Marxist youth serve as the "useful idiots" necessary for the one world Govt tyrannical system....

I think this is a good read. Chem, this is the type of stuff I've been talking about for some time. None of this 100% proves anything; however, this is real stuff that (I believe) caused the result in the 2020 election.

https://uncoverdc.com/2022/04/15/pennsylvania-compelling-evidence-shows-blue-counties-scored-grants-in-2020-election/

No reason for anybody to watch the movie rigged2020 as this article spells it out…

If we were following platforms that weren't censored, we'd know what sex the following two people are:
- Michelle Obama
- Susan Rice
Obama would have never been elected POTUS either and he could not have served either.

caryking said:

---

I think this is a good read. Chem, this is the type of stuff I've been talking about for some time. None of this 100% proves anything; however, this is real stuff that (I believe) caused the result in the 2020 election.

https://uncoverdc.com/2022/04/15/pennsylvania-compelling-evidence-shows-blue-counties-scored-grants-in-2020-election/

No reason for anybody to watch the movie rigged2020 as this article spells it out…

---

Here's the thing, and I've been thinking about this for a while now. This information and the information in Wisconsin were well known BEFORE the election. Why didn't Trumps team challenge these in court BEFORE the election?

Do I think that Trumps team didn't challenge before the election because they thought they were going to win in a landslide? I don't think so because as early as the summer Trump was already starting with this rigged election stuff.

What I think happened and why I would not vote for Trump again if he runs in 24 is because he had very bad advisors around him both in the White House and in his campaign. Those folks fell asleep at the wheel and when the actual challengeable actions happened, they didn't do anything. That's pretty damning in my eyes.

So, it's up to the Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania legislators to take corrective action. Otherwise if it worked once, It will be tried again.

BBW12OG said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

I don't know if this is where post about Biden now or not....but I found this interesting (and surprising).

Joe Biden's numbers are collapsing among a group you really wouldn't expect - CNNPolitics

I hate Chris Cillizza with a passion -- I think he is one of the worst of the new wave of media henchmen who have made things so bad within the media these days....but I guess even he couldn't ignore how bad the support has gotten for Biden.

---

Wait until August when he suddenly erases "student loan debt.."

This joke of an administration that many on here voted for and still support is exactly what the GOP needed. I said it a year or more ago... when the left gets absolute power like they have now they absolutely show just how bad their policies are.

MARXISM is putting it mildly on what this clown show envisions for the country. And anyone that supports them are MARXISTS. Own it.

---

While I agree with you 100%, never underestimate the ability of the GOP to screw things up.

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

I think this is a good read. Chem, this is the type of stuff I've been talking about for some time. None of this 100% proves anything; however, this is real stuff that (I believe) caused the result in the 2020 election.

https://uncoverdc.com/2022/04/15/pennsylvania-compelling-evidence-shows-blue-counties-scored-grants-in-2020-election/

No reason for anybody to watch the movie rigged2020 as this article spells it out…

---

Here's the thing, and I've been thinking about this for a while now. This information and the information in Wisconsin were well known BEFORE the election. Why didn't Trumps team challenge these in court BEFORE the election? I don't know

Do I think that Trumps team didn't challenge before the election because they thought they were going to win in a landslide? I don't think so because as early as the summer Trump was already starting with this rigged election stuff. I agree

What I think happened and why I would not vote for Trump again if he runs in 24 is because he had very bad advisors around him both in the White House and in his campaign. Those folks fell asleep at the wheel and when the actual challengeable actions happened, they didn't do anything. That's pretty damning in my eyes. No argument from me

So, it's up to the Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania legislators to take corrective action. Otherwise if it worked once, It will be tried again. I agree because the system is already set up

---

I think I've said this before. We all know Trump has an ego, right? I believe Trumps ego got in the way with his policies. I believe he thought he would be able convince people to follow him, based on his charisma alone. Unfortunately, the system (administrative state) is so big that no one person can change and/or drain the swamp on their own.

Also, Trump allowed the Republican Party to convince him that certain people will be good for his administration. That, in my opinion, didn't work out good for him. Again, ego thinking he could use his style.

Also, just this week, Zuckerberg said he would not be funding future election support. Is he scared? I don't know, but, his actions could be a problem for him, if the right republicans get elected in November.

Also, go look for Mo Brooks' video recently. He's at a campaign event and talking about how the system works. He said that a congress person has to pay to be the head of a committee (pay to who?). This is where lobbyist come in and tell the congress person they will pay the fee. Brooks said that you are done once you allow a lobbyist to pay that fee for you.

So many pieces to the puzzle that it's mind blowing!!

https://newspunch.com/dutch-journalist-in-donbass-western-media-is-lying-about-what-is-happening-in-ukraine/

Truth or fiction; nah, Corporate Media LIES!

I thought the topic was censorship and lies. We were lied to about Obama, Michael, etc. Fell for it like a bunch of fools.....

and because I was banned on Twitter three years ago for posting unacceptable narratives I essentially have nothing to contribute. :-)

hokiewolf said:

---

Bro, I'm good with you posting all your weird stuff, but enough with the Obama posts. Guy hasn't been in office for 6 years

---

I just wanted to star this post twice.

TheStorm said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Bro, I'm good with you posting all your weird stuff, but enough with the Obama posts. Guy hasn't been in office for 6 years

---

I just wanted to star this post twice.

---

My good friend, ha.

hokiewolf said:

---

Bro, I'm good with you posting all your weird stuff, but enough with the Obama posts. Guy hasn't been in office for 6 years

---

LOL... you typed this with a straight face? How many days can you go without mentioning FORMER President Trump??

Like I said.. the left is the party of hypocrites and they are too self righteous to own up to it.

"Good for me but not for thee..."

You should add that to your sig line.

BBW12OG said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Bro, I'm good with you posting all your weird stuff, but enough with the Obama posts. Guy hasn't been in office for 6 years

---

LOL... you typed this with a straight face? How many days can you go without mentioning FORMER President Trump??

Like I said.. the left is the party of hypocrites and they are too self righteous to own up to it.

"Good for me but not for thee..."

You should add that to your sig line.

---

I'm not sure I understand your beef BBW, can you clarify? I didn't mention Trump in this post at all.

Hows the new sig line ?

hokiewolf said:

---

Hows the new sig line ?

---

hokiewolf said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Bro, I'm good with you posting all your weird stuff, but enough with the Obama posts. Guy hasn't been in office for 6 years

---

LOL... you typed this with a straight face? How many days can you go without mentioning FORMER President Trump??

Like I said.. the left is the party of hypocrites and they are too self righteous to own up to it.

"Good for me but not for thee..."

You should add that to your sig line.

---

I'm not sure I understand your beef BBW, can you clarify? I didn't mention Trump in this post at all.

Hows the new sig line ?

---

Ok, Hokie, that's a good one...

Manny Sanguine said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

If we were following platforms that weren't censored, we'd know what sex the following two people are:
- Michelle Obama
- Susan Rice
Obama would have never been elected POTUS either and he could not have served either.

---

More effort went into producing this forgery than the fake "student ID" posted earlier, but it is, nonetheless, an obvious forgery. In particular, is purports to have been signed in 1961 by doctors at Coast Province General Hospital in "Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya." However, Mombasa was part of Zanzibar until it became part of Kenya at the time of Kenya's independence in 1963. Therefore any document referring to Mombasa as part of Kenya in 1961 is not genuine. It is also true that because Mombasa became part of Kenya after independence, there would never be a genuine document referring to "Mombasa, British Protectorate of Kenya," as seen here.

---

Manny bringing the receipts…

Wait a minute... I don't get on here much lately... so we can't have a thread about Biden now?

Biden being shut down again, this time by a staffer in a bunny costume. Another embarrassing moment for the leader of the free world. It's clear he is on a short leash.

https://nypost.com/2022/04/18/easter-bunny-stops-biden-from-answering-reporters-question/

Sky News segment…their opinion is likely shared by other leaders…

https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/peta-credlin/easter-bunny-runs-interference-as-biden-discusses-foreign-policy/video/a22c9cc8645e8f31b404ccc208cd029f

From the article:

"The only way Twitter, with 217 million users, could exist as an economically viable platform is if they had access to tech systems of incredible scale and performance, and those systems were essentially free or very cheap. The only entity that could possibly provide that level of capacity and scale is the United States Government combined with a bottomless bank account. A public-private partnership.

If my hunch is correct, Elon Musk is poised to expose the well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy."

I think this is way overboard with the crying. Psaki is upset with a bill that will let kids from kindergarten up through grade 3 just be kids without a gender teaching agenda. Typical left labeling a bill incorrectly, this one labeled as don't say gay. That's not representative of the bill.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/apr/19/jen-psaki-tears-republican-anti-lgbtq-bills

Is this still the new political thread?

packofwolves said:

---

Is this still the new political thread?

---

I think we moved it over to the "Economy" thread.

Steve Williams said:

---

I've not spent much time looking at it but did the Babylon Bee banning push Elon over the edge with Twitter?

---

It's interesting that the Bee and Drudge almost swapped sides.

https://rumble.com/v11zwr0-nunes-truth-social-migration-to-rumble-cloud-has-gone-flawlessly.html
Here's the news of Truth Social and Rumble coming together ..........in hopes of free speech forum and a way to get out from under cancel culture and medical tyranny

Lol. Twitter board realized the legal issues were gonna be too big not to accept, it seems

EXCLUSIVE Twitter set to accept Musk's 'best and final' offer-sources https://t.co/t1zkNz9YhX by @GregRoumeliotis

— Kenneth Li (@kenli729) April 25, 2022

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

That or calling the right any number of ism's.

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

Twitter isn't making money. Hopefully, someone will create an operating structure that supports the stock value!!!

caryking said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

Twitter isn't making money. Hopefully, someone will create an operating structure that supports the stock value!!!

---

Has that always been the case, or did that start happening about the time of censorship?

Steve Videtich said:

---

caryking said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

Twitter isn't making money. Hopefully, someone will create an operating structure that supports the stock value!!!

---

Has that always been the case, or did that start happening about the time of censorship?

---

A quick P&L look shows they started losing money in 2018

caryking said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

caryking said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

Twitter isn't making money. Hopefully, someone will create an operating structure that supports the stock value!!!

---

Has that always been the case, or did that start happening about the time of censorship?

---

A quick P&L look shows they started losing money in 2018

---

I think that's backwards. According the the wikipedia page for Twitter (with references to the annual reports), Twitter first became profitable in 2018. They were also profitable in 2019 and 2021.

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

I agree with you BBW on this point. It's fascinating that the guy who is really trying to help move away from fossil fuels and into "green energy" would be applauded by these fools, as well as being a champion for free speech. I find that part extremely fascinating in that the left and right coast media who are the majority on twitter these days really are the ones complaining the loudest about what Musk wants to do.

It's fascinating to watch the hyperbole and hand wringing for sure.

Manny Sanguine said:

---

caryking said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

caryking said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Watch and see how the "accepting" left reacts. So many have said they would leave Twitter if Musk took over.

These are the same clowns that said they'd leave if President Trump was elected.....

Besides hypocrisy if the left couldn't claim to be victims at every turn they would never have anything to say.

---

Twitter isn't making money. Hopefully, someone will create an operating structure that supports the stock value!!!

---

Has that always been the case, or did that start happening about the time of censorship?

---

A quick P&L look shows they started losing money in 2018

---

I think that's backwards. According the the wikipedia page for Twitter (with references to the annual reports), Twitter first became profitable in 2018. They were also profitable in 2019 and 2021.

---

Their EBIT shows a negative for 2021. They have so many line items in their financials, it's really hard to determine the truth… in other words, past my financial knowledge. Public financials can make it difficult for my simple mind..

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TWTR/financials?p=TWTR