Pacfanweb said:

---

It's almost as if more data and information was acquired and facts changed, they changed their stance. You know, like they learned something?

---

Except that wasn't the case.

Pacfanweb said:

---

It's almost as if more information was acquired and facts changed, they changed their stance. You know, like they learned something?

---

Nothing changed. Numerous studies going back decades had proven that masks were ineffective. Then, suddenly, around April or May, they came out with a few bogus "studies" that claimed that now masks "were effective" at preventing the spread of disease.

In reality, masks are not effective at all. And as packgrad pointed out, it's political. Forcing you to wear a mask is about power and control. It's about conditioning people to accept draconian measures.

The idea that these communist politicians (who champion the murder of unborn children) are doing all of this because they are such "humanitarians" and "care so much about human life" is absolutely laughable. These people are totalitarians. They care nothing about human life. They are not doing this because they care about you or your family, or grandma. They are doing this to advance their totalitarian political agenda.

So I guess doctors and nurses should never wear them then?

Pacfanweb said:

---

So I guess doctors and nurses should never wear them then?

---

I've addressed this here a few months ago. The reason that doctors initially started wearing a mask was for SURGERY only. It was worn by surgeons, to prevent some of their spittle from getting into an open wound while operating on someone. The use of masks by doctors was never intended (or able) to prevent the spread of an airborne virus.

A virus is microscopic (or nano-scopic). A cloth bandana over your face is doing NOTHING to prevent the transmittal of such small particles through the air. Those particles are going right through the openings in the fabric.

And there is why you were wrong.

Masks are to prevent spray from your mouth in your nose, which is where the virus is, from getting anywhere besides the other side of the Mask. That's how the virus spreads primarily. It is not just some little bug floating around in the air that you breathe out of your lungs that goes right through the mask.

You must have not even read what Mormad wrote a while back about viral load. Or didn't understand it.
There are numerous studies about the effectiveness of masks and the vast majority of them conclude that they do in fact help.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/29/health/coronavirus-viral-load.html

Pacfanweb said:

---

And there is why you were wrong.

Masks are to prevent spray from your mouth in your nose, which is where the virus is, from getting anywhere besides the other side of the Mask. That's how the virus spreads primarily. It is not just some little bug floating around in the air that you breathe out of your lungs that goes right through the mask.

You must have not even read what Mormad wrote a while back about viral load. Or didn't understand it.
There are numerous studies about the effectiveness of masks and the vast majority of them conclude that they do in fact help.

---

The so-called "experts" have said that "covid" can also be transmitted via the air (and not just via "respiratory droplets" of water).

The faux "experts" keep flip-flopping and changing what they are saying about covid. First it was that masks aren't effective. Then they "are". One minute it's "not transmitted by air". And then it is. They'll just keep lying and changing their story as they go, to suit their agenda.

As for the mask studies, you cannot deny that for decades, the "orthodox" medical community acknowledged that masks were not effective. And then suddenly that changed around April of this year, with the new "studies". These new "studies" are bunk.

Pacfanweb said:

---

It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.

---

Man,
Did you forget he doesnt read well, if at all?

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-12/aiop-mne122120.php

waynecountywolf said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.

---

Man,
Did you he he doesnt read well, if at all?

---

Lol. Irony.

Mormad said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan says that the vaccines will not even prevent you from contracting or transmitting "covid-19". They claim that it only "lowers" your chance of contracting or transmitting it. So it's not anywhere "95% effective", or whatever bogus lie they are telling the public.

So this means that the tyrants are still going to mandate all of the other restrictions even after people are vaccinated -- including socialist distancing, mask-wearing, lockdowns, etc. It's never going to end, because it never was about the scamdemic or a virus. This is about implementing a communist takeover of society -- ie, "The Great Reset" advocated by the World Economic Forum, etc.

---

You again show your complete lack of understanding. This is NOT new news to anybody but you. You have no clue what she is saying. You have no idea how to interpret the meaning of what she's saying. In the words of your hero, Karl Mullis, you don't "know anything about anything." You listen to this and think it means the vaccine isn't effective or doing what is was designed to do. You come here to complain and get people to think like you without one clue about the disease or the vaccine or how to interpret the data you receive.

The studies weren't powered to determine whether or not the vaccine stopped virus from getting in your nose or stopped you from shedding virus that got there. It did, however, have a 90+ % effectiveness at stopping the disease (kept people from getting sick from it). And if davie's meta analysis is correct, even if people get asymptomatic infections then we will likely stop transmission and therefore end this mess. But we can't know that yet, even if we can predict that the vaccine will have a solid chance of stopping infection and transmission. Just can't say it yet.

You can personally choose whether or not you want to get the vaccine. But to come here and tell people to beware a vaccine about which you have an extremely poor understanding is unreasonable. You know nothing about the studies, how the vaccine works, what potential toxins it may have, what the adverse events were, the incidence of adverse events, the sequelae of adverse events, how effectiveness was defined, what the results mean, or anything else one can name. How can you act the expert when you can't correctly answer one question about it or logically interpret one bit of data presented? You make the false claims when you know absolutely nothing about which you speak. And somebody had the balls to suggest we should do our due diligence? It's simply mind boggling.

---

Preach on, Brother!

waynecountywolf said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.

---

Man,
Did you he he doesnt read well, if at all?

---

Yeah.... you are one to question someone's credibility. You blatantly LIED on TOS moments ago on a thread bashing President Trump that you were arguing with someone who was "saying that the Earth was flat." Now you can be all high and mighty to some and they may buy it. I've seen you post for years and you are nothing more than a pot stirrer. I do not post there but knew you did. I have bounced back and forth the last few days just to see how full of crap you are. It's buckets. Anyone that doubts it can check it out on their own. If I missed someone saying the Earth was flat please direct me to the post and I will recant my statement. Until then...dude....get a freaking life.

pineknollshoresking said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.

---

I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

---

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.

---

Hey moderators... are you going to put up with this stuff? I've been called out for less. It appears as if some on here can't have a debate without getting into ad hominem attacks...

People like Glass, waynecounty (or, are they the same person), civ, and others are guilty of these attacks. The irony is that they are all progressives...

---

Unlike you and your buddy GuerillaPack aka Northwolf, aka Northwolf28- I dont need or have ever had an "alias".

The new studies aren't bunk. You just have to be able to determine what they mean. It's not black and white. You can't conclude that "masks don't work" if they don't stop all resp viral transmission or stop all infections. Surgical masks block about 38% of particles, which sounds bad, but that amount actually lowers viral load significantly and would reduce transmission and disease significantly. Masks were never meant to be impenetrable barriers that would end all transmission. To expect them to and then act surprised or angry or disappointed when they don't is intellectually disingenuous. And to deny that they reduce the risk of disease is unreasonable.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Mormad said:

---

If you're gonna come here and cry about toxins and MANY adverse events at least be able to name the potential toxins involved and the individual adverse events reported and their incidence.

It's so funny to me. When small percentages of covid sufferers get complications like stroke, myocarditis, hypercoagulable states, pneumonia, sepsis, respiratory failure, or death people wanna say it's no big deal. People die or get sick is something, right? But when 7 out of 80000 get Bell's palsy that's completely self limited and painless? Oh the HORROR!!! You better not get that vaccine!!! You might get BELL'S PALSY!! That's so much worse than the death, complications, and global direct and indirect costs of the pandemic.

---

I've posted several times in just the last few days about the toxic ingredients that are included in vaccines, in general -- including aluminum, mercury, and formaldehyde. Aluminum and mercury are neurotoxins that are causing autism, and other neurological disorders. And eczema and other immune response disorders are being caused by these toxic ingredients.

And I explained that Bell's Palsy is just one small example of the harm done by the vaccines. When you consider all of the other harmful effects (autism, eczema, other immune response disorders), you're talking about a HUGE percentage of people being negatively impacted by vaccines. Research is also linking many types of cancers to the toxic ingredients in the vaccines. And there are many other diseases which I'm not just thinking of off the top of my head that are also most likely linked to vaccines -- such as Crohn's disease and other illnesses that have skyrocketed in frequency in recent years.

What makes you so confident that this "covid" vaccine is even going to work? The vaccine for the flu hardly ever works. It is notoriously ineffective. They've tried to make vaccines for other types of coronaviruses (including the common cold) over the past several decades, and have been unsuccessful, even by their bogus standards of "effectiveness". But we are to believe that the vaunted "scientists" really have it together this time, and are going to create a vaccine that is "95% effective" for "covid-19" in just a few short months? Please.

Vaccines are not necessary to prevent disease. They cause much more harm, than good. The best defense against disease is to keep your body and immune system healthy and strong. God already gave us an IMMUNE system. I don't think he expected us to have to inject our veins with strange concoctions of dna, dead viruses, and other toxins in order to "be healthy".

---

Are you just trying to personally save all us "Lefty Commies" ?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Mormad said:

---

This isn't about vaccines in general, though based on what you've said that would be really fun. This about the covid vaccine. Name its specific toxins, what potential adverse effects they could have, what adverse effects were documented in the study, and their incidence. You started this with your Bell's palsy worry, and then transfer to all vaccines in general because you're clueless about the vaccine you fight so irrationally hard to vilify.

---

I'm not clueless. If you want to talk about clueless, then look to no other than that little goober Sopranos wannabe Fauci, and anyone trusting him. I've done a ton of research into vaccines in general, their ingredients, and the many harmful side effects and diseases they cause. Knowing that, I'm naturally not going to trust this "covid" vaccine, and think that the criminals in Big Pharma suddenly decided to change course and produce a "good" vaccine that is truly "safe" and doesn't include all of those toxic ingredients.

And even if, hypothetically, the vaccine companies are claiming that some of these toxic ingredients that are in other vaccines (such as aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde) are "not" in the covid vaccine, I have no reason to trust that their claims are true. Because they have been known to hide and deny many of the toxic ingredients.

---

Tell the truth, you have watched The Fugitive two dozen times.

waynecountywolf said:

---

Unlike you and your buddy GuerillaPack aka Northwolf, aka Northwolf28- I dont need or have ever had an "alias".

---

I don't have an alias or other account on this site. I've only ever posted on IPS using the username "GuerillaPack", and never "Northwolf" or any other username.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

And there is why you were wrong.

Masks are to prevent spray from your mouth in your nose, which is where the virus is, from getting anywhere besides the other side of the Mask. That's how the virus spreads primarily. It is not just some little bug floating around in the air that you breathe out of your lungs that goes right through the mask.

You must have not even read what Mormad wrote a while back about viral load. Or didn't understand it.
There are numerous studies about the effectiveness of masks and the vast majority of them conclude that they do in fact help.

---

The so-called "experts" have said that "covid" can also be transmitted via the air (and not just via "respiratory droplets" of water).

The faux "experts" keep flip-flopping and changing what they are saying about covid. First it was that masks aren't effective. Then they "are". One minute it's "not transmitted by air". And then it is. They'll just keep lying and changing their story as they go, to suit their agenda.

As for the mask studies, you cannot deny that for decades, the "orthodox" medical community acknowledged that masks were not effective. And then suddenly that changed around April of this year, with the new "studies". These new "studies" are bunk.

---

You would think if the Establishment Commie Lefties wanted to have a conspiracy, they would at least get their story straight out da gate.

packgrad said:

---

waynecountywolf said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.

---

Man,
Did you he he doesnt read well, if at all?

---

Lol. Irony.

---

I said nothing about his spelling....I fixed it for ya

GuerrillaPack said:

---

waynecountywolf said:

---

Unlike you and your buddy GuerillaPack aka Northwolf, aka Northwolf28- I dont need or have ever had an "alias".

---

I don't have an alias or other account on this site. I've only ever posted on IPS using the username "GuerillaPack", and never "Northwolf" or any other username.

---

Splittin' hairs again. "I've only ever posted on IPS" Thats how GP rolls.
There is only one like you. You are known far and wide. Its OK to take the credit for all your prior aliases-be Proud.

BBW12OG said:

---

waynecountywolf said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.

---

Man,
Did you he he doesnt read well, if at all?

---

Yeah.... you are one to question someone's credibility. You blatantly LIED on TOS moments ago on a thread bashing President Trump that you were arguing with someone who was "saying that the Earth was flat." Now you can be all high and mighty to some and they may buy it. I've seen you post for years and you are nothing more than a pot stirrer. I do not post there but knew you did. I have bounced back and forth the last few days just to see how full of crap you are. It's buckets. Anyone that doubts it can check it out on their own. If I missed someone saying the Earth was flat please direct me to the post and I will recant my statement. Until then...dude....get a freaking life.

---

Still dont know what TOS stands for but I suppose you mean PP.
You and GP are the only high and mighty on this thread.
Here is the Flat Earth thread so where is that a lie (its epic, BTW)??
Flat Earth Thread for BBW

Sorry they ran you off PP and glad you have seen me for years its been around 20, yet you didnt bother to post there. Must be a reason you, NorthWolf / Northwolf28/ GP /; Dee didnt survive.
You are welcome to show us where I lied, where I am a pot stirrer (other than GP's ridiculous theories).
I think I have found the actual pot stirrers. Call em like I see 'em.


Here is your pot-and its black.

Flat Earth has most certainly been discussed in this very thread, multiple times.

And if you're arguing with GP, you're arguing with someone who thinks the Earth is flat, so if you say you're arguing with someone that says the Earth is flat, you're telling the truth even if you're actually arguing a different subject.
R.I.F.

pineknollshoresking said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.

---

I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

---

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.

---

Hey moderators... are you going to put up with this stuff? I've been called out for less. It appears as if some on here can't have a debate without getting into ad hominem attacks...

People like Glass, waynecounty (or, are they the same person), civ, and others are guilty of these attacks. The irony is that they are all progressives...

---

1. No, you haven't been called out for "less".
2. There's no ad hominem in my post. You should look up the definition. A clever (or not clever) play on words, such as re-arranging someone's name, is not an example, nor is it remotely an "attack".
3. Grow a pair. Sounds like you must have gotten your knuckles rapped by a mod over something. Not surprising.

BBW12OG said:

---

waynecountywolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

And there is why you were wrong.

Masks are to prevent spray from your mouth in your nose, which is where the virus is, from getting anywhere besides the other side of the Mask. That's how the virus spreads primarily. It is not just some little bug floating around in the air that you breathe out of your lungs that goes right through the mask.

You must have not even read what Mormad wrote a while back about viral load. Or didn't understand it.
There are numerous studies about the effectiveness of masks and the vast majority of them conclude that they do in fact help.

---

The so-called "experts" have said that "covid" can also be transmitted via the air (and not just via "respiratory droplets" of water).

The faux "experts" keep flip-flopping and changing what they are saying about covid. First it was that masks aren't effective. Then they "are". One minute it's "not transmitted by air". And then it is. They'll just keep lying and changing their story as they go, to suit their agenda.

As for the mask studies, you cannot deny that for decades, the "orthodox" medical community acknowledged that masks were not effective. And then suddenly that changed around April of this year, with the new "studies". These new "studies" are bunk.

---

You would think if the Establishment Commie Lefties wanted to have a conspiracy, they would at least get their story straight out da gate.

---

I was wrong Wayne... it's the thread about the Congressman passing away that you are making fun of posters on this site. Kudos to you for being such a fine example of a ....well.... I'll leave it that. My advice to all involved is to ignore Wayne. He's using this board for comedy on TOS. Making fun of posters and the conversations with his cronies over there. True colors my friend...true colors.

---

Thanks for that report Les; glad you are poppin' back n forth .
Only poster (not plural)I have questioned/made fun of is GP/Northwolf and his theories but I could add you to the list but dont want to feed you any notoriety- because unlike GP, you have none.
Bet you are just itchin' to post something about Trump or Biden but for some reason you just cannot.

waynecountywolf said:

---

pineknollshoresking said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.

---

I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

---

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.

---

Hey moderators... are you going to put up with this stuff? I've been called out for less. It appears as if some on here can't have a debate without getting into ad hominem attacks...

People like Glass, waynecounty (or, are they the same person), civ, and others are guilty of these attacks. The irony is that they are all progressives...

---

Unlike you and your buddy GuerillaPack aka Northwolf, aka Northwolf28- I dont need or have ever had an "alias".

---

Being that you don't pay for access to insidepacksports, I'm sure you have your other pay account, right?

Pacfanweb said:

---

pineknollshoresking said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.

---

I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

---

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.

---

Hey moderators... are you going to put up with this stuff? I've been called out for less. It appears as if some on here can't have a debate without getting into ad hominem attacks...

People like Glass, waynecounty (or, are they the same person), civ, and others are guilty of these attacks. The irony is that they are all progressives...

---

1. No, you haven't been called out for "less".
2. There's no ad hominem in my post. You should look up the definition. A clever (or not clever) play on words, such as re-arranging someone's name, is not an example, nor is it remotely an "attack".
3. Grow a pair. Sounds like you must have gotten your knuckles rapped by a mod over something. Not surprising.

---

Son, is that a threat?

Actually, I'm not going there. I'll take your advice and grow a pair. The question is: grow a pair of what?

Ad hominem

• Attacking a person's character or motivations rather than a position or argument.
• adj. Appealing to the emotions rather than to logic or reason.

By the way, people like you are beneath me...

Pacfanweb said:

---

Flat Earth has most certainly been discussed in this very thread, multiple times.

And if you're arguing with GP, you're arguing with someone who thinks the Earth is flat, so if you say you're arguing with someone that says the Earth is flat, you're telling the truth even if you're actually arguing a different subject.
R.I.F.

---

What dd BBW, BBW12v2 (how many aliases did he have?) do to get banned, anyway . Same shtick different site, I suppose. Yeah BBW never posted anywhere else, he was loved in a "special way".
Ban stick must sting to call ME a LIAR and say I have been nothing but a pot stirrer on another unmentioned site.
I havent been banned or even reprimanded in almost 20 years bet BBW12v2 and GP cant say the same.
They are just havin' fun and being themselves (while they can).

Pacfanweb said:

---

Flat Earth has most certainly been discussed in this very thread, multiple times.

And if you're arguing with GP, you're arguing with someone who thinks the Earth is flat, so if you say you're arguing with someone that says the Earth is flat, you're telling the truth even if you're actually arguing a different subject.
R.I.F.

---

Who exactly are you talking too? Actually, why do I care?

Some of you folks come on here and stir up crap. If you're going to do that, at least join the site and give the owners some money.

Mormad said:

---

0The new studies aren't bunk. You just have to be able to determine what they mean. It's not black and white. You can't conclude that "masks don't work" if they don't stop all resp viral transmission or stop all infections. Surgical masks block about 38% of particles, which sounds bad, but that amount actually lowers viral load significantly and would reduce transmission and disease significantly. Masks were never meant to be impenetrable barriers that would end all transmission. To expect them to and then act surprised or angry or disappointed when they don't is intellectually disingenuous. And to deny that they reduce the risk of disease is unreasonable.

---

Is it? A paper published in PNAS promoting mask efficacy by Nobel laureate Mario Molina is being widely panned and calls for its retraction are growing according to news soures as varied as Buzzfeed to The NY Times. I don't think skepticism is unreasonable. I'd further argue that mask mandates are an unacceptable violation of Constitutional rights, and I opine that Americans shouldn't have to cave on their God-given rights just because the Center for Disease Control can't seem to live up to its name.

waynecountywolf said:

---

Pacfanweb said:

---

Flat Earth has most certainly been discussed in this very thread, multiple times.

And if you're arguing with GP, you're arguing with someone who thinks the Earth is flat, so if you say you're arguing with someone that says the Earth is flat, you're telling the truth even if you're actually arguing a different subject.
R.I.F.

---

What dd BBW, BBW12v2 (how many aliases did he have?) do to get banned, anyway . Same shtick different site, I suppose. Yeah BBW never posted anywhere else, he was loved in a "special way".
Ban stick must sting to call ME a LIAR and say I have been nothing but a pot stirrer on another unmentioned site.
I havent been banned or even reprimanded in almost 20 years bet BBW12v2 and GP cant say the same.
They are just havin' fun and being themselves (while they can).

---

Why would you get banned? You gargle the same BS that one of the mods allow. That's why their membership is in the toilet. You and that gang of slap happy's on there 16+ hours a day hijacking threads and doing the same thing there that you have done to this one. Pony up... pay a monthly membership. Guess being an internet jockey doesn't pay enough huh???

Oldsouljer said:

---

Mormad said:

---

0The new studies aren't bunk. You just have to be able to determine what they mean. It's not black and white. You can't conclude that "masks don't work" if they don't stop all resp viral transmission or stop all infections. Surgical masks block about 38% of particles, which sounds bad, but that amount actually lowers viral load significantly and would reduce transmission and disease significantly. Masks were never meant to be impenetrable barriers that would end all transmission. To expect them to and then act surprised or angry or disappointed when they don't is intellectually disingenuous. And to deny that they reduce the risk of disease is unreasonable.

---

Is it? A paper published in PNAS promoting mask efficacy by Nobel laureate Mario Molina is being widely panned and calls for its retraction are growing according to news soures as varied as Buzzfeed to The NY Times. I don't think skepticism is unreasonable. I'd further argue that mask mandates are an unacceptable violation of Constitutional rights, and I opine that Americans shouldn't have to cave on their God-given rights just because the Center for Disease Control can't seem to live up to its name.

---

I'm essence i absolutely agree with you. I have skepticism about so much of this. But there's a difference between questioning, lack of true understanding, lack of sufficient data, or skepticism and decreeing "MASKS DON'T WORK" or "THE VACCINE DOESN'T WORK! "

Skepticism in the face of all this is completely reasonable, especially when one shows the open mindedness to digest and comprehend data without jumping to irrational dogmatic conclusions that aren't supported by the data.

I've never supported a mask mandate. I don't support mandated vaccination. But i think there's some misinformation being posted here, so i offer what apolitical insight i feel i can.

Too often we let our opinions be shaped by fear, politics, prejudice or ignorance.

Regarding mask, I've spoken to as many physicians saying they don't work as saying they do work. So, I guess I can take only they ones I agree with as fact. Logic tells me that the efficacy of mask is on the low side.

That being said, here is where I fall on the argument/debate:

• I disagree with a mandate from government on this
• If a "Private" business or "Public" building requires them, then that's their prerogative - we should all give difference to them
• In my own personal property, I set the rules, no one else - either follow my rules or make your own choice about being on my property

If all of us would have a similar position, we wouldn't be arguing so much.

pineknollshoresking said:

---

Regarding mask, I've spoken to as many physicians saying they don't work as saying they do work. So, I guess I can take only they ones I agree with as fact. Logic tells me that the efficacy of mask is on the low side.

That being said, here is where I fall on the argument/debate:

• I disagree with a mandate from government on this
• If a "Private" business or "Public" building requires them, then that's their prerogative - we should all give difference to them
• In my own personal property, I set the rules, no one else - either follow my rules or make your own choice about being on my property

If all of us would have a similar position, we wouldn't be arguing so much.

---

Don't you think the answer to the question you ask the different doctors is highly dependent upon how each one defines "work?"

If you ask a general question, "do masks work?" You should expect variable answers. If you ask specific questions, "how do masks work?" "Do they reduce droplets?" "Do they reduce aerosols? " " Do they reduce transmission? " Do they stop infections?" "Do they reduce the severity of disease?" Etc then you get specific answers based on their current understanding of the data/disease.

Mormad said:

---

pineknollshoresking said:

---

Regarding mask, I've spoken to as many physicians saying they don't work as saying they do work. So, I guess I can take only they ones I agree with as fact. Logic tells me that the efficacy of mask is on the low side.

That being said, here is where I fall on the argument/debate:

• I disagree with a mandate from government on this
• If a "Private" business or "Public" building requires them, then that's their prerogative - we should all give difference to them
• In my own personal property, I set the rules, no one else - either follow my rules or make your own choice about being on my property

If all of us would have a similar position, we wouldn't be arguing so much.

---

Don't you think the answer to the question you ask the different doctors is highly dependent upon how each one defines "work?"

If you ask a general question, "do masks work?" You should expect variable answers. If you ask specific questions, "how do masks work?" "Do they reduce droplets?" "Do they reduce aerosols? " " Do they reduce transmission? " Do they stop infections?" "Do they reduce the severity of disease?" Etc then you get specific answers based on their current understanding of the data/disease.

---

Don't you think the question was asked properly? Don't you think these physicians were clear on the context? Don't you think others, on this board, have common sense? Don't you think... Don't you think...

Your response is ridiculous (my opinion) and comes off as being the smartest person in the room. Typically, the smartest person in a room will allow for other considerations...