Systemic, institutionalized, and codified racism and discrimination

53,106 Views | 355 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by Civilized
cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NCSUBill said:

Anyone from age 18 on can invest the cost of a 6 pack of beer and a large pizza a week into any of 100's of etfs or mutual funds and end up a multimillionaire by age 65. Given lifespans moving toward 100+ that is potentially 82+ yrs to save and grow wealth for your use and future generations.. Value of compound interest over time.. Nothing prevents anyone from. Fighting for an education, working multiple jobs, working more than 40 hrs per wk.

My mom grew up in abject poverty , went to a 1 room school house all the way through HS. She wore underwear made from flower slacks. She was proud of her first job as a file clerk at $0.25/hr.. she worked 3 jobs. I remember her parents getting electricity when I was 6, running water when I was 12 and an indoor bathroom when I was 16.

My dad grew up with a widowed mom in poverty. He worked 3 jobs from age 6 until WWII to help feed the family. He made the most money he had ever made starting as a private and working his way up to a Master Sargent during WWII in Europe. He carried books with him Iin his rucksack from Normandy to Berlin. Took a job due to him becoming commu ications specialist in the Army and started on 3rd shift weekends at Western Electric. While working other jobs during his off hours ... made $50/mth all total for 1st yr after WWII.

They scrimped and saved everything they could and invested it. My sister and I were comfortable, bot did chores for neighbors at $0.25/chore. They pounded into our heads the value of education, hard work, multiple jobs, long hours and investing.

Wealth. Is not measured by what car one drives (deprectiating asset), clothes one wears --$200 jeans, quality of Alcohol one drinks $100 bottles of beverage, eating 7 or more meals a week in restaurants. $250 sneakers one wears or drugs one takes ... mj, etc...

There is no reason 50%+ of the people in this country can't retire as a millionaire .. provide money to their kids for education and leave money when they retire. Life spending and savings knowledge passed down through the ages is how wealth is built generationally.

Money is green, in the US - that is the dream the majority of the world is fighting for.. it is the freedom. To improve yourself and future generations.

My father always told me when I wanted more of anything to go look in the mirror and ask the person I saw what I should do to get more.








packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?

910wolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

910wolf said:

Civilized, I want to hear your take specifically addressing some points others have made that seem to have been lost in your replies. Apologies if you did respond to this specifically and I missed it.

In my opinion, I think the family life and upbringing plays a HUGE role in someone's future. The stats of African American's being raised in one parent households with no father figure is very alarming to me, along with not taking education seriously and dropping out of high school and no desire to attend college.

I know and believe there are instances of racial injustices out there, so please don't go on a tangent with that. But how big of a role do you believe these apparent lack of family morals play in an individual's future, and how do you think those trends can be changed?

Yeah man. Childhood instability is a huge, huge determinant of future success or strife in life.

Food insecurity and housing insecurity are probably the two most severe and commonly-discussed types of instability but family instability plays a huge part. Two parent households have much better outcomes on average. Divide and conquer, right? More time and resources to spend on each kid, more financial stability, a little more in the savings account, on and on. It's normally quite advantageous.

The thing is, you can't just pat black Americans on the butt and say, "Now y'all run along, stay married, and make sure your kids value education and go to college!" and expect that to be effectual. It would clearly be beneficial, but that's not a plan of action.

If you've been married, think back to the hardest times of your marriage. Now imagine layering on top of that significant financial stress, job instability, lack of family wealth to fall back on (and wealth doesn't mean being rich, just having some resources on the sidelines), lack of eduction yourself, very young children in the house, etc. You start drowning before you realize you're in trouble.

That's how the cycle of poverty keeps pulling you back in. It's like getting stuck in a rip current and then desperately to keep your head above water while fighting to get back to shore. There are so many forces pulling you under from a very young age.

You've got to get to kids early and often with resources and opportunities to improve those situations. You've got to get them while they're still playing in the tidal pools...once they wade out into the breakers it gets so much harder.
Thanks for the response. You make some good points and definitely seems like a "chicken or the egg" problem. Hopefully, those smarter than me can figure out a solution.
ncsualum05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

Civilized said:

Pacfanweb said:

Don't know who "you three" refer to, but regarding the Yankees analogy:

That's like saying all white people are Kennedys, Rockfellers, Vanderbilts, Fords, Carnegies, and Morgans.

Yeah, if you're one of them...or even if you're a step down or two down the ladder, and you're "just" a Hilton....sure, you have all sorts of built-in advantages like you described. History. Prestige. Money.

But the average white, black, Asian, etc....aren't members of that group.



The average net worth of a black family in this country is $18,000.

The average net worth of a white family in this country is $180,000.

91 of 92 presidents and vice presidents have been white in this country's history. (1% black)

Since our country's inception we've had around 10,500 congressmen. 170 have been black. (1.6% black)

It ain't just Kennedys and Rockefellers that have money and power in this country.

12.5% of Presidents have been black since the civil rights era and schools were fully integrated. About the same % that blacks are in America.

The last 5 Congresses have been the most racially diverse in history. 12% of Congress is black now, IIRC.

Representation is not the issue. The racial makeup of 150 years ago is irrelevant. Even WWII era is irrelevant now.

People of color have had a pretty significant level of representation for about 12 years now, including 8 years of President, yet you'd think things right now are worse than ever.

Why didn't all that representation change things?
Great post. To add to that this is a community level issue in a lot of cases. It's a class problem as well. But who are running and in many cases have been running the communities for a long time? Democrats forever in some cities and for multiple decades in others. Not only that but black democrats make up a majority of local government now in many major cities including city council positions, police chiefs, mayors, etc. Makes the "systemic racism" argument pretty hollow.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

12.5% of Presidents have been black since the civil rights era and schools were fully integrated. About the same % that blacks are in America.

The last 5 Congresses have been the most racially diverse in history. 12% of Congress is black now, IIRC.

Representation is not the issue. The racial makeup of 150 years ago is irrelevant. Even WWII era is irrelevant now.

People of color have had a pretty significant level of representation for about 12 years now, including 8 years of President, yet you'd think things right now are worse than ever.

Why didn't all that representation change things?

Why would you leave out the lily-white Congresses from the late 1700's until integration/suffrage and the all-white presidencies till 2008?

Those 200 years matter. Whites were getting ahead in this country on the backs of slaves, and later continued getting ahead because blacks could not legally vote, and then even when legal where in many cases not allowed to vote.

Now white men want to act like "Oh, but we're straight, there are black politicians NOW."

White men don't want to address their massive head start that they got because of slavery and later because of lack of representation in our government.

Say you're running a marathon, and your competitor can't start the race until your 1/3 through, he should still be able to catch up, right?. You've still got 2/3 of the race left, 17 miles! That's a long time! He should be able to catch up in 17 miles, right?!?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah. And now with multicultural branches of government black people and white guilt people want to act like "But before there wasn't equal opportunity so today doesn't count."

Edit 3... Jesus, don't reply to messages from the truck.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Pacfanweb said:

12.5% of Presidents have been black since the civil rights era and schools were fully integrated. About the same % that blacks are in America.

The last 5 Congresses have been the most racially diverse in history. 12% of Congress is black now, IIRC.

Representation is not the issue. The racial makeup of 150 years ago is irrelevant. Even WWII era is irrelevant now.

People of color have had a pretty significant level of representation for about 12 years now, including 8 years of President, yet you'd think things right now are worse than ever.

Why didn't all that representation change things?

Why would you leave out the lily-white Congresses from the late 1700's until integration/suffrage and the all-white presidencies till 2008?

Those 200 years matter. Whites were getting ahead in this country on the backs of slaves, and later continued getting ahead because blacks could not legally vote, and then even when legal where in many cases not allowed to vote.

Now white men want to act like "Oh, but we're straight, there are black politicians NOW."

White men don't want to address their massive head start that they got because of slavery and later because of lack of representation in our government.

Say you're running a marathon, and your competitor can't start the race until your 1/3 through, he should still be able to catch up, right?. You've still got 2/3 of the race left, 17 miles! That's a long time! He should be able to catch up in 17 miles, right?!?

White men and white women alive today (and going back at least two generations) had nothing to do with slavery. Nothing. So why are you trying to guilt trip white people who are alive today? They've done absolutely nothing wrong. And, it must be said again, 99.5% of white people alive today do NOT descend from white people who owned slaves. Even prior to the 1860s, the vast majority of white people (98%+) did not own slaves. And most white people in this country are descended from European immigrants who came to America after the 1860s when slavery was over.

What exactly are you saying white people need to do now? Are you saying that having them discriminated against by law in education and employment ("affirmative action") is not enough? What more? Have their wealth confiscated and "re-distributed" to black people? Over something that not one single white person alive today had any part in? Over something that 99.5%+ of white people alive, not even their ancestors had anything to do with?

When will the Marxist Left stop vilifying white people and blaming white people for every problem in the world? How is this not racism against white people? To teach that they are "evil" and must be discriminated against by law? That's not evil? That's not racism?

It most certainly IS racism. Affirmative action is egregious racism against white people. This "white privilege" nonsense being taught in universities is institutionalized hate-mongering against white/European peoples. The Marxist Left is essentially now a racist cult that hates white people.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Pacfanweb said:

12.5% of Presidents have been black since the civil rights era and schools were fully integrated. About the same % that blacks are in America.

The last 5 Congresses have been the most racially diverse in history. 12% of Congress is black now, IIRC.

Representation is not the issue. The racial makeup of 150 years ago is irrelevant. Even WWII era is irrelevant now.

People of color have had a pretty significant level of representation for about 12 years now, including 8 years of President, yet you'd think things right now are worse than ever.

Why didn't all that representation change things?

Why would you leave out the lily-white Congresses from the late 1700's until integration/suffrage and the all-white presidencies till 2008?

Those 200 years matter. Whites were getting ahead in this country on the backs of slaves, and later continued getting ahead because blacks could not legally vote, and then even when legal where in many cases not allowed to vote.

Now white men want to act like "Oh, but we're straight, there are black politicians NOW."

White men don't want to address their massive head start that they got because of slavery and later because of lack of representation in our government.

Say you're running a marathon, and your competitor can't start the race until your 1/3 through, he should still be able to catch up, right?. You've still got 2/3 of the race left, 17 miles! That's a long time! He should be able to catch up in 17 miles, right?!?


That analogy does not work because each generation starts over and makes its own way through life.
Your point would make sense if all these terrible white people were passing down generational wealth all these years. But that's not the case. Each generation starts over basically from scratch. We're on the third or fourth generation since the Civil Rights era enabled blacks to go to the same schools and have all the same rights. And they still aren't taking their education seriously. That has nothing to do with anything white people did 150 years ago.

THEY need to change that. Until they do, everything else is really a moot point.

Whites weren't even being educated a hundred years ago for the most part. They haven't even had that much of a head start in that aspect.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:


That analogy does not work because each generation starts over and makes its own way through life.
Your point would make sense if all these terrible white people were passing down generational wealth all these years. But that's not the case. Each generation starts over basically from scratch. We're on the third or fourth generation since the Civil Rights era enabled blacks to go to the same schools and have all the same rights. And they still aren't taking their education seriously. That has nothing to do with anything white people did 150 years ago.

THEY need to change that. Until they do, everything else is really a moot point.

Whites weren't even being educated a hundred years ago for the most part. They haven't even had that much of a head start in that aspect.

I can understand your position better if you think that each generation starts out fresh.

That may be where you and I disagree most strongly, and everything stems from there.

Over 60% of American wealth over the last 110 years is inherited wealth, not created wealth.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2019/02/06/people-like-estate-tax-whole-lot-more-when-they-learn-how-wealth-is-distributed/

"Inheritance can directly link the disadvantaged economic position and prospects of today's blacks to the disadvantaged positions of their parents' and grandparents' generations. According to a report done by Robert B. Avery and Michael S. Rendall, "one in three white households will receive a substantial inheritance during their lifetime compared to only one in ten black households."[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States#cite_note-75][75][/url] This relative lack of inheritance that has been observed among African Americans can be attributed in large part to factors such as unpaid labor (slavery), violent destruction of personal property in incidents such as Red Summer of 1919, unequal opportunity in education and employment (racial discrimination), and more recent policies such as redlining and planned shrinkage. Other ethnic minorities, particularly those with darker complexions, have at times faced many of these same adversities to various degrees"
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That "60% of American wealth" is comprised in about the top 0.50%-1% of the population. So, ~99% of white people do essentially "start from scratch" every generation.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very misleading figures. 90% of the wealth is owned by 20% of the families. You're talking the super-rich. Not the typical white family.

The bottom 60% owns about 1% of the wealth. That's mostly white people, in case you were wondering.

So don't give me this story about how all white people have it so much better because of generational wealth.

Nobody has it better because their parents died and left them the family home when the kids were already in their 60's or 70's. That's not going to make much difference in the lives of most people at that point....it'll probably get them a better level of late-life care, that's about it.

But up until that point, those kids mostly worked their butts off for everything they have.

In America, everyone has a chance if they work hard and get educated.

For 4 generations now, black people have had the same opportunity to get educated, work hard and make a decent life for themselves.

What have they done with that opportunity? Has each generation hammered into their children's heads how hard they should work in school, to make the sacrifices and hard-fought rights that their grandparents and parents (and now great-grandparents) earned for them?
Have they demanded that each generation do better than they did?

Have they improved their lot in life by any significant margin?

If the answer is "No"....then, why? I say that white people had not a damn thing to do with what blacks have done with their opportunity.

Again, whites weren't even getting much in the way of education 100 years ago. It's not like the white race has been churning out high school and college graduates for hundreds of years now, that went on to be wealthy businessmen. No, that was reserved for very few until kind of recently, historically speaking.

My point is, you cannot be complaining about "white privilege" and such unmeasurable foolishness and at the same time, ignoring the fact that blacks haven't been (mostly) doing a damn thing to better themselves in the last 50 years.

Again, as mentioned previously...black single mother birth rate was roughly 40% in the 60's. It's over 70% now.

They can't be demanding that everyone else BUT them needs to make changes, when THEY are the ones that need to make the most change, change that could make more difference than any changes any other group can make will do.
SupplyChainPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

James Henderson said:

Well what bothers me is race discussion often boils down to black or white, which it's not.

You have Native Americans, Asians, Hispanics, etc... who also deal with racial issues in this country, but it's often Black or White.

Imagine being told your tribe/heritage isn't legitimate by the federal government. That's what my people have to deal with. That should be an issue folks fight for too, but it's not.

Over 90% of Natives were killed by viruses alone. Staggering loss of human life, and then most that survived viruses and guns were rounded up and put on reservations.

Between slavery and the colossal loss and displacement and political disenfranchisement of Natives, European colonialism's history from a human rights/human toll standpoint is almost indescribably horrific.




What do you think the history of human rights were in Africa (and the Middle East, for that matter)? How do you think that Africans were brought into a state of enslavement before they were loaded onto slave ships?

They didn't just stroll onboard thinking they were getting a free cruise to see the world.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SupplyChainPack said:

Civilized said:

James Henderson said:

Well what bothers me is race discussion often boils down to black or white, which it's not.

You have Native Americans, Asians, Hispanics, etc... who also deal with racial issues in this country, but it's often Black or White.

Imagine being told your tribe/heritage isn't legitimate by the federal government. That's what my people have to deal with. That should be an issue folks fight for too, but it's not.

Over 90% of Natives were killed by viruses alone. Staggering loss of human life, and then most that survived viruses and guns were rounded up and put on reservations.

Between slavery and the colossal loss and displacement and political disenfranchisement of Natives, European colonialism's history from a human rights/human toll standpoint is almost indescribably horrific.




What do you think the history of human rights were in Africa (and the Middle East, for that matter)? How do you think that Africans were brought into a state of enslavement before they were loaded onto slave ships?

They didn't just stroll onboard thinking they were getting a free cruise to see the world.


What's your point?
SupplyChainPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm saying that the statement: " European colonialism's history from a human rights/human toll standpoint is almost indescribably horrific" is exquisitely selective outrage and gives no context whatsoever of the world that existed at that time.

Slavery was prevalent on the African continent at that time. In fact, it existed (has existed) throughout the history of the African continent. It was Arab muslims who were the early practitioners of buying and selling slaves from Africa - men and women who had already been enslaved by other Africans. But the practice of exporting slaves from Africa went back at least to the Roman empire.

Monstrously, it was common for Africans to use their (African) slaves as human sacrifices.

Incredibly, slavery still exists in Africa to this day - though, oddly, this ongoing practice seems to be of little concern to Western liberals.
Mormad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man this is gonna be an epic election cycle.

Sorry, SCP, was gonna reply to you about peeps googling your statement, decided not to, and forgot to unreply my general observation
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SupplyChainPack said:

I'm saying that the statement: " European colonialism's history from a human rights/human toll standpoint is almost indescribably horrific" is exquisitely selective outrage and gives no context whatsoever of the world that existed at that time.

Slavery was prevalent on the African continent at that time. In fact, it existed (has existed) throughout the history of the African continent. It was Arab muslims who were the early practitioners of buying and selling slaves from Africa - men and women who had already been enslaved by other Africans. But the practice of exporting slaves from Africa went back at least to the Roman empire.

Monstrously, it was common for Africans to use their (African) slaves as human sacrifices.

Incredibly, slavery still exists in Africa to this day - though, oddly, this ongoing practice seems to be of little concern to Western liberals.

This "but but but other people are bad too!!1" argument is so weak. It doesn't hold up when your kid comes home in trouble for pulling pigtails saying "...but but but Jack did it too!!" much less when you're talking about global human rights atrocities.

The scale of slavery exploded when Europeans globalized it and it went trans-Atlantic. Africans were complicit in it too and blood is on their hands too. So...what? What do you do with that information? Use it to make yourself feel better? Use it to avoid taking action here in this country, where there is clearly action to be taken, because other people did it too?

We have an obligation to recognize and fight oppression and cruelty wherever it happens but it's obviously most practicable to fight the battles in the country you live in first/foremost.
SupplyChainPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"What do you do with that information? "

Well first of all - you can use the information to give yourself some perspective. Putting the Europeans and the founding generation of Americans under an electron microscope (ignoring wholly their genius, the boldness, the hard work, and their sacrifices) - while turning a blind eye to what was happening in the rest of the world at that time - specifically in Africa itself, and in the muslim Middle East - that says much more about your personal biases and flaws than any judgement you may presume to pass on them.

SupplyChainPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Secondly, the realization that the horrific practice of slavery still exists in Africa to this day must make you re-think your general view of humanity. "WASPs bad, everyone else good" - doesn't cut it any longer when you realize your key piece of evidence that shows how "horrific" Europeans and American settlers were to the rest of the world - and to Africans in particular - is still energetically being practiced in that very same Africa to this very day.

Your outrage over events that took place over 180 years ago is bizarre when understood in the proper perspective of what is still taking place to this day - on which you heretofore have failed to even comment.

Anyone who is outraged about slavery that took place many, many generations ago, but breezily ignores the slavery that is practiced in our very days is either ignorant or a savage hypocrite.
PackBacker07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why can't people be outraged at both? The two things are independent of each other.
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SupplyChainPack said:

I'm saying that the statement: " European colonialism's history from a human rights/human toll standpoint is almost indescribably horrific" is exquisitely selective outrage and gives no context whatsoever of the world that existed at that time.

Slavery was prevalent on the African continent at that time. In fact, it existed (has existed) throughout the history of the African continent. It was Arab muslims who were the early practitioners of buying and selling slaves from Africa - men and women who had already been enslaved by other Africans. But the practice of exporting slaves from Africa went back at least to the Roman empire.

Monstrously, it was common for Africans to use their (African) slaves as human sacrifices.

Incredibly, slavery still exists in Africa to this day - though, oddly, this ongoing practice seems to be of little concern to Western liberals.

This "but but but other people are bad too!!1" argument is so weak. It doesn't hold up when your kid comes home in trouble for pulling pigtails saying "...but but but Jack did it too!!" much less when you're talking about global human rights atrocities.

The scale of slavery exploded when Europeans globalized it and it went trans-Atlantic. Africans were complicit in it too and blood is on their hands too. So...what? What do you do with that information? Use it to make yourself feel better? Use it to avoid taking action here in this country, where there is clearly action to be taken, because other people did it too?

We have an obligation to recognize and fight oppression and cruelty wherever it happens but it's obviously most practicable to fight the battles in the country you live in first/foremost.
Dude....we don't have slaves anymore. Haven't for a long, long time.

It's time to stop blaming everyone on slavery. The repercussions of the end of slavery certainly stuck around for quite awhile...but they're gone.

The only thing today that is holding back black people is.....black people.

It's time they step up to the challenge of America. It's there for anyone to accept. They (as a whole) are not doing their part. And it's not because white people are holding them back.

As I've said many times....education is the key. They will never be, or feel, "equal" to white people....until they actually ARE. And that means they need to start taking education seriously. Do that, and their outcomes as adults will get better, and they will be "accepted" , for lack of a better term.

Until that happens, everything else that is done or suggested is just pissing into the wind.

We can cease everything that BLM feels is "oppressive and racist" and it won't change the facts or outcomes of black people. Only education and work ethic will do that. The Civil Rights era was supposed to help give blacks access to the same opportunities that everyone else had.
They have that now, and have for quite some time...they're not taking advantage of it.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SupplyChainPack said:

Secondly, the realization that the horrific practice of slavery still exists in Africa to this day must make you re-think your general view of humanity. "WASPs bad, everyone else good" - doesn't cut it any longer when you realize your key piece of evidence that shows how "horrific" Europeans and American settlers were to the rest of the world - and to Africans in particular - is still energetically being practiced in that very same Africa to this very day.

Your outrage over events that took place over 180 years ago is bizarre when understood in the proper perspective of what is still taking place to this day - on which you heretofore have failed to even comment.

Anyone who is outraged about slavery that took place many, many generations ago, but breezily ignores the slavery that is practiced in our very days is either ignorant or a savage hypocrite.


Clearly you weren't on these threads two weeks ago.
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PackBacker07 said:

Why can't people be outraged at both? The two things are independent of each other.
You can be, of course.

That said....which one should have priority? Slavery that is happening NOW, in the 21st century (no matter where), or slavery that happened in the 1800's?

People in Europe have more reason to be outraged about this than US blacks do...many of them were enslaved by the Germans and Soviets just 75 years ago, and literally worked to death.

All countries have done things for people to be outraged about as time has gone by. But as time does go by, these things get put in the history books where they belong, as lessons on how to not do things, and people quit living them and using them as an excuse for sucking at life.

Turkey committed the Armenian Genocide in 1919. Up to 1.5 million killed. Turkey still denies it.
Greek Genocide. Assyrian Genocide. All in the WWI-up era.

Yet the whole world thinks WE are the worst for our slavery. F them. The whole world sucks in one way or another.
Nowhere do people of all colors and ethnicity have the opportunity that they do in America.

One just has to seize the opportunity and make their way. Blacks fought and died for that opportunity, and have since failed to do what it takes to seize it and succeed.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

Dude....we don't have slaves anymore. Haven't for a long, long time.

It's time to stop blaming everyone on slavery. The repercussions of the end of slavery certainly stuck around for quite awhile...but they're gone.

The only thing today that is holding back black people is.....black people.

It's time they step up to the challenge of America. It's there for anyone to accept. They (as a whole) are not doing their part. And it's not because white people are holding them back.

As I've said many times....education is the key. They will never be, or feel, "equal" to white people....until they actually ARE. And that means they need to start taking education seriously. Do that, and their outcomes as adults will get better, and they will be "accepted" , for lack of a better term.

Until that happens, everything else that is done or suggested is just pissing into the wind.

We can cease everything that BLM feels is "oppressive and racist" and it won't change the facts or outcomes of black people. Only education and work ethic will do that.


When where the 'repercussions of the end of slavery' eliminated? As in, what year/era? When did everything get 'trued up'?

If white people had been enslaved for 350 years on this continent, would you feel the same way?

And why do you continue to think that you as a white man are well-equipped to white-man-splain to black people what, exactly, is holding them back?

For weeks on here you've started with what you want the conclusion to be - that black people just need to EDUCATE and STOP COMMITTING CRIME - and ignored the mountains of data that the inputs to their circumstances are grossly different than whites in this country. You've said the data is old, or incomplete, or slanted and instead just attacked the black experience rhetorically - saying that if they were just more educated or less criminalistic they wouldn't have these issues.

Stop infantilizing black people and acting like they're ill-equipped to understand or explain their experience. Ask yourself why you as a white man know better than they do. Listen to them when they explain to you how very different their starting place in the race for equal opportunity in this country is. And stop for a second and ask yourself how you would feel if you belonged to a race that was an enslaved minority for centuries.
SupplyChainPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do you believe that a man can't can't accomplish something with his life because of something that happened with his great, great, great,great, great, great grandfather?

Who is the one treating his fellow man like infants?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes, white men. You can't have an opinion about other races or genders. Whitemansplaining is absolutely unacceptable. Mind you other races and genders can tell you about your "privilege" but you are whitemansplaining if you disagree.

The woke are the ruination of this country.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SupplyChainPack said:

Why do you believe that a man can't can't accomplish something with his life because of something that happened with his great, great, great,great, great, great grandfather?

Who is the one treating his fellow man like infants?

Because I've got my ears on and I believe what black Americans in this country tell me about their experience.

You're so concerned about the way you want things to be that you refuse to listen to what black Americans are telling you.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Yes, white men. You can't have an opinion about other races or genders. Whitemansplaining is absolutely unacceptable. Mind you other races and genders can tell you about your "privilege" but you are whitemansplaining if you disagree.

The woke are the ruination of this country.

Do you agree that you as a white man have a different view of life in America than minorities, including black Americans?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SupplyChainPack said:

Why do you believe that a man can't can't accomplish something with his life because of something that happened with his great, great, great,great, great, great grandfather?

Who is the one treating his fellow man like infants?

I'll ask you the same question:

When where the 'repercussions of the end of slavery' eliminated? As in, what year/era? When did everything get 'trued up'?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Yes, white men. You can't have an opinion about other races or genders. Whitemansplaining is absolutely unacceptable. Mind you other races and genders can tell you about your "privilege" but you are whitemansplaining if you disagree.

The woke are the ruination of this country.

Do you agree that you as a white man have a different view of life in America than minorities, including black Americans?


Do you believe it's OK for other races and genders to tell me about my life experience, but not for me to tell them about their experience? Simply because I am a white male?
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have said time and again, "education is the key".

Better education leads to better outcomes as adults.

All the rest will fall into line as better education starts being the norm for them.

You don't seem to get that. It's not that some magic wand need to be waved and
all the blacks just will stop committing crimes. It's too late for the adults that did
not get educated when they had the chance.

It's not too late for the kids. Somehow, the kids need to be convinced to shed the notion
that getting educated is "acting white" or however they put it in particular locales.
I know for a FACT that's how they put it here. The smart black kids in my kid's HS are called "Burnt Marshmallows" (edited the name after asking my daughter) by the other black kids...."because they're white on the inside".
And that experience is pretty universal across the black community in this country, sadly.

I don't need to be black to know these things. But somehow, blacks need to be convinced
that they've been "doing it wrong".....their average outcome is proof of that.

It's not because of white people, though....not now. Those kids are sitting in the same classrooms,
using the same textbooks/computers, etc, as white kids are, and not doing as well.

That starts in the home. And white people don't have a thing to do with that...unless you want to start
a discussion about how the Great Society destroyed the black family....THEN you might have a point
about how whites affected blacks in a negative way over the last 40 years or so.
Pacfanweb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SupplyChainPack said:

Why do you believe that a man can't can't accomplish something with his life because of something that happened with his great, great, great,great, great, great grandfather?

Who is the one treating his fellow man like infants?

Because I've got my ears on and I believe what black Americans in this country tell me about their experience.

You're so concerned about the way you want things to be that you refuse to listen to what black Americans are telling you.
You have your ears on for what you WANT to hear from black Americans.

You need to have some kids in school for the last 10 years, and see how they act. How they value education. How they don't support their kids, and basically drop them off as kindergarteners, far behind the average white kids.
How they get in trouble more often as kids....which follows them into life, naturally. How they look down at other black kids who study and get into the advanced classes and do nerdy things like band or math club.

And on and on and on.

All that needs to change, and not a bit of it is caused by anything us evil white folks are doing to them.
SupplyChainPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

SupplyChainPack said:

Why do you believe that a man can't can't accomplish something with his life because of something that happened with his great, great, great,great, great, great grandfather?

Who is the one treating his fellow man like infants?

Because I've got my ears on and I believe what black Americans in this country tell me about their experience.

You're so concerned about the way you want things to be that you refuse to listen to what black Americans are telling you.


You're going to have to do better than that. Tell us specifically what it is that is keeping any man from accomplishing the same as any other man based on what happened to his grandparents 6 generations removed.

Be specific.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pacfanweb said:

You have your ears on for what you WANT to hear from black Americans.

You need to have some kids in school for the last 10 years, and see how they act. How they value education. How they don't support their kids, and basically drop them off as kindergarteners, far behind the average white kids.
How they get in trouble more often as kids....which follows them into life, naturally. How they look down at other black kids who study and get into the advanced classes and do nerdy things like band or math club.

And on and on and on.

All that needs to change, and not a bit of it is caused by anything us evil white folks are doing to them.


I go where the data leads me, and it doesn't hurt to listen to people too.

What black America is saying aligns precisely with all the data about outcomes. All of it. I've cited study after study here. Health. Wealth. Educational opportunity. Criminal justice.

What you're saying doesn't align with the data, or with what they're saying. It just aligns with what you want to be true.

You don't want to admit that you're playing a card game with a stacked deck, and then telling your opponent "just play better, you'll win more!"

To be clear, I'm very supportive of ways to provide equal educational opportunity and trying to achieve equal educational outcomes.

Why are you not supportive of admitting the deck is stacked, much less trying to fix it?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SupplyChainPack said:

Civilized said:

SupplyChainPack said:

Why do you believe that a man can't can't accomplish something with his life because of something that happened with his great, great, great,great, great, great grandfather?

Who is the one treating his fellow man like infants?

Because I've got my ears on and I believe what black Americans in this country tell me about their experience.

You're so concerned about the way you want things to be that you refuse to listen to what black Americans are telling you.


You're going to have to do better than that. Tell us specifically what it is that is keeping any man from accomplishing the same as any other man based on what happened to his grandparents 6 generations removed.

Be specific.


You're late to the party. Dive back into this thread, the George Floyd thread, and others.

And this isn't about 'any man'. It's about macro outcomes. Go bigger with your sample size until the data set is meaningfully large.

I'll ask you again though, when was the impact of slavery 'over'? How long did it last? At what point in our history was black America starting the race from the same starting line as white Americans?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Yes, white men. You can't have an opinion about other races or genders. Whitemansplaining is absolutely unacceptable. Mind you other races and genders can tell you about your "privilege" but you are whitemansplaining if you disagree.

The woke are the ruination of this country.

Do you agree that you as a white man have a different view of life in America than minorities, including black Americans?


Do you believe it's OK for other races and genders to tell me about my life experience, but not for me to tell them about their experience? Simply because I am a white male?

What are they telling you about your life experience?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.