Charlie Kirk shot

24,171 Views | 660 Replies | Last: 14 min ago by GuerrillaPack
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?




Yep, bad idea (excluding threats). Let karma catch up to those spewing hate, like violating employer's core values gets them fired.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Steve Bannon says here that "no one in his audience is buying" the official story that we are being "spoonfed" on this Robinson guy being behind it.

Too many things not adding up.

This is a video. Click in body of post or open in IG to play.

https://instagr.am/p/DOpLqadjPec
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?



Agreed, I do not like this at all.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

jkpackfan said:

I hope Bill Ackman sues the **** out of Candace. She's pathetic.




Oh right. Candace was only one of Charlie's closest friends.

She's "pathetic" for WHAT REASON exactly??



They weren't as close as they were in previous years.

Here's Charlie's producer on Ackman, he'd know a lot more than Candace.

GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?



On the surface, Yes, it's bad news. Let's see what implementation looks like, if done. You and I both know, any means to squelch speech will be met with a Supreme Court ruling.
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?



Hate speech, while vile, is protected under the first amendment. I would expect the Attorney General of the United States to know that
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?



Hate speech, while vile, is protected under the first amendment. I would expect the Attorney General of the United States to know that

I agree! I watched Tim Pool last night and they were talking about this subject (not specifically about Bondi) and they were talking about the funding of these actions. There may a place where this can be some type of racketeering.

Right now, I want to see how this gets played out; however, Bondi sounds like some left wingers saying hate speech is not constitutionally protected…

NOT GOOD!!
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah. This is up there with the flag burning. Not going to fly.
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is a story from Just the News about how people on the left, including celebrities, are spreading false information about the assassination and inventing quotes that he never said or they cherry pick certain things. Hmmm sound familiar?

https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/powerful-public-figures-spread-false-info-about-charlie-kirk-assassination?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Must see TV…


Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?



Hate speech, while vile, is protected under the first amendment. I would expect the Attorney General of the United States to know that

Yes, there's a difference between "hate speech" (legal) and terroristic threatening (not so legal). See Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad to see we've made it to the "just completely make **** up and be as unprofessional and divisive as humanly possible" phase of this Administration.

Aside from JD wishcasting a false reality, and the alarming fact that the AG either doesn't have a clue about the Constitution or is just happy to be Trump's spineless legal secretary mouthpiece, Constitution bedamned, does anyone here really believe that Kash hasn't already in some way compromised the assassination investigation and subsequent prosecution?

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Glad to see we've made it to the "just completely make **** up and be as unprofessional and divisive as humanly possible" phase of this Administration.

Aside from JD wishcasting a false reality, and the alarming fact that the AG either doesn't have a clue about the Constitution or is just happy to be Trump's spineless legal secretary mouthpiece, Constitution bedamned, does anyone here really believe that Kash hasn't already in some way compromised the assassination investigation and subsequent prosecution?




Shift the responses to your rabid TDS. Good tactic considering what a fool you've made of yourself with the selective quotes from Kirk and accusations about who the shooter was affiliated with.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

hokiewolf said:

This seems like a bad idea, no?



Hate speech, while vile, is protected under the first amendment. I would expect the Attorney General of the United States to know that

Yes, there's a difference between "hate speech" (legal) and terroristic threatening (not so legal). See Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.



I view it much like the targeting call in football. it's a painful pill to swalllow but do we really want an interpretation of the specifics of the rule everytime? Wish it could be easy but i don't think it can be implemented without much downwind consternation and exposure to freedom.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Sigh.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kash Patel said in a Senate hearing today that more than 20 people are being investigated from the Discord thread the alleged shooter was posting on.

https://truthsocial.com/@KarliBonne/posts/115214524373841856

Edit: Just the News is also reporting this.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/patel-says-others-could-have-been-involved-charlie-kirks-assassination?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrummerboyWolf said:

Kash Patel said in a Senate hearing today that more than 20 people are being investigated from the Discord thread the alleged shooter was posting on.

https://truthsocial.com/@KarliBonne/posts/115214524373841856

Edit: Just the News is also reporting this.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/patel-says-others-could-have-been-involved-charlie-kirks-assassination?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost

Thank you for getting us back on topic.
#Devolution #Expand Your Thinking #Eye of The Storm #TheGreatAwakening
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.

caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.

Being that I agree with you speech being constitutional, which has been argued against, by people with like views as you, I think something we may need to consider.

Free Speech does have a tipping point when someone calls to action for something illegal. Now, Civ, I'm not versed enough to know where that line begins and ends. At the same time, we definitely need to be careful as a slippery slope could get created.

BTW, Megan Kelly is usually fairly level-headed about things. Here is her thoughts.


packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.




People need to held accountable for the hit pieces they write. They knowingly make false statements then "oh, our bad" but the damage is done…on to the next outrage.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:



Totally a right winger.
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"He was speaking so loveably about this partner". Who gives a fk? Our media is an absolute joke.

SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.




People need to held accountable for the hit pieces they write. They knowingly make false statements then "oh, our bad" but the damage is done…on to the next outrage.

So you're saying the entire right wing media machine should be shut down? Ok, I'm listening! Hit pieces and misleading/false statements (without even an "oh, our bad"), and then on to the next outrage, definitely fills up about 80% of their airtime.

I think we can at least all agree that Werewolf behind bars for shamelessly spewing Russian disinformation for years would make the world a better place.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrummerboyWolf said:

This may not be the guy. That is why I am erasing the tweet.


The guy I posted about last week right after the assassination and had his picture up, was shouting I am the shooter and shoot me to the police. He was arrested for obstruction, but today he was arrested for child porn. Maybe they can set him and the shooter up together for the firing squad.

https://www.tmz.com/2025/09/16/charlie-kirk-utah-george-zinn-child-porn-charges/
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.




People need to held accountable for the hit pieces they write. They knowingly make false statements then "oh, our bad" but the damage is done…on to the next outrage.

You've literally just described Trump's entire flood zone with **** media strategy, as proudly conceived by Steve Bannon.

That is rich.
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:



Just a thought, he took it up unassembled in his pants and his backpack, put it together and jumped off the roof with it, but forgot the screwdriver.
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.




People need to held accountable for the hit pieces they write. They knowingly make false statements then "oh, our bad" but the damage is done…on to the next outrage.

We already have laws and civil penalties in place to regulate and adjudicate making knowingly, bad faith, false statements that bring demonstrable harm to someone else.

That's what enabled Dominion to win a gazillion dollars in the Fox settlement.

That's the recourse. The government unconstitutionally regulating speech or the press ain't where it's at.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not only did Kirk fear that Israel might kill him, but so does Trump.

"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, this is funny…


wolf howl
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:


Sigh.


People are tired of these activists masquerading as media. It's been one sided for so long (since the mid 60's)


We're never going to agree on the actual level of bias.

But what we should agree on completely is that such speech is perfectly legal and Constitutional, and that the man-baby threatening the press for exercising legal free speech (because they hurt his feewings) is colossally inappropriate.




People need to held accountable for the hit pieces they write. They knowingly make false statements then "oh, our bad" but the damage is done…on to the next outrage.

So you're saying the entire right wing media machine should be shut down? Ok, I'm listening! Hit pieces and misleading/false statements (without even an "oh, our bad"), and then on to the next outrage, definitely fills up about 80% of their airtime.

I think we can at least all agree that Werewolf behind bars for shamelessly spewing Russian disinformation for years would make the world a better place.

Two things....I would 100000000% be in favor of shutting down FOX if we can also shut down CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, NPR, etc.

Maybe ole Obama was a f'n idiot for repealing the Smith-Mundt Act or, more likely knew exactly what he was doing.

You know, if we put Were in prison for Russian disinformation, he'd have a LOT of company, pretty much every Democrat in Congress along with Obama, Comey, Biden, all those "national security experts" who said it was true, etc..

Anyways, glad they released the text messages, those are helpful. Absolutely f'n pathetic how ABC (or whoever it was up above) saying how eloquent and beautiful his texts to his ****** lover was after murdering someone. THAT is the s h it that is truly disgusting by the media, to make a sorry POS murderer out to be human. He's not. F you for saying he is.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.