SmaptyWolf said:packgrad said:
I love that smapty and civ are Kimmel defenders. Defend the shield, cultists!!!!
Baaaaaa
Not sure I've ever watched an entire Kimmel episode. I'm defending the First Amendment, you know the one about the federal government silencing critics?
Just kidding, you could care less. I'll let you get back to practicing your goose stepping.
SmaptyWolf said:packgrad said:
I love that smapty and civ are Kimmel defenders. Defend the shield, cultists!!!!
Baaaaaa
Not sure I've ever watched an entire Kimmel episode. I'm defending the First Amendment, you know the one about the federal government silencing critics?
Just kidding, you could care less. I'll let you get back to practicing your goose stepping.
The left was thrilled to see a sitting president banned from every social media platform.
— Jeffery Mead (@the_jefferymead) September 18, 2025
But they’re now outraged when Jimmy Kimmel loses his show for lying about a political assassination carried out by someone on the left.
caryking said:GuerrillaPack said:caryking said:GuerrillaPack said:
Charlie Kirk was killed by Israel, because he started to express "anti-Semitic" views.
And now cry babies like you want to ban me for saying the same things Charlie did.
Ironic
GP, I'm a little late to this today…
I really don't see where Charlie Kirk was Anti-Semitic at all. Did he call out concerns with Israel's tactics in Gaza? Yes he did. That, in no way, makes him Anti-Semitic.
i am another person that had concerns with Israel's actions, especially in Iran, and now Qatar. Additionally, I believe Gaza became a cesspool of extremist Muslims; therefore, I get why Israel has done what they've done, generally speaking. I also think, based on my limited knowledge, that the people living in Gaza have had a hard time living recently. What needs to be done? I'm not sure.
My concerns, in now way, makes me Anti-Semitic. Am I Un-American, when I have issues with things the US does? No!
The term "anti-Semitic" is a loaded and subjective smear term, that could mean anything depending on who is using it, and what they mean by it.
My point is that opponents of Kirk could and were labeling many of Kirk's recently expressed views as "antisemitic" - such as him saying that Oct 7th was a stand down and that Israel is "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza", or his statement (paraphrasing) that elite "Jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".
If you would, please find those quotes in video (context as well). I would like to hear how Charlie said those things.
Charlie Kirk suggested Bibi Netanyahu or someone in his government issued a stand-down order on October 7th. pic.twitter.com/fk9BUjDjUU
— The Disruptor💥 (@IWashington) September 14, 2025
Bill Ackman confirms he and Charlie Kirk did in fact have a meeting in BridgeHampton, as Candace stated, discussing the dissenting public opinion of Israel on August 4th and 5th. With 35 Influencer’s who had over 100 million followers
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 16, 2025
This is Charlie Kirk with Megyn Kelly on… https://t.co/Z4iCiMYjEi pic.twitter.com/K0fd8MpD6A
wolf howl said:Civilized said:
Lawdhavemercy. LOLOLOLOLhttps://t.co/coFILBHABk pic.twitter.com/kx5gq6yNy8
— This You? (@Thiss_Youu) September 18, 2025
You're not allowed to openly use cuss words on broadcast tv either, shouldn't that also have your panties in a wad if this does? At some point we need just human decency, everything can't be excused.
Silly Jimmy Kimmel. He should have just called for all homeless people to be killed and he’d still have a job.
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) September 18, 2025
hokiewolf said:Sooooooo….. their ratings have been in decline for years and these shows are incredibly expensive to produce. This is why Colbert is out tooCivilized said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Sooooo...should the consequence of them sucking just be they eventually fall victim their presumably lower ratings?
BREAKING UPDATE: The government pressured ABC — and ABC caved. The timing of ABC's decision, on the heels of the FCC chairman’s pledge to the network to “do this the easy way or the hard way,” tells the whole story. Another media outlet withered under government pressure,…
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) September 17, 2025
hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is declining ratings makes it easier to find excuses out of contracts.Civilized said:hokiewolf said:Sooooooo….. their ratings have been in decline for years and these shows are incredibly expensive to produce. This is why Colbert is out tooCivilized said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Sooooo...should the consequence of them sucking just be they eventually fall victim their presumably lower ratings?
Are we really making believe that this decision was just a company decision based on ratings and not being blackmailed by the federal government?BREAKING UPDATE: The government pressured ABC — and ABC caved. The timing of ABC's decision, on the heels of the FCC chairman’s pledge to the network to “do this the easy way or the hard way,” tells the whole story. Another media outlet withered under government pressure,…
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) September 17, 2025
gold star!packofwolves said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Wouldn't be surprised if Disney/ABC decided to take advantage of the exit ramp that Kimmel provided them.
No, sorry, guys.
— The Reagan Caucus (@NewReaganCaucus) September 18, 2025
Enough with the excuses.
Using the FCC to go after your political opponents is thug behavior and a sane Congress wouldn't put up with it.
Werewolf said:caryking said:GuerrillaPack said:caryking said:GuerrillaPack said:
Charlie Kirk was killed by Israel, because he started to express "anti-Semitic" views.
And now cry babies like you want to ban me for saying the same things Charlie did.
Ironic
GP, I'm a little late to this today…
I really don't see where Charlie Kirk was Anti-Semitic at all. Did he call out concerns with Israel's tactics in Gaza? Yes he did. That, in no way, makes him Anti-Semitic.
i am another person that had concerns with Israel's actions, especially in Iran, and now Qatar. Additionally, I believe Gaza became a cesspool of extremist Muslims; therefore, I get why Israel has done what they've done, generally speaking. I also think, based on my limited knowledge, that the people living in Gaza have had a hard time living recently. What needs to be done? I'm not sure.
My concerns, in now way, makes me Anti-Semitic. Am I Un-American, when I have issues with things the US does? No!
The term "anti-Semitic" is a loaded and subjective smear term, that could mean anything depending on who is using it, and what they mean by it.
My point is that opponents of Kirk could and were labeling many of Kirk's recently expressed views as "antisemitic" - such as him saying that Oct 7th was a stand down and that Israel is "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza", or his statement (paraphrasing) that elite "Jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".
If you would, please find those quotes in video (context as well). I would like to hear how Charlie said those things.Charlie Kirk suggested Bibi Netanyahu or someone in his government issued a stand-down order on October 7th. pic.twitter.com/fk9BUjDjUU
— The Disruptor💥 (@IWashington) September 14, 2025
Civilized said:wolf howl said:Civilized said:
Lawdhavemercy. LOLOLOLOLhttps://t.co/coFILBHABk pic.twitter.com/kx5gq6yNy8
— This You? (@Thiss_Youu) September 18, 2025
You're not allowed to openly use cuss words on broadcast tv either, shouldn't that also have your panties in a wad if this does? At some point we need just human decency, everything can't be excused.Silly Jimmy Kimmel. He should have just called for all homeless people to be killed and he’d still have a job.
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) September 18, 2025
Civilized said:hokiewolf said:Civilized said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Sooooo...should the consequence of them sucking just be they eventually fall victim their presumably lower ratings?
Sooooooo….. their ratings have been in decline for years and these shows are incredibly expensive to produce. This is why Colbert is out too
Are we really making believe that this decision was just a company decision based on ratings and not being blackmailed by the federal government?BREAKING UPDATE: The government pressured ABC — and ABC caved. The timing of ABC's decision, on the heels of the FCC chairman’s pledge to the network to “do this the easy way or the hard way,” tells the whole story. Another media outlet withered under government pressure,…
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) September 17, 2025
packofwolves said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Wouldn't be surprised if Disney/ABC decided to take advantage of the exit ramp that Kimmel provided them.
packgrad said:
Civ rejoiced when his president Trump was banned from social media. Civ was silent when Biden admin was pressuring Facebook and Twitter to silence viewpoints contrary to government positions on Covid. As per usual, Civ is a hypocrite.
Civ is upset that a fellow propagandist that did a horrible job on his late night tv show was silenced. Propaganda before truth. Hitler world be proud.
hokiewolf said:Civilized said:hokiewolf said:Civilized said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Sooooo...should the consequence of them sucking just be they eventually fall victim their presumably lower ratings?
Sooooooo….. their ratings have been in decline for years and these shows are incredibly expensive to produce. This is why Colbert is out too
Are we really making believe that this decision was just a company decision based on ratings and not being blackmailed by the federal government?BREAKING UPDATE: The government pressured ABC — and ABC caved. The timing of ABC's decision, on the heels of the FCC chairman’s pledge to the network to “do this the easy way or the hard way,” tells the whole story. Another media outlet withered under government pressure,…
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) September 17, 2025
not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is declining ratings makes it easier to find excuses out of contracts.
caryking said:Civilized said:hokiewolf said:Civilized said:hokiewolf said:
Since Letterman and Conan left these guys have been awful. No one tunes in to hear your politics, you're supposed to be entertainment
Sooooo...should the consequence of them sucking just be they eventually fall victim their presumably lower ratings?
Sooooooo….. their ratings have been in decline for years and these shows are incredibly expensive to produce. This is why Colbert is out too
Are we really making believe that this decision was just a company decision based on ratings and not being blackmailed by the federal government?BREAKING UPDATE: The government pressured ABC — and ABC caved. The timing of ABC's decision, on the heels of the FCC chairman’s pledge to the network to “do this the easy way or the hard way,” tells the whole story. Another media outlet withered under government pressure,…
— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) September 17, 2025
Perhaps…. That said, point the finger over there, while the person at hand, is committing the act. Very typical of people with your ideology. Civ, you can do better…
Over the last week, the left assassinated one of ours, slandered his name, celebrated his murder, defaced our murals, interrupted our vigils, threatened our events, called for the killings of more of us, then got on a microphone and blamed “rightwing violence” for all of it.
— The Redheaded libertarian (@TRHLofficial) September 18, 2025
jkpackfan said:packgrad said:
Civ rejoiced when his president Trump was banned from social media. Civ was silent when Biden admin was pressuring Twitter to silence viewpoints contrary to government positions on Covid. As per usual, Civ is a hypocrite.
Civ is upset that a fellow propagandist that did a horrible job on his late night tv show was silenced. Propaganda before truth. Hitler world be proud.
Exactly. Cry me a freaking river.
PackFan104 said:
What was the misinformation about the vaccine? I was told if you get the vaccine you won't get Covid. That was not misinformation...that was a blatant lie.
Praise the Lord I am jab free.
Remember when Twitter’s Jack Dorsey banned the President of the United States from the world’s biggest forum during an election?
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 18, 2025
Screw Jimmy Kimmel. pic.twitter.com/H6iNpenWo6
Leftists are MELTING DOWN over Disney/ABC pulling Jimmy Kimmel, saying it’s a “violation of free speech”…
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 18, 2025
But they were RADIO SILENT when Disney FIRED @ginacarano for speaking out against COVID mandates
They can ALL shut the hell up. pic.twitter.com/eyiVpc9iid
Civilized said:jkpackfan said:packgrad said:
Civ rejoiced when his president Trump was banned from social media. Civ was silent when Biden admin was pressuring Twitter to silence viewpoints contrary to government positions on Covid. As per usual, Civ is a hypocrite.
Civ is upset that a fellow propagandist that did a horrible job on his late night tv show was silenced. Propaganda before truth. Hitler world be proud.
Exactly. Cry me a freaking river.
You agree that an administration asking a social media platform to better limit clear misinformation about vaccine safety in the midst of a global pandemic that was killing millions is a little different than an administration squelching speech that, in the worst possible light, was simply speech that was critical of their political party conduct?
Did the Biden Administration letter(s) threaten Facebook?
Where they coercive?
Would the Biden administration legally have been able to remove Facebook from the Internet?
Most importantly, you're aware that case has already been adjudicated by the Supreme Court, which found insufficient evidence of harm to Facebook, right?
Burn in hell, Sinclair.
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) September 18, 2025
Alongside Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/VjRfmUKXXK
Civilized said:jkpackfan said:packgrad said:
Civ rejoiced when his president Trump was banned from social media. Civ was silent when Biden admin was pressuring Twitter to silence viewpoints contrary to government positions on Covid. As per usual, Civ is a hypocrite.
Civ is upset that a fellow propagandist that did a horrible job on his late night tv show was silenced. Propaganda before truth. Hitler world be proud.
Exactly. Cry me a freaking river.
You agree that an administration asking a social media platform to better limit clear misinformation about vaccine safety in the midst of a global pandemic that was killing millions is a little different than an administration squelching speech that, in the worst possible light, was simply speech that was critical of their political party conduct?
Did the Biden Administration letter(s) threaten Facebook?
Where they coercive?
Would the Biden administration legally have been able to remove Facebook from the Internet?
Most importantly, you're aware that case has already been adjudicated by the Supreme Court, which found insufficient evidence of harm to Facebook, right?
Werewolf said:BREAKING
— Lee Golden (@LeeGolden6) September 16, 2025
According to multiple reports, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA $150 million in cash to adopt an even more ardently pro-israel stance.
Kirk refused the money.
Now israel is using his death to promote israel!
Does it make sense now! pic.twitter.com/t15ktVsKrG
Oldsouljer said:Werewolf said:BREAKING
— Lee Golden (@LeeGolden6) September 16, 2025
According to multiple reports, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA $150 million in cash to adopt an even more ardently pro-israel stance.
Kirk refused the money.
Now israel is using his death to promote israel!
Does it make sense now! pic.twitter.com/t15ktVsKrG
"Does it make sense now!"
Not in the least.
