TRUMP 2024

2,020,375 Views | 17810 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Civilized
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:56p, 8/7/25
Nino has access to top flight resources, we shall see.

Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:19p, 8/7/25
The Goliath to be felled!
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 10:30p, 8/7/25
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.

Need I say more (bolded above).

BTW, I have no belief that you single-handedly were responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers. I really don't think, you alone, were smart enough to do so. That said, if you were surrounded by people with your thinking, then YES… you were a contributor.

Here's the part where you double down on the stupid.

What you call a "lack of solid numbers" is called a projection. If you can't comprehend why projections and other types of predictive analytics are vital to being a first world country or a large cap company, then you really should spare the world your opinion on the topic.
Reply Quote
6
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 10:34p, 8/7/25
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.
Reply Quote
6
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 10:35p, 8/7/25
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!

Yep, we like Mike ever since you tried to hang him for not participating in your coup.

Isn't it weird that a Vice President refused to endorse the President he worked for? You'd think that would have been a red flag.
Reply Quote
6
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 10:36p, 8/7/25
#Sieve is going to be having crow for 3meals a day for weeks on end. A traitor supporting treason and sedition.
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 10:43p, 8/7/25
Werewolf said:
#Sieve is going to be having crow for 3meals a day for weeks on end. A traitor supporting treason and sedition.

Whatever you say, comrade.
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:52p, 8/7/25
Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 11:23p, 8/7/25
Werewolf said:
#Sieve is going to be having crow for 3meals a day for weeks on end. A traitor supporting treason and sedition.


So many characters to remember.

So who is the traitor, and who is the treasonous seditioner in this dramatic masterpiece you're concocting?
Reply Quote
5
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 3:01a, 8/8/25
SmaptyWolf said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!

Yep, we like Mike ever since you tried to hang him for not participating in your coup.

Isn't it weird that a Vice President refused to endorse the President he worked for? You'd think that would have been a red flag.


And your President Trump STILL won. Can you believe that??! Man, that must really sting?
Reply Quote
5
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 3:33a, 8/8/25
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.

Need I say more (bolded above).

BTW, I have no belief that you single-handedly were responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers. I really don't think, you alone, were smart enough to do so. That said, if you were surrounded by people with your thinking, then YES… you were a contributor.

Here's the part where you double down on the stupid.

What you call a "lack of solid numbers" is called a projection. If you can't comprehend why projections and other types of predictive analytics are vital to being a first world country or a large cap company, then you really should spare the world your opinion on the topic.

Yep… and Boards remove CEO's for not hitting projections. It is the very thinking, you have, that allows for companies, like Lehman, to get the ultimate CEO removal…. You know, shut it down!

Your condescending arrogance is not impressive at all…. Every retort you make shows me how effed up your thinking really is.

Just remember, many companies, agencies, independent organizations rely on labor statistics to make decisions. Let's continue to accept poor projections (as you call it) and try to manage economic conditions. Go ahead and accept mediocrity…. It's certainly your prerogative.
Reply Quote
6
1 edit
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 6:17a, 8/8/25
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.


Haha! Says the guy who had no problem with Mrs. Harris as a nominee without one single primary vote. gO DEmocRacY!1
Reply Quote
5
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 6:44a, 8/8/25
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.

For democracy? No genuine primary for Democrat voters in 2024. You must really hate Biden, Harris, and the Democrat Party.
CALS grad
Reply Quote
6
TheStorm
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:49a, 8/8/25
Just normal college students doing normal college student things...
Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 7:31a, 8/8/25
#Sieve, i have tried numerous times to help you see. Now you will be "wearing it for all to see"
Reply Quote
1
BBW12OG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 8:29a, 8/8/25
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.

Need I say more (bolded above).

BTW, I have no belief that you single-handedly were responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers. I really don't think, you alone, were smart enough to do so. That said, if you were surrounded by people with your thinking, then YES… you were a contributor.

Here's the part where you double down on the stupid.

What you call a "lack of solid numbers" is called a projection. If you can't comprehend why projections and other types of predictive analytics are vital to being a first world country or a large cap company, then you really should spare the world your opinion on the topic.

Yep… and Boards remove CEO's for not hitting projections. It is the very thinking, you have, that allows for companies, like Lehman, to get the ultimate CEO removal…. You know, shut it down!

Your condescending arrogance is not impressive at all…. Every retort you make shows me how effed up your thinking really is.

Just remember, many companies, agencies, independent organizations rely on labor statistics to make decisions. Let's continue to accept poor projections (as you call it) and try to manage economic conditions. Go ahead and accept mediocrity…. It's certainly your prerogative.


He's a damn unc guy. He gets his jollies off of posting here to "own" Pack fans.

He's just a lowlife tarhole loser that jerks off to Morning Joe and comes here to make himself feel useful.
Reply Quote
1
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:59a, 8/8/25
I tend to believe that there are simple reasons why something has changed that gets ignored for the sake of politics. Why has the BLS data gotten off track. Here's some possibilities in my mind

1. It's survey data. The response rates are getting lower

2. Is it harder to make job projections when you're moving workers out of the country

3. The economy has been more volatile since the pandemic and that might be difficult to model

4. Maybe the change in population is not being properly modeled.

Maybe the job is just getting harder rather than the BLS is getting worse. The erosion of trust in government is also a contributing factor.

Firing someone because you want the data to say what you want it to say is just a bad idea.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 11:20a, 8/8/25
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.


Haha! Says the guy who had no problem with Mrs. Harris as a nominee without one single primary vote. gO DEmocRacY!1


Do y'all ever reasearch anything?

Harris' nomination and democracy weren't in conflict.

This is a good explanation:

Quote:
voters cast ballots for delegates to the convention who were pledged to Biden but who are "unbound" if the candidate withdraws, allowing them to vote for another person at the convention; and the Supreme Court has held that political parties control the nominating process, and they are entitled to manage how they arrive at a nominee as an incident of their First Amendment associational rights.


PSU Law: Ask an Expert - Harris 2024 nomination legality

The nomination was fraught and extraordinarily time-constrained.

That late in the game, no one better than Kamala was going to swallow the poison pill for the party. It was always a long shot. The Biden/Harris fundraising was already in place and available for her and only her (not a candidate not already on the ticket). Also anyone with aspirations beyond 2024 was going to be better off keeping their powder dry and mounting a full campaign in 2028 and beyond.

Kamala was flawed but she absolutely did about as much with the hand she was dealt as you could hope for. Her answers to some questions sucked (trans inmate sex changes, whether she'd change anything about her VP tenure, etc.) but she mounted a really good campaign given all the constraints and considerations.
Reply Quote
3
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Oldsouljer • 11:22a, 8/8/25
Oldsouljer said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.

For democracy? No genuine primary for Democrat voters in 2024. You must really hate Biden, Harris, and the Democrat Party.


See above.

Research the issue and come back to me with why it was in conflict.

It's the Democratic Party's choice to conduct themselves as they see fit (as long as its lawful) and they did.
Reply Quote
3
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:28a, 8/8/25
Civ is such a good little sheep. Lol.

Baaaaaa.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
5
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 11:31a, 8/8/25
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.

Need I say more (bolded above).

BTW, I have no belief that you single-handedly were responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers. I really don't think, you alone, were smart enough to do so. That said, if you were surrounded by people with your thinking, then YES… you were a contributor.

Here's the part where you double down on the stupid.

What you call a "lack of solid numbers" is called a projection. If you can't comprehend why projections and other types of predictive analytics are vital to being a first world country or a large cap company, then you really should spare the world your opinion on the topic.

Yep… and Boards remove CEO's for not hitting projections. It is the very thinking, you have, that allows for companies, like Lehman, to get the ultimate CEO removal…. You know, shut it down!

Your condescending arrogance is not impressive at all…. Every retort you make shows me how effed up your thinking really is.

Just remember, many companies, agencies, independent organizations rely on labor statistics to make decisions. Let's continue to accept poor projections (as you call it) and try to manage economic conditions. Go ahead and accept mediocrity…. It's certainly your prerogative.

The companies and agencies that rely on labor statistics understand that the numbers will always be revised with real data, because modeling is never perfect. The only people up in arms about this are MAGA partisan hacks trying to justify Dear Leader going into a rage and doing something incredibly stupid.

The "problem" we have is that you live in a Reality Show Cult. There is only one kind of acceptable data, the kind that shows that Trump is always WINNING and/or that Dems are always LOSING. Anyone not on board with that... the BLS, the FBI, the CIA, our best universities, federal judges, the United States itself... is immediately added to the DEEP STATE CONSPIRACY and targeted for destruction.
Reply Quote
3
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:31a, 8/8/25
Democrats thought it was fine for unelected bureaucrats and the auto pen to run the country. They were ready to vote for 4 more years of that until the drugs couldn't keep up for their Weekend at Bernie's candidate.

They give zero ****s about democracy. They care about their mental illness and usurpring a president a second time.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
6
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 2:08p, 8/8/25
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.


Haha! Says the guy who had no problem with Mrs. Harris as a nominee without one single primary vote. gO DEmocRacY!1


Do y'all ever reasearch anything?

Harris' nomination and democracy weren't in conflict.

This is a good explanation:

Quote:
voters cast ballots for delegates to the convention who were pledged to Biden but who are "unbound" if the candidate withdraws, allowing them to vote for another person at the convention; and the Supreme Court has held that political parties control the nominating process, and they are entitled to manage how they arrive at a nominee as an incident of their First Amendment associational rights.


PSU Law: Ask an Expert - Harris 2024 nomination legality

The nomination was fraught and extraordinarily time-constrained.

That late in the game, no one better than Kamala was going to swallow the poison pill for the party. It was always a long shot. The Biden/Harris fundraising was already in place and available for her and only her (not a candidate not already on the ticket). Also anyone with aspirations beyond 2024 was going to be better off keeping their powder dry and mounting a full campaign in 2028 and beyond.

Kamala was flawed but she absolutely did about as much with the hand she was dealt as you could hope for. Her answers to some questions sucked (trans inmate sex changes, whether she'd change anything about her VP tenure, etc.) but she mounted a really good campaign given all the constraints and considerations.


Poppycock
Reply Quote
Gulfstream4
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 2:09p, 8/8/25
packgrad said:
Civ is such a good little sheep. Lol.

Baaaaaa.


Got to give it to him. He's a true believer.
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 2:29p, 8/8/25
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
SmaptyWolf said:
caryking said:
Let's see…. Liberals rave about the job creation numbers under the Biden admin. Then we find out that BLS revised the numbers down by around 1M. Now, these same liberals are concerned about the firing of this department head.

Please make that sensible for people, according Smapty, are basically dumb as ****…

Becaaaaaaause the BLS always revises the numbers after they get in more hard data.

Yes, the BLS revised Biden down A MILLION JOBS. In your mind, that wasn't the conspiracy, it was him getting the good job numbers in the first place. Oh, but in Trump's case you pranced around, crowing about his great numbers, and then when the hard data came in revising those numbers down, OMG IT'S THE DEEP STATE!!! FIRE EVERYONE!!!!!

Yes, the problem is in fact that you're dumb as sh**.

Now guess what happens next month when they release numbers? You think anyone will pay attention to them? How do you imagine a First World bond market is supposed to function with a Third World tin pot idiot threatening to fire everyone who doesn't drop golf balls for him?

And yes… you know a lot about numbers. Need I say why?

Continuously proving to be sub-par at one's job probably means…. You may not be very good. At some point, we need a change. Honestly, haven't you been finding the lack of solid numbers a little concerning? This isn't a new phenomenon, right?

Lol, it's very flattering that you think I was personally responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers.

Anyway, no, the "lack of solid numbers" isn't concerning. The BLS uses wildly complicated mathematical models that produce projections because those projections are incredibly important to financial markets. BLS isn't doing all that work to make Presidents look good or bad. It's actually important that they could care less how it makes a President look. The reason that they "revise" the numbers is exactly because you want to base future projections on current reality, not previous projections... not revising the numbers as hard data trickles in would lead to drift that would quickly make important projections useless.

The key takeaway is this: When you and your moron-in-arms Wolfblood suggest that we should do away with BLS projections, all you're doing is revealing that you are clueless and have had your brains soaked in MAGA fan fiction. If you actually want to Make America Great Again, maybe clueless people should go back to the good ol' days when they kept their mouths shut until they read a book on the subject, instead of just raging that everything should be burned to the ground.

Need I say more (bolded above).

BTW, I have no belief that you single-handedly were responsible for the demise of Lehman Brothers. I really don't think, you alone, were smart enough to do so. That said, if you were surrounded by people with your thinking, then YES… you were a contributor.

Here's the part where you double down on the stupid.

What you call a "lack of solid numbers" is called a projection. If you can't comprehend why projections and other types of predictive analytics are vital to being a first world country or a large cap company, then you really should spare the world your opinion on the topic.

Yep… and Boards remove CEO's for not hitting projections. It is the very thinking, you have, that allows for companies, like Lehman, to get the ultimate CEO removal…. You know, shut it down!

Your condescending arrogance is not impressive at all…. Every retort you make shows me how effed up your thinking really is.

Just remember, many companies, agencies, independent organizations rely on labor statistics to make decisions. Let's continue to accept poor projections (as you call it) and try to manage economic conditions. Go ahead and accept mediocrity…. It's certainly your prerogative.

The companies and agencies that rely on labor statistics understand that the numbers will always be revised with real data, because modeling is never perfect. The only people up in arms about this are MAGA partisan hacks trying to justify Dear Leader going into a rage and doing something incredibly stupid.

The "problem" we have is that you live in a Reality Show Cult. There is only one kind of acceptable data, the kind that shows that Trump is always WINNING and/or that Dems are always LOSING. Anyone not on board with that... the BLS, the FBI, the CIA, our best universities, federal judges, the United States itself... is immediately added to the DEEP STATE CONSPIRACY and targeted for destruction.

like I said...

Every retort you make shows me how effed up your thinking really is.
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Gulfstream4 • 2:53p, 8/8/25
Gulfstream4 said:
packgrad said:
Civ is such a good little sheep. Lol.

Baaaaaa.


Got to give it to him. He's a true believer.



About 10-20% of the country is like #Sieve. That's a lot of F'd up people. As the media and Hollywood is taken down, he'll dry foul and Trump is a dictator. He won't believe his eyes ....that's how bad he's brainwashed.
Reply Quote
Oldsouljer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 7:30p, 8/8/25
Civilized said:
Oldsouljer said:
Civilized said:
Gulfstream4 said:
Civilized said:

Well said, Mike!


Now we like Mike!


I'm an OG Mike fan. We go back to Jan 2021!

Anyone that stands up for democracy to their own significant personal and political detriment is a friend of mine.

For democracy? No genuine primary for Democrat voters in 2024. You must really hate Biden, Harris, and the Democrat Party.


See above.

Research the issue and come back to me with why it was in conflict.

It's the Democratic Party's choice to conduct themselves as they see fit (as long as its lawful) and they did.

That's right. It's their choice and not that of those peasant voters. Just ask any Superdelegate.
CALS grad
Reply Quote
2
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:06p, 8/8/25
NYT: Trump Directs Military to Target Foreign Drug Cartels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/trump-military-drug-cartels.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Looks like somebody just watched Sicario 2 and thought it would be cool to try it out in real life.
Reply Quote
1
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 10:45p, 8/8/25
Civilized said:
NYT: Trump Directs Military to Target Foreign Drug Cartels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/trump-military-drug-cartels.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Looks like somebody just watched Sicario 2 and thought it would be cool to try it out in real life.


No surprise this is your position. Didn't work out so good on immigration for you. I'm sure you'll be right this time though. Good to see you're mocking going against the cartels though. Kind of shows how much tooth you have when expressing concern about pedophilia and human trafficking, doesn't it?

Mentally ill.
"I'm 100% an expert on what opinions I have written on this site"
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:45p, 8/8/25
Race Fans, watch! We are just getting started......

Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:07p, 8/8/25
I told you about this back in Sept 2024. It was brought to the attention of Juan O'Savin who now has this in front of DOJ and possibly Grassley's committee. Asst Chief Shawn Miller of Millersville, Tn.



Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 11:36p, 8/8/25
packgrad said:
Civilized said:
NYT: Trump Directs Military to Target Foreign Drug Cartels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/trump-military-drug-cartels.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Looks like somebody just watched Sicario 2 and thought it would be cool to try it out in real life.


No surprise this is your position. Didn't work out so good on immigration for you. I'm sure you'll be right this time though. Good to see you're mocking going against the cartels though. Kind of shows how much tooth you have when expressing concern about pedophilia and human trafficking, doesn't it?

Mentally ill.

Dude it's Friday night. Pour yourself a bourbon and lighten up and laugh a little.

I wasn't making a political statement. It's literally the plot of Sicario 2, which is a funny and pretty wild parallel.

Preview:


If y'all haven't seen Sicario and Sicario 2, do yourself a favor and watch them. BDT is one of my all-time favorite actors and he's great in these. As per usual the first one is probably a touch better than the sequel but both are worth watching. Emily Blount and Josh Brolin are really good too.
Reply Quote
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 11:59p, 8/8/25
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Civilized said:
NYT: Trump Directs Military to Target Foreign Drug Cartels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/trump-military-drug-cartels.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Looks like somebody just watched Sicario 2 and thought it would be cool to try it out in real life.


No surprise this is your position. Didn't work out so good on immigration for you. I'm sure you'll be right this time though. Good to see you're mocking going against the cartels though. Kind of shows how much tooth you have when expressing concern about pedophilia and human trafficking, doesn't it?

Mentally ill.

Dude it's Friday night. Pour yourself a bourbon and lighten up and laugh a little.

I wasn't making a political statement. It's literally the plot of Sicario 2, which is a funny and pretty wild parallel.

Preview:


If y'all haven't seen Sicario and Sicario 2, do yourself a favor and watch them. BDT is one of my all-time favorite actors and he's great in these. As per usual the first one is probably a touch better than the sequel but both are worth watching. Emily Blount and Josh Brolin are really good too.

After you finish the Sicario double feature, be sure to watch South Park. Good loooooooooord they're brutal.

Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 12:31a, 8/9/25
SmaptyWolf said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
Civilized said:
NYT: Trump Directs Military to Target Foreign Drug Cartels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/08/us/trump-military-drug-cartels.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Looks like somebody just watched Sicario 2 and thought it would be cool to try it out in real life.


No surprise this is your position. Didn't work out so good on immigration for you. I'm sure you'll be right this time though. Good to see you're mocking going against the cartels though. Kind of shows how much tooth you have when expressing concern about pedophilia and human trafficking, doesn't it?

Mentally ill.

Dude it's Friday night. Pour yourself a bourbon and lighten up and laugh a little.

I wasn't making a political statement. It's literally the plot of Sicario 2, which is a funny and pretty wild parallel.

Preview:


If y'all haven't seen Sicario and Sicario 2, do yourself a favor and watch them. BDT is one of my all-time favorite actors and he's great in these. As per usual the first one is probably a touch better than the sequel but both are worth watching. Emily Blount and Josh Brolin are really good too.

After you finish the Sicario double feature, be sure to watch South Park. Good loooooooooord they're brutal.



Scathing.

Fascinated to see if Paramount bends the knee and Respects Trump's Authori-TY or whether thy let it ride. South Park has always been an equal opportunity offender but it's clear they've got this administration in their crosshairs right now.
Reply Quote
1
First Page Refresh
Page 509 of 509 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.