As I've been watching YouTube and Instagram videos with analysis, I've seen shorter clips of this video spread around and seen comments recommending this video as the best analysis of the ballistics of the shot.
He shows and analyzes footage from multiple cameras of the shot, and demonstrates and concludes that the shot came from Kirk's right side, likely entering around the area of his right ear or lower jaw or neck, and the visible wound on the left side of Kirk's neck (where blood gushed out) is the exit wound. He says that a 30-06 was not what hit Kirk, but rather a smaller caliber, as a 30-06 round (which is used to hunt very big game like elk or moose) would cause much more damage to Kirk's head and neck than what was seen, with a much larger diameter exit wound and spraying out blood and tissue upon exit. Also, a 30-06 is extremely loud audibly when fired, much louder that what is heard that hit Kirk, which sounds like a much smaller caliber and possibly even with a suppressor on the gun.
Also, he shows how Kirk's shirt "flutters" at impact of the bullet due to his earpiece (with a wire going from his ear around his neck and down over his chest inside his shirt) flying off his head and pulling the wire.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Reporter at the Charlie Kirk memorial today in Arizona says he talked to many of the people attending, and NO ONE believes the official story that Robinson is the shooter.
Steve Bannon then chimes in and says "Zero percent" of his audience on his show believes the official story.
KENNEDY: Spoke with folks in line and no one believed the shooter they got, did it.
BANNON: The WarRoom Posse is 0%. My big fear was it would be a lone gunman in Utah and police, everybody would want to shut it down. The FBI officially expanded the investigation bc you have to. pic.twitter.com/SQmrhYM9LN