caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

You know, every post, by Civ and Smapty are exact post that could be made about Biden. What's interesting is? They defend the hell out of Biden. Then, they say Trump supporters are in a cult.

Hey, I absolutely think Trump has flaws! From my position, and what appears to be Hokies position is: he's not conservative enough. The difference between Hokie and Me is that I think true conservatives are few and far between, in the Republican Party…

They are typically self-serving people that are getting rich of the back of tax payers.

---

Try saying the same stuff about Biden then.

Tell us what crimes Biden has been or may be charged with.

Tell us how much evidence Republicans have found in their impeachment investigation.

Tell us what women he has assaulted.

Tell us which buddies of his have gone to prison for obstructing.

You can argue policy all day long but there's nothing to defend Biden against from a conduct perspective. Nobody's credibly accused him of anything.

---

No reason… you are too far gone…. The whole Biden thread answers you.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

I love this! He has it Right, We do not need someone to guide the sheep, we need someone to awaken the Lions! Be the voice of the People, do the Will of the PEOPLE. https://t.co/9YsdM1HzsS

— Private Citizen (@Syl_Stormrider) January 19, 2024

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Is there anything better than a Trump Rally? https://t.co/SnZKCTPiDP

— John L Steinberger (@steinberger_l) March 11, 2024

The left: if we could just put Trump in jail, get rid of the electoral college, ban voter ID, and censor free speech we’d be able to save democracy!

— Kevin Sorbo (@ksorbs) March 10, 2024

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

We were on the sidelines for so long because the right wingers in our country liked Hitler. Same as it ever was.

---

Yes sir, we love us some dictator's…

---

One of the many accurate statements by Tucker! pic.twitter.com/4yUse5z4iN

— Sequencer (@RealSeq16) March 10, 2024

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

Hokie, are you saying that each country did not commit payment, into NATO, to a percent of their GDP?

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

Hokie, are you saying that each country did not commit payment, into NATO, to a percent of their GDP?

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

Hokie, are you saying that each country did not commit payment, into NATO, to a percent of their GDP?

---

They committed to spending more of their GDP on their own military, not some non existent NATO fund, which by the way, the US also doesn't pay into, They just spend money on defense.

---

packgrad said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

Hokie, are you saying that each country did not commit payment, into NATO, to a percent of their GDP?

---

They committed to spending more of their GDP on their own military, not some non existent NATO fund, which by the way, the US also doesn't pay into, They just spend money on defense.

---

And the majority of them didn't honor their commitments to the spending. But yes, you are of course triggered by Trump calling them on it. Standard response from "conservative" hokie.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

When you cut out the rhetoric and the catastrophe theater of the other sides policy. No one has a policy of sending the US into another war.

---

When Biden said (I paraphrase) that the US will support Ukraine, all Dems and a few Pubs stood up and cheered. Also, who is going to man the port, in Gaza, once Biden builds it?

Don't be naive...

---

Sweden, who had been neutral for 200 years, just joined NATO. Why do you think they did that?

You're the one that's profoundly naive about what Putin is up to. Supporting Ukraine now is absolutely the best way to prevent U.S. troops in Europe later. If you can't see that then you should probably leave the national security thinking to someone else.

---

So, Sweden joining NATO and Ukraine not in NATO makes me naive.

Europe can spend more money than their so-called NATO commitment, if this is a big deal for them. We didn't enter WW2 until Japan bombed us. We declared war on them, then Germany declared war on us. We were on the sidelines until the Pearl Harbor catastrophe…

---

they are spending more. They're spending more because Putin is a threat. That's what countries do when they feel threatened, they spend more money on defense.

Also, you ever thought about how much more money the US would have to spend if there wasn't NATO on defense? A lot more.

---

Good! It's in their part of the world.

If Europe can't handle their continent, then I'm sure we will jump in. That said, it's about damn time for these countries to step up their military spending and meet their NATO commitment.

If they do the above, then, a lot of us will have a different view! Until, let it blow up! If they want to be dismantled by Russia, they will sit idly by…

---

Cary, NATO isn't something that countries have to pay due to be a part of. That's not how it works. Trump treats NATO like it's Mar-a-lago and you have to pay dues to join. It doesn't work that way and that's why I have a huge problem with what Trump says about NATO countries paying their fare share.


If NATO didn't exist, the US would be spending billions more in defense.

---

Hokie, are you saying that each country did not commit payment, into NATO, to a percent of their GDP?

---

They committed to spending more of their GDP on their own military, not some non existent NATO fund, which by the way, the US also doesn't pay into, They just spend money on defense.

---

And the majority of them didn't honor their commitments to the spending. But yes, you are of course triggered by Trump calling them on it. Standard response from "conservative" hokie.

---

I'm not triggered by Trump, I'm concerned that how he views NATO and projects that view out to the world has an influence on how Russia operates.

---

The America I know…push this song to number #1#LakenRiley #LakenRiley #LakenRiley

The Truth https://t.co/E99jNEr4EZ

— General Mike Flynn (@GenFlynn) March 15, 2024

Wufskins said:

---

Mother has let go of Pence's balls. He's decided not to endorse Trump.

---

🔥LISTEN!🔥

If you believe Trump is telling us the truth, then this should be PROOF that I'm not crazy.

"They think we are playing 4 dimensional chess"

"They say, there is NO WAY this is happening"

"They are to smart for that"

"It's 4 dementional chess, does anyone know… https://t.co/c1P5pbDkjW pic.twitter.com/87NvugZr5O

— Joe Rambo (@BrainStorm_Joe) March 14, 2024

The line of people in Ohio is HUGE for President Trump's speech! 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/uHtqDoG2EF

— Anthony Hughes (@CallMeAntwan) March 16, 2024

WOW WEE🇺🇸🇺🇸🔥🔥🔥
OHIO ❤️TRUMP🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️🙏 https://t.co/MkAf3fuCyy

— ❄☃❄Just me👀Cassie💎🤍💎 (@browneyegirl400) March 16, 2024

Pardon? « Joe Biden a gagné contre Barack Hussein Obama », dit Trump en Ohio. https://t.co/ch8Ib6iPA3

— Richard Hétu (@richardhetu) March 16, 2024

Werewolf said:

---

Domestic terrorists in a large group, time for a drone attack and get Trump too.

WOW WEE🇺🇸🇺🇸🔥🔥🔥
OHIO ❤️TRUMP🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️🙏 https://t.co/MkAf3fuCyy

— ❄☃❄Just me👀Cassie💎🤍💎 (@browneyegirl400) March 16, 2024

---