Wikipedia completely occupied by ✡️’s.
— Khaled Soliman (@VyprCEO) April 20, 2024
A look into how they hijack and manipulate sources of information to further their cause. pic.twitter.com/VHrY2Rdmyt
In other news…
134,682 Views |
1427 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by Werewolf
NPR's Woke CEO Katherine Maher explains how we now live in a post-truth world.
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) April 17, 2024
(Just in case you're wondering what happened to Wikipedia.)pic.twitter.com/9mDyhbSGbJ
As we bicker back n forth with MSM distractions, our freedoms are stripped away without a peep.
Julian Assange: ‘This generation is the last free generation’
— Afshin Rattansi (@afshinrattansi) April 20, 2024
The Senate voted to approve, once again, spying on Americans without requiring a warrant
More coverage of Julian’s persecution: https://t.co/IOKTJ9LzpY pic.twitter.com/QquA0QOhal
Thanks to WikiLeaks we learned that most of our information was being collected through our smart devices. #RiseUP #StandUP for our rights #FreeAssangeNOW https://t.co/YL2sVrQiIj pic.twitter.com/wusNWkyiWC
— Eagle Wings (@EagleWings3578) April 20, 2024
Nice job by our federal government protecting the Indians that we have put on reservations against their will .
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13333313/Native-American-chiefs-reveal-THOUSANDS-drug-cartel-gangsters-infiltrated-reservations-using-bases-traffic-fentanyl-reveal-shocking-number-tribal-cops-fight-them.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13333313/Native-American-chiefs-reveal-THOUSANDS-drug-cartel-gangsters-infiltrated-reservations-using-bases-traffic-fentanyl-reveal-shocking-number-tribal-cops-fight-them.html
Senator Rand Paul (@RandPaul) from Kentucky, like his father before him, Senator Ron Paul (@RonPaul), is one of Washington's most honest American senators. Last night/early this morning, he was defending the 4th Amendment, saying Americans should not be spied on without a… pic.twitter.com/MkUeHlY25I
— Simon Ateba (@simonateba) April 20, 2024
A #Basij militiaman of the #IRGC named Ali Heibati who is also a MMA fighter kiched a ring girl over not having Islamic Hijab during HFC MMA event in #Russia. Russians taught him a good lesson. He is banned from competing in MMA games forever. He returned #Iran with broken bones. pic.twitter.com/5tbKLLx06d
— Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch (@BabakTaghvaee1) April 22, 2024
For Civ, Smapty, Wufskins, and others…. What are your thoughts on the narrative being stated, in these tweets?
It's not an accident or coincidence that both women are white and one of them blonde.
— HabitualLinestepper (@HabitualLinest) April 22, 2024
These ads are the only ads Democrats make that aren't diverse. https://t.co/48upvpZA7O
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
SmaptyWolf said:ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
I'm not crying
I'll need to google which state but I know at least one red state passed a law that makes it a crime to assist a minor in getting an abortion in another state. That's likely what this ad is referring to.
Things that make you go hmmm.
The US Congress has just voted to protect every country's border not named USA.
The US Congress has just voted to protect every country's border not named USA.
And did so with overwhelming bipartisan support.
Don't you love how certain people use words? a 50 year precedent? 50 years of unconstitutional rulings, is more appropriate...ncsupack1 said:SmaptyWolf said:ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
I'm not crying
caryking said:Don't you love how certain use words? a 50 year precedent? 50 years of unconstitutional rulings, is more appropriate...ncsupack1 said:SmaptyWolf said:ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
I'm not crying
Wait, why were you upset by that commercial, again? Isn't cops arresting women for getting abortions what's you've dreamed about? Or you just don't like it being said out loud in an election year?
I'll say this. The leaders of the GOP better start getting ahead of this messaging or November will end bad. Once again " messaging " is key here. Call me a liberal if you want ( I'm not) but this abortion issue is not going away. Heck, the guy running for governor of NC had to admit to paying for one. WTH is going on here?
Like this kind of messaging?
Do you agree with Trump’s VP contender Kristi Noem that rape survivors should be forced to give birth to their rapist's child — YES or NO?pic.twitter.com/P69VeTFcnl
— Jon Cooper (@joncoopertweets) April 22, 2024
Lol, WTH is going on here?ncsupack1 said:
I'll say this. The leaders of the GOP better start getting ahead of this messaging or November will end bad. Once again " messaging " is key here. Call me a liberal if you want ( I'm not) but this abortion issue is not going away. Heck, the guy running for governor of NC had to admit to paying for one. WTH is going on here?
Ok, I'll bite - what states are arresting women for getting abortions? All I see are reports that deal in fear porn that it could happen. Now there are cases where women who self aborted being charged.SmaptyWolf said:caryking said:Don't you love how certain use words? a 50 year precedent? 50 years of unconstitutional rulings, is more appropriate...ncsupack1 said:SmaptyWolf said:ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
I'm not crying
Wait, why were you upset by that commercial, again? Isn't cops arresting women for getting abortions what's you've dreamed about? Or you just don't like it being said out loud in an election year?
As to the ad, what state forbids a woman from leaving the state to get an abortion. I don't know of any but I'm sure you'll provide a list.
I didn't click on the link, but I'm guessing she said yes, since you posted. Look maybe don't care, I mean if they lose Congress and the WH, the stolen election train continues.
barelypure said:Ok, I'll bite - what states are arresting women for getting abortions? All I see are reports that deal in fear porn that it could happen. Now there are cases where women who self aborted being charged.SmaptyWolf said:caryking said:Don't you love how certain use words? a 50 year precedent? 50 years of unconstitutional rulings, is more appropriate...ncsupack1 said:SmaptyWolf said:ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
I'm not crying
Wait, why were you upset by that commercial, again? Isn't cops arresting women for getting abortions what's you've dreamed about? Or you just don't like it being said out loud in an election year?
As to the ad, what state forbids a woman from leaving the state to get an abortion. I don't know of any but I'm sure you'll provide a list.
Idaho has become the first state to pass a law explicitly restricting some out-of-state travel for abortions.
The new legislation makes helping a pregnant minor get an abortion, whether through medication or a procedure, in another state punishable by two to five years in prison. Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, signed the bill on Wednesday night, and it goes into effect after 30 days.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/idaho-most-extreme-anti-abortion-state-law-restricts-travel-rcna78225
The new legislation makes helping a pregnant minor get an abortion, whether through medication or a procedure, in another state punishable by two to five years in prison.
Idaho's new law offers those who facilitate a minor's access to abortion a reasonable defense against prosecution if the parents consented.
"When you're talking about a minor being transported across state lines, especially for a medical procedure without parental consent, I think that is clearly within the authority of the state of Idaho to criminalize and discourage," Ripley said.
So if I'm reading this right the parents can travel out of state with their minor child for an abortion. Or they can give consent for someone else to do so. What can't happen is a 3rd party taking a minor child without the parent's consent. IOW Idaho is sticking up for parental rights to be involved in the decisions affecting their minor children.
The law doesn't apply to non-minors and I don't see a problem with what they have passed.
Idaho's new law offers those who facilitate a minor's access to abortion a reasonable defense against prosecution if the parents consented.
"When you're talking about a minor being transported across state lines, especially for a medical procedure without parental consent, I think that is clearly within the authority of the state of Idaho to criminalize and discourage," Ripley said.
So if I'm reading this right the parents can travel out of state with their minor child for an abortion. Or they can give consent for someone else to do so. What can't happen is a 3rd party taking a minor child without the parent's consent. IOW Idaho is sticking up for parental rights to be involved in the decisions affecting their minor children.
The law doesn't apply to non-minors and I don't see a problem with what they have passed.
Using words, way out of context, is exactly the product of Marxist! If a Marxist can change the meaning of a word or its usage, then that allows for the breakdown of society.SmaptyWolf said:caryking said:Don't you love how certain use words? a 50 year precedent? 50 years of unconstitutional rulings, is more appropriate...ncsupack1 said:SmaptyWolf said:ncsupack1 said:
I'd say stop passing bills making IVF illegal , the GOP could get ahead of this nonsense and put an end to the fear monger.
Awww, poor Republicans. Dems are being so UNFAIR after you trashed a 50 year precedent and decided to force women in 13 states (so far) to have rape babies. And yes, Alabama is in fact trying to go after people who cross state lines for abortions.
I'm not crying
Wait, why were you upset by that commercial, again? Isn't cops arresting women for getting abortions what's you've dreamed about? Or you just don't like it being said out loud in an election year?
But the parents can't take their minor that has been raped and impregnated to get an abortion in the state of Idaho. You ok with that?
I didn't read the law; however, if the commentary above is accurate, then I have no issue with it…barelypure said:
The new legislation makes helping a pregnant minor get an abortion, whether through medication or a procedure, in another state punishable by two to five years in prison.
Idaho's new law offers those who facilitate a minor's access to abortion a reasonable defense against prosecution if the parents consented.
"When you're talking about a minor being transported across state lines, especially for a medical procedure without parental consent, I think that is clearly within the authority of the state of Idaho to criminalize and discourage," Ripley said.
So if I'm reading this right the parents can travel out of state with their minor child for an abortion. Or they can give consent for someone else to do so. What can't happen is a 3rd party taking a minor child without the parent's consent. IOW Idaho is sticking up for parental rights to be involved in the decisions affecting their minor children.
The law doesn't apply to non-minors and I don't see a problem with what they have passed.
If we are talking about the same state law, it states with parent consent. Sounds like parents can. unless I read wrong.Wufskins said:
But the parents can't take their minor that has been raped and impregnated to get an abortion in the state of Idaho. You ok with that?
I don't personally agree with it but if that's the law they passed and you still have viable options outside of the state then yes.
I still think they can't in the state. They would have to travel to a neighboring state
Got ya, I need to read more to be honest.BigBarryWood said:
I still think they can't in the state. They would have to travel to a neighboring state
ncsupack1 said:If we are talking about the same state law, it states with parent consent. Sounds like parents can. unless I read wrong.Wufskins said:
But the parents can't take their minor that has been raped and impregnated to get an abortion in the state of Idaho. You ok with that?
That's for taking them out of state. The state of Idaho has no exceptions for rape or incest.
Do you reside in Idaho? Not likely, and you're cherry picking.Wufskins said:ncsupack1 said:If we are talking about the same state law, it states with parent consent. Sounds like parents can. unless I read wrong.Wufskins said:
But the parents can't take their minor that has been raped and impregnated to get an abortion in the state of Idaho. You ok with that?
That's for taking them out of state. The state of Idaho has no exceptions for rape or incest.
It's a state's rights issue. Lobby your state's legislative body and vote accordingly.
Like I posted above I know that now. I will keep reading about the law though.Wufskins said:ncsupack1 said:If we are talking about the same state law, it states with parent consent. Sounds like parents can. unless I read wrong.Wufskins said:
But the parents can't take their minor that has been raped and impregnated to get an abortion in the state of Idaho. You ok with that?
That's for taking them out of state. The state of Idaho has no exceptions for rape or incest.
I've been told in the past over other issues, that if it doesn't effect me, why should I care?Werewolf said:Do you reside in Idaho? Not likely, and you're cherry picking.Wufskins said:ncsupack1 said:If we are talking about the same state law, it states with parent consent. Sounds like parents can. unless I read wrong.Wufskins said:
But the parents can't take their minor that has been raped and impregnated to get an abortion in the state of Idaho. You ok with that?
That's for taking them out of state. The state of Idaho has no exceptions for rape or incest.
It's a state's rights issue. Lobby your state's legislative body and vote accordingly.
Featured Stories
See All
COMMIT ALERT: Purdue OL Jalen Grant Picks NC State
by P.J. Williams
14:18
17h ago
999
IPS IN 5: Thoughts On Today's ACC Basketball Slate
by James Henderson
5:05
1d ago
1.5k
Jonathan Paylor: "You Have To Actually Know The game"
by James Henderson