TheStorm said:
packgrad said:
DrummerboyWolf said:
Figured here would be good place for this. BLM is scrubbing their anti-American Marxist language from their web site. I wonder why in the world would they be doing that?
https://thepostmillennial.com/exposed-blm-quietly-scrubs-anti-american-marxist-language-from-its-website
Dem polling strikes again.
Yep. The Dems have been funding the riots from the very start...
LOLOLOL So you jumped from talking about BLM website verbiage changing to the Dems funding riots? Makes perfect sense.
Even reading that uber-right wing description of the language on their website it seems pretty clear that BLM is trying to reinforce that children raised by single moms, grandparents, aunts, uncles, or in less orthodox family settings aren't made to feel like second class citizens.
Or, if you're conspiratorial,
"Couched in language about liberation, this section intended to foster the idea that a person's immediate, nuclear family, mother, father, sisters, brothers, is less important than the movement."
The only person describing the nuclear family as "less important than the movement" is the Post Millennial author. Nobody on the BLM side is saying that.
What is threatening to any of you about not looking down on unorthodox family settings or fostering community bonds?
What would blowing up the nuclear family look like, anyway? Are they going to ban marriage? To euthanize fathers? To give tax incentives to single mothers as long as they stay single? What exactly are you afraid of?