BTW, where did the inaction occur in the sale of the Uvalde and Buffalo guns? From reports (perhaps untrue still), they got the weapons right after they turned 18. Did either get held up for some check?PackFansXL said:We have a paid agency approving gun sales at most retail outlets. They just don't do anything when they find someone who lied on their paperwork. It happens everyday and the Feds ignore it. We have these laws to prevent known criminals and people who have already demonstrated a propensity to harm someone with whom they were or are in a relationship with and the Feds do NOTHING!Packchem91 said:Agreed on baseball bats...it was one of the "whatabouts" though from one of the big guns for everyone supporters. Oh, but a crazy person will just use a baseball bat, lol.PackFansXL said:Baseball bats is supposed to be a meaningful retort???Packchem91 said:I didn't miss it. No more than you missed the fact that these killings we are discussing aren't happening with baseball bats (laughable). They are happening with guns that maybe should have a little more control?PackFansXL said:In case you missed this ...PackFansXL said:ARs are controlled exactly the same as every other semi-automatic weapon. The same lethality exists with semi-automatic weapons in handgun form as in rifle form. The reason inner city killings are mentioned is those locations usually already have the gun bans you prefer with no positive effect. Likewise, those locations are governed by Democrats who try to politicize gun control for hoped for gains in the election booth. Time and time again we see these methods don't help Democrats, but they continue to try the same failed policies.Quote:
But now, all the sudden, when everyone starts talking about all these active shooter incidents and proliferation with very little controls of ARs, guys are coming out of the woodwork to talk about inner city shootings.
People choosing to go out in a blaze of "glory" accomplish absolutely nothing. Their actions suck and we all wish they would limit the damage to no more than themselves. Unfortunately, the rest of the reactions are virtue signals that offer little more than making the signaler feel better.
Hokie says waiting time for 18-21. Why only 18-21? Why not for all purchases? What is it impacting if the government (or whatever agency) does some thorough review on each AR purchase?
Does the crazies stop at 21?
Again, the same lethality of weapon has already been banned in most major Democratically controlled cities. No effect!
If you think a waiting period for folks of any age is going to stop school shootings, I don't know what to tell you. As hokie and others have stated, the problems are not with the weapons but with the people.
In order to make substantive change, we have to stop with the virtue signaling and begin to address the core issues.
Disagree on your waiting list -- Steve had told us all the things this kid had just done. A thorough internet and personal investigation should have turned those things up, no? If the media can turn them up in 2 days, surely a paid agency can? And so it would / should have stopped him from having two weapons with which he killed a ton of kids, yes? So how is that virtue signaling?
The kid in Buffalo also bought his AR days after he turned 18. Everyone keeps saying "oh, but there were signs".
So why not investigate him and find that out before selling it to him? Frankly, it seems stupid not to investigate him. If he were trying to join the army, they'd make sure he was fit to make decisions...but we just gonna give him a AR?Quote:
In 2017, the year the GAO audited, there were 112,000 attempts by prohibited persons to buy a firearm that were stopped by the background-check system that's 112,000 federal gun crimes in which the perpetrator signed his name on the form and thereby provided all the evidence needed to convict him. Shockingly, the federal government simply ignored about 100,000 of those cases, investigating only 12,700. To be clear, this isn't a mere paperwork crime we are talking about: According to the GAO, 36 percent of those 112,000 denied firearms were convicted felons, 30 percent were subjects of protective orders, and 16 percent had been convicted of disqualifying domestic-violence misdemeanors. These are the very people who should be our top priorities when it comes to fighting gun crime; in fact, the Department of Justice reports that about 30 percent of those who fail a background check are arrested on another criminal charge within five years.
Here's the really bad part: Out of those 12,700 cases that were taken up for investigation, there were only twelve prosecutions.
If they did, were there no flags raised? If no, isn't that an issue.
Seems like htere are two issues here --- one, how do threats on the internet or membership of hate groups, or whatever other flags reasonable people can agreed upon NOT show up for these two.
And....when flats are found, how do you improve the process to ensure that those people are actually restricted from lawful purchases
(and acknowledging that it is unlikely you stop the after-market sales).