He literally commented on X as did his spokesperson who flatly denied the story.

On X.

Dear God it takes literally fifteen seconds to conclusively demonstrate the falsity of this “report.”

This is true 1970s Soviet-style Pravda stuff. https://t.co/Uv601QsDxy

— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) November 29, 2025

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

Breaking: Hegseth Orders Navy to Review Sen. Mark Kelly's Comments in 'Illegal Order' Video

---

At a minimum, he's out there for Conduct unbecoming an Officer under Article 133.

---

Was he an officer or enlisted as they have different guidelines for the two, as I understand things. Personally, the six Senators actions are abhorrent. The interviews I'm seeing, they are saying that they were just reminding soldiers of their options. Personally, I think that's bogus and this response has become their legal advice.

---

LOL. They don't need legal advice.

Service members are literally duty-bound to disobey unlawful orders. That's the law as written in the UCMJ.

Now we're pretending it's somehow bad to say that out loud?

---

You know good and well the never ending GET TRUMP democrats were trying to undermine the President. Anyone being honest with themselves could admit that.

I asked you once, which orders given by the President were unlawful? Please be specific.

---

"Hey Mike, you need to reject those electoral votes to help me overturn this election."

Murdering noncombatant alleged drug runners is almost certainly unlawful too. Conjecture

Trump has a clear pattern of illegal and unethical behavior personally, professionally, and executively. Conjecture

And "undermining" the President already has built-in consequences since following lawful orders is non-discretionary. Soldiers would get court-martialed before they could blink for refusing to follow lawful orders. I think you need to read the code where Mark Kelly could be in trouble

Regardless, it's certainly not illegal or a violation of the UCMJ to say "disobey unlawful orders." This talk of court-martialing Kelly or otherwise attempting to punish ex-service and intelligence officials for saying the same is laughable. I think you need to read the code where Mark Kelly could be in trouble

The UCMJ literally requires that soldiers disobey unlawful orders.
I think you need to read the code where Mark Kelly could be in trouble

---

The bolded comment about Mike is so disingenuous! Two times in our history (1876 and 1960), alternate electors have been presented at the counting. Both of those were done by Dems.

There was nothing wrong with a State offering a different elector set. When it's been done in the past, it was done because of irregularities, as I understand it.

Trump made request to look at them, Pemce said no. It's just that simple!

---

Trump asked Pence to do something unconstitutional. Pence has no constitutional authority to "look at them" or delay the certification or anything remotely similar.

Which is my response to people with short memories on here that are playing the fake, "when has Trump *ever* asked someone to do something Unconstitutional??, game.

---