Charlie Kirk shot

29,348 Views | 817 Replies | Last: 16 min ago by Werewolf
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure Stormy and Turkey would want Charlie Kirk banned and censored from the entire internet for this tweet, among many other statement by Kirk (critical of Israel and jews, etc)...

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
seapineswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

TheStorm said:

It will be a glorious day when I no longer have to see the tripe he posts here regularly... let's just keep giving him more rope.

Believe me. It's coming...

I haven't even received a warning for posting anything that is against board rules.

But here you are Nostradamus "predicting" that I will be banned from the board, per your cowardly wet dream fantasy to silence those you disagree with.

For WHAT? I have violated no rules whatsoever. As I understand, the latest updated board rules (that I've seen) were posted by Steve, and the major thing that was prohibited was personal attacks against other users. There was no mention whatsoever about "hate speech" or any groups that were "beyond criticism".

You cannot ban people from the forum when they haven't violated any rules. Name the rule I have violated. You can't.


I agree with this poster here. I have read the rules and there is nothing specifically against Anti Semitic or other types of terrible speech (not to mention off the wall crazy talk) against the board rules, so carry on!
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This was posted on Twitter over a month ago on August 13th by Harrison Smith, one of the reporters working for Alex Jones' Infowars.

This is one of the few people (maybe only) who spoke out publicly prior to Kirk's assassination claiming that sources close to Charlie Kirk said that Charlie feared Israel might kill him.

Given this, wouldn't it at least be POSSIBLE that Israel could be responsible for his assassination?

Seems like standard investigative and detective procedure. If I worked as a homicide detective and was investigating a murder and knew about the victim fearing for his life from a certain individual/group, then they would be a prime suspect.

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:




If democrats didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

TheStorm said:

packofwolves said:

seapineswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

seapineswolf said:

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

I never said what poster I was referring to...


I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.



Fascist!!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

packgrad said:




If democrats didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all

The sitting president was de-platformed because he had just incited a mob to attack the Capitol, and for a brief time before the "up is down" machine kicked in even Republicans were horrified by it.

Meanwhile Kimmel said something that hurt MAGA's fee fees.

Totally the same!
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

TheStorm said:

packofwolves said:

seapineswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

seapineswolf said:

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

I never said what poster I was referring to...


I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.



Fascist!!

Yes you are!

Hey cool! Trump just announced that he'd like to shut down any network that is "against him". That's your boy!

Have you gotten your goose stepping reps in today?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

hokiewolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

Well....we officially can't talk about Charlie Kirk.

Because the special snowflake Leftist brigade put out orders to whine and cry to censor their ideological opponents.

According to those close to Charlie Kirk, he was afraid that Israel might kill him. And now Tucker and Candace are reporting it.

And this has MASSIVELY TRIGGERED the special snowflakes.

So they've freaked out. Anyone telling the truth about Israel must be silenced forever.

That about right?

You are welcome to continue to show yourself as the antisemite you are until the folks who own this site decide it is hurting their revenue stream.

Oh, so anyone critical of Israel is "hurting the revenue stream"? Where is the evidence for that? There is NONE.

I see that Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube are doing just fine financially by allowing freedom of speech, including *gasp the horror* criticism of Israel and the pro-Israel lobby.

A terrible way to run a message board is to engage in censorship, as PackPride has done. When you censor a large segment of your user/customer base, you alienate them and they will quit the site. This is what has happened to PackPride, and they are hurting financially in large part because they engaged in such a pro-Leftist leaning censorship.

The best business strategy, by far, is to allow MAXIMUM levels of freedom of speech. That encourages and allows the MOST people to enjoy and use the site, and creates a lively debate, and more discussion and activity on the site.

So, turkey, you are once again dead wrong again.

GP, I think the point is the same as Jimmy Kimmel getting pulled. Listen, you certainly have the right to speak; however, the site owners can pull you from the site, if they feel your content isn't good for their business.

Now, I have no idea whether your content is hurtful, or not…. So, free speech isn't a pass for everything. Yes, the government can't make laws to prohibit your speech; however, your speech can have consequences, with business, other people (ignoring you), and/or someone just cussing you out…

So, my suggestion is to recognize that people find things you're saying as offensive and ask questions and allow people to tell you explicitly what is offensive.

Im not saying you should accept people saying you're antisemitic; rather, have people explain in detail what you've said and why they believe it is. You may or may not agree.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

packgrad said:




If democrats didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all

Listen, the left set the rules of engagement; so, we just play by them. Honestly, based on how people are responding to the Jimmy Kimmel deal, this will never be resolved until some self-reflection is experienced (by the left that is)
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

packgrad said:




If democrats didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all

The sitting president was de-platformed because he had just incited a mob to attack the Capitol, and for a brief time before the "up is down" machine kicked in even Republicans were horrified by it.

Meanwhile Kimmel said something that hurt MAGA's fee fees.

Totally the same!

False!! Yet, another lie by the left!!

liberals are the real fascist in this world. Remember, whatever they are saying, they are doing…
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

TheStorm said:

packofwolves said:

seapineswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

seapineswolf said:

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

I never said what poster I was referring to...


I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.



Fascist!!

Yes you are!

Hey cool! Trump just announced that he'd like to shut down any network that is "against him". That's your boy!

Have you gotten your goose stepping reps in today?

Fascist!!
flylike44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watching liberals decry "cancel culture" has been hilarious.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Nappy might stroke out here and we won't be able to watch. Hey #Nappy, there's a new mRNA jab out that prevents strokes.....like the Covid mRNA, it does wonders .....

Yet, _again, you're the smartest dude here at the WC!

SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

SmaptyWolf said:

TheStorm said:

packofwolves said:

seapineswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

seapineswolf said:

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

I never said what poster I was referring to...


I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.



Fascist!!

Yes you are!

Hey cool! Trump just announced that he'd like to shut down any network that is "against him". That's your boy!

Have you gotten your goose stepping reps in today?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.