#AshliBabbitt #riots pic.twitter.com/crCr1jglc4

— Spaceballs the Twïtter Account (@Spaceballs_) January 28, 2023

Back before most were paying close attention, Lt General McInerny and Mary Fanning were interviewed several times along with the guy primarily responsible for the development of the software, Scorecard and Hammer. I don't recall that guy's name. Essentially; McInerny and Fanning discussed the military's interference in the attempted 2016 election theft......preventing HRC from the steal. When the full truth comes, this will be fully revealed i believe.

General McInerny We Got Her Laptop - Nancy Pelosi (*****ute.com)
..........the female dog name in the website is a problem with this link.

INDEFENSIBLE: If a book-length compilation of errors and dishonest coverage — printed in the Columbia Journalism Review, and written by a reporter with the credentials of Jeff Gerth — doesn’t get picked up by MSM at all, it’s proof they will never reform. https://t.co/ZBDchee5nm

— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) February 1, 2023

More like the press verse a ConMan!!

Could get interesting what is said when under oath.

Mike Pence is now fighting his grand jury subpoena. Of course, he already REVEALED his conversations with Trump in his book, “So Help me God,” which, ironically, are the last words of the oath he will be administered when he is ordered to testify in the grand jury. pic.twitter.com/t5T7HheNKP

— Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2) February 14, 2023

Let's see what Tucker does with this. Out of all of corporate media he's the most likely to allow the truth out. He apparently has much control over his content and Fox has less than the norm.

THEY'RE SCARED: Democrats And A Certain RINO Are Melting Down Over Tucker Carlson Releasing 41,000 Hours Of J6 Footage | The Gateway Pundit

#J6footage will finally prove the story we were told by mainstream media wrong. pic.twitter.com/ag9yXaYpWz

— Joey Gilbert (@joeygilbertinc) February 22, 2023

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

Sieve, you've got this my friend. You've got it. ;-)

It would be ironic if the footage showed more violence then shown in the J6 committee

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

hokiewolf said:

---

It would be ironic if the footage showed more violence then shown in the J6 committee

---

Anything is possible, I agree.

EDIT: The real purpose may be to 'see who Tucker Carlson really is'.

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Yeah. You're a programmed sheep. The president used words and words are insurrection. Hahahaha. Classic.

It was definitely a protest. Calling it an insurrection shows the critical thought your pretend to have is just a facade when it comes to topics TRUMP!!!

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Yeah. You're a programmed sheep. The president used words and words are insurrection. Hahahaha. Classic.

It was definitely a protest. Calling it an insurrection shows the critical thought your pretend to have is just a facade when it comes to topics TRUMP!!!

---

Are there legitimate criticisms of Trump's behavior and performance in office?

Or are all criticisms just examples of TDS?

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Yeah. You're a programmed sheep. The president used words and words are insurrection. Hahahaha. Classic.

It was definitely a protest. Calling it an insurrection shows the critical thought your pretend to have is just a facade when it comes to topics TRUMP!!!

---

Are there legitimate criticisms of Trump's behavior and performance in office?

Or are all criticisms just examples of TDS?

---

Yes, there are. That has nothing to do with being brainwashed into calling January 6 an insurrection though.

---

I don't care what you or anyone else calls it.

What I care about is people using whatever word they want to use to minimize how historically problematic Trump's words and actions and inactions were leading up to, and on, January 6 and more generally regarding the fairness of American elections.

When historians analyze Trump's presidency, his electoral conduct will be viewed as his most egregious failing.

---

Yeah, people who listen to that speech in the context in which it was given, amd think it did not lead directly to the riot and violence that occurred are either ignorant or political hacks

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Yeah. You're a programmed sheep. The president used words and words are insurrection. Hahahaha. Classic.

It was definitely a protest. Calling it an insurrection shows the critical thought your pretend to have is just a facade when it comes to topics TRUMP!!!

---

Are there legitimate criticisms of Trump's behavior and performance in office?

Or are all criticisms just examples of TDS?

---

Yes, there are. That has nothing to do with being brainwashed into calling January 6 an insurrection though.

---

I don't care what you or anyone else calls it.

What I care about is people using whatever word they want to use to minimize how historically problematic Trump's words and actions and inactions were leading up to, and on, January 6 and more generally regarding the fairness of American elections.

When historians analyze Trump's presidency, his electoral conduct will be viewed as his most egregious failing.

---

I disagree. I don't think Trump is the one historians will look back on unfavorably. He certainly has his warts, but I think there is a far bigger fly in the ointment of society today. I think historians will look back on the misinformation from the left on all things Trump, covid, race, gender, schools, etc and will view it as their most egregious failure. They went all in on it when they colluded with msm and social media. You have been brainwashed by the likes of CNN, that you proudly admit to being one of the few remaining viewers of, and social media. Elon Musk has opened a lot of eyes and boy does the left look like the lying, fascist, conspiracy driven imbeciles they've framed the right to be.

Anyone that thinks Trump caused an "insurrection" is ignorant or a brainwashed political hack.

---

I think they'll look back and think both things were true. We elected a bad guy president who did and said thing's taht invalidated him from leading the free world. Amd the media was as bad as we all here think it is.

And that the two groups brought out the worst in each other.

We have plenty of hacks, right here on this board…

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Yeah. You're a programmed sheep. The president used words and words are insurrection. Hahahaha. Classic.

It was definitely a protest. Calling it an insurrection shows the critical thought your pretend to have is just a facade when it comes to topics TRUMP!!!

---

Are there legitimate criticisms of Trump's behavior and performance in office?

Or are all criticisms just examples of TDS?

---

Yes, there are. That has nothing to do with being brainwashed into calling January 6 an insurrection though.

---

I don't care what you or anyone else calls it.

What I care about is people using whatever word they want to use to minimize how historically problematic Trump's words and actions and inactions were leading up to, and on, January 6 and more generally regarding the fairness of American elections.

When historians analyze Trump's presidency, his electoral conduct will be viewed as his most egregious failing.

---

I disagree. I don't think Trump is the one historians will look back on unfavorably. He certainly has his warts, but I think there is a far bigger fly in the ointment of society today. I think historians will look back on the misinformation from the left on all things Trump, covid, race, gender, schools, etc and will view it as their most egregious failure. They went all in on it when they colluded with msm and social media. You have been brainwashed by the likes of CNN, that you proudly admit to being one of the few remaining viewers of, and social media. Elon Musk has opened a lot of eyes and boy does the left look like the lying, fascist, conspiracy driven imbeciles they've framed the right to be.

Anyone that thinks Trump caused an "insurrection" is ignorant or a brainwashed political hack.

---

I think they'll look back and think both things were true. We elected a bad guy president who did and said thing's that invalidated him from leading the free world. And the media was as bad as we all here think it is.

And that the two groups brought out the worst in each other.

---

You're really reaching now again, Chem... I don't agree with that whatsoever. Trump's policies were dead-on 95% of the time... you can say, that you didn't like him or whatever - but don't just start making **** up that you - even today - know just isn't true.

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Well, for one it definitely wasn't a free and fair election. Let's get back to one person, one vote, show a picture ID - and then you can make that statement.

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Ahhh, yes. The story we were told was wrong.

Because we had to be told a story by our MSM overlords.

Because somehow we couldn't see and hear for ourselves what was happening.

Riiiight…

---

I mean, you say there was an insurrection. You absolutely believe what you were told. Lol that you think you believe what you saw versus what you were told. Insurrection…. Hahaha. Classic.

---

Correct.

That's what I call it when I hear a sitting president deny the results of a free and fair election; incite a mob of protestors to riot and rush the capital to interrupt the election certification; and directly pressure his vice president and other election officials to not certify the election results.

What do you call that unprecedented and profoundly undemocratic event in American history? A simple protest? A peaceful sit-in?

Hahaha. Classic.

---

Yeah. You're a programmed sheep. The president used words and words are insurrection. Hahahaha. Classic.

It was definitely a protest. Calling it an insurrection shows the critical thought your pretend to have is just a facade when it comes to topics TRUMP!!!

---

Are there legitimate criticisms of Trump's behavior and performance in office?

Or are all criticisms just examples of TDS?

---

Yes, there are. That has nothing to do with being brainwashed into calling January 6 an insurrection though.

---

I don't care what you or anyone else calls it.

What I care about is people using whatever word they want to use to minimize how historically problematic Trump's words and actions and inactions were leading up to, and on, January 6 and more generally regarding the fairness of American elections.

When historians analyze Trump's presidency, his electoral conduct will be viewed as his most egregious failing.

---

I disagree. I don't think Trump is the one historians will look back on unfavorably. He certainly has his warts, but I think there is a far bigger fly in the ointment of society today. I think historians will look back on the misinformation from the left on all things Trump, covid, race, gender, schools, etc and will view it as their most egregious failure. They went all in on it when they colluded with msm and social media. You have been brainwashed by the likes of CNN, that you proudly admit to being one of the few remaining viewers of, and social media. Elon Musk has opened a lot of eyes and boy does the left look like the lying, fascist, conspiracy driven imbeciles they've framed the right to be.

Anyone that thinks Trump caused an "insurrection" is ignorant or a brainwashed political hack.

---

I think they'll look back and think both things were true. We elected a bad guy president who did and said thing's that invalidated him from leading the free world. And the media was as bad as we all here think it is.

And that the two groups brought out the worst in each other.

---

You're really reaching now again, Chem... I don't agree with that whatsoever. Trump's policies were dead-on 95% of the time... you can say, that you didn't like him or whatever - but don't just start making **** up that you - even today - know just isn't true.

---

So tell you what, read my statement opposite --- "we elected a good guy president who did and said things that lifted people up around the country". Now, which is more true.

Look, I've said it before and i'll say it again --- if Trump weren't such a self-promoting a-hat, he'd still be POTUS. Despite a media against him (for most part) and the Covid interruption, and a 80 year old mentally degraded opponent, he still nearly did. No one will ever convince me that, even prior to his Jan 6 shenanigans, the reason he lost is enough people were tired of his un-presidential actions. You have the most important position in the world....act like it. His actions after the election up thru and on Jan 6 seal the deal --- as we saw in the mid-terms, when his involvement cost the GOP what should have been an easy win overall.
(and yes, I fully agree the current resident of the office also falls way short of that bar).

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

lol...or some of us can just think on our own and watch a person's actions and words. I mean, come on man, you are THE GUY who was so politically motivated, that you said the family was lying about the girl getting raped for political reasons to support the Roe stuff. Just like the talking heads on the right.

Talk about being brainwashed.
Don't "think",. jeez, wjhy would a family subject themselves to this, just join the far right crowd that says they have to be lying and timed it just to have this story, lol.

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

lol...or some of us can just think on our own and watch a person's actions and words. I mean, come on man, you are THE GUY who was so politically motivated, that you said the family was lying about the girl getting raped for political reasons to support the Roe stuff. Just like the talking heads on the right.

Talk about being brainwashed.
Don't "think",. jeez, why would a family subject themselves to this, just join the far right crowd that says they have to be lying and timed it just to have this story, lol.

---

LOL. The family didn't subject themselves to anything, a leftist activist took advantage of their situation to attempt to paint a picture that also didn't really turn out to be true, since it was a relative that was in the country illegally... the entire situation was sad from every possible angle.

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

lol...or some of us can just think on our own and watch a person's actions and words. I mean, come on man, you are THE GUY who was so politically motivated, that you said the family was lying about the girl getting raped for political reasons to support the Roe stuff. Just like the talking heads on the right.

Talk about being brainwashed.
Don't "think",. jeez, why would a family subject themselves to this, just join the far right crowd that says they have to be lying and timed it just to have this story, lol.

---

LOL. The family didn't subject themselves to anything, a leftist activist took advantage of their situation to attempt to paint a picture that also didn't really turn out to be true, since it was a relative that was in the country illegally... the entire situation was sad from every possible angle.

---

That's why I ignore that lying clown. I never said the family lied about anything. He's a worthless POS.

It was absolutely a sad situation, politicized by a leftist hack.

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

lol...or some of us can just think on our own and watch a person's actions and words. I mean, come on man, you are THE GUY who was so politically motivated, that you said the family was lying about the girl getting raped for political reasons to support the Roe stuff. Just like the talking heads on the right.

Talk about being brainwashed.
Don't "think",. jeez, why would a family subject themselves to this, just join the far right crowd that says they have to be lying and timed it just to have this story, lol.

---

LOL. The family didn't subject themselves to anything, a leftist activist took advantage of their situation to attempt to paint a picture that also didn't really turn out to be true, since it was a relative that was in the country illegally... the entire situation was sad from every possible angle.

---

That's why I ignore that lying clown. I never said the family lied about anything. He's a worthless POS.

It was absolutely a sad situation, politicized by a leftist hack.

---

The family even tried to deny that it happened, because some of them were here illegally.

TheStorm said:

---

packgrad said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

lol...or some of us can just think on our own and watch a person's actions and words. I mean, come on man, you are THE GUY who was so politically motivated, that you said the family was lying about the girl getting raped for political reasons to support the Roe stuff. Just like the talking heads on the right.

Talk about being brainwashed.
Don't "think",. jeez, why would a family subject themselves to this, just join the far right crowd that says they have to be lying and timed it just to have this story, lol.

---

LOL. The family didn't subject themselves to anything, a leftist activist took advantage of their situation to attempt to paint a picture that also didn't really turn out to be true, since it was a relative that was in the country illegally... the entire situation was sad from every possible angle.

---

That's why I ignore that lying clown. I never said the family lied about anything. He's a worthless POS.

It was absolutely a sad situation, politicized by a leftist hack.

---

The family even tried to deny that it happened, because some of them were here illegally.

---

Yep. Mama even knew it was going on. Terrible.

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

lol...or some of us can just think on our own and watch a person's actions and words. I mean, come on man, you are THE GUY who was so politically motivated, that you said the family was lying about the girl getting raped for political reasons to support the Roe stuff. Just like the talking heads on the right.

Talk about being brainwashed.
Don't "think",. jeez, wjhy would a family subject themselves to this, just join the far right crowd that says they have to be lying and timed it just to have this story, lol.

---

Kim continues to suck that s$it up from the MSNBC and CNN straws of truth.

TheStorm said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

It would be ironic if the footage showed more violence then shown in the J6 committee

---

Anything is possible, I agree.

EDIT: The real purpose may be to 'see who Tucker Carlson really is'.

---

Were?!? when the footage gets released, will you please circle where you are whenever you show up, so that we can get a better perspective of what you were seeing / weren't seeing as it was happening? Thanks!

---

LOL.....I'm not sure we're on good enough terms for me to trust you with where I was. :-)

But again, I watched a guy on the bullhorn next to us announce everything going on inside chambers. Little did I know I was part of false flag operation. Soon a group of men came out of the crowd (we were at the portable barrier fence line) and began to tussle with police attempting to pull back the barrier fence. Looking back on the events there was a veiled attempt to push through the barrier fence and then minutes later they successfully pulled the barrier fence back. All of this -- looking back and watching the 'Ray Epps appearance' guy with the bull horn was orchestrating all of this.

The Capitol Police then proceeded (after losing the battle for a couple of sections of fence) pulled all the barrier fences back......simply allowing the crowd (Supreme Court side) to rush to the Capitol........all being encouraged by the guy on the bullhorn.

My sister and I moved behind a large statue........as we were concerned about the guys with semiautomatic weapons on the roof opening fire on the crowd rushing toward the Capitol.

There was absolutely a group of men at each of the 3 chambers doors attempting to push through the Capitol Police. I went up to the steps of the main chamber doors to get a good view. Most all on the Supreme Court side watched and many began to leave.....I suspect out of concern for escalation.

Thirty minutes or so into the door pushing....flashbangs and tear gas .......the guy on the bullhorn began to encourage all to leave as the National Guard was being called in. Not a single weapon of any kind was held by a protestor that we noticed. The Capitol Police were well armed as were the snipers on the roof with drum mags.

Summary of what I saw from the "STOP THE STEAL" side.....SCOTUS side. Sis and I did not go to Trump's speech as it was near the far end of the Mall and 1.7 miles away.

packgrad said:

---

It's brainwashing. If they say it over and over and over again they think it becomes true. They do it with gender, race, police, guns, etc too. The left, the media, the leftist Twitter mob, etc just say it over and over and over. His words make him unfit, ineligible/disqualify (for manny), invalidate him to be president. It's utter nonsense, but they just say it over and over again and are reprogrammed by their preferred media source over and over again.

Nothing he said made him unfit/ineligible/disqualify/invalidate him from being president. Thats just hyperbolic brainwashed nonsense.

---

Here's another word you're hung up on. Its too bad you get distracted and triggered by words like insurrection and unfit. They're just words. Are you OK?

Trump was historically unfavorable and electorally unviable by the end of his presidency. 70% of the country watched and listened to Trump be president for four years and were completely turned off from the prospect of four more years of his performance.

Call that whatever you want. Most of the country thought he sucked and many of their reasons were completely legitimate.