TRUMP 2024

2,489,491 Views | 22212 Replies | Last: 20 min ago by packgrad
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

hokiewolf said:

What do you guys think? I think it's a possibility but I don't know enough about the rules of engagement. Perhaps those here who have served have some additional info?


There's a reason the heat on Hegseth is ratcheting up exponentially.

If this happened as is now being widely reported, it's a textbook example of an illegal order; is precisely the type of order that the Seditious 6 were warning armed servicemembers about; and unfortunately has exposed those in the chain of command to potential criminal charges for extrajudicial murder.

Hegseth is out there cosplaying GI Joe with real lives.


packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.


Pitiful #Sieve, no awareness whatsoever.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some terminology to get acquainted with.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting read
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Been shared here before ...months ago.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.


Snowflakes would be devastated if they learned more about Seal Team 6 and attacks on terrorists. Who am I kidding? They only pretend they care because Trump. Mentally ill sheep.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.
so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Wait?!? What?!?

You mean, he's not even talking about the Epstein Files anymore?

But I'm 100% sure that he's 100% sure that they'll "get Trump" this time...


Muahahaha!!!!!

(Talk about reducing oneself to nothing but a caricature... *don't be a caricature, Kevin.)
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.

so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.

Been catching up on this story this morning as I missed it yesterday and...Im just going to let this one play out for a while. Lotta mud coming from both sides at the moment, so Im just going to sit back and see where it lands in the end.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.

so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.

Hokiewolf, I'm sure the admin will say they take responsibility; however, what does actually mean? To my knowledge, when any admin say "I take full responsibility", I don't think that actually means anything… Those are words; however, seldom, if ever, does any type of accountability come along with those words…

I can't imagine any legal issue will and should come from those actions. For me, I take a more hardline approach…. These people on the boat had a clear intent to provide for the distribution of drugs in the US. Taking them completely out is not out of order.

The people responsible for the distribution of drugs have an intent to make money, with a byproduct of destruction of people, whether the people want the drugs or not. For that, and with the volume of these drugs, eliminating them is a reasonable action. I think we need to clear up any laws that make this thinking shut down. These people are like any other person or group with the intent of destroying the people of the US with other means.

Take them out, 100%!!!
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I definitely see your point, but I do have concerns about that approach as we have "declared war" I think that changes the rules of engagement, but again I just don't know.

What I've seen reported but not confirmed is that this would be similar to if you shot a plane down and the pilot ejected, at that point they stop being a combatant. Therefore it would be a war crime to shoot the pilot.

I think Flossy has the right idea, it needs to be played out, but I do have concerns about the approach taken.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Wait?!? What?!?

You mean, he's not even talking about the Epstein Files anymore?

But I'm 100% sure that he's 100% sure that they'll "get Trump" this time...


Muahahaha!!!!!

(Talk about reducing oneself to nothing but a caricature... *don't be a caricature, Kevin.)


They are going to GET TRUMP this time…you just wait…you'll see…..YOU WILL SEE!!1
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

I definitely see your point, but I do have concerns about that approach as we have "declared war" I think that changes the rules of engagement, but again I just don't know.

What I've seen reported but not confirmed is that this would be similar to if you shot a plane down and the pilot ejected, at that point they stop being a combatant. Therefore it would be a war crime to shoot the pilot.

I think Flossy has the right idea, it needs to be played out, but I do have concerns about the approach taken.


Was that pilot acting the line of duty as a commissioned officer for an official national or was he a Joe Blow given an airplane by a criminal organization and on the way to bomb a sovereign nation and kill men, women and children for money?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.

so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.

Hokiewolf, I'm sure the admin will say they take responsibility; however, what does actually mean? To my knowledge, when any admin say "I take full responsibility", I don't think that actually means anything… Those are words; however, seldom, if ever, does any type of accountability come along with those words…

I can't imagine any legal issue will and should come from those actions. For me, I take a more hardline approach…. These people on the boat had a clear intent to provide for the distribution of drugs in the US. Taking them completely out is not out of order.

The people responsible for the distribution of drugs have an intent to make money, with a byproduct of destruction of people, whether the people want the drugs or not. For that, and with the volume of these drugs, eliminating them is a reasonable action. I think we need to clear up any laws that make this thinking shut down. These people are like any other person or group with the intent of destroying the people of the US with other means.

Take them out, 100%!!!

Sounds good, except for the fact that's totally illegal.

If we've declared war (we haven't) and the enemy combatant is out of the fight, it's a war crime to kill them.

If we're not at war and we're offing civilians that pose no clear threat to the US (someone injured hanging from the side of the boat), that's extrajudicial murder and military members aren't shielded.

The crux of whether any crime took place here likely hinges on whether it can be established someone knew there were survivors before ordering the second round of attacks on the boat.

If that's established, I think this goes very poorly for Hegseth or the op commander or whoever else knew before ordering or executing their killing.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.

so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.

Hokiewolf, I'm sure the admin will say they take responsibility; however, what does actually mean? To my knowledge, when any admin say "I take full responsibility", I don't think that actually means anything… Those are words; however, seldom, if ever, does any type of accountability come along with those words…

I can't imagine any legal issue will and should come from those actions. For me, I take a more hardline approach…. These people on the boat had a clear intent to provide for the distribution of drugs in the US. Taking them completely out is not out of order.

The people responsible for the distribution of drugs have an intent to make money, with a byproduct of destruction of people, whether the people want the drugs or not. For that, and with the volume of these drugs, eliminating them is a reasonable action. I think we need to clear up any laws that make this thinking shut down. These people are like any other person or group with the intent of destroying the people of the US with other means.

Take them out, 100%!!!

Sounds good, except for the fact that's totally illegal.

If we've declared war (we haven't) and the enemy combatant is out of the fight, it's a war crime to kill them.

If we're not at war and we're offing civilians that pose no clear threat to the US (someone injured hanging from the side of the boat), that's extrajudicial murder and military members aren't shielded.

The crux of whether any crime took place here likely hinges on whether it can be established someone knew there were survivors before ordering the second round of attacks on the boat.

If that's established, I think this goes very poorly for Hegseth or the op commander or whoever else knew before ordering or executing their killing.



Keep hope alive
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

I definitely see your point, but I do have concerns about that approach as we have "declared war" I think that changes the rules of engagement, but again I just don't know.

What I've seen reported but not confirmed is that this would be similar to if you shot a plane down and the pilot ejected, at that point they stop being a combatant. Therefore it would be a war crime to shoot the pilot.

I think Flossy has the right idea, it needs to be played out, but I do have concerns about the approach taken.


Was that pilot acting the line of duty as a commissioned officer for an official national or was he a Joe Blow given an airplane by a criminal organization and on the way to bomb a sovereign nation and kill men, women and children for money?
I don't know honestly, but my concern is very well stated by Civ here in the above post. There's definitely a gray area. Again, I hope everything was done correctly but I have concerns it wasn't
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.

so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.

Hokiewolf, I'm sure the admin will say they take responsibility; however, what does actually mean? To my knowledge, when any admin say "I take full responsibility", I don't think that actually means anything… Those are words; however, seldom, if ever, does any type of accountability come along with those words…

I can't imagine any legal issue will and should come from those actions. For me, I take a more hardline approach…. These people on the boat had a clear intent to provide for the distribution of drugs in the US. Taking them completely out is not out of order.

The people responsible for the distribution of drugs have an intent to make money, with a byproduct of destruction of people, whether the people want the drugs or not. For that, and with the volume of these drugs, eliminating them is a reasonable action. I think we need to clear up any laws that make this thinking shut down. These people are like any other person or group with the intent of destroying the people of the US with other means.

Take them out, 100%!!!

Sounds good, except for the fact that's totally illegal.

If we've declared war (we haven't) and the enemy combatant is out of the fight, it's a war crime to kill them.

If we're not at war and we're offing civilians that pose no clear threat to the US (someone injured hanging from the side of the boat), that's extrajudicial murder and military members aren't shielded.

The crux of whether any crime took place here likely hinges on whether it can be established someone knew there were survivors before ordering the second round of attacks on the boat.

If that's established, I think this goes very poorly for Hegseth or the op commander or whoever else knew before ordering or executing their killing.

Civ, I think you need to caution yourself on the legality of this. You, nor I, have the knowledge of all laws to determine your statement; therefore, I'm not saying you're wrong. Nor, should you be so dogmatic to say that you're right.

The gentleman, assuming the person was male, posed a real threat to the US. Being that his boat was destroyed doesn't change that fact. What should have we done?

  • Left him there to die of starvation?
  • Picked him up and bring him to the US for trial?
  • Allowed a person, from his cartel family, pick him up and put him back in action!
  • Heck, why not lure a bunch of sharks near him and allow them to finish the guy off…
These so-called legal statements need to be considered for reality. Remember, these people are not afforded the same legal protections that you and I have, as US citizens. I say… it is what it is…
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Gulfstream4 said:

hokiewolf said:

I definitely see your point, but I do have concerns about that approach as we have "declared war" I think that changes the rules of engagement, but again I just don't know.

What I've seen reported but not confirmed is that this would be similar to if you shot a plane down and the pilot ejected, at that point they stop being a combatant. Therefore it would be a war crime to shoot the pilot.

I think Flossy has the right idea, it needs to be played out, but I do have concerns about the approach taken.


Was that pilot acting the line of duty as a commissioned officer for an official national or was he a Joe Blow given an airplane by a criminal organization and on the way to bomb a sovereign nation and kill men, women and children for money?

I don't know honestly, but my concern is very well stated by Civ here in the above post. There's definitely a gray area. Again, I hope everything was done correctly but I have concerns it wasn't

Hokie, it's these so-called gray areas that's allowed our country to be in the mess it's in. Damn, we have parts of Minnesota with Somali Muslims utilizing Sharia Law and/or Imams to dictate law enforcement on crime, against women, you and I would never accept. At the same time, we have a report the Somali's abused and perhaps committed fraud on our support systems, that people like Civ so fervently love.

Its time to toughen up…
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Civilized said:

caryking said:

hokiewolf said:

caryking said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ doesn't say a word about the "armed servicemen" murdered by illegal immigrant, but is more than willing to threaten prosecution for those killing drug runners as ordered by the President and the Dept of War. What a guy!

Truly mentally ill.

Right. Why would I?

The two events literally have nothing to do with each other.

Why don't you take your irrelevant whataboutism to the bipartisan House and Senate Armed Services committee members that will be investigating Hegseth's order, and see if they find it persuasive.


Yeah. I know. You don't care about "armed servicemen". You just want to prosecute and arrest those who disagree with you politically, like you cheered for with your current president. You have so much in common with Nazis. What a guy.

Cool.

What about the bipartisan Congressmen that are investigating Hegseth's order?

Do they just want to prosecute and arrest those that disagree with them politically?

Do they have so much in common with Nazis?


Investigation means dick, cheerleader. Republicans aren't cultist like you, and are willing to look into accusations. People like you however are minions. Notice how you still don't say anything about your God murdering civilians. Wonder why?

But you most certainly do have a lot in common with Nazis, "amirite"?

Report tonight, I think, says that second order came from someone at a lower level than Hegseth.

so if the order came at a lower level, and it's not legal, are we saying Hegseth doesn't have responsibility as Secretary of Defense?

Again, I have no idea the legality of such an order.

Hokiewolf, I'm sure the admin will say they take responsibility; however, what does actually mean? To my knowledge, when any admin say "I take full responsibility", I don't think that actually means anything… Those are words; however, seldom, if ever, does any type of accountability come along with those words…

I can't imagine any legal issue will and should come from those actions. For me, I take a more hardline approach…. These people on the boat had a clear intent to provide for the distribution of drugs in the US. Taking them completely out is not out of order.

The people responsible for the distribution of drugs have an intent to make money, with a byproduct of destruction of people, whether the people want the drugs or not. For that, and with the volume of these drugs, eliminating them is a reasonable action. I think we need to clear up any laws that make this thinking shut down. These people are like any other person or group with the intent of destroying the people of the US with other means.

Take them out, 100%!!!

Sounds good, except for the fact that's totally illegal.

If we've declared war (we haven't) and the enemy combatant is out of the fight, it's a war crime to kill them.

If we're not at war and we're offing civilians that pose no clear threat to the US (someone injured hanging from the side of the boat), that's extrajudicial murder and military members aren't shielded.

The crux of whether any crime took place here likely hinges on whether it can be established someone knew there were survivors before ordering the second round of attacks on the boat.

If that's established, I think this goes very poorly for Hegseth or the op commander or whoever else knew before ordering or executing their killing.



Keep hope alive


I love how him and his boy tried to pretend like they're looking at this objectively. They just want all the facts to come out. Lol. Riiiiiight.


First Page Refresh
Page 635 of 635
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.