June 2020. Alvin Bragg spreads the Charlottesville Fine People Hoax lie.
— MAZE (@mazemoore) April 15, 2024
Bragg should be interning at MSNBC, not the DA of Manhattan. pic.twitter.com/HlPHkBqsac
June 2020. Alvin Bragg spreads the Charlottesville Fine People Hoax lie.
— MAZE (@mazemoore) April 15, 2024
Bragg should be interning at MSNBC, not the DA of Manhattan. pic.twitter.com/HlPHkBqsac
TheStorm said:Yeah, that's pure bull*****Wufskins said:
Convincing Ga residents not to vote in the Senate run off came with consequences.
You guys parroting these narratives is funny!ncsupack1 said:TheStorm said:Yeah, that's pure bull*****Wufskins said:
Convincing Ga residents not to vote in the Senate run off came with consequences.
Not smart at all. And more than likely cost the Senate.
No. The narrative was pure bull**** . There is a huge difference between pointing out voting irregularities v. telling people not to vote.caryking said:You guys parroting these narratives is funny!ncsupack1 said:TheStorm said:Yeah, that's pure bull*****Wufskins said:
Convincing Ga residents not to vote in the Senate run off came with consequences.
Not smart at all. And more than likely cost the Senate.
ncsupack1 said:
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
REPORTER: “Do you condemn the antisemitic protests on college campuses?”
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 22, 2024
BIDEN: There were very fine people on both sides.
REPORTER: “Should the Columbia University president resign?"
BIDEN: “I didn’t know that.”
*shuffles away* pic.twitter.com/PHaO3VVZZO
Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.
Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.
ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.
Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.
I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.
We have plenty here that the same thing could be said..Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.
Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.
I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.
Yep. Rudy G too.
Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.
Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
What about if Trump was for the Democrats (DevilCrats)... pic.twitter.com/7FMqRjDDtn
— Audit The States 🇺🇲 📜 🦅 (@Audit_TheStates) February 8, 2024
caryking said:We have plenty here that the same thing could be said..Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.
Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.
I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.
Yep. Rudy G too.
Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.
Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
NEW: Chicago resident wearing a red MAGA hat shreds socialist Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson to his face for requesting more money for illegals.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) April 19, 2024
Epic 🔥
“We need that money in my neighborhood, we need that money on my block. So I’m asking ya’ll to use our tax money for our… pic.twitter.com/OZizIi0IEb
I agree. It is interesting to read people's opinion. For me, it does provide credence to my opinion on differing world views.ncsupack1 said:caryking said:We have plenty here that the same thing could be said..Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:ncsupack1 said:
Trump may not have told folks not to vote, but high level supporters sure did. Powell comes to mind.
That lady's executive functioning is abysmal.
Between her loony-tunes election fraud lies getting her sued to smithereens and her cutting off Trump/Republican Georgia voters' noses to spite their face, her actions surrounding Trump in 2020 were electorally and professionally suicidal.
I admit that it was something to watch unfold back then. Wild.
Yep. Rudy G too.
Say whatever anyone wants to about their politics but these two are not spring chickens. Rudy had been the mayor of perhaps the most influential city in the world for eight years for Pete's sake. Sid Powell was a former federal prosecutor and still-practicing attorney. They two of them at one point had plenty of functioning brain cells.
Their actions seemed bat-**** crazy in real time and time passing has made them seem even moreso.
That is what makes the board fun. I do enjoy reading other people's opinions.
Werewolf said:
Hey #Sieve, Chicago is turning red. ;-)NEW: Chicago resident wearing a red MAGA hat shreds socialist Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson to his face for requesting more money for illegals.
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) April 19, 2024
Epic 🔥
“We need that money in my neighborhood, we need that money on my block. So I’m asking ya’ll to use our tax money for our… pic.twitter.com/OZizIi0IEb
Gulfstream4 said:
Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.
Do illegals get counted in the census?Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.
Play that out.
By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.
The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.
Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.
The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.
So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?
Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
BBW12OG said:Do illegals get counted in the census?Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.
Play that out.
By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.
The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.
Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.
The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.
So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?
Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
Are House seats determined by population?
If the Dems pick up house seats could they keep and maintain the House in elections?
Does that affect how the government is run?
Even if they are illegal they are counted so having more in blue states actually benefits the left because they can/will pick up additional house seats correct?
Why don't you answer those little "insignificant statements..."
I'll hang up and listen.
barelypure said:
IMO the invite for the illegals isn't so much for their votes immediately, that's for in the future. Right now getting them into the states they need is for representation. So many are leaving blue states that they're in danger of losing seats in Congress with the next census. But since we count everybody and not just citizens the blue states keep their numbers.
As to elections and voting as we saw with LBJ and the Dems having the Ns voting Dem for decades I can see where they'll push for an amnesty for the 30 million illegals and then use that as they have welfare for blacks to get them into the Dem tent. It's an insidious plan that sells out their own people but if it keeps them in power they don't give a flying rip.
The real mystery is why otherwise intelligent people allow themselves to be used to further their Marxist goals.
BBW12OG said:Do illegals get counted in the census?Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:
Democrats don't care about the black vote. They have that for the foreseeable future. Democrats are building a new power base (illegals) for future elections.
Play that out.
By illegals I assume you mean southern border crossers, almost all of which are Hispanic.
The states with the three largest illegal populations - by far - are California, Texas, and Florida.
Cali is obviously very blue and Texas and Florida are very red. These aren't exactly swing states.
The Hispanic vote is very diverse but trending red, and recent immigrants are even more likely to reject poltiicians that are associated - even if loosely or innaccurately - with socialist ideas/ideals like some Dems are.
So how would this grand plan to somehow leverage an immigrant population that is increasingly red and avoidant of socialism and located in non-swing states work to Democrats' benefit long-term, exactly?
Also, even if mildly, the black male vote has been trending red the last couple of elections so Dems better care about the black vote or it will bite them.
Are House seats determined by population?
If the Dems pick up house seats could they keep and maintain the House in elections?
Does that affect how the government is run?
Even if they are illegal they are counted so having more in blue states actually benefits the left because they can/will pick up additional house seats correct?
Why don't you answer those little "insignificant statements..."
I'll hang up and listen.
BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?SmaptyWolf said:BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
BBW12OG said:So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?SmaptyWolf said:BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
Civilized said:BBW12OG said:So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?SmaptyWolf said:BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.
There are confounders all over the place.
Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?
Nobody wants it to really end!ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:BBW12OG said:So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?SmaptyWolf said:BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.
There are confounders all over the place.
Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?
A challenge that needs to end.
caryking said:Nobody wants it to really end!ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:BBW12OG said:So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?SmaptyWolf said:BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.
There are confounders all over the place.
Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?
A challenge that needs to end.
I'm talking about Congress and money people, like the US Chamber of Commerce.ncsupack1 said:caryking said:Nobody wants it to really end!ncsupack1 said:Civilized said:BBW12OG said:So does allowing illegals in benefit the GOP or dems?SmaptyWolf said:BBW12OG said:
You didn't answer the question.
Will having more people counted in the census add seats to the blue states they are in?
Will that add to the dems numbers in the house?
YES! So maybe the Texas governor should stop bussing them to NY in droves? He's messing up the leftist's konspiracy to give Texas an infinite number of congressional seats.
It's not obvious how it benefits either in the aggregate.
There are confounders all over the place.
Why does it have to? Why can't it just be a difficult challenge for our country that doesn't benefit either political party?
A challenge that needs to end.
I do. We have no idea who is crossing the border. Kinda scary.