Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech.

And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment.

Keep America free.

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 3, 2024

I have recently posted I am very much opposed to banning any form of speech by the GOVT. Not sure what I think about any institution receiving GOVT funding but I think that would also be included. The flag burning I've witnessed in years past has been by one side as a mechanism of protest and of course I have strong opinions on that crowd (the #Sieve and #Nappy crowd).....but it is dangerous to ban any form of free expression outside of the "yelling fire in the crowded theatre". Very carefully thought out, the inciting a riot angle could be possible but then we get into interpretation and the slippery slope aspects of it........I DO NOT in any way support any of the rhetoric out of Pam Bondi on this topic. The antisemitic smear has long been used as a tool to silence those that question some of the state of Israel tactics. I would hope that GP could express himself differently in his views on the state of Israel, however, Charlie Kirk expressed his concerns over Gaza and his concerns over Oct 17th....could that be why he was silenced? Or might it have been the influence he'd gained with our youth relative to free speech and biblical views.

A young man that's on my staff is a Colorado kid who graduated from Iowa State with similar views to my own (Yes, conspiracy too) and he has shared with me the pressures, disapproval and silencing that he and his many likeminded classmates experienced on campus from numerous leftist Iowa State professors, etc.

By the way, I think this platform should be able to ban speech.

Bas2020 said:

---

I was almost banned on this board by a liberal leaning Mod because I said studies showed the Covid shot did not work .

---

You almost got GLASSED?!?

(Just kidding, Glass )

seapineswolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

---

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

---

I never said what poster I was referring to...

---

I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

packofwolves said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

---

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

---

I never said what poster I was referring to...

---

I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

---

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

TheStorm said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

---

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

---

I never said what poster I was referring to...

---

I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

---

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

---

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

---

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

---

I never said what poster I was referring to...

---

I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

---

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

---

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.

---

Ha.......I'll say that's a James call and I can assure you if he or Steve PM'd me and said to tone it down certain comments I 100% would. You'd be very happy to have me silenced.........much like Facebook and Twitter did. Let's review..........virus, PCR test, 2020 election, bioweapons lab in Ukraine, child trafficking, Epstein, etc. When the psyop war is complete and whatever kinetic aspects are behind us we'll see who understand what was actually true and not true the best. If anybody has me beat in the end, hats off to ya.

You guys are quick to attack the non-MSM narrative; the MSM narrative, you soak up like a sponge (virus from a monkey or from a bat- do you remember?).

The crazy liberals had yet another ESPN announcer (tennis) canceled and fired because he used the term "guerilla warfare " during a Venus Williams tennis match .

We have long memories . I can bring up hundreds more examples .

https://nypost.com/2022/07/28/espn-still-hasnt-fixed-disgraceful-doug-adler-firing/

El Lobo Loco said:

---

"Hate speech" is free speech. That just means the government can't make laws against it and prosecute you for what you're saying. Nothing in the 1st Amendment about not facing repercussions from other entities such as employers, customers, etc.

---

Bingo!!!!!!

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Bas2020 said:

---

The crazy liberals had yet another ESPN announcer (tennis) canceled and fired because he used the term "guerilla warfare " during a Venus Williams tennis match .

We have long memories . I can bring up hundreds more examples .

https://nypost.com/2022/07/28/espn-still-hasnt-fixed-disgraceful-doug-adler-firing/

---

MAGA seems determined to be worse than the worst lefty stereotype we can imagine. You're already cheering for economic policies that make full-on Marxists barf in their mouth. Now you've innovated out of control cancel culture beyond racism into "anything we don't like".

I guess that's what Trump meant by "retribution"?

El Lobo Loco said:

---

I40Wolf said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

A couple notes -
1. It wasnt taken out of context
2. The fact he wasnt going to apologize is probably what pushed this whole thing over the ledge

Look, I think his show was a dead man walking regardless. I still dont like the FCC stepping in to pressure the networks, but I do think the end result would inevitably be the same.

---

What did Kimmel say?

---

https://nypost.com/2025/09/18/entertainment/jimmy-kimmels-full-controversial-comments-on-charlie-kirk-that-led-to-abc-pulling-jimmy-kimmel-live/

There's a video embedded in the article.

---

That must be the wrong link. I didn't hear Kimmel say anything about Charlie Kirk. I heard criticism of the far right.

I40Wolf said:

---

El Lobo Loco said:

---

I40Wolf said:

---

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

A couple notes -
1. It wasnt taken out of context
2. The fact he wasnt going to apologize is probably what pushed this whole thing over the ledge

Look, I think his show was a dead man walking regardless. I still dont like the FCC stepping in to pressure the networks, but I do think the end result would inevitably be the same.

---

What did Kimmel say?

---

https://nypost.com/2025/09/18/entertainment/jimmy-kimmels-full-controversial-comments-on-charlie-kirk-that-led-to-abc-pulling-jimmy-kimmel-live/

There's a video embedded in the article.

---

That must be the wrong link. I didn't hear Kimmel say anything about Charlie Kirk. I heard criticism of the far right.

---

It's the link to what he said. Your interpretation of its content is entirely up to you.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

seapineswolf said:

---

I don't often come over to this board very often, but reading this thread was a little disturbing, and fwiw im a conservative.

has anyone reported that one poster for some pretty hardcore anti Semitic views along with a few other forms of hate speech? I am just surprised that the owners of this site let that kind of stuff fly on their platform.

anyways, just curious....thanks,

---

This is preposterous.

What EXACTLY have I said here that remotely warrants being censored and silenced? Be specific.

All I've done here is re-post statements by people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and even Charlie Kirk himself. And those views are part of the free and open debate going on all across the internet and all of social media - including Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

To repeat myself for the 3rd or 4th time, Charlie Kirk himself explicitly said that October 7th was a "stand down" by the Israelis and that they are "trying to ethnically cleanse Gaza" (direct quote). Charlie Kirk also said, paraphrasing, that "elite jewish donors are the driving force behind the cultural Marxist agenda in America".

Are you seriously saying that jews and Israel cannot be criticized in ANY way, and that anyone who does "deserves" to be censored, banned, and silenced from the internet? Is that what you mean by "anti-semitism"? No criticism of jews or Israel allowed at all?

If so, then you need to censor all of this exact debate that is going on on the entire internet.

---

I never said what poster I was referring to...

---

I know you didn't mention the poster, but I am willing to bet everyone who has been on the WC for a while will reach the same conclusion on which poster.

---

Even the poster himself knew exactly who he was talking about...

---

Here, I'll help! GP needs to be shown the door! And of course our other resident rabid anti-Semite, Werewolf. And for good measure BBW, a raging beyond-the-pale psycho (which is saying something around here). Those three have no business interacting with any human outside of 4Chan.

---

Wow, you REALLY are desperate to silence me...LOLOL

I ask you again, name me one legitimate reason why I should be censored and silenced. You can't.

And as I said before, if you are saying it is because I criticize Israel or the power of the "pro-Israel lobby", then unless you are a hypocrite you should be calling for the mass censorship of over half of the Democrat party and voters, due to their support for Palestine and opposition to the Israel military action in Gaza.

There is ZERO legitimate reason to censor me. The only reason is because you are a rabid far Left ideologue, and you want to use ANY excuse to silence a right-wing conservative such as myself. Period, end of story. It has nothing to do with me saying anything that deserves censorship.