hokiewolf said:
Legislation being crafted and debated through committee rather than dictated from the Speakers Office would be a great first step.
Can't do that when one party's entire political objective is not to govern but to GET TRUMP.
hokiewolf said:
Legislation being crafted and debated through committee rather than dictated from the Speakers Office would be a great first step.
Today’s 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court is a Victory for the American People and a Win for the Separation of Powers enshrined in the Constitution of the United States.
— Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) February 20, 2026
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, our Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Constitution grants Congress -…
Civilized said:
My guy Mike!Today’s 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court is a Victory for the American People and a Win for the Separation of Powers enshrined in the Constitution of the United States.
— Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) February 20, 2026
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, our Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Constitution grants Congress -…
Civilized said:SmaptyWolf said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
Finally, sanity.
Overdue but incredibly welcomed.A 6-3 Court tells Trump he lacks the power to impose tariffs under IEEPA pic.twitter.com/sFygXiggOx
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) February 20, 2026
Does this mean the democrat cries of the SC doing the bidding for the President were false?
Lol, no. It means that this was so over the top obvious that there was no way they could rule in favor of Trump and keep any pretense of credibility. And it was still a 6-3 ruling.
Exactly.
There was simply no way for the SC to deny the unconstitutionality of these legally groundless tariffs and maintain their reputation, and yet still there were 3 dissenters to that opinion.
Look forward to reading the minority opinion on this one for sure.
🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent just STUNNED the "Experts," he and Trump have been making big plans and it's FULL-STEAM AHEAD
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 20, 2026
Tariff revenue will be *unchanged* in 2026. Boom.
"Let's be clear about what today's ruling WAS and what it WASN'T. Despite the misplaced… pic.twitter.com/tYHk1DoEvy
LOL! SCOTUS’s ruling basically said Trump was using the wrong law for his tariffs, so Trump just issued the same tariffs under different laws and increased them by 10%.
— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) February 20, 2026
“Thank you for your attention to this matter.” - Trump 🤣
Follow: @WallStreetMav pic.twitter.com/GDoVuYyCuV
Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
My guy Mike!Today’s 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court is a Victory for the American People and a Win for the Separation of Powers enshrined in the Constitution of the United States.
— Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) February 20, 2026
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, our Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Constitution grants Congress -…
Now we like Mike!
HUGE: President Trump is rumored to be releasing declassified evidence that the 2020 election was stolen with evidence of foreign interference from multiple countries.
— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) February 20, 2026
Nothing can stop what's coming. The truth will always prevail. pic.twitter.com/CwuYcaItTs
🚨 HOLY CRAP. President Trump hints he is about to expose the exact foreign influences who swayed SCOTUS' opinion on tariffs
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) February 20, 2026
REPORTER: Foreign influence...do you have evidence of that? Will you investigate that?
TRUMP: You’re going to find out.
👀🔥pic.twitter.com/svFql0N7Gz
Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
My guy Mike!Today’s 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court is a Victory for the American People and a Win for the Separation of Powers enshrined in the Constitution of the United States.
— Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) February 20, 2026
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, our Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Constitution grants Congress -…
Now we like Mike!
Love that ****ing guy.
🚨 BREAKING: Foreign governments are PANICKING after the Supreme Court move just opened the door for Trump to hit them with EVEN BIGGER tariffs.
— Charlie’s Voice Rising (@CharlieK_news) February 20, 2026
Trump: “Vietnam’s top guy just left my office and said, ‘You can charge us more than before!’”
Canada next? 🔥🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/MxX11gpySL
Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
My guy Mike!Today’s 6-3 ruling by the Supreme Court is a Victory for the American People and a Win for the Separation of Powers enshrined in the Constitution of the United States.
— Mike Pence (@Mike_Pence) February 20, 2026
In Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, our Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Constitution grants Congress -…
Now we like Mike!
Love that ****ing guy.
hokiewolf said:
Legislation being crafted and debated through committee rather than dictated from the Speakers Office would be a great first step.
Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
Finally, sanity.
Overdue but incredibly welcomed.
Does this mean the democrat cries of the SC doing the bidding for the President were false?
"Doing the bidding" sounds unnecessarily dramatic.
But let's not pretend this court isn't as or more conservative than any court dating back a century.
Trump got lucky and appointed 3 justices in 4 years, so the court leans further right than it has in generations.
That is definitely true.
Congrats on your victory.
Call me crazy but me thinks the democrats will be back to outraging when the next ruling doesn't go their way?
Thank you Gulf, thank you. I'm riding high today.
Seriously, the tariffs were always predictably economically harmful, punitive, not well-reasoned, unconstitutional, and just all around stupid.
Hopefully this will give American and international companies more certainty and confidence to invest in our country, along with reducing inflation, and hopefully allowing rates to fall.
I'm very pleased with this ruling.
The country has 340 million people and roughly half of those people (that care about issues anyway) will be unhappy with every ruling.
That said, tariffs were always colossally dumb and unconstitutional, made worse by Trump's openly using them as a cudgel against friends and foes alike.
Good riddance, tariffs!
Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
Finally, sanity.
Overdue but incredibly welcomed.A 6-3 Court tells Trump he lacks the power to impose tariffs under IEEPA pic.twitter.com/sFygXiggOx
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) February 20, 2026
Does this mean the democrat cries of the SC doing the bidding for the President were false?
RNCResearch: Democrat Rep. Becca Balint ADMITS illegal aliens are voting in U.S. elections — and justifies it.
— Republican Women of Mercer County 💪🇺🇸 (@RWOMC) February 19, 2026
BALINT: "It's just a miniscule number of people...” pic.twitter.com/nhydncSBgy
AMERICAN DETERRENCE 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/5ECasMCsPG
— Department of War CTO (@DoWCTO) February 19, 2026
If I thought tariffs were vital to the future of the US, I would be upset that the government wasted a year doing them illegally when it could have done them legally instead. https://t.co/jUm2EmjFN3
— Dominic Pino (@DominicJPino) February 20, 2026
🚨 Not sure who this young lady is but she NAILS IT! 🔥
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) February 18, 2026
“… I have to show my ID to get married, change my legal name, update Social Security card, get a new driver's license, update my passport, fly on a plane, open and manage bank accounts, get prescriptions, verify my age,… pic.twitter.com/z3A1QP13O8
Hillary Clinton taunts tampering with the election against Donald Trump:
— Bridgett Fertig (@LightOnLiberty) February 19, 2026
"Maybe what they'll do this next time, is to REALLY disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines, because still, TOO MANY OF… pic.twitter.com/hUMklmyfci
YUGE Loss For Newsom!
— 🇺🇸The REAL Lady De’Plorable🇺🇸 (@LadyRedWave) February 20, 2026
9th Circuit Court of Appeals just SLAMMED the door shut: FULL BLOCK on California’s insane law forcing ICE agents to UNMASK while doing their jobs.
pic.twitter.com/sKgYS3aNUa
This is how it's done. WTG Victorville City Council. Victorville and the high desert are RED. #Victorville#ICE https://t.co/DkdkmhfZoc
— Cloud 9 (@mrschief1020) February 20, 2026
Pregnant 14 year old girl was saved by Tom Homan
— Derek Johnson (@derekjoihnson1) February 21, 2026
He said:
"We just found one two days ago. A 14-year-old little girl. Living with two adult males. Who trafficked her. We found her, she’s pregnant. From trafficking forced into prostitution. to it.” pic.twitter.com/ZwnKM01Eb5
[Epstein] [Wexner]The story goes much deeper [darker]. Qhttps://t.co/Z57qrSK8DI
— Star stuff (@Juanlife4) February 20, 2026
3875 Q pic.twitter.com/hVMJN8Hc8z
🚩🚩🚩Lesley Wexner's attorney who threatened to k1ll him during his Congressional Epstein interview,
— Joshua Sanftner (@JoshuaSanftner) February 20, 2026
MICHAEL LEVY, appears to be MENTIONED IN the EPSTEIN EMAILS, worked at the White House under Clinton, was involved with Exxon, FTX, and more...
- Diligent Denizen https://t.co/GH3eOFEUBP
In 1988, Jeffrey Epstein’s financier Les Wexner took control of Abercrombie & Fitch and placed Mike Jeffries as CEO in 1992.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) October 22, 2024
During Jeffries’ time at the helm, Epstein was managing Wexner’s wealth.
Decades later, Jeffries, now 80, has been arrested for s*x trafficking young… pic.twitter.com/JrfHdWe6Bc
For a minute, all the Democrats were screaming to release the files and now we have total silence. We even had women on the View, making excuses for the people on the list when not too long ago they were screaming release the files. They were making this political, it was never… pic.twitter.com/YBvCZTAVsF
— Denise Aguilar (@InformedMama209) February 20, 2026
The cast of “The View” are the perfect example of flip flopping liberals and how the current narrative dictates their stance 😂😂
— {Matt} $XRPatriot (@matttttt187) February 19, 2026
Prior to Epstein Files being released..
🗣️ Just release it all, this is what is is
After Epstein Files released….and Whoopi is on it….
🗣️:… pic.twitter.com/E74Fir1vac
Jay-Z y Beyoncé buscados por cargos de asesinato infantil vinculados en los archivos de Epstein.
— XAVIER (@xavigonzafwga) February 20, 2026
La policía ahora exige que Jay-Z y Beyoncé se sometan a interrogatorios por el explosivo testimonio de sobrevivientes que los vincula a estos safaris humanos. pic.twitter.com/pv0nAA8y3e
caryking said:Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:
Finally, sanity.
Overdue but incredibly welcomed.
Does this mean the democrat cries of the SC doing the bidding for the President were false?
"Doing the bidding" sounds unnecessarily dramatic.
But let's not pretend this court isn't as or more conservative than any court dating back a century.
Trump got lucky and appointed 3 justices in 4 years, so the court leans further right than it has in generations.
That is definitely true.
Congrats on your victory.
Call me crazy but me thinks the democrats will be back to outraging when the next ruling doesn't go their way?
Thank you Gulf, thank you. I'm riding high today.
Seriously, the tariffs were always predictably economically harmful, punitive, not well-reasoned, unconstitutional, and just all around stupid.
Hopefully this will give American and international companies more certainty and confidence to invest in our country, along with reducing inflation, and hopefully allowing rates to fall.
I'm very pleased with this ruling.
The country has 340 million people and roughly half of those people (that care about issues anyway) will be unhappy with every ruling.
That said, tariffs were always colossally dumb and unconstitutional, made worse by Trump's openly using them as a cudgel against friends and foes alike.
Good riddance, tariffs!
Civ, let me deal with your points:
- the tariffs were always predictably economically harmful - so far, that's an opinion not based in economic data
- punitive - really? Not seeing that one either, so far
- not well-reasoned - opinion
- Unconstitutional - well, only some were ruled that way. Others were not and most likely all tariffs will follow those other statutes
- just all around stupid - opinion
- Hopefully this will give American and international companies more certainty and confidence to invest in our country, along with reducing inflation, and hopefully allowing rates to fall. - how can you think that? The tariffs will not go away. In fact, don't be surprised we end up with more strenuous tariffs in the future.
- The country has 340 million people and roughly half of those people (that care about issues anyway) will be unhappy with every ruling. - two things: 1) do we really have 340M citizens in the country? 2) I agree with the unhappy part. That said, I'm not unhappy with this ruling. I'm happy that we have a ruling and guidelines moving forward. I believe in tariffs for certain reasons and hope Trump uses them to drive more manufacturing in the US.
- tariffs were always colossally dumb and unconstitutional, made worse by Trump's openly using them as a cudgel against friends and foes alike. - opinion
- Good riddance, tariffs! - as Leo Corso would say… not so fast, my friend!
They’re throwing a temper tantrum and will have to defend this in court again. Amazing how much they’re acting against their own interests for the sake of the president’s crank views on economics. https://t.co/lXI7eGSIp4
— Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) February 21, 2026
Let's go: "Senate Democrats Call for 'Expeditious and Transparent' Refund of IEEPA Duties" https://t.co/XzL4SRzsXA pic.twitter.com/ioSssBfM0m
— Scott Lincicome (@scottlincicome) February 21, 2026
FlossyDFlynt said:Civilized said:
Finally, sanity.
Overdue but incredibly welcomed.A 6-3 Court tells Trump he lacks the power to impose tariffs under IEEPA pic.twitter.com/sFygXiggOx
— Joyce Alene (@JoyceWhiteVance) February 20, 2026
Good. Well past time to reign in executive power.
Now get us out of the emergency declaration from COVID please
hokiewolf said:
"The tariffs will not go away. In fact, don't be surprised we end up with more strenuous tariffs in the future."
I seem to remember there being an issue about Biden losing in the Supreme Court on student loan debt forgiveness and you joined the majority here (including me) that Biden trying to ignore the ruling to get what he wanted politically was a bad thing.
Is Trump vowing to continue to apply tariffs by any means necessary not the same bad thing?
Maxwell and Kevin Spacey sitting on Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Phillip’s thrones at Buckingham Palace in 2002.
— matrixbot (@thematrixb0t) February 13, 2026
It really is a big club. pic.twitter.com/GaRhhzVDOv
the 10% tariffs he announced aren't legal either. Rhetoric is the same thoughOldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:
"The tariffs will not go away. In fact, don't be surprised we end up with more strenuous tariffs in the future."
I seem to remember there being an issue about Biden losing in the Supreme Court on student loan debt forgiveness and you joined the majority here (including me) that Biden trying to ignore the ruling to get what he wanted politically was a bad thing.
Is Trump vowing to continue to apply tariffs by any means necessary not the same bad thing?
Continuing tariffs through other legal authorities that exist doesn't seem analogous to me, because Biden had no alternative authorities to fall back upon to justify student loan forgiveness once the Court ruled against him.