part of his historic infrastructure bill. That ship has sailed.
#Sieve, this lady isn't.Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
A vote for Mrs. Harris is a vote for San Francisco policies. [google SF and take a look at what has happened to that city]
Was she the AG or the governor?
Was she too tough on crime, or not tough enough?
Y'all are all over the place.
JUST RECEIVED SOME INTEL ON WHAT PLANS ARE BEING PUT IN PLACE FOR KAMALA'S PRESIDENTIAL RUN. I HAPPENED TO HAVE BEEN CONTACTED BY A FEW PEOPLE TO BE ON A ZOOM CALL THAT I AM NO WAY BEING APART OF pic.twitter.com/SIgOiy4VTF
— Peggy Dodson (@PeggyDodson) July 22, 2024
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
BREAKING: Former Georgia Republican Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan has endorsed Kamala Harris for President.
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) July 24, 2024
Even some from his own party are on the Kamala Harris bandwagon. pic.twitter.com/EmTrbOwXKn
You never see the opposite. Weird.
Really hope CEO/Pres. of Urban Broadcasting Co. Peggy Dodson NY is correct about the CHANGES coming!! pic.twitter.com/JLygdzNk9V
— D. Valory ✞📖🇺🇸 Ⅹ (@DsJ0URNEY) December 13, 2023
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Why would anyone be afraid of Harris? The lefties here hated her 3 weeks ago. She will have to run on her record now. She is a far left Democrat. Nowhere close to the middle. Her speeches in the past 3 years give a compelling argument that she suffers from an alcohol problem.
Hell, Democrat Jesus, Obama, hasn't even endorsed her.
She won't have all of social media and MSM running interference for her now. Thank you Elon Musk.
It's going to be a bloodbath.
Hell, Democrat Jesus, Obama, hasn't even endorsed her.
She won't have all of social media and MSM running interference for her now. Thank you Elon Musk.
It's going to be a bloodbath.
Civilized said:BREAKING: Former Georgia Republican Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan has endorsed Kamala Harris for President.
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) July 24, 2024
Even some from his own party are on the Kamala Harris bandwagon. pic.twitter.com/EmTrbOwXKn
You never see the opposite. Weird.
Yeah. Y'all are in a cult. Brainwashed minions. Congratulations????
Lolol.
This is what Kamala thinks about 18-24 year olds…
— American AF 🇺🇸 (@iAnonPatriot) July 23, 2024
Would be a shame if this went viral. pic.twitter.com/j88rO1cZWu
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Yep, and now they are saying she was never appointed as Border Czar…. Just a friendly reminder…packgrad said:
lol at civ trying to blame Trump for Biden/Harris border failures. What a deranged sheep.
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) July 24, 2024
Trump is ripping her in Charlotte. He is funny here.
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/71941
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/71941
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Hawk Tuah…spit on that thang
— MummyisTired (@MummyisT) July 22, 2024
Kamala Harris 60 minutes interview
🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️🧐🧐🤭🤭🤭 pic.twitter.com/JrzGzrMRaP
GuerrillaPack said:Hawk Tuah…spit on that thang
— MummyisTired (@MummyisT) July 22, 2024
Kamala Harris 60 minutes interview
🤷🏼♀️🤷🏼♀️🧐🧐🤭🤭🤭 pic.twitter.com/JrzGzrMRaP
Mrs. Harris is the OG Hawk Tuah girl, says Mr. Willie Brown
What exactly is this mandatory gun buy back program she is in favor of?
A very apt description of Kamala Harris.
Kamala Harris combines all the charisma of Hillary Clinton with the brains of Jamaal Bowman
— Darren J. Beattie 🌐 (@DarrenJBeattie) July 25, 2024
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Kamala will end of being a placeholder. She'll be replaced after or at the convention. Oprah, HRC and BIg Mike are possibilities.
Literally as far left as it is possible to go!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 25, 2024
They’re trying so hard to erase the Internet lmao.
https://t.co/jqYbA4GtIZ
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Axios ‘Clarified’ 2021 Report In Desperate Attempt To Distance VP Harris From ‘Border Czar’ Gig https://t.co/njX9BVj716
— 𝐊𝐂 𝐎'𝐃𝐞𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦 (@KCOnTheRadio) July 25, 2024
People who have been lifelong Democrats refuse to accept the clear reality that the Democratic Party is rapidly become openly antisemitic.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 25, 2024
This trend is accelerating, not slowing down.
Knock, knock. Hello, Captain Obvious here! https://t.co/YspN1d4GQy
True. Dems who've seen the light simply change Parties. By the hundreds over the past few decades.Civilized said:BREAKING: Former Georgia Republican Lt. Governor Geoff Duncan has endorsed Kamala Harris for President.
— Ed Krassenstein (@EdKrassen) July 24, 2024
Even some from his own party are on the Kamala Harris bandwagon. pic.twitter.com/EmTrbOwXKn
You never see the opposite. Weird.
Blatantly lying for her is more like it.ncsupack1 said:Yeah it is.Gulfstream4 said:FlossyDFlynt said:If you want the full transcript, here is the official White House TranscriptCivilized said:FlossyDFlynt said:
They just made it even worse
The media does realize 1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual...right?
This should be pretty simple.
Did Biden say she was a "border czar" or not?
People keep throwing up the Axios article where it wasn't a direct quote from Biden.
Is he on tape or on record saying it?
More broadly I hope Harris' team leans heavily into this angle and people move out of fantasy land where they think Trump is some sort of Border Genius.
CATO: Trump's dismantling of immigration policy
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/03/24/remarks-by-president-biden-and-vice-president-harris-in-a-meeting-on-immigration/
NYT in April 2021
Axios in April 2021
AP in March 2021
Border czar, in charge of the border, I dont particularly care what language that was used. She was in charge of it and now the media is trying to tell the public she wasnt because it doesnt match the narrative they want to paint since she is now the Democratic nominee. Thats the definition of Orwellian
It must be nice having 90% of the MSM running interference for the democrat party.
packgrad said:
lol at civ trying to blame Trump for Biden/Harris border failures. What a deranged sheep.
Interesting that the more liberal folks here seem to have no issue with Harris not condemning the violence in DC, which included occupying the Rotunda, vandalizing monuments, sneaking into the Watergate Hotel and throwing maggots on the tables, chanting "Hammas is coming", and taking the flag down at Union Square and desecrating it (which by the way is a felony), and not one peep out of here as the presumptive Democratic nominee.
Also, refusing to speak to the leader of an ally in Israel so that she could attend a sorority event because she doesn't want to be photographed with Bebe Netanyahu is a egregious behavior by not only the nominee but the Democratic Party leadership as a whole.
These protester do not want peace, as demonstrated by the rhetoric at these protests. They want Hamas to destroy the Jewish state, and well as all Jews off the face of the earth.
To not immediately condemn this protest is being complicit in that messaging. This acceptance of leftist extremism should be unacceptable, just like any complicit behavior in support of far right groups.
Also, refusing to speak to the leader of an ally in Israel so that she could attend a sorority event because she doesn't want to be photographed with Bebe Netanyahu is a egregious behavior by not only the nominee but the Democratic Party leadership as a whole.
These protester do not want peace, as demonstrated by the rhetoric at these protests. They want Hamas to destroy the Jewish state, and well as all Jews off the face of the earth.
To not immediately condemn this protest is being complicit in that messaging. This acceptance of leftist extremism should be unacceptable, just like any complicit behavior in support of far right groups.
The left is scary. I don't like the right because they are all full of **** but the left is truly nuts.
Featured Stories
See All
Five Impact Players Versus East Carolina
by Rob McLamb
13:41
3h ago
1.6k
IPS IN 5: Two Days Later
by James Henderson
10:26
15h ago
703
LOCKER ROOM REPORT: Wolfpack Fends Off Tigers in ACC Home Opener
by Daniel Wilson
66:40
21h ago
912
POSTGAME FOOTBALL TALK: East Carolina
by James Henderson
50:00
1d ago
5.6k
IPS IN 5: Sunday Morning Thoughts On The East Carolina Loss
by James Henderson