Oh, I agree with that. My point was that we've had them. Now, I do believe people have different world views, that said, their views don't supersede the constitution.Oldsouljer said:And President Washington warned against them from the beginning. Political parties represent entrenched interests, usually not in alignment with the national interest.caryking said:we've had parties from the beginning. We've also had ideological differences from the beginning.ncsupack1 said:caryking said:no offense... people are in ideological categories. You can't run from that.ncsupack1 said:barelypure said:It sounds like you're calling for the dissolution of the Democrat Party.ncsupack1 said:
I really look forward to the day that folks can stop looking at race and other categories and just be fair all around.
lol…some people love to put people in categories. So frustrating.
Your right. Doesn't mean it's okay.
Example: I am 100% pro-life without any exclusions. That said, I also believe the constitution doesn't speak to the issue; therefore, the 10th amendment kicks in. I 100% disagree with my pro-life compadres who think Trump gave up on the issue with his video today. He gave the constitutional statement.