TRUMP 2024

597,486 Views | 7052 Replies | Last: 26 min ago by Gulfstream4
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Charlottesville, Charlottesville, Charlottesville" = "Russia, Russia, Russia". It's so hard to understand for the #Napster useful idiots................but - hey - that's why they're useful idiots.

ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TheStorm said:

Wufskins said:

Convincing Ga residents not to vote in the Senate run off came with consequences.
Yeah, that's pure bull*****


Not smart at all. And more than likely cost the Senate.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

TheStorm said:

Wufskins said:

Convincing Ga residents not to vote in the Senate run off came with consequences.
Yeah, that's pure bull*****


Not smart at all. And more than likely cost the Senate.
You guys parroting these narratives is funny!
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Go do a google search, there were Trump supporters saying it.
Wufskins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey Storm, read this article and tell me again why my post was bs.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/528508-pro-trump-attorneys-tell-georgians-not-to-vote-in-runoff-until-votes-are/
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

TheStorm said:

Wufskins said:

Convincing Ga residents not to vote in the Senate run off came with consequences.
Yeah, that's pure bull*****


Not smart at all. And more than likely cost the Senate.
You guys parroting these narratives is funny!
No. The narrative was pure bull**** . There is a huge difference between pointing out voting irregularities v. telling people not to vote.

The books were cooked already regardless at that point, but the narrative that he told people not to vote in the runoff is pure bull**** .
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
Wufskins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never said Trump told them not to vote. His minions did and it likely cost the Republicans the Senate.

https://www.gpb.org/news/2021/04/22/who-stayed-home-more-in-georgias-senate-runoffs-rural-white-republicans
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ok, I give...
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.

That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.

Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.
barelypure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh good god, are we about to see a repeat of Jan6. On Truth Social he posted, "GO OUT AND PEACEFULLY PROTEST. RALLY BEHIND MAGA. SAVE OUR COUNTRY!" Are we going to see hordes of old people armed with selfie cameras descend on the courthouse? Will Judge Merchan have to run for his life? Stay tuned, stand back and stand by.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So......... the people screaming "we are Hamas..."...... are the same correct?

That is what he is saying according to the rules of context.... and even Jake Tapper said the "good people on both side" was FALSE....



https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/26/cnn-tapper-trump-white-supremacist-nazis/

Would love to see the libbies reply.... I know they won't.... tough to dispute the facts.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.

That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.

Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.


I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.

That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.

Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.


I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.

Yep. Rudy G too.

Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.

Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.

That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.

Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.


I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.

Yep. Rudy G too.

Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.

Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
We have plenty here that the same thing could be said..
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How do we undo what's been done to you? #TURNOFFTHEMAINSTREAMMEDIA

ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.

That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.

Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.


I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.

Yep. Rudy G too.

Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.

Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
We have plenty here that the same thing could be said..


That is what makes the board fun. I do enjoy reading other people's opinions.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey #Sieve, Chicago is turning red. ;-)

caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

caryking said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

ncsupack1 said:

Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.

That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.

Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.


I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.

Yep. Rudy G too.

Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.

Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
We have plenty here that the same thing could be said..


That is what makes the board fun. I do enjoy reading other people's opinions.
I agree. It is interesting to read people's opinion. For me, it does provide credence to my opinion on differing world views.
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

Hey #Sieve, Chicago is turning red. ;-)




Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:


Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.

Play that out.

By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.

The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.

Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.

The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.

So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?

Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
barelypure
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IMO the invite for the illegals isn't so much for their votes immediately, that's for in the future. Right now getting them into the states they need is for representation. So many are leaving blue states that they're in danger of losing seats in Congress with the next census. But since we count everybody and not just citizens the blue states keep their numbers.

As to elections and voting as we saw with LBJ and the Dems having the Ns voting Dem for decades I can see where they'll push for an amnesty for the 30 million illegals and then use that as they have welfare for blacks to get them into the Dem tent. It's an insidious plan that sells out their own people but if it keeps them in power they don't give a flying rip.

The real mystery is why otherwise intelligent people allow themselves to be used to further their Marxist goals.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:


Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.

Play that out.

By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.

The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.

Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.

The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.

So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?

Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
Do illegals get counted in the census?

Are House seats determined by population?

If the Dems pick up house seats could they keep and maintain the House in elections?

Does that affect how the government is run?

Even if they are illegal they are counted so having more in blue states actually benefits the left because they can/will pick up additional house seats correct?

Why don't you answer those little "insignificant statements..."

I'll hang up and listen.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:


Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.

Play that out.

By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.

The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.

Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.

The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.

So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?

Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
Do illegals get counted in the census?

Are House seats determined by population?

If the Dems pick up house seats could they keep and maintain the House in elections?

Does that affect how the government is run?

Even if they are illegal they are counted so having more in blue states actually benefits the left because they can/will pick up additional house seats correct?

Why don't you answer those little "insignificant statements..."

I'll hang up and listen.

He literally just did. Two of the three states with by far the biggest illegal immigrant populations are Red states.

So get out your calculator. When they do the census and decide to give Florida more seats, given how insanely gerrymandered Florida is, who do you think wins out, Republicans or Dems?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barelypure said:

IMO the invite for the illegals isn't so much for their votes immediately, that's for in the future. Right now getting them into the states they need is for representation. So many are leaving blue states that they're in danger of losing seats in Congress with the next census. But since we count everybody and not just citizens the blue states keep their numbers.

As to elections and voting as we saw with LBJ and the Dems having the Ns voting Dem for decades I can see where they'll push for an amnesty for the 30 million illegals and then use that as they have welfare for blacks to get them into the Dem tent. It's an insidious plan that sells out their own people but if it keeps them in power they don't give a flying rip.

The real mystery is why otherwise intelligent people allow themselves to be used to further their Marxist goals.

Wait, are "the Ns" who I think they are? Lol, a Republican asking "why do the Ns always vote Dem?!" might actually be the stupidest question ever asked.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

Civilized said:

Gulfstream4 said:


Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.

Play that out.

By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.

The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.

Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.

The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.

So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?

Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
Do illegals get counted in the census?

Are House seats determined by population?

If the Dems pick up house seats could they keep and maintain the House in elections?

Does that affect how the government is run?

Even if they are illegal they are counted so having more in blue states actually benefits the left because they can/will pick up additional house seats correct?

Why don't you answer those little "insignificant statements..."

I'll hang up and listen.

So they allegedly want them to land in blue states, but also get pissed when Texas and Florida and other red state governors bus them to blue states.

Are the governors and mayors in blue states not being let in on the secret that they should be encouraging mass migration of illegals to blue states?

Or are activists and mayors and governors just acting pissed when deep down they're actually excited that the Pubs are unwittingly being a taxicab service for immigrants into blue states?

This theory is as wacky as the massive and highly effective but somehow still secret and impervious to lawsuits electoral fraud lunacy in 2020, or as fake moon landings or JFK assassination theories for that matter.

LOLOL, y'all are crazy
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?

It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.

There are confounders all over the place.

Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

BBW12OG said:

SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?

It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.

There are confounders all over the place.

Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?


A challenge that needs to end.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

BBW12OG said:

SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?

It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.

There are confounders all over the place.

Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?


A challenge that needs to end.
Nobody wants it to really end!
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

BBW12OG said:

SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?

It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.

There are confounders all over the place.

Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?


A challenge that needs to end.
Nobody wants it to really end!


I do. We have no idea who is crossing the border. Kinda scary.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsupack1 said:

caryking said:

ncsupack1 said:

Civilized said:

BBW12OG said:

SmaptyWolf said:

BBW12OG said:

You didn't answer the question.

Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?

Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?

YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?

It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.

There are confounders all over the place.

Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?


A challenge that needs to end.
Nobody wants it to really end!


I do. We have no idea who is crossing the border. Kinda scary.
I'm talking about Congress and money people, like the US Chamber of Commerce.
First Page Last Page
Page 95 of 202
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.