Charlie Kirk shot

48,875 Views | 1094 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by GuerrillaPack
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

https://www.foxnews.com/us/unc-professor-placed-leave-after-far-left-redneck-revolt-gun-club-membership-exposed

Just normal college professors doing normal college professor things again...


I remember seeing him at the Durham protest with his AR.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Sorry GP, Charlie didn't believe the jews were at fault for everything.



I think we can be weary of Netanyahu and not blame Jews for everything (or atleast a lot). I have been very supportive of Netanyahu for a long time; however, right now, I'm not sure I can see what his goal is.

i get he wants and says he want peace in the Middle East. That said, his actions (Qatar bombing) make me say, what? Now, I'm not in favor of a two state solution. Why? Because the original green line and the subsequent war that changed the lines in 1967, is so vague, that I'm not even sure what's, what…. I guess I need to research more to see what happened and why to establish a real position.

The bombing of Qatar was the right move because he is solving a problem, much like Iran for the other Arab states. Improving relationships with the Arab States that aren't rogue actors is the key to peace.

A two state solution will never work unless Hamas is destroyed.


This isn't a criticism of the desire to end Hamas but has any terrorist org ever been defeated militarily?
Has it ever been tried without some bs peace treaty that gets ignored?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

Sorry GP, Charlie didn't believe the jews were at fault for everything.



I think we can be weary of Netanyahu and not blame Jews for everything (or atleast a lot). I have been very supportive of Netanyahu for a long time; however, right now, I'm not sure I can see what his goal is.

i get he wants and says he want peace in the Middle East. That said, his actions (Qatar bombing) make me say, what? Now, I'm not in favor of a two state solution. Why? Because the original green line and the subsequent war that changed the lines in 1967, is so vague, that I'm not even sure what's, what…. I guess I need to research more to see what happened and why to establish a real position.

The bombing of Qatar was the right move because he is solving a problem, much like Iran for the other Arab states. Improving relationships with the Arab States that aren't rogue actors is the key to peace.

A two state solution will never work unless Hamas is destroyed.


This isn't a criticism of the desire to end Hamas but has any terrorist org ever been defeated militarily?

Has it ever been tried without some bs peace treaty that gets ignored?


Yeah I don't know. I think this is what makes the terrorist nut such a tough one to crack.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's not my point...

Netanyahu needs the US support to do some of these initiatives. If not, we wouldn't have bombed Iran. He bombed Qatar, without notifying the US and had to apologize for his actions.

Now, I with Civ on this one... I don't believe a terrorist organization will ever completely go away. If that is possibly true, a two-state solution can never be achieved.

So, what is the end game?
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Candace with an extremely good point here....

Why is she about the only prominent "friend" of Charlie Kirk that is questioning the "official" story that is so obviously completely bogus?

Why is TPUSA going along with the fraudulent official story? Has his wife Erika questioned the official story?

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe someone else here has already mentioned this here, but I haven't seen it discussed here yet...

Does anyone else find the behavior of Charlie's wife, Erika Kirk, a little "odd" since his death? Within the last week, but especially over the last few days, I'm seeing tons of people talking about this on social media.

She appeared on a TPUSA show a few days ago, and had a huge smile on her face and seemed extremely happy and upbeat during it. Now, I get that it had been about two weeks since his death, and people grieve differently. And some people might just behave that way publicly in order to put on a "strong persona", and primarily show more grief in private. And in the other speeches she gave, such as the one a few days after his death and at the memorial, she just came across to me as a little fake, as if she was acting, and not genuinely upset.

And we don't see her saying anything about the totally bogus official story, that has more holes than Swiss cheese?

And, of course, we have TPUSA and Trump's FBI (who ostensibly should be close to Kirk, a huge Trump ally) going along with the Robinson patsy story, covering all of this up.

This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

That's not my point...

Netanyahu needs the US support to do some of these initiatives. If not, we wouldn't have bombed Iran. He bombed Qatar, without notifying the US and had to apologize for his actions.

Now, I with Civ on this one... I don't believe a terrorist organization will ever completely go away. If that is possibly true, a two-state solution can never be achieved.

So, what is the end game?
The US was fully aware what the Israelis were doing.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

That's not my point...

Netanyahu needs the US support to do some of these initiatives. If not, we wouldn't have bombed Iran. He bombed Qatar, without notifying the US and had to apologize for his actions.

Now, I with Civ on this one... I don't believe a terrorist organization will ever completely go away. If that is possibly true, a two-state solution can never be achieved.

So, what is the end game?

The US was fully aware what the Israelis were doing.

Agreed, I don't buy that we didn't know about it.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Candace with an extremely good point here....

Why is she about the only prominent "friend" of Charlie Kirk that is questioning the "official" story that is so obviously completely bogus?

Why is TPUSA going along with the fraudulent official story? Has his wife Erika questioned the official story?



I don't believe a single word coming out of her mouth and I used to be a fan. She's completely lost it.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jkpackfan said:

I don't believe a single word coming out of her mouth and I used to be a fan. She's completely lost it.

Why?

I see it as the compete opposite. Anyone who actually believes the "official" story that Tyler Robinson did this are the ones who are insane. Who actually believes that those alleged texts to his furry boyfriend are real? Who actually believes that a 30-06 hit Kirk's neck, and had no exit wound? Who actually believes that Robinson disassembled, reassembled, then disassembled, and then reassembled the rifle again only to leave it in the woods.

But Candace has "lost it" because she doesn't believe that bogus story?

TPUSA, the FBI, and anyone else going along with this phony official story are the ones who have lost their minds.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.