With Candace just saying yesterday that three separate people close to Charlie Kirk have contacted her claiming that Charlie told them on the very day before he was killed that "I think they are going to kill me", I think it is extremely important to re-post this tweet by Alex Jones' Infowars reporter Harrison Smith, that was posted on August 13, 2025 about a month before Charlie's death.

I’m not gonna name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them. https://t.co/X7xoY5kIuV

— Harrison H. Smith ✞ (@HarrisonHSmith) August 13, 2025

wolf howl said:

---

Well those text messages surely do not tamper down the conspiracy theory side of his murder. There's absolutely more going on then meets the eye IMO.

---

Moreover, I call BS on the whole premise. For him to reject Israel would be for him to reject specific doctrines within holy scripture, and I don't see that he ever did that. People not of CK's faith simply don't understand the nature of his faith, or they wouldn't spin these fantastic conjectures. For people like CK, it's Israel, right or wrong.

Oldsouljer said:

---

wolf howl said:

---

Well those text messages surely do not tamper down the conspiracy theory side of his murder. There's absolutely more going on then meets the eye IMO.

---

Moreover, I call BS on the whole premise. For him to reject Israel would be for him to reject specific doctrines within holy scripture, and I don't see that he ever did that. People not of CK's faith simply don't understand the nature of his faith, or they wouldn't spin these fantastic conjectures. For people like CK, it's Israel, right or wrong.

---

The critical error people are making is in regard to who the so-called "jews" really are. They are NOT the true biological descendants of the Israelites.

I saw a map the other day showing the shooter's movements before / after the shooting, and unfortunately the common sense approach was dead on, just like I said it was, but one of the resident conspiracy nutjobs shouted out otherwise.

Idiots got to idiot... you know?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

wolf howl said:

---

Well those text messages surely do not tamper down the conspiracy theory side of his murder. There's absolutely more going on then meets the eye IMO.

---

Moreover, I call BS on the whole premise. For him to reject Israel would be for him to reject specific doctrines within holy scripture, and I don't see that he ever did that. People not of CK's faith simply don't understand the nature of his faith, or they wouldn't spin these fantastic conjectures. For people like CK, it's Israel, right or wrong.

---

The critical error people are making is in regard to who the so-called "jews" really are. They are NOT the true biological descendants of the Israelites.

---

So we should treat them as subhuman? I can get on board with that! /s

TheStorm said:

---

I saw a map the other day showing the shooter's movements before / after the shooting, and unfortunately the common sense approach was dead on, just like I said it was, but one of the resident conspiracy nutjobs shouted out otherwise.

Idiots got to idiot... you know?

---

Ad hominem smear tactics. Not a valid argument. If the evidence actually supported your view, you wouldn't need to engage in childish name-calling as your only "argument".

The "official" story with patsy Robinson is absolutely laughable - the obviously bogus text messages allegedly between Robinson and his tr@nny boyfriend, the claim of a 30-06 as the murder weapon that does not have an exit wound and Charlie's "neck of steel" stopping the round, the claim of Robinson disassembling and reassembling the rifle two times and then only to leave it in the woods, etc.

Sorry man. I only see your posts anymore if they get quoted...

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

wolf howl said:

---

Well those text messages surely do not tamper down the conspiracy theory side of his murder. There's absolutely more going on then meets the eye IMO.

---

Moreover, I call BS on the whole premise. For him to reject Israel would be for him to reject specific doctrines within holy scripture, and I don't see that he ever did that. People not of CK's faith simply don't understand the nature of his faith, or they wouldn't spin these fantastic conjectures. For people like CK, it's Israel, right or wrong.

---

The critical error people are making is in regard to who the so-called "jews" really are. They are NOT the true biological descendants of the Israelites.

---

So we should treat them as subhuman? I can get on board with that! /s

---

Complete strawman argument. I never said that, and no serious critics of Israel out there (Candace, Tucker, etc) are saying that. You are shooting down a fake argument.

The people calling themselves "jews" are actually descended from Esau (Edomites), Canaanites, and the Khazars. They descend from the Pharisees of the time of the Messiah ~2,000 years ago, who were Edomites (aka "Idumeans") who were converts to Judaism.

For example, look up King Herod the Great (the king of Israel at the time of the Messiah) on Wikipedia. It admits that he was not an ethnic Israelite, but was rather and Edomite (descendant of Esau) and a Nabatean Arab. There were multiple ethnic groups in the land of Israel at that time...including a remnant of true Israelites (including the Messiah and his 12 apostles), and these Edomites.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_the_Great
[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_the_Great][/url]

Quote:

---

Herod was born around 72 BCE[11][12] in Idumea, south of Judea. He was the second son of Antipater the Idumaean, a high-ranking official under ethnarch Hyrcanus II, and Cypros, a Nabatean Arab princess from Petra, in present-day Jordan. Herod's father was by descent an Edomite; his ancestors had been forcibly converted to Judaism.

---

TheStorm said:

---

I saw a map the other day showing the shooter's movements before / after the shooting, and unfortunately the common sense approach was dead on, just like I said it was, but one of the resident conspiracy nutjobs shouted out otherwise.

Idiots got to idiot... you know?

---

Yep, the resident nutjobs you screamed about warning you about the jabs. Resident nut jobs probably don't have spike proteins crossing in their blood brain barrier along with the dozens of other risks associated with the wonder-jab you soaked up....like a stooge.

But hey, you've made progress.....you're glad Trump won....recall u said he couldn't? You see the Deep State being disassembled .....exactly as I said it would be.

Michelle's a woman too, right?

Joe Biden's identity will be disclosed at some point too.
#Devoltion, #Boomerang, #TheStorm .....#TrustThePlan, #Q

All your standing in the crowd and throwing rocks from the security of the crowd has done nothing for you except give you a ****ing shot that may cut your life short and certainly shorten your life, wise guy!

Jews are Jews, you're splitting hairs because it serves your ridiculous narratives and conspiracy theories.

It's the Jews fault for not being "real Jews". Incredible

TheStorm said:

---

Sorry man. I only see your posts anymore if they get quoted...

---

my bad Storm.

hokiewolf said:

---

So we should treat them as subhuman? I can get on board with that! /s

---

This is the kind of crap fake "arguments" that crybabies like you use to whine and cry for me to be censored, with your constant whining for anyone who criticizes jews or the nation of Israel to be banned and censored.

You totally smear me with the ridiculous lie that I am saying that jews are "subhuman", and then hope that others believe that I ever actually said something like that.

hokiewolf said:

---

Jews are Jews, you're splitting hairs because it serves your ridiculous narratives and conspiracy theories.

It's the Jews fault for not being "real Jews". Incredible

---

No. It's absolutely not "splitting hairs" at all. It's a fundamental distinction. The people calling themselves "jews" today (and since the time of the Messiah) are not the actual biological and racial descendants of the Israelites. They are imposters, who actually descend from Esau (who married Canaanites) a Turkish people called the Khazars, who lived in the area of modern day Ukraine and converted to Judaism around the 8th century AD.

Also, the religion called "Judaism" is not the religion of the Old Testament Israelites. It is a gross perversion of it, bringing a ton of occult and pagan doctrines, many of which the Israelites picked up while in captivity in Babylon. Modern-day "Judaism" is the same religion of the Pharisees of the New Testament. And the Messiah himself strongly condemned the Pharisees and their religion, saying that they religion created "children of hell" (Matthew 23:15). And this, of course, is why it was the Pharisees who sought to murder the Messiah and ended up getting the Romans to kill him. They murdered him because he so strongly condemned them and their religion.

The most "holy" and authoritative book in the religion now called "Judaism" is not the Old Testament, but rather the "Babylonian Talmud", a collection of writings of rabbis over the centuries.

This distinction about who the "jews" actually are is one of the most important facts in history, that explains what is going on in the world today, and why.

Are Catholics Christians?

hokiewolf said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Sorry man. I only see your posts anymore if they get quoted...

---

my bad Storm.

---

Nah, it's fine... but I do have to admit that I love it whenever I open a thread and all I see is a list of three names stacked up one after another.

hokiewolf said:

---

Are Catholics Christians?

---

The Old Testament says that the chosen people of God are the twelve tribes of Israel, who descend from the 12 sons of Jacob (who was re-named "Israel"). The Old Testament never says that the chosen people are "jews".

The term "jews" originates from a term used to describe people who lived in the land of Judea...around the time of the Messiah. And the term "Judea" originates from only one of those twelves tribes/sons of Israel, Judah.

There were multiple ethnic groups of people living in the land of Judea at the time of the Messiah. Not just a remnant of Israelites...but also Edomites, Canaanites, Arabs, and others. I just cited the example of the Herodians (see Wikipedia link above), who were not racial Israelites, but rather descendants of Esau (Edomites) and Arabs. And if they very king of the land of Judea at that time was a non-Israelite, then what do you think that says about the majority of the population in the land at that time? The majority of those in the land of Judea at the time of the Messiah were not even ethnic Israelites. Most of the Pharisees were ethnic kinsmen of the Herodians, these non-Israelite descendants of Esau and Canaanites (the Edomites).

Most of the Israelites never returned to Palestine after being taken into captivity by the Assyrians (around 700 BC) and into Babylon (around 500 BC). Only a small remnant of Israelites returned to Palestine/Judea after the Babylonian captivity. The vast majority of Israelites migrated elsewhere in the world, and came to be known as the "lost tribes of Israel" . Over the centuries after their captivity, they primarily migrated north and west, over the Caucasus Mountain range and into Europe. This is why the European peoples are called "Caucasians", because they came from the Mid East and over the Caucasus Mountains.

The true biological descendants of the Israelites are actually the European peoples - specifically the Germanic, Anglo-Saxon peoples. Over the centuries, they "lost" and forget their ancestry and that they descended from the Israelites. But they "naturally" adopted the TRUE religion of the Old Testament, and the continuation of that true religion, in the message from the Messiah. They were receptive to that religion because they are the true descendants of the Israelites.

jkpackfan said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

I saw a map the other day showing the shooter's movements before / after the shooting, and unfortunately the common sense approach was dead on, just like I said it was, but one of the resident conspiracy nutjobs shouted out otherwise.

Idiots got to idiot... you know?

---

I'm hearing Bibi himself fired the shot.

---

So just believe the blatantly absurd "official" story with patsy Robinson, and ignore all the real evidence about who was pressuring Kirk just before his death and who Charlie himself said he thought might kill him.

Charlie Kirk himself said that he feared that Israel and the "pro-Israel lobby" were going to kill him. This is all now being proven, with testimony from those close to Kirk. Candace and others are producing the documented evidence proving that Kirk said has going to "leave the pro-Israel cause" (eg, text messages from Kirk that even TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet admit are authentic). And we have heard from Kirk himself and from numerous friends and witnesses close to Kirk about how much pressure and "bullying" he was facing from his pro-Israel donors.

The official story on Robinson killing Kirk with a 30-06 and no exit wound and Charlie's "neck of steel" miraculously stopping the bullet, and all the other preposterous nonsense in the official narrative...THAT is what is truly insane.

That didn't answer the question I asked. Are Catholics Christians?

hokiewolf said:

---

That didn't answer the question I asked. Are Catholics Christians?

---

You think I care about your questions? lol

I mean you do have to admit there's an awful lot of evidence saying there's more to it...

The meeting with Ackerman ahead of time where he was pressured on his stance to be more pro-Israel.

The text messages saying he's losing donors and isn't going to be bullied by Israel.

The text messages saying he felt he was going to be killed by Israel mere hours before he was killed.

All text messages have been verified as true so it's not a matter of did he actually say that, it's more a matter of why he felt so strongly that was the case to say it out loud to those close to him. There was certainly smoke.

It's also very obvious he was not shot by that weapon when there's no exit wound. We can all agree it's bs to say his bones were made of titanium and somehow stopped a bullet from a gun that normally will rip through any bone/soft tissue with zero issue?

Also 100% complete non-sense to say this kid disassembled and reassembled this gun multiple times while being hunted by police. I'm sure there's people out there that believe he could do that but anyone with firearm knowledge understands how difficult that is to do quickly under the BEST circumstances much less in that circumstance.

We'll never know what actually happened IMO.

hokiewolf said:

---

That didn't answer the question I asked. Are Catholics Christians?

---

You are practically irrelevant to me. You are a joke. I will respond to some of your drivel, and in the manner I want to.

hokiewolf said:

---

That didn't answer the question I asked. Are Catholics Christians?

---

I think anyone who has accepted Jesus as their savior is a Christian. Catholics are part of a denomination of Christians, no different than evangelical denominations. Now, each denomination has some level of requirement, doctrines, etc.. that makes it part of your Christianity.

I believe that one's acceptance of Jesus, for who he was, is the determining factor. Now, I have no idea whether a person is a Christian; rather, I can form opinions based on their fruit. That said, only a persons heart and personal relationship with God dictates whether they are a Christian.

So, to ask a question as broad as: are Catholics Christians puts an individual's relationship with God through an organization and takes it away from the individual. So, for me, a better question would be: are their Christians in the Catholic Church? The answer is: most likely. BTW, that same question can be asked for any denomination and get the same answer.

I'll ask.. why do you ask that question?

You're a normal person, of course you believe it.

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

That didn't answer the question I asked. Are Catholics Christians?

---

I think anyone who has accepted Jesus as their savior is a Christian. Catholics are part of a denomination of Christians, no different than evangelical denominations. Now, each denomination has some level of requirement, doctrines, etc.. that makes it part of your Christianity.

I believe that one's acceptance of Jesus, for who he was, is the determining factor. Now, I have no idea whether a person is a Christian; rather, I can form opinions based on their fruit. That said, only a persons heart and personal relationship with God dictates whether they are a Christian.

So, to ask a question as broad as: are Catholics Christians puts an individual's relationship with God through an organization and takes it away from the individual. So, for me, a better question would be: are their Christians in the Catholic Church? The answer is: most likely. BTW, that same question can be asked for any denomination and get the same answer.

I'll ask.. why do you ask that question?

---

Well thought out.

New statements from Tucker Carlson on the Charlie Kirk assassination. Tucker is "guarded" with his words here, but essentially you can tell that he does not buy the official story on Tyler Robinson. And he outright states that he has no confidence in the FBI as institution or that they will do an real, honest investigation into Kirk's assassination.

Who Killed Charlie Kirk?

“I spoke to Erika… don’t want to make it worse — but If it turns out the FBI did not do an adequate investigation, people should go BONKERS and absolutely Demand it! They risk further fracturing the United States

I want to trust the FBI.. who’s in… https://t.co/BCIN4cXyjv pic.twitter.com/c5OQnCZC4s

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) October 10, 2025

Quote:

---

Who Killed Charlie Kirk?

"I spoke to Erika… don't want to make it worse but If it turns out the FBI did not do an adequate investigation, people should go BONKERS and absolutely Demand it! They risk further fracturing the United States

I want to trust the FBI.. who's in there, but I'm under no obligation to considering all they've done."

- they have a guy in custody
- the story is a little weird
- No videos where there should be
- who the hell is George Zinn?

---

Is the FBI in cahoots with real Jews or fake Jews? Maybe a little bit of both?

hokiewolf said:

---

Is the FBI in cahoots with real Jews or fake Jews? Maybe a little bit of both?

---

Some of us want to find out who actually killed Charlie Kirk.

Others, like you, have a fetish to defend the "poor jews" at all cost...and then whine like a baby and b1tch and moan for people to be censored from the internet if they dare criticize them.

It seems that you worship jews. Is that your religion? What is this religion you are involved in, where you worship jews? How does one join this religion of yours?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Is the FBI in cahoots with real Jews or fake Jews? Maybe a little bit of both?

---

Some of us want to find out who actually killed Charlie Kirk.

Others, like you, have a fetish to defend the "poor jews" at all cost...and then whine like a baby and b1tch and moan for people to be censored from the internet if they dare criticize them.

It seems that you worship jews. Is that your religion? What is this religion you are involved in, where you worship jews? How does one join this religion of yours?

---

GP, there really may be more to the story, I don't know. I think it would be interesting to hear your thoughts on what information you could receive to put to bed that things happened according to the current narrative?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Is the FBI in cahoots with real Jews or fake Jews? Maybe a little bit of both?

---

Some of us want to find out who actually killed Charlie Kirk.

Others, like you, have a fetish to defend the "poor jews" at all cost...and then whine like a baby and b1tch and moan for people to be censored from the internet if they dare criticize them.

It seems that you worship jews. Is that your religion? What is this religion you are involved in, where you worship jews? How does one join this religion of yours?

---

No one worships Jews, a lot of us just don't think they're always responsible for the world's ills. They make up .2% of the world's population but we're supposed to believe they have such control over the rest of the world?

jkpackfan said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Is the FBI in cahoots with real Jews or fake Jews? Maybe a little bit of both?

---

Some of us want to find out who actually killed Charlie Kirk.

Others, like you, have a fetish to defend the "poor jews" at all cost...and then whine like a baby and b1tch and moan for people to be censored from the internet if they dare criticize them.

It seems that you worship jews. Is that your religion? What is this religion you are involved in, where you worship jews? How does one join this religion of yours?

---

No one worships Jews, a lot of us just don't think they're always responsible for the world's ills. They make up .2% of the world's population but we're supposed to believe they have such control over the rest of the world?

---

People like me are not just "out of the random blue sky" deciding to blame Jews, or because of some "irrational" bias against Jews. It's because of the reality of the world we live in, the facts, the evidence. Jewish elites actually do have a LOT of power in our society, as anyone who is paying close attention to world events knows.

So, for example, on this Charlie Kirk assassination, take a minute to actually examine the facts of the situation. Charlie himself said (according to someone close to Charlie, per the tweet made by Harrison Smith of InfoWars a month before Kirk's death, that I re-posted above at the top of this page of the thread) that he "feared Israel would kill him if he turned against them". And then you have at least three other people close to Charlie saying that he told them the very day before he was assassinated that "I think they are going to kill me". And who was the "they" he was referring to? We have Charlie himself on video saying (in interview with Megyn Kelly shortly before his death) that his pro-Israel donors were "bullying" and putting intense pressure on him. And we have multiple other sources and people close to Charlie confirming that his pro-Israel donors were pressuring and bullying him in the very last weeks and days of his life, and that Charlie feared for his safety due to this.

And then look at how the "official" story is a complete farce, with Tyler Robinson looking like an obvious framed patsy…and the FBI and government engaged in a coverup and therefore being complicit in his murder. This all clearly points to some other very powerful group or individuals being the ones who were responsible for killing Kirk.

And it's not just me, little ol GuerillaPack, who has this view on who really killed Charlie Kirk. If you even casually look on social media, you will see that there is a HUGE portion of the population with these views - not buying the official story, and who believe that Israel or powerful pro-Israel interests were the ones who killed Charlie..

jkpackfan said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Is the FBI in cahoots with real Jews or fake Jews? Maybe a little bit of both?

---

Some of us want to find out who actually killed Charlie Kirk.

Others, like you, have a fetish to defend the "poor jews" at all cost...and then whine like a baby and b1tch and moan for people to be censored from the internet if they dare criticize them.

It seems that you worship jews. Is that your religion? What is this religion you are involved in, where you worship jews? How does one join this religion of yours?

---

No one worships Jews, a lot of us just don't think they're always responsible for the world's ills. They make up .2% of the world's population but we're supposed to believe they have such control over the rest of the world?

---

For sure. If Jews are a threat, they rank pretty small compared to other groups in this world.

The Charlie Kirk assassination story is even more ridiculous than the JFK assassination story

There is no death certificate no ballistics report there were no crime scene investigation no paramedics no police swarming in.
Just alot of B.S. that ain't adding up. pic.twitter.com/tswOi4hWMw

— mrredpillz jokaqarmy (@JOKAQARMY1) October 12, 2025

Kash Patel gave an interview to Just the News and said that more charges will come in the Kirk case if the evidence warrants it. Let the FBI do it's job and see what they find.

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/fbi-director-kash-patel-says-more-charges-could-come-kirk-case-if-evidence?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost



"Patel said, though, that a restless public that wants more information about what happened that day will have to wait for the court process to play out, noting that if the FBI were to publish any of the evidence it has collected, it could undermine the prosecution.

The director vowed that the FBI would provide "every piece of evidence" that it collects to the prosecutors in Utah as they try Robinson's case.

"I think the best thing we can do for Charlie, especially me as FBI director and our team, is to prosecute this case in the courts of law, where it is, in Utah, in the state in a court of law," Patel said.

"And what we're going to do is what we've done, give them every piece of evidence we collect. Our cellular analysis systems are the best in the world, and that's what the FBI does, and that's what we flew in and did. That's how we led the manhunt and got him in 33 short hoursand every single piece of video or forensic evidence or witness interview," the director explained. "We've done dozens and dozens, gone on these platforms, found every single person, all of that material."