That was probably the biggest piece of crap that set me off during 2021. Totally illogical. They were pushing a narrative that essentially said the laws of nature and physics have been temporarily suspended. Influenza doesn't just disappear and masks don't suppress the spread of influenza. If they did, it would have worked in 1918-1919. And a virus is a virus. Covid, influenza, hantavirus, or variola, they all are subject to the same respiratory protection methods.GuerrillaPack said:
Another thing on them now admitting masking was of no benefit whatsoever...
Do y'all remember when the Establishment said that the regular flu basically "vanished worldwide" for more than a year following the beginning of the "covid-19 pandemic"??
And do you remember that they said that the "reason" for this was because all the "masking was preventing spread of the regular flu"??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA
Of course, us "crazy conspiracy theorists" knew all along that they had just re-named and re-branded the regular flu as "covid-19".
But now that also can be confirmed for the rest of you. Because we now know from their admission that masking is of absolutely no benefit, that it certainly could not have caused the regular flu to vanish for a whole year.
The usual media-Democrat narrative strategy goes:
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 28, 2023
1. No, that's not true;
2. You're crazy if you think it might be true;
3. Okay, it might be true, but not how you think;
4. Okay, it's true how you thought, but what does it even matter anymore.
The truth hurts when you're double masked and put your faith into MSNBC and CNN.. pic.twitter.com/bgBshmzmmZ
— Scott Himrod (@ScottHimrod1967) February 27, 2023
Cancer free. It was nothing of any size. Caught it way early. Most was precautionaryTheStorm said:How's everything going for you with the recovery? Hope it's working out exactly as you hoped it would.Glasswolf said:
My friend, regardless of who does what, I will get up tomorrow and go about my day, without fear or regret. I will do that until the Lord calls me home.
LOL. So true, so true... just look at this board.packgrad said:
This hits it on the head.The usual media-Democrat narrative strategy goes:
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 28, 2023
1. No, that's not true;
2. You're crazy if you think it might be true;
3. Okay, it might be true, but not how you think;
4. Okay, it's true how you thought, but what does it even matter anymore.
Good to hear, I thought I saw that was the case previously, but wasn't entirely sure...Glasswolf said:Cancer free. It was nothing of any size. Caught it way early. Most was precautionaryTheStorm said:How's everything going for you with the recovery? Hope it's working out exactly as you hoped it would.Glasswolf said:
My friend, regardless of who does what, I will get up tomorrow and go about my day, without fear or regret. I will do that until the Lord calls me home.
TheStorm said:
Civ will deny it, but he was staunchly against the lab leak theory because of "but Trump!"... he came around to it over time, as it became more obvious though... but originally to him it was one of those "crazy cockamamie right-wing conspiracy theories" because anybody with any ounce of intelligence (like him, of course) knew good and well that it had to come from the Wuhan Wet Market
A lot of people would argue the same about Christians -- accepting multiple stories written long after things occurred but treated as defiant to any science. In fact, isn't there some study that says the societies where the IQ is highest, the % of religious followers is lowest? Its pretty clear here in the US -- as the country has become more aware and intelligent via exposure to new things, people believe the Bible much less than they did when they lived back in the holler and never met 10 people from outside there.Oldsouljer said:
It's makes sense. Think about it….low IQ types will not question whatever bilge that authority figures shovel out because they're low IQ. "Conspiracy theorists" are individuals whose high IQs keep getting triggered because they can't help but notice the existence of irregularities in a given narrative. Logical.
Dude... looking back on the start of this thread, its obvious why sf91 doesn't come around anymore. Lots of crow for that guy. GoPack2008 apparently doesn't post here anymore, but he does too.TheStorm said:LOL. So true, so true... just look at this board.packgrad said:
This hits it on the head.The usual media-Democrat narrative strategy goes:
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) February 28, 2023
1. No, that's not true;
2. You're crazy if you think it might be true;
3. Okay, it might be true, but not how you think;
4. Okay, it's true how you thought, but what does it even matter anymore.
Classic.GoPack2008 said:packgrad said:
I think it just shows the power of the social media mob.
Your posts aren't going to age well. Reality has a funny way of winning out at the end of the day.
You really think a social media mob cancelled the ACC tourney?
packgrad said:Classic.GoPack2008 said:packgrad said:
I think it just shows the power of the social media mob.
Your posts aren't going to age well. Reality has a funny way of winning out at the end of the day.
You really think a social media mob cancelled the ACC tourney?
packgrad said:Classic.GoPack2008 said:packgrad said:
I think it just shows the power of the social media mob.
Your posts aren't going to age well. Reality has a funny way of winning out at the end of the day.
You really think a social media mob cancelled the ACC tourney?
It's far easier for scientists to condemn wildlife traders than to publicly standup to powerful leaders in their field and say that the risky virus work they funded and supported might've led to millions dead.
— Alina Chan (@Ayjchan) February 28, 2023
Daviewolf83 said:
Just going to leave this here. As most of you know, I have been a strong advocate for a full investigation into the origin of the virus that causes Covid-19. I have always thought it was possible the virus leaked from the virology lab in Wuhan China and as such, it should definitely be considered. Of course, the Chinese Communist Party wants no part in an investigation and the idea of transparency is not in their DNA. We should also question the use of gain-of-function research in the study of viruses, particularly ones that can lead to the death of millions of people.It's far easier for scientists to condemn wildlife traders than to publicly standup to powerful leaders in their field and say that the risky virus work they funded and supported might've led to millions dead.
— Alina Chan (@Ayjchan) February 28, 2023
Anybody here want to add "what else" Alina Chan said about the lab leak that was also previously opined here close to three years ago already?!? I think the words were "purposefully leaked"...Daviewolf83 said:
Just going to leave this here. As most of you know, I have been a strong advocate for a full investigation into the origin of the virus that causes Covid-19. I have always thought it was possible the virus leaked from the virology lab in Wuhan China and as such, it should definitely be considered. Of course, the Chinese Communist Party wants no part in an investigation and the idea of transparency is not in their DNA. We should also question the use of gain-of-function research in the study of viruses, particularly ones that can lead to the death of millions of people.It's far easier for scientists to condemn wildlife traders than to publicly standup to powerful leaders in their field and say that the risky virus work they funded and supported might've led to millions dead.
— Alina Chan (@Ayjchan) February 28, 2023
FBI Director Christopher Wray said that the Covid pandemic was probably the result of a laboratory leak in China, providing the first public confirmation of the bureau’s classified judgment of how the virus first emerged https://t.co/KIr8niy8H9
— The Wall Street Journal (@WSJ) March 1, 2023
Could everyone please take a moment to appreciate once again the most ridiculous tweet of the pandemic? @apoorva_nyc is a legend pic.twitter.com/f561Pumnwb
— Jurassic Carl 🦖🐭 (@carl_jurassic) February 26, 2023
They should be more clear with their words...Daviewolf83 said:
By the way, here's the context to my last post. Apoorva is an activist pretending to be a journalist at the NYT.Could everyone please take a moment to appreciate once again the most ridiculous tweet of the pandemic? @apoorva_nyc is a legend pic.twitter.com/f561Pumnwb
— Jurassic Carl 🦖🐭 (@carl_jurassic) February 26, 2023
caryking said:
They should be more clear with their words...
Trump is a racist; therefore, when he called the virus the "China Virus", it was racist...
My, oh my... have times changed...
Please tell me that you can figure this out without any outside help?hokiewolf said:
It's actually interesting. I would think saying the virus came from a wet market would actually be the racist comment because that type of market is found in Asian countries. A virology lab is not something that has any sort of cultural significance in only Asian countries
I used what little common sense that I have.TheStorm said:Please tell me that you can figure this out without any outside help?hokiewolf said:
It's actually interesting. I would think saying the virus came from a wet market would actually be the racist comment because that type of market is found in Asian countries. A virology lab is not something that has any sort of cultural significance in only Asian countries
packgrad said:
By mixed company, I presume you mean democrat and other.
Squeezed it out of every little cell in his body but it took several hours :-)hokiewolf said:I used what little common sense that I have.TheStorm said:Please tell me that you can figure this out without any outside help?hokiewolf said:
It's actually interesting. I would think saying the virus came from a wet market would actually be the racist comment because that type of market is found in Asian countries. A virology lab is not something that has any sort of cultural significance in only Asian countries
The man on the left is Kristian Andersen, a British scientist who emailed Fauci 1/31/20, saying the virus looks lab-made. The man on the right is Kristian Andersen, the guy who Fauci called on 2/1/20 and ordered to publicly say it wasn’t lab-made, which he did. Fauci then gave… https://t.co/UDzIhNb37k pic.twitter.com/LY7ttS23kJ
— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 1, 2023
Progressive activists like to use the accusation as a method to nullify a counter argument. If you accuse someone of being racist, it shifts the argument and the person being accused must defend against it, instead of arguing the original point. It is a classic example of the use of misdirection to try and win an argument.Civilized said:packgrad said:
By mixed company, I presume you mean democrat and other.
Democrats like using the word racist. That's not what triggers them; they're triggered by the topic.
The right is triggered by the word because they're so tired of hearing Democrats talk about it.
Case study of selection bias misleading scientists:
— Alina Chan (@Ayjchan) March 1, 2023
Wuhan investigators only searched for early cases linked to or living near the market because human-human transmission was not recognized.
Western scientists say early cases clustering around the market mean it's ground zero.
That's a very "racist" thing to say!!!!!Daviewolf83 said:Progressive activists like to use the accusation as a method to nullify a counter argument. If you accuse someone of being racist, it shifts the argument and the person being accused must defend against it, instead of arguing the original point. It is a classic example of the use of misdirection to try and win an argument.Civilized said:packgrad said:
By mixed company, I presume you mean democrat and other.
Democrats like using the word racist. That's not what triggers them; they're triggered by the topic.
The right is triggered by the word because they're so tired of hearing Democrats talk about it.
When I see someone misuse the accusation, I assume their point of view should not be taken seriously.