TheStorm said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Trump says he will not oppose release of documents from FBI Mar-a-Lago raid. That would include search warrant, inventory of items seized, and underlying affidavit. The Justice Dept wants to release the first two; the last, which would be most informative, it will keep secret. pic.twitter.com/H3RpGk0o7P

— Byron York (@ByronYork) August 12, 2022

---

If there is anyone who is the biggest "woe is me" victim in the world. Maybe DJT was expecting a participation trophy as he left the White House too. One thing for sure is that it's abundantly obvious that DJT is politicizing this too…

---

But Trrruuummmpppppp!

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Trump says he will not oppose release of documents from FBI Mar-a-Lago raid. That would include search warrant, inventory of items seized, and underlying affidavit. The Justice Dept wants to release the first two; the last, which would be most informative, it will keep secret. pic.twitter.com/H3RpGk0o7P

— Byron York (@ByronYork) August 12, 2022

---

If there is anyone who is the biggest "woe is me" victim in the world. Maybe DJT was expecting a participation trophy as he left the White House too. One thing for sure is that it's abundantly obvious that DJT is politicizing this too…

---

There, there. Don't let your TDS influence your opinion before all the facts come out. Crazy biased.

---

Wolfpack said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Trump says he will not oppose release of documents from FBI Mar-a-Lago raid. That would include search warrant, inventory of items seized, and underlying affidavit. The Justice Dept wants to release the first two; the last, which would be most informative, it will keep secret. pic.twitter.com/H3RpGk0o7P

— Byron York (@ByronYork) August 12, 2022

---

If there is anyone who is the biggest "woe is me" victim in the world. Maybe DJT was expecting a participation trophy as he left the White House too. One thing for sure is that it's abundantly obvious that DJT is politicizing this too…

---

But Trrruuummmpppppp!

---

I thought you had me on mute. Guess you can't resist? Weird…

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

I guess y'all aren't the type to wait for facts then

---

Lol.

"I'm wondering why he would keep such sensitive documents in his house lol"

---

That's me questioning the angle, just like you were. If your buddies said it, you'd read it completely differently. Exact same thing Storm said. Y'all are crazy biased lol

---

Kind of like you only wanting people to wait for the facts to come out when commenting on the ridiculousness of nuclear papers being kept. You had no problem with the purse clutching. Practice what you preach and you'll do a better job pretending to be an independent that looks at all sides before forming an opinion.

---

Nah, you're right. Go ahead and put your halloween outfit on and play detective then

---

Will do. You keep pretending to be objective. It's good to be untruthful.

---

TheStorm said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Trump says he will not oppose release of documents from FBI Mar-a-Lago raid. That would include search warrant, inventory of items seized, and underlying affidavit. The Justice Dept wants to release the first two; the last, which would be most informative, it will keep secret. pic.twitter.com/H3RpGk0o7P

— Byron York (@ByronYork) August 12, 2022

---

If there is anyone who is the biggest "woe is me" victim in the world. Maybe DJT was expecting a participation trophy as he left the White House too. One thing for sure is that it's abundantly obvious that DJT is politicizing this too…

---

But Trrruuummmpppppp!

---

I thought you had me on mute. Guess you can't resist? Weird…

---

You are in over your head, and don't even realize it...

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

I guess y'all aren't the type to wait for facts then

---

Lol.

"I'm wondering why he would keep such sensitive documents in his house lol"

---

That's me questioning the angle, just like you were. If your buddies said it, you'd read it completely differently. Exact same thing Storm said. Y'all are crazy biased lol

---

Kind of like you only wanting people to wait for the facts to come out when commenting on the ridiculousness of nuclear papers being kept. You had no problem with the purse clutching. Practice what you preach and you'll do a better job pretending to be an independent that looks at all sides before forming an opinion.

---

Nah, you're right. Go ahead and put your halloween outfit on and play detective then

---

Will do. You keep pretending to be objective. It's good to be untruthful.

---

My facts are we're gonna find out today, clearly some people are emotional about that. Second fact is that statement from DJT was also a political statement for his followers to sop up for a bit.

---

Sad that it is considered a "political statement" to defend one's self.

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

I guess y'all aren't the type to wait for facts then

---

Lol.

"I'm wondering why he would keep such sensitive documents in his house lol"

---

That's me questioning the angle, just like you were. If your buddies said it, you'd read it completely differently. Exact same thing Storm said. Y'all are crazy biased lol

---

Kind of like you only wanting people to wait for the facts to come out when commenting on the ridiculousness of nuclear papers being kept. You had no problem with the purse clutching. Practice what you preach and you'll do a better job pretending to be an independent that looks at all sides before forming an opinion.

---

Nah, you're right. Go ahead and put your halloween outfit on and play detective then

---

Will do. You keep pretending to be objective. It's good to be untruthful.

---

My facts are we're gonna find out today, clearly some people are emotional about that. Second fact is that statement from DJT was also a political statement for his followers to sop up for a bit.

---

Sad that it is considered a "political statement" to defend one's self.

---

If you can see my bias through a few anonymous posts on an internet board, you should be able to see your own too. I can't help you with that

---

I never said I wasn't biased. I'm not the one pretending to be objective and waiting for all the facts to come out before formulating an opinion.

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

I guess y'all aren't the type to wait for facts then

---

Lol.

"I'm wondering why he would keep such sensitive documents in his house lol"

---

That's me questioning the angle, just like you were. If your buddies said it, you'd read it completely differently. Exact same thing Storm said. Y'all are crazy biased lol

---

Kind of like you only wanting people to wait for the facts to come out when commenting on the ridiculousness of nuclear papers being kept. You had no problem with the purse clutching. Practice what you preach and you'll do a better job pretending to be an independent that looks at all sides before forming an opinion.

---

Nah, you're right. Go ahead and put your halloween outfit on and play detective then

---

Will do. You keep pretending to be objective. It's good to be untruthful.

---

My facts are we're gonna find out today, clearly some people are emotional about that. Second fact is that statement from DJT was also a political statement for his followers to sop up for a bit.

---

Sad that it is considered a "political statement" to defend one's self.

---

If you can see my bias through a few anonymous posts on an internet board, you should be able to see your own too. I can't help you with that

---

I never said I wasn't biased. I'm not the one pretending to be objective and waiting for all the facts to come out before formulating an opinion.

---

I'll say the same thing about the other side when I see it. My stance is I want reform in how we identify and vote for candidates. We are not left with any good choices and it's harmful to our country. The inflation reduction act is a joke too

---

No, you won't. You participated in the purse clutching last night without the "wait for all the facts to come out" admonishment.

It's great you have that stance on those other issues.

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Wolfpackrich1 said:

---

Then I wonder what does nuclear documents mean?

---

Haaaa, when I first read that, even after reading "nuclear", it didn't click. My mind was registering a different meaning of nuclear, as in "nuclear family", which of course made no sense. It never crossed my mind of the sinister definition, because as Flossy said....why would it?

If Trumps team refuses to make the warrant public, it may mean nothing, but it will make his words sound like the UNC leaders, who said they were the most cooperative school ever with the NCAA, but spent years in court to prevent them from doing a thing, lol

---

Chem, see packgrads post above…. Looks like, so far, Trump wants it all opened, including parts Garland doesn't want opened.

So, please everyone that is *****ing about nuclear codes, etc.. raise Hell with Garland for not wanting to open everything…

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

I guess y'all aren't the type to wait for facts then

---

Lol.

"I'm wondering why he would keep such sensitive documents in his house lol"

---

That's me questioning the angle, just like you were. If your buddies said it, you'd read it completely differently. Exact same thing Storm said. Y'all are crazy biased lol

---

Kind of like you only wanting people to wait for the facts to come out when commenting on the ridiculousness of nuclear papers being kept. You had no problem with the purse clutching. Practice what you preach and you'll do a better job pretending to be an independent that looks at all sides before forming an opinion.

---

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

I guess y'all aren't the type to wait for facts then

---

Lol.

"I'm wondering why he would keep such sensitive documents in his house lol"

---

That's me questioning the angle, just like you were. If your buddies said it, you'd read it completely differently. Exact same thing Storm said. Y'all are crazy biased lol

---

Kind of like you only wanting people to wait for the facts to come out when commenting on the ridiculousness of nuclear papers being kept. You had no problem with the purse clutching. Practice what you preach and you'll do a better job pretending to be an independent that looks at all sides before forming an opinion.

---

ahhh yes, one side is pearl clutching, and the other side is "trump nut clutching"

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Wolfpackrich1 said:

---

Then I wonder what does nuclear documents mean?

---

Haaaa, when I first read that, even after reading "nuclear", it didn't click. My mind was registering a different meaning of nuclear, as in "nuclear family", which of course made no sense. It never crossed my mind of the sinister definition, because as Flossy said....why would it?

If Trumps team refuses to make the warrant public, it may mean nothing, but it will make his words sound like the UNC leaders, who said they were the most cooperative school ever with the NCAA, but spent years in court to prevent them from doing a thing, lol

---

Chem, see packgrads post above…. Looks like, so far, Trump wants it all opened, including parts Garland doesn't want opened.

So, please everyone that is *****ing about nuclear codes, etc.. raise Hell with Garland for not wanting to open everything…

---

UNC and its leaders said the exact same thing years ago in public, but then did the exact opposite in private.

In this case, he could be legit, or he could simply be posturing so he can blame someone else when they aren't actually released at 3pm. Both sides are clearly fighting for public opinion at this point.

---

Chem, please look at my post clearly... I think you will see I am waiting to see how things are going to play out. The use of the term 'so far" says something to that effect...

Also, I'm truly trying to be objective, on this subject... I do not know what the truth is; however, the only way to get to that truth, is to see everything associated with it, right?

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Wolfpackrich1 said:

---

Then I wonder what does nuclear documents mean?

---

Haaaa, when I first read that, even after reading "nuclear", it didn't click. My mind was registering a different meaning of nuclear, as in "nuclear family", which of course made no sense. It never crossed my mind of the sinister definition, because as Flossy said....why would it?

If Trumps team refuses to make the warrant public, it may mean nothing, but it will make his words sound like the UNC leaders, who said they were the most cooperative school ever with the NCAA, but spent years in court to prevent them from doing a thing, lol

---

Chem, see packgrads post above…. Looks like, so far, Trump wants it all opened, including parts Garland doesn't want opened.

So, please everyone that is *****ing about nuclear codes, etc.. raise Hell with Garland for not wanting to open everything…

---

UNC and its leaders said the exact same thing years ago in public, but then did the exact opposite in private.

In this case, he could be legit, or he could simply be posturing so he can blame someone else when they aren't actually released at 3pm. Both sides are clearly fighting for public opinion at this point.

---

Chem, please look at my post clearly... I think you will see I am waiting to see how things are going to play out. The use of the term 'so far" says something to that effect...

Also, I'm truly trying to be objective, on this subject... I do not know what the truth is; however, the only way to get to that truth, is to see everything associated with it, right?

---

Brian Kilmeade, filling in for Tucker Carlson tonight, shared a clearly fake, photoshopped image of the judge involved in approving the Mar-a-Lago warrant pic.twitter.com/W3cxHdy6id

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 12, 2022

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Wolfpackrich1 said:

---

Then I wonder what does nuclear documents mean?

---

Haaaa, when I first read that, even after reading "nuclear", it didn't click. My mind was registering a different meaning of nuclear, as in "nuclear family", which of course made no sense. It never crossed my mind of the sinister definition, because as Flossy said....why would it?

If Trumps team refuses to make the warrant public, it may mean nothing, but it will make his words sound like the UNC leaders, who said they were the most cooperative school ever with the NCAA, but spent years in court to prevent them from doing a thing, lol

---

Chem, see packgrads post above…. Looks like, so far, Trump wants it all opened, including parts Garland doesn't want opened.

So, please everyone that is *****ing about nuclear codes, etc.. raise Hell with Garland for not wanting to open everything…

---

UNC and its leaders said the exact same thing years ago in public, but then did the exact opposite in private.

In this case, he could be legit, or he could simply be posturing so he can blame someone else when they aren't actually released at 3pm. Both sides are clearly fighting for public opinion at this point.

---

Chem, please look at my post clearly... I think you will see I am waiting to see how things are going to play out. The use of the term 'so far" says something to that effect...

Also, I'm truly trying to be objective, on this subject... I do not know what the truth is; however, the only way to get to that truth, is to see everything associated with it, right?

---

always the TRUTH on Tucker!

Brian Kilmeade, filling in for Tucker Carlson tonight, shared a clearly fake, photoshopped image of the judge involved in approving the Mar-a-Lago warrant pic.twitter.com/W3cxHdy6id

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 12, 2022

---

packgrad said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Wolfpackrich1 said:

---

Then I wonder what does nuclear documents mean?

---

Haaaa, when I first read that, even after reading "nuclear", it didn't click. My mind was registering a different meaning of nuclear, as in "nuclear family", which of course made no sense. It never crossed my mind of the sinister definition, because as Flossy said....why would it?

If Trumps team refuses to make the warrant public, it may mean nothing, but it will make his words sound like the UNC leaders, who said they were the most cooperative school ever with the NCAA, but spent years in court to prevent them from doing a thing, lol

---

Chem, see packgrads post above…. Looks like, so far, Trump wants it all opened, including parts Garland doesn't want opened.

So, please everyone that is *****ing about nuclear codes, etc.. raise Hell with Garland for not wanting to open everything…

---

UNC and its leaders said the exact same thing years ago in public, but then did the exact opposite in private.

In this case, he could be legit, or he could simply be posturing so he can blame someone else when they aren't actually released at 3pm. Both sides are clearly fighting for public opinion at this point.

---

Chem, please look at my post clearly... I think you will see I am waiting to see how things are going to play out. The use of the term 'so far" says something to that effect...

Also, I'm truly trying to be objective, on this subject... I do not know what the truth is; however, the only way to get to that truth, is to see everything associated with it, right?

---

In speculation, no one is being objective. When the facts come out, you can be objective. I expect the tds boys to continue to clutch their purses though.

---

PackFansXL said:

---

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/thoughts-on-ag-garlands-remarks/

Quote:

---

5. On the other hand, if you believe, as I do, that what the DOJ is really interested in is making a Capitol riot case against Trump, then the timing makes perfect sense.
In June, as the high-profile House January 6 committee began its summer docudrama series, the Democratic base had a meltdown over whether Garland was committed to the holy grail of indicting Trump. Suddenly, DOJ ratcheted up activity. In late June, totally unnecessary search warrants were theatrically executed for the communications devices of two lawyers key to the January 6 "stop the steal" campaign, Jeffrey Clark and John Eastman 18 months after the fact. Grand-jury subpoenas were then issued to former vice president Mike Pence's advisers. Last week, more grand-jury subpoenas were issued to the two top lawyers in Trump's White House counsels' office. Then, just a day after the Mar-a-Lago search, the FBI executed a search warrant on a member of Congress, Representative Scott Perry (R., Pa.), as he walked on the street on vacation with his family. All of these evidence-gathering initiatives are patently aimed at building a case that Trump and his underlings conspired to defraud the government and obstruct Congress's counting of state-certified electoral votes . . . or at least to assure the Democratic base that Garland is really, really trying to build that case.

Do you really think the search at Trump's Florida estate, which happened smack in the middle of all this very publicly ratcheted-up investigative activity centering on January 6, has nothing to do with January 6? When the main guy they're trying to make the January 6 case on is Trump? Really?

---

McCarthy, a former prosecutor who writes for National Review, is sticking to his belief that the raid was about events leading up to Jan 6. He also scoffs at the nuclear secrets ruse given the track record of this administration as it continues to pursue the Iran nuclear deal.

---