jkpackfan said:
packgrad said:
Speaking of the fraud "insurrection."
Why am I not surprised? But remember he lead the insurrection!!
Maybe you're not surprised because it seems like complete BS from Trump as per usual, along with Vivek's typical enthusiasm to strap on the knee pads and settle in for a good session hoping Trump taps him as VP.
Quote:
Moreover, the committee said that when he referenced so many troops, it was not because he wanted to protect the Capitol. He "floated the idea of having 10,000 National Guardsmen deployed to protect him and his supporters from any supposed threats by left-wing counter protesters," the report said.
In November, Denver District Judge Sarah B. Wallace evaluated the 10,000-troops claim when she considered arguments that Trump should be removed from the Colorado ballot because he inspired an insurrection. She concluded that Trump engaged in an insurrection through incitement but said a president was not covered by the 14th Amendment and so Trump could remain on the ballot a ruling that was celebrated by the Trump campaign at the time.
In her ruling, Wallace rejected testimony about Trump's supposed troop order from a fervent Trump supporter, Kash Patel, who was chief of staff to the acting secretary of defense on Jan. 6.
"The Court finds that Mr. Patel was not a credible witness," Wallace wrote. "His testimony regarding Trump authorizing 10,000-20,000 National Guardsmen is not only illogical (because Trump only had authority over about 2,000 National Guardsmen) but completely devoid of any evidence in the record."
In a footnote, she elaborated: "Trump, as commander of the D.C. National Guard, only had direct authority over around 2,000 Guardsmen. To mobilize 10,000-20,000 Guardsmen, he would have had to contact the Governors of other States and they would have had to then give orders, or he would have had to federalize the Guardsmen from those States. In either case, there would have been significant official action taken. No record of such action was produced at the Hearing."
Trump maybe mentioning 10,000 guardsmen offhandedly isn't a call to action. If he'd wanted 10,000 troops there were official channels to go through.
Where are the transcripts of him contacting other governors requesting support of their guardsmen?
Where are the orders of him federalizing other states' guardsmen?
If either happened, they would be able to produce official correspondence between Trump and governors or state officials.
This is just like the classified docs case and him allegedly declassifying them.
There are channels and rules and processes that he completely ignores and then later wants to say "Oh but I thought about doing so-and-so."
That's not the way being President works.