What's the point of you trying to change the subject? Is it because there is much more support for women getting to vote, that you think that should cause us to "by extension" agree with you that women should also have the right to murder their unborn children?Civilized said:GuerrillaPack said:Analogy fail. That's completely different. There is an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution addressing women getting to vote.Civilized said:DrummerboyWolf said:This is correct. It was a wrong ruling in 1973. It was not in the Constitution and should have been sent back to the States then.PackFansXL said:There is a standard process to make changes. What the Court did 49 years ago was ignore our processes and create a law where none existed. That was wrong and has finally been corrected.Glasswolf said:
So since we changed a 50 year old ruling it should be ok to make changes to a 200+ year old document right?
I wonder if same sex marriage will get a redo also. Same thing. It should be left to the States.
Should women's right to vote be a state issue?
There is no Amendment to the Constitution giving Sodomites the "right" to have their fake "marriages".
Why is women's right to vote a federal issue? Why not leave it to the states?
If women's voting was not a Federal issue (with an Amendment), then yes, the states would be involved. But that's not the case. We do have an Amendment, so the argument is moot.
But that's not the case with abortion. There is no federal law or Constitutional Amendment on abortion, so the states should be making the decision.
I guess you want some "evil right wingers" here to say that women's voting rights should be up for debate again, and then you can swoop in with the "moral high ground" and say "I knew you right-wingers hate women!"