Roy and Mandy can bust hell wide open

36,520 Views | 360 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Mormad
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
acslater1344 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

This thread exemplifies what is needed in response to the draconian measures taken over the "covid" scamdemic: civil disobedience.

People should and must refuse to comply with these dictatorial and unconstitutional orders. And these are fiat orders, not laws. As was noted in the creation of this thread, people are justified to refuse to comply with the orders limiting the number of people you can have in your own home. And the same goes with the 10pm-5am curfew, the mask mandates, the business lockdowns, and the rest of it.

And, thankfully, many county sheriffs have publicly announced or demonstrated that they refuse to enforce these unconstitutional edicts -- including the mask mandate, the curfew, and limits on family gatherings.

We the people have the ultimate power in our constitutional republic. Not these communist dictator governors. And we have God-given rights that cannot be taken away on ANY pretext by man-made governments -- including the right to gather/assemble with others, conduct our business and go to work, etc.


You are a Rebel.
Against communist tyrants. Rebellion against tyrants is duty to God.

Communist/Leftist degenerates are rebels against God.
Commies need love, too.
They need to go to hell where they belong. Where other people who celebrate murdering unborn children and Sodomy will go.

How on Earth do the admins of this site let **** like this stay posted? What an embarrassment.
Wow, another Lefty who does not believe in freedom of speech.

I have broken no rules.

Did you notice that the title of this thread was saying that Roy Cooper could "go to hell"?

You Lefties are tyrants who believe in silencing people, and preventing conservatives and those on the right from even being able to present their arguments.

Yes, I think there's a special place in hell for people who think it is acceptable to murder unborn children. That's not really controversial. That's Biblical teaching.

Do you want to ban the Bible next? Quoting from the Bible should be prohibited on IPS?

And if there is this subset of people with political power who think it is acceptable, and even a "wonderful right" to murder unborn children, then WHAT OTHER injustices and atrocities do you think these people will promote? -- ie, communism.

And what is the "harm" being done by allowing people to have true freedom of speech? Who is being "harmed" if someone argues that communists and Roy Cooper should "go to hell"? Is it your precious little feelings that are being harmed? We should censor the boards so that your feelings are not hurt?
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
slater is a snowflake...yet he is making blatant misogynistic comments on another thread...typical liberal.... hypocritical at every turn. Nothing you said is remotely close to being ban worthy or offensive. Yet, let a identify as a woman and they get "mis-gendered" I bet you money slater would be among the first to piss and moan about it. Typical....
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
acslater1344 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

This thread exemplifies what is needed in response to the draconian measures taken over the "covid" scamdemic: civil disobedience.

People should and must refuse to comply with these dictatorial and unconstitutional orders. And these are fiat orders, not laws. As was noted in the creation of this thread, people are justified to refuse to comply with the orders limiting the number of people you can have in your own home. And the same goes with the 10pm-5am curfew, the mask mandates, the business lockdowns, and the rest of it.

And, thankfully, many county sheriffs have publicly announced or demonstrated that they refuse to enforce these unconstitutional edicts -- including the mask mandate, the curfew, and limits on family gatherings.

We the people have the ultimate power in our constitutional republic. Not these communist dictator governors. And we have God-given rights that cannot be taken away on ANY pretext by man-made governments -- including the right to gather/assemble with others, conduct our business and go to work, etc.


You are a Rebel.
Against communist tyrants. Rebellion against tyrants is duty to God.

Communist/Leftist degenerates are rebels against God.
Commies need love, too.
They need to go to hell where they belong. Where other people who celebrate murdering unborn children and Sodomy will go.

How on Earth do the admins of this site let **** like this stay posted? What an embarrassment.

Seriously. It's either the most elaborate troll in the history of the internet, or someone who is very sick. Either way it doesn't just make NC State fans look bad, it makes the human race look bad.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

slater is a snowflake...yet he is making blatant misogynistic comments on another thread...typical liberal.... hypocritical at every turn. Nothing you said is remotely close to being ban worthy or offensive. Yet, let a identify as a woman and they get "mis-gendered" I bet you money slater would be among the first to piss and moan about it. Typical....
Another problem is that there is a lack of clearly defined rules for the forum. To my knowledge, as far as rules for the forums, all I've seen from the moderators are posts here and there on the subject of rules. And, as I understand, the main rules are to 1) keep "political" content off of the sports forums, 2) don't engage in personal attacks with other users (calling them vulger names, etc), and 3) don't post pornography.

It would be nice if there was a post "super-pinned" somewhere on the boards or something clearly defining the rules.

Aside from those very few rules, as far as I understand, all political and social viewpoints are allowed in The Water Cooler.

Yet, despite this, Leftists are "hard-wired" to think that they should be able to censor right-wing views -- for example, censoring people who believe the that homosexuality is a "sin" according to the Bible, and that these sinners will go to hell. I guess Leftists are emboldened to advocate censorship everywhere now because of the fact that Leftist-controlled Big Tech (Facebook, YouTube) has blatantly censored conservative and anti-Establishment speech over the last few years, as well as the general "cancel culture" where they think they can get anyone fired for right-wing views.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

acslater1344 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

This thread exemplifies what is needed in response to the draconian measures taken over the "covid" scamdemic: civil disobedience.

People should and must refuse to comply with these dictatorial and unconstitutional orders. And these are fiat orders, not laws. As was noted in the creation of this thread, people are justified to refuse to comply with the orders limiting the number of people you can have in your own home. And the same goes with the 10pm-5am curfew, the mask mandates, the business lockdowns, and the rest of it.

And, thankfully, many county sheriffs have publicly announced or demonstrated that they refuse to enforce these unconstitutional edicts -- including the mask mandate, the curfew, and limits on family gatherings.

We the people have the ultimate power in our constitutional republic. Not these communist dictator governors. And we have God-given rights that cannot be taken away on ANY pretext by man-made governments -- including the right to gather/assemble with others, conduct our business and go to work, etc.


You are a Rebel.
Against communist tyrants. Rebellion against tyrants is duty to God.

Communist/Leftist degenerates are rebels against God.
Commies need love, too.
They need to go to hell where they belong. Where other people who celebrate murdering unborn children and Sodomy will go.

How on Earth do the admins of this site let **** like this stay posted? What an embarrassment.

Seriously. It's either the most elaborate troll in the history of the internet, or someone who is very sick. Either way it doesn't just make NC State fans look bad, it makes the human race look bad.

So "makes NC State fans look bad" is justification to censor a poster, and deny their freedom of speech?

I personally think that any NC State fans who support abortion (among other things) makes "NC State fans look bad", and also "makes the human race look bad".

But do I argue that Leftists who support abortion should be censored and silenced? Absolutely not. Because I'm not a tyrant. Because I actually believe in freedom of speech. Because I'm not a sensitive little precious snowflake.

The Bible says that certain people will go to hell, and should go to hell. FACT. I don't care if you don't like it, or it hurts your feelings, and if you think people who believe the Bible "make NC State fans look bad".

Do you propose that we make it a rule on IPS that the Bible is banned? And anyone who says what the Bible teaches should be banned?
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
waynecountywolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

acslater1344 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

This thread exemplifies what is needed in response to the draconian measures taken over the "covid" scamdemic: civil disobedience.

People should and must refuse to comply with these dictatorial and unconstitutional orders. And these are fiat orders, not laws. As was noted in the creation of this thread, people are justified to refuse to comply with the orders limiting the number of people you can have in your own home. And the same goes with the 10pm-5am curfew, the mask mandates, the business lockdowns, and the rest of it.

And, thankfully, many county sheriffs have publicly announced or demonstrated that they refuse to enforce these unconstitutional edicts -- including the mask mandate, the curfew, and limits on family gatherings.

We the people have the ultimate power in our constitutional republic. Not these communist dictator governors. And we have God-given rights that cannot be taken away on ANY pretext by man-made governments -- including the right to gather/assemble with others, conduct our business and go to work, etc.


You are a Rebel.
Against communist tyrants. Rebellion against tyrants is duty to God.

Communist/Leftist degenerates are rebels against God.
Commies need love, too.
They need to go to hell where they belong. Where other people who celebrate murdering unborn children and Sodomy will go.

How on Earth do the admins of this site let **** like this stay posted? What an embarrassment.
Wow, another Lefty snowflake who does not believe in freedom of speech.

I have broken no rules.

Did you notice that the title of this thread was saying that Roy Cooper could "go to hell"?

You Lefties are tyrants who believe in silencing people, and preventing conservatives and those on the right from even being able to present their arguments.

Yes, I think there's a special place in hell for people who think it is acceptable to murder unborn children. That's not really controversial. That's Biblical teaching.

Do you want to ban the Bible next? Quoting from the Bible should be prohibited on IPS?

And if there is this subset of people with political power who think it is acceptable, and even a "wonderful right" to murder unborn children, then WHAT OTHER injustices and atrocities do you think these people will promote? -- ie, communism.

And what is the "harm" being done by allowing people to have true freedom of speech? Who is being "harmed" if someone argues that communists and Roy Cooper should "go to hell"? Is it your precious little feelings that are being harmed? We should censor the boards so that your feelings are not hurt?
1. Proverbs 10:19: "In the multitude of words sin is not lacking, but he who restrains his lips is wise."

2. Proverbs 13:3: "He who guards his mouth preserves his life, but he who opens wide his lips shall have destruction."

3. Proverbs 17:28: "Even a fool is counted wise when he holds his peace; when he shuts his lips, he is considered perceptive."

My favorite: When You Haven't Verified The Story
4. Deuteronomy 17:6 On the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses the one who is to die shall be put to death; a person shall not be put to death on the evidence of one witness.


Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ironic, coming from literally the biggest snowflake here who is offended by everything.

And who just wished for others to go to hell because of his beliefs.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

Ironic, coming from literally the biggest snowflake here who is offended by everything.

And who just wished for others to go to hell because of his beliefs.
There's a big difference between taking offense to something, and being such a weak little sissy that you have to try to have those you disagree with be forcibly silenced.

There's nothing wrong with taking offense to, or strongly objecting to certain things. God takes offense to murdering unborn children. He also takes offense to Sodomy or homosexuality, among other sins. So much so, that he says people will go to hell for doing those things. But you have a big problem with that, don't you? It seems your main problem is with God, not me. I'm not the one who will send those people to hell. God will. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

It's not your place to wish those people to go to hell. If you had read the Bible and understood it, you would know that.

That's not unbiblical at all. God hates the wicked.

Psalm 11:5

"The Lord trieth the righteous; but the wicked and him that loveth violence, His soul hateth."


Proverbs 11:10

"When the righteous prosper, the city rejoices; when the wicked perish, there are shouts of joy."


Psalm 139:21-22

"Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? and am not I grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate them with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies."


Like David, I also hate the enemies of God. And I will rejoice at their destruction, as God judges them.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jesus would have loved them. And last time I checked, you are not God. God supposedly doesn't hate anyone
acslater1344
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

slater is a snowflake...yet he is making blatant misogynistic comments on another thread...typical liberal.... hypocritical at every turn. Nothing you said is remotely close to being ban worthy or offensive. Yet, let a identify as a woman and they get "mis-gendered" I bet you money slater would be among the first to piss and moan about it. Typical....

LOL and yet you didn't respond to my last post on that thread because you don't have a leg to stand on. Quit being so damn sensitive.

It's hilarious watching a Trumper like yourself be the misogyny police. Talk about hypocritical...



And the end of the day, I get it. Nobody likes losing. Your boy lost. You lost.

My advice would be to pick up your head and walk away. You only have to wait 4 more years..........
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
waynecountywolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

waynecountywolf said:



Lets help your little self with basic math.
43,448 total participants in Pfizer trial alone.
30,000 in Moderna
Lets see 43448 + 30,000= 200 participants in GuerillaPack Math
See, that didn't take long, did it?
Thats about par for the course with majority of your postings, unfortunately


I already admitted and said I didn't read the part of the article that talked about how many guinea pigs there were. So you got me. I didn't know. When I said "200" I was just throwing out a hypothetical guess. As I already stated, the reason I posted the article was primarily to bolster the claim of the nurse in Nashville, with proof that the vaccine can cause Bell's Palsy.
"Hypothetical guess" then why not 25,000, or 50,000? You were provided the numbers and a USATODAY article that refuted what you posted (you seemed to like USAToday).
200 was posted by you to simply support your narrative- 200 is not even remotely in the ballpark.Then you proceeded to back up your claim with a fake percentage of cases based on this hypothetical guess of "200.
Some posters read just fine.
I give your credit, you take a big step today by saying "I didnt know"
Please show a little more grace! GP admitted to being wrong. What else do you want?
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

Ironic, coming from literally the biggest snowflake here who is offended by everything.

And who just wished for others to go to hell because of his beliefs.
Hey moderators... others have been ostracized for far less. Please call balls and strike fairly...
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

Pacfanweb said:

Ironic, coming from literally the biggest snowflake here who is offended by everything.

And who just wished for others to go to hell because of his beliefs.
Hey moderators... others have been ostracized for far less. Please call balls and strike fairly...

Seriously?
Did you even notice what I was responding to?
The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell. And all I did was point out that he's one of the biggest complainers about these types of things.

I am glad for the moderators to go through my posting history and yours and a couple of others around here and look and see who has been most likely to be rude and hurl insults and be generally demeaning to others here. Go for it.

If you have been talked to by the moderators previously, it certainly wasn't just for something like I just did. Guaranteed.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:



The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.
I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Pacfanweb said:



The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.
I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

GuerrillaPack said:

Pacfanweb said:



The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.
I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.

Personally, I don't care that people call me names, as is typical around here. Call me whatever you want -- "conspiracy theorist", "crazy", etc. Using adjectives to describe and refer to people is part of normal and accepted conversation. Of course, we don't want it crossing a certain line, which is why we have rules in the forum on that. But I don't think in this thread that line has even come close to being crossed.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan says that the vaccines will not even prevent you from contracting or transmitting "covid-19". They claim that it only "lowers" your chance of contracting or transmitting it. So it's not anywhere "95% effective", or whatever bogus lie they are telling the public.

So this means that the tyrants are still going to mandate all of the other restrictions even after people are vaccinated -- including socialist distancing, mask-wearing, lockdowns, etc. It's never going to end, because it never was about the scamdemic or a virus. This is about implementing a communist takeover of society -- ie, "The Great Reset" advocated by the World Economic Forum, etc.






You again show your complete lack of understanding. This is NOT new news to anybody but you. You have no clue what she is saying. You have no idea how to interpret the meaning of what she's saying. In the words of your hero, Karl Mullis, you don't "know anything about anything." You listen to this and think it means the vaccine isn't effective or doing what is was designed to do. You come here to complain and get people to think like you without one clue about the disease or the vaccine or how to interpret the data you receive.

The studies weren't powered to determine whether or not the vaccine stopped virus from getting in your nose or stopped you from shedding virus that got there. It did, however, have a 90+ % effectiveness at stopping the disease (kept people from getting sick from it). And if davie's meta analysis is correct, even if people get asymptomatic infections then we will likely stop transmission and therefore end this mess. But we can't know that yet, even if we can predict that the vaccine will have a solid chance of stopping infection and transmission. Just can't say it yet.

You can personally choose whether or not you want to get the vaccine. But to come here and tell people to beware a vaccine about which you have an extremely poor understanding is unreasonable. You know nothing about the studies, how the vaccine works, what potential toxins it may have, what the adverse events were, the incidence of adverse events, the sequelae of adverse events, how effectiveness was defined, what the results mean, or anything else one can name. How can you act the expert when you can't correctly answer one question about it or logically interpret one bit of data presented? You make the false claims when you know absolutely nothing about which you speak. And somebody had the balls to suggest we should do our due diligence? It's simply mind boggling.
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you're gonna come here and cry about toxins and MANY adverse events at least be able to name the potential toxins involved and the individual adverse events reported and their incidence.

It's so funny to me. When small percentages of covid sufferers get complications like stroke, myocarditis, hypercoagulable states, pneumonia, sepsis, respiratory failure, or death people wanna say it's no big deal. People die or get sick from something, right? But when 7 out of 80000 get Bell's palsy that's completely self limited and painless? Oh the HORROR!!! You better not get that vaccine!!! You might get BELL'S PALSY!! That's so much worse than the death, complications, and global direct and indirect costs of the pandemic.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mormad said:

GuerrillaPack said:

WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan says that the vaccines will not even prevent you from contracting or transmitting "covid-19". They claim that it only "lowers" your chance of contracting or transmitting it. So it's not anywhere "95% effective", or whatever bogus lie they are telling the public.

So this means that the tyrants are still going to mandate all of the other restrictions even after people are vaccinated -- including socialist distancing, mask-wearing, lockdowns, etc. It's never going to end, because it never was about the scamdemic or a virus. This is about implementing a communist takeover of society -- ie, "The Great Reset" advocated by the World Economic Forum, etc.






You again show your complete lack of understanding. This is NOT new news to anybody but you. You have no clue what she is saying. You have no idea how to interpret the meaning of what she's saying. In the words of your hero, Karl Mullis, you don't "know anything about anything." You listen to this and think it means the vaccine isn't effective or doing what is was designed to do. You come here to complain and get people to think like you without one clue about the disease or the vaccine or how to interpret the data you receive.

The studies weren't powered to determine whether or not the vaccine stopped virus from getting in your nose or stopped you from shedding virus that got there. It did, however, have a 90+ % effectiveness at stopping the disease (kept people from getting sick from it). And if davie's meta analysis is correct, even if people get asymptomatic infections then we will likely stop transmission and therefore end this mess. But we can't know that yet, even if we can predict that the vaccine will have a solid chance of stopping infection and transmission. Just can't say it yet.

You can personally choose whether or not you want to get the vaccine. But to come here and tell people to beware a vaccine about which you have an extremely poor understanding is unreasonable. You know nothing about the studies, how the vaccine works, what potential toxins it may have, what the adverse events were, the incidence of adverse events, the sequelae of adverse events, how effectiveness was defined, what the results mean, or anything else one can name. How can you act the expert when you can't correctly answer one question about it or logically interpret one bit of data presented? You make the false claims when you know absolutely nothing about which you speak. And somebody had the balls to suggest we should do our due diligence? It's simply mind boggling.

I didn't state anything that is factually inaccurate, regarding what the WHO Chief Scientist said. You are basing your claim that I "don't understand what she meant" solely upon your ASSUMPTION of what I might be thinking -- ie, trying to get inside my brain and create a strawman of something that I might be thinking.

And you're splitting hairs about "getting the infection" versus "getting the infection and having symptoms". Either way, you still are INFECTED. So the bottom line is that this vaccine won't prevent people from contracting the virus and getting infected. And, by the way, even people who get the vaccine still have a very good chance of getting infected, AND HAVING SYMPTOMS...ie, "getting sick".

The REAL people who "don't know anything" are people like Fauci, and all of those who trust him. It's the blind leading the blind. The reality is that this whole "covid-19" has never even been isolated and shown to be a novel virus. You are just taking the word of criminals like Fauci, the WHO, and the CDC. In reality, this is mostly just the seasonal flu, and they created this boogeyman "covid-19", which for the most part does not even exist. The flu didn't "vanish" this year, as the CDC and WHO are claiming. The flu is still here. They are just now calling everything "covid". Based on the PCR and other bogus methods of "testing".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

GuerrillaPack said:

Pacfanweb said:



The dude is literally calling people snowflakes and wishing them to go to hell.
I never said directly to another poster here "go to hell".

Well that makes it much better then. lol

But you have hurled the snowflake moniker around freely, and the king of Pine Knoll seems to think that is offensive some reason.

Hey moderators... are you going to put up with this stuff? I've been called out for less. It appears as if some on here can't have a debate without getting into ad hominem attacks...

People like Glass, waynecounty (or, are they the same person), civ, and others are guilty of these attacks. The irony is that they are all progressives...
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mormad said:

If you're gonna come here and cry about toxins and MANY adverse events at least be able to name the potential toxins involved and the individual adverse events reported and their incidence.

It's so funny to me. When small percentages of covid sufferers get complications like stroke, myocarditis, hypercoagulable states, pneumonia, sepsis, respiratory failure, or death people wanna say it's no big deal. People die or get sick is something, right? But when 7 out of 80000 get Bell's palsy that's completely self limited and painless? Oh the HORROR!!! You better not get that vaccine!!! You might get BELL'S PALSY!! That's so much worse than the death, complications, and global direct and indirect costs of the pandemic.
I've posted several times in just the last few days about the toxic ingredients that are included in vaccines, in general -- including aluminum, mercury, and formaldehyde. Aluminum and mercury are neurotoxins that are causing autism, and other neurological disorders. And eczema and other immune response disorders are being caused by these toxic ingredients.

And I explained that Bell's Palsy is just one small example of the harm done by the vaccines. When you consider all of the other harmful effects (autism, eczema, other immune response disorders), you're talking about a HUGE percentage of people being negatively impacted by vaccines. Research is also linking many types of cancers to the toxic ingredients in the vaccines. And there are many other diseases which I'm not just thinking of off the top of my head that are also most likely linked to vaccines -- such as Crohn's disease and other illnesses that have skyrocketed in frequency in recent years.

What makes you so confident that this "covid" vaccine is even going to work? The vaccine for the flu hardly ever works. It is notoriously ineffective. They've tried to make vaccines for other types of coronaviruses (including the common cold) over the past several decades, and have been unsuccessful, even by their bogus standards of "effectiveness". But we are to believe that the vaunted "scientists" really have it together this time, and are going to create a vaccine that is "95% effective" for "covid-19" in just a few short months? Please.

Vaccines are not necessary to prevent disease. They cause much more harm, than good. The best defense against disease is to keep your body and immune system healthy and strong. God already gave us an IMMUNE system. I don't think he expected us to have to inject our veins with strange concoctions of dna, dead viruses, and other toxins in order to "be healthy".
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Mormad said:

GuerrillaPack said:

WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan says that the vaccines will not even prevent you from contracting or transmitting "covid-19". They claim that it only "lowers" your chance of contracting or transmitting it. So it's not anywhere "95% effective", or whatever bogus lie they are telling the public.

So this means that the tyrants are still going to mandate all of the other restrictions even after people are vaccinated -- including socialist distancing, mask-wearing, lockdowns, etc. It's never going to end, because it never was about the scamdemic or a virus. This is about implementing a communist takeover of society -- ie, "The Great Reset" advocated by the World Economic Forum, etc.






You again show your complete lack of understanding. This is NOT new news to anybody but you. You have no clue what she is saying. You have no idea how to interpret the meaning of what she's saying. In the words of your hero, Karl Mullis, you don't "know anything about anything." You listen to this and think it means the vaccine isn't effective or doing what is was designed to do. You come here to complain and get people to think like you without one clue about the disease or the vaccine or how to interpret the data you receive.

The studies weren't powered to determine whether or not the vaccine stopped virus from getting in your nose or stopped you from shedding virus that got there. It did, however, have a 90+ % effectiveness at stopping the disease (kept people from getting sick from it). And if davie's meta analysis is correct, even if people get asymptomatic infections then we will likely stop transmission and therefore end this mess. But we can't know that yet, even if we can predict that the vaccine will have a solid chance of stopping infection and transmission. Just can't say it yet.

You can personally choose whether or not you want to get the vaccine. But to come here and tell people to beware a vaccine about which you have an extremely poor understanding is unreasonable. You know nothing about the studies, how the vaccine works, what potential toxins it may have, what the adverse events were, the incidence of adverse events, the sequelae of adverse events, how effectiveness was defined, what the results mean, or anything else one can name. How can you act the expert when you can't correctly answer one question about it or logically interpret one bit of data presented? You make the false claims when you know absolutely nothing about which you speak. And somebody had the balls to suggest we should do our due diligence? It's simply mind boggling.

I didn't state anything that is factually inaccurate, regarding what the WHO Chief Scientist said. You are basing your claim that I "don't understand what she meant" solely upon your ASSUMPTION of what I might be thinking -- ie, trying to get inside my brain and create a strawman of something that I might be thinking.

And you splitting hairs about "getting the infection" versus "getting the infection and having symptoms". Either way, you still are INFECTED. So the bottom line is that this vaccine won't prevent people from contracting the virus and getting infected. And, by the way, even people who get the vaccine still have a very good chance of getting infected, AND HAVING SYMPTOMS...ie, "getting sick".

The REAL people who "don't know anything" are people like Fauci, and all of those who trust him. It's the blind leading the blind. The reality is that this whole "covid-19" has never even been isolated and shown to be a novel virus. You are just taking the word of criminals like Fauci, the WHO, and the CDC. In reality, this is mostly just the seasonal flu, and they created this boogeyman "covid-19", which for the most part does not even exist. The flu didn't "vanish" this year, as the CDC and WHO are claiming. The flu is still here. They are just now calling everything "covid". Based on the bogus PCR test.


Your statement that 95 effective is a lie is completely non factual. You don't even know how they defined effectiveness.

The difference between being infected and having disease is not splitting hairs. It means EVERYTHING. That assertion is assinine and simpleton. Especially if the study Davie referenced is accurate. Again, you simply don't get it.

Please explain how you know even those getting the vaccine have a very good chance of getting sick. That will be an extremely entertaining explanation.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mormad said:



Please explain how you know even those getting the vaccine have a very good chance of getting sick. That will be an extremely entertaining explanation.

The same way that people who get the flu vaccine still get infected by the flu (and still have symptoms and "get sick"). Because the vaccine doesn't work and/or because there are many other strains of the flu than the strain that the vaccine was based on. Same thing could occur with "covid". The "experts" are already saying that "covid" could mutate into other strains. Which would be a perfect excuse for why the vaccine doesn't work.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This isn't about vaccines in general, though based on what you've said that would be really fun. This about the covid vaccine. Name its specific toxins, what potential adverse effects they could have, what adverse effects were documented in the study, and their incidence. You started this with your Bell's palsy worry, and then transfer to all vaccines in general because you're clueless about the vaccine you fight so irrationally hard to vilify.
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Mormad said:



Please explain how you know even those getting the vaccine have a very good chance of getting sick. That will be an extremely entertaining explanation.

The same way that people who get the flu vaccine still get infected by the flu (and still have symptoms and "get sick"). Because the vaccine doesn't work and/or because there are many other strains of the flu than the strain that the vaccine was based on. Same thing could occur with "covid". The "experts" are already saying that "covid" could mutate into other strains. Which would be a perfect excuse for why the vaccine doesn't work.


Dude, that's your opinion. No better than a prediction. Nothing at all factual or scientific about any of that drivel. Using the word "could" is completely different than "very high chance."
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Mormad said:



Please explain how you know even those getting the vaccine have a very good chance of getting sick. That will be an extremely entertaining explanation.

The same way that people who get the flu vaccine still get infected by the flu (and still have symptoms and "get sick"). Because the vaccine doesn't work and/or because there are many other strains of the flu than the strain that the vaccine was based on. Same thing could occur with "covid". The "experts" are already saying that "covid" could mutate into other strains. Which would be a perfect excuse for why the vaccine doesn't work.

That's a terrible example because there are many strains of the flu. That is not the case here.
And when you branch out to other vaccines, you ignore the fact that many diseases have been essentially if not totally eradicated since the vaccines were developed.
Polio, mumps, measles, smallpox, Etc. A long list of diseases that are completely preventable as long as you get the vaccine.

Even the flu... Far more people used to die prior to having a flu vaccine.

Many of the side effects you claim are not true, such as autism or Downs. No vaccine causes those and there is zero proof of it.
But even if they did rarely cause such side effects, the vaccines are still by far worth it because of how many people they do help.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mormad said:

This isn't about vaccines in general, though based on what you've said that would be really fun. This about the covid vaccine. Name its specific toxins, what potential adverse effects they could have, what adverse effects were documented in the study, and their incidence. You started this with your Bell's palsy worry, and then transfer to all vaccines in general because you're clueless about the vaccine you fight so irrationally hard to vilify.
I'm not clueless. If you want to talk about clueless, then look to no other than that little goober Sopranos wannabe Fauci, and anyone trusting him. I've done a ton of research into vaccines in general, their ingredients, and the many harmful side effects and diseases they cause. Knowing that, I'm naturally not going to trust this "covid" vaccine, and think that the criminals in Big Pharma suddenly decided to change course and produce a "good" vaccine that is truly "safe" and doesn't include all of those toxic ingredients.

And even if, hypothetically, the vaccine companies are claiming that some of these toxic ingredients that are in other vaccines (such as aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde) are "not" in the covid vaccine, I have no reason to trust that their claims are true. Because they have been known to hide and deny many of the toxic ingredients.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you know in what way this vaccine is different from all other previous vaccines?
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Mormad said:

This isn't about vaccines in general, though based on what you've said that would be really fun. This about the covid vaccine. Name its specific toxins, what potential adverse effects they could have, what adverse effects were documented in the study, and their incidence. You started this with your Bell's palsy worry, and then transfer to all vaccines in general because you're clueless about the vaccine you fight so irrationally hard to vilify.
I'm not clueless. If you want to talk about clueless, then look to no other than that little goober Sopranos wannabe Fauci, and anyone trusting him. I've done a ton of research into vaccines in general, their ingredients, and the many harmful side effects and diseases they cause. Knowing that, I'm naturally not going to trust this "covid" vaccine, and think that the criminals in Big Pharma suddenly decided to change course and produce a "good" vaccine that is truly "safe" and doesn't include all of those toxic ingredients.

And even if, hypothetically, the vaccine companies are claiming that some of these toxic ingredients that are in other vaccines (such as aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde) are "not" in the covid vaccine, I have no reason to trust that their claims are true. Because they have been known to hide and deny many of the toxic ingredients.

You are definitely clueless. There is more formaldehyde naturally in your body than is in any vaccine you will ever take. There's not any mercury in anything but certain flu vaccines. You can take a different flu vaccine without it if it matters. It's not in any others.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe in vaccines and will take it if ever trickles down to my demographic. With that said, I understand skepticism from some in taking the vaccine. Our virus superhero, Fauci, is on record saying he will lie to drive narratives in combatting this virus. Local, state, and federal leaders that used to claim to be the party of science have now abandoned science and make decisions based on assumed power. And many questions the speed at which it came out and want to see a few more million citizen test cases before getting the shot.

The vaccine will become political, just like masks, because it's not about health. It's about power and conformity.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

I believe in vaccines and will take it if ever trickles down to my demographic. With that said, I understand skepticism from some in taking the vaccine. Our virus superhero, Fauci, is on record saying he will lie to drive narratives in combatting this virus. Local, state, and federal leaders that used to claim to be the party of science have now abandoned science and make decisions based on assumed power. And many questions the speed at which it came out and want to see a few more million citizen test cases before getting the shot.

The vaccine will become political, just like masks, because it's not about health. It's about power and conformity.
The lies about the masks is a huge issue that most people now just gloss over. Initially, in the first few months of this "covid" scamdemic, Fauci and the U.S. Surgeon General and most of the other so-called "experts" were telling us to not wear masks, even specifically stating that masks "do not prevent the spread of disease". Then, after just a few months, they did a 180 degree flip flop, and claimed that we must wear masks and that they now "are effective" at preventing spread of disease. And most of the sheeple don't even stop for one minute to scratch their heads and think about how they lied and flip-flopped?

For example...this tweet from February:



But we're supposed to just blindly trust these KNOWN LIARS like Fauci and all the other "experts" who either lied or were dead wrong about something so simple as the effectiveness of a mask?
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's almost as if more data and information was acquired and facts changed, they changed their stance. You know, like they learned something?
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
acslater1344 said:

BBW12OG said:

slater is a snowflake...yet he is making blatant misogynistic comments on another thread...typical liberal.... hypocritical at every turn. Nothing you said is remotely close to being ban worthy or offensive. Yet, let a identify as a woman and they get "mis-gendered" I bet you money slater would be among the first to piss and moan about it. Typical....

LOL and yet you didn't respond to my last post on that thread because you don't have a leg to stand on. Quit being so damn sensitive.

It's hilarious watching a Trumper like yourself be the misogyny police. Talk about hypocritical...



And the end of the day, I get it. Nobody likes losing. Your boy lost. You lost.

My advice would be to pick up your head and walk away. You only have to wait 4 more years..........
What does your blatant misogyny have to do with Trump other than the fact that he has lived rent free in your head for over four years? I'm guessing because you hero Biden is a blithering idiot you are one as well since you support him? That's the inference you are making because I supported Trump and he has made less than acceptable comments in the past. Typical liberal... when they show us who they are and are exposed they always deflect and try to blame someone else. My head is just fine. Looking forward to the democrats swinging even further left and solidifying their socialist movement. You and your ilk have made a lifetime out of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory with your pompous, condescending, smug attitudes. Just like the posts you make. Like I said, you have shown us who you are now you have to deal with the fallout. Also, I'm guessing you picked your head up in 2016 and didn't scream at the sky, scream "Russia, Russia, Russia", "his taxes, his taxes, his taxes" etc... for the last four years? BS...you are what you are. A hypocritical liberal who can't see the forest for the trees.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.