Manny Sanguine said:
Werewolf said:
Manny Sanguine said:
Werewolf said:
Manny Sanguine said:
caryking said:
Manny Sanguine said:
Werewolf said:
Civilized said:
caryking said:
Civilized said:
Werewolf said:
This goes back to the 2020 election and Jan 06th if you choose to listen.
We all listened, including the courts. There was nothing to hear.
Consequential electoral fraud is a fantasy.
That's like saying.. OJ didn't do it!
We all know he did it; however, a legal process found him not guilty. Civ, your arguments are extremely weak! If you don't believe the narrative, then that's fine; however, standing on your tired argument is another…
The legal process didn't declare OJ not guilty. The prosecutors were unable to meet the required burden of proof.
Huge difference between OJ and electoral fraud.
There was significant circumstantial evidence presented in court that OJ was guilty. In the case of electoral fraud, no evidence of consequence has been brought forth and substantiated in courts that lead any judge at any time to believe consequential fraud was present.
Furthermore, there is not any circumstantial evidence (that has not been debunked) to indicate electoral fraud happened either.
Frankly I've got to say I was quite pleasantly surprised at how little talk of fraud there was this cycle, other than Kari Lake and her loons.
Even if such a stance is politically motivated since most politicians across the spectrum realized before these elections that fake electoral fraud was a loser at the polls, I'm glad that's where we ended up.
I'd certainly rather end up in the right place for the wrong reason then not end up there at all.
This case that the SCOTUS has now decided to hear...........is one of maybe 100-150........out of maybe 1,500 to 2,000 submitted. SCOTUS didn't arbitrarily pick this case.......there is a reason.
I realized a while ago that bringing factual information to this board is pointless. (This was around the time that posters on this board wouldn't even admit that a rumor about Adam Schiff's sister was false, considering the fact that he doesn't have a sister.) I still drop by from time to time to see what nonsense you all are repeating back to each other in your little echo chamber, but without commenting. However, I could not let this pass.
The description of the status of this case above is false.
For the many people who don't understand the SCOTUS certiorari process, here is where things stand.
The case in question, Brunson v. Adams, had a petition filed at SCOTUS on November 23. The petition is listed to be reviewed in conference on January 6 in order to determine whether the case will be heard by SCOTUS. That's all.
SCOTUS receives thousands of such petitions each year (more than 5000 in 2020) and all of them (assuming they meet minimal requirements for form, signatures, fees, etc.) are reviewed in conference regardless of how meritless or ridiculous their claims are.
So, no, SCOTUS has not decided to hear this case. Law clerks for most, but not all, of the justices will read Brunson's petition and any responses filed by the hundreds of named respondents and will make recommendations about whether SCOTUS should hear the case or deny the petition. Four justices will have to agree to hear the case. That decision - most likely a single sentence - will be made public some time after the January 6 conference.
(Edited for a typo. Back to occasional lurker mode.)
What is this petition? I don't follow these things. I like to stay on constitutional policy…
Yes, I also think we had enough evidence to warrant a "real" investigation in the 2020 election. That said, the issues we saw in 2020 continued to the 2022 election. It is what it is…. Now, we just have to out-think the opposition on how the election will be administered.
The process of having a case heard by SCOTUS starts with a petition for certiorari, essentially a request for the court to take up the case. The other party then nas 30 days to file a response to your request. The justices then meet in conference to decide which cases to hear.
The petition in this case was filed on 11/23. The hundreds of respondents have until 12/23 to file response(es). The justices will consider the petition and respons(es) in conference on 1/6, but the decision in almost all cases are based entirely on recommendation from their clerks. If the justices agree to hear a case, there is a months-long process of briefs being filed before oral arguments.
The plaintiff was one of the 4 men in the discussions. It was agreed that the SCOTUS can made a decision this week........and that decision would not even be required to be made public. You are simply wrong.
I'll add one more thing, the SCOTUS to act on this favorably is clearly the healthiest outcome. Watching Will Cain Show this AM and listening to his interview of Tucker Carlson. Per Tucker thinking, a civilian process and the Constitution working via one of the three branches is clearly best. We are in COG. Hopefully Law of War Manual Chapter 11 is not the final remedy. Its right there as a last resort.
So, your belief is that SCOTUS will abandon their established procedures to:
- Decide this case on the merits based only on a petition for certiorari, and without briefs or oral arguments (let alone any kind of response at all from the hundreds of named respondents),
- That will do so without the case even being on their calendar in any respect until January,
- That they will grant the requested relief of deposing essentially the entire sitting elected government of the United States,
- And they they will do so in secret?
So does that mean that SCOTUS will install a new legislative and executive government, in secret? If a week from now, or a month from now, or a year from now, the same members of congress and the same executive are continuing to act like they're running things, does that mean that their actions after this secret decision by SCOTUS are null and void and that some shadow government is taking actions that we just don't know wbout?
What is your evidence for such an extraordinary assertion?
Whatcha thinking we're in a courtroom?
SCOTUS made a decision behind closed doors with Roe v Wade only to be leaked..............just like that.
As I've stated here many times, I'm not going to waste a lot of my time debating someone on the other side. My focus is to provide info to others w similar viewpoints as mine such that they can be more confident in the treachery and the evil which exists among our elites and their minions in govt. So many only see things in terms of R v D........it's much more sinister and evil than that.
Rest assured; military Law and trial is nothing like a civilian courtroom. The military can try you in the morning and hang you in the afternoon. Look for a lot of it.......2023-2024ish probably. The question is "how long does this fiasco go on to wake the American citizenry up..........as so many remain asleep.
Oh, so you're just having fantasies about the military staging a coup and murdering people you don't like. Cool.
FROM OTHERS:
It's been brought to my attention about the Brunson vs. Adams, docket 22-380, filed to the Supreme Court in Utah in October 2022... which is getting some "excited" and I'm here to wreck the party and I'm going to break this down as vanilla as possible.
What the Filing is about:
"He alleged that before accepting the electoral votes on January 6, 2021, defendants intentionally refused to investigate evidence that the November 2020 presidential election was fraudulent."
Brunson vs. Adams:
https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010110749788.pdf In order to understand why this filing is irrelevant, this is why I have been showing the two different angles the Military is in complete control of our Nation via the Law of War Manual 2016 and the Military Justice Act 2016 that tie in with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (Military Law) and Federal Laws.
This has NEVER been about 'Election Fraud' from the Voter or State.
One… this is Military Operation, a Covert Operation, Military Occupancy as defined in the Law of War Manual. It was published in June 2015, updated in December 2016. Also, the Military Justice Act of 2016, shows the Supreme Court outlining Military Law and Courts is/are separate the Civil Laws and Courts which combined sets the stage for the Laws and Orders put into place from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021, the National Guard being Federalized to Active-Duty Status in March 2020 to present day, which all lead to the grand finale Military Tribunals / Commissions (Court Trials) as reported on December 29, 2021, by the New York Times.
Two, the Military Alliance of Generals plugged (planted) Trump where the people could see a visual President (which is a Continuation of Government) in Presidential Form to use and reverse all the fraudulent laws, codes, and statutes, of the Federal Corporation of the District of Columbia that violates the Constitution of the United States of America (the highest Law in the Land) and to dismantle the RINOS of the Federal Corporation.
CIC Trump as visual President took all the Laws, Codes, Orders, Acts, and Statutes and applied them as they legally read, not how they were abused by the Corporate RINOS. Doing so, allows the American people to see the RINOS implode from within from top to bottom without being able to point any fingers and be accused of abuse of power or laws.
The Military and CIC were never going to make this known. But a LOT more people should be awake by now with understanding of what he says "we're going to give the power back to the people" means.
The Military works on a Chain of Command, Intelligence, and Orders. We are a Nation of Laws and Orders. They work very well when people know how the Government works, it's our right and our duty.
In 2016, candidate Trump made it very clear what was coming (hindsight 20/20). On the campaign in 2016, "Never again will we voice to the public what we're doing with the Military… if you find out, guess who else does?"
Plus, it's a different kind of war as he proclaimed over and over and over. It's an invisible and hidden enemy not from abroad, but from within.
The Military Occupancy in the United States is dismantling the Washington Establishment known as the RINOS from the Supreme Court all the way down to State Courts, Governors, Attorney Generals, House of Representatives, and Senators who use and abuse the Voting System by placing their candidates in positions to conduct their money laundering schemes and control for genocides, trafficking, and their secret society get rich while appeasing and suppressing the American people via chaos, divisions, and distractions for many, many years.
These evil and dirtbag RINOS have used the word "constitution" along with those to deceive you the people into believing they're quoting the Constitution of the United States of America, as data shows roughly 70% of Americans know NOTHING about the Constitution much less our History, Foundation, Quotes, and meanings of the verbiage etc.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
