caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Best advise given…. Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…

https://gettr.com/post/p17vmw7a903

---

That's great advice if you want to trigger a class action lawsuit. I'm sure Bannon wants this to happen because he's probably invested in Truth Social and Musk taking over Twitter has the chance to tank that platform.

---

Bannon isn't on Twitter and has never been on Twitter. The Warroom Twitter ID was not used by him; rather, by Jack Maxie for putting out information from the "Laptop from Hell"

Hokie, as I said... "Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…". You probably shouldn't have commented, as you don't know what you're talking about.

---

appreciate your assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. That's how you debate!

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Best advise given…. Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…

https://gettr.com/post/p17vmw7a903

---

That's great advice if you want to trigger a class action lawsuit. I'm sure Bannon wants this to happen because he's probably invested in Truth Social and Musk taking over Twitter has the chance to tank that platform.

---

Bannon isn't on Twitter and has never been on Twitter. The Warroom Twitter ID was not used by him; rather, by Jack Maxie for putting out information from the "Laptop from Hell"

Hokie, as I said... "Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…". You probably shouldn't have commented, as you don't know what you're talking about.

---

appreciate your assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. That's how you debate!

---

Your comment (bolded above) says a lot. the balance of your comment above is nothing but an assumption. BTW, when you make comments like you did, it really is hard to debate.

If you would like, I can show you how a debate may happen, regarding this topic...

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Best advise given…. Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…

https://gettr.com/post/p17vmw7a903

---

That's great advice if you want to trigger a class action lawsuit. I'm sure Bannon wants this to happen because he's probably invested in Truth Social and Musk taking over Twitter has the chance to tank that platform.

---

Bannon isn't on Twitter and has never been on Twitter. The Warroom Twitter ID was not used by him; rather, by Jack Maxie for putting out information from the "Laptop from Hell"

Hokie, as I said... "Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…". You probably shouldn't have commented, as you don't know what you're talking about.

---

appreciate your assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. That's how you debate!

---

Your comment (bolded above) says a lot. the balance of your comment above is nothing but an assumption. BTW, when you make comments like you did, it really is hard to debate.

If you would like, I can show you how a debate may happen, regarding this topic...

---

why wouldn't pulling out of a deal, tanking the stock and then offering 20% less not trigger a shareholder law suit?

---

I'd suggest taking a business class. Seems like it is pretty obvious to those of us familiar with owning/running a business or subscribe to the ideology of Capitalism......just saying...

BBW12OG said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Best advise given…. Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…

https://gettr.com/post/p17vmw7a903

---

That's great advice if you want to trigger a class action lawsuit. I'm sure Bannon wants this to happen because he's probably invested in Truth Social and Musk taking over Twitter has the chance to tank that platform.

---

Bannon isn't on Twitter and has never been on Twitter. The Warroom Twitter ID was not used by him; rather, by Jack Maxie for putting out information from the "Laptop from Hell"

Hokie, as I said... "Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…". You probably shouldn't have commented, as you don't know what you're talking about.

---

appreciate your assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. That's how you debate!

---

Your comment (bolded above) says a lot. the balance of your comment above is nothing but an assumption. BTW, when you make comments like you did, it really is hard to debate.

If you would like, I can show you how a debate may happen, regarding this topic...

---

why wouldn't pulling out of a deal, tanking the stock and then offering 20% less not trigger a shareholder law suit?

---

I'd suggest taking a business class. Seems like it is pretty obvious to those of us familiar with owning/running a business or subscribe to the ideology of Capitalism......just saying...

---

oh I didn't know you and Cary did multibillion dollar buyouts of publicly traded companies. Please enlighten me experts!

Here you go....

https://www.dummies.com/article/business-careers-money/business/small-business/start-ups/starting-a-business-all-in-one-for-dummies-cheat-sheet-207554/

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Best advise given…. Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…

https://gettr.com/post/p17vmw7a903

---

That's great advice if you want to trigger a class action lawsuit. I'm sure Bannon wants this to happen because he's probably invested in Truth Social and Musk taking over Twitter has the chance to tank that platform.

---

Bannon isn't on Twitter and has never been on Twitter. The Warroom Twitter ID was not used by him; rather, by Jack Maxie for putting out information from the "Laptop from Hell"

Hokie, as I said... "Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…". You probably shouldn't have commented, as you don't know what you're talking about.

---

appreciate your assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. That's how you debate!

---

Your comment (bolded above) says a lot. the balance of your comment above is nothing but an assumption. BTW, when you make comments like you did, it really is hard to debate.

If you would like, I can show you how a debate may happen, regarding this topic...

---

why wouldn't pulling out of a deal, tanking the stock and then offering 20% less not trigger a shareholder law suit?

---

The accepted "offer to purchase" has outs, I'm 99% confident. I've never been part of a deal where it didn't. With Twitter coming out, last week, not hitting projections, then, stating they have been overstating metrics since 2019, that should kick in one of the outs, I'm sure..

Now, based on how the deal has gone down, Bannon is correct, they don't have another offer on the table. So, just look at the people in that company, that management team appears incapable of running a business. Just look at the fianacials!

Again, Bannon is correct by saying pull the offer. Will that kick off a few lawsuits? Yes, it probably will... against the board. Then, the board is going to have to make changes to the management staff and get rid of the cancer that's at Twitter. Once that's done, Twitter may have the ability to take on another buyer (probably not as they would have already come to the table) or take a lower "offer to purchase" from Musk.

Obviously, I've never been a deal this large; however, the tactics are the same. Why would anybody in their right mind want to walk right into the snakes den with that management team? I wouldn't!

hokiewolf said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Best advise given…. Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…

https://gettr.com/post/p17vmw7a903

---

That's great advice if you want to trigger a class action lawsuit. I'm sure Bannon wants this to happen because he's probably invested in Truth Social and Musk taking over Twitter has the chance to tank that platform.

---

Bannon isn't on Twitter and has never been on Twitter. The Warroom Twitter ID was not used by him; rather, by Jack Maxie for putting out information from the "Laptop from Hell"

Hokie, as I said... "Only people that know how a deal is done will get this…". You probably shouldn't have commented, as you don't know what you're talking about.

---

appreciate your assumption that I don't know what I'm talking about. That's how you debate!

---

Your comment (bolded above) says a lot. the balance of your comment above is nothing but an assumption. BTW, when you make comments like you did, it really is hard to debate.

If you would like, I can show you how a debate may happen, regarding this topic...

---

why wouldn't pulling out of a deal, tanking the stock and then offering 20% less not trigger a shareholder law suit?

---

I'd suggest taking a business class. Seems like it is pretty obvious to those of us familiar with owning/running a business or subscribe to the ideology of Capitalism......just saying...

---

oh I didn't know you and Cary did multibillion dollar buyouts of publicly traded companies. Please enlighten me experts!

---

See my above post...

Interesting that the following Google bias story originated with the NC State computer science department.

https://nypost.com/2022/05/01/big-tech-does-it-again-gmail-favors-dem-candidates/

What was RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA is now RACIST RACIST RACIST Elon........the same ole same ole.

https://saraacarter.com/new-york-times-tries-to-paint-elon-musk-as-racist-who-grew-up-in-elite-white-communities-in-south-africa/?utm_source=jeeng

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/elon-musk-says-he-will-reverse-trump-twitter-ban/

Quote:

---

Musk called the decision to ban Trump "foolish" and "morally wrong" in his Tuesday remarks. No timeline was given for the ban's lifting, but it is expected to occur once Musk formally gains control of the company in November of this year.

"Permanent bans should be extremely rare and really reserved for accounts that are bots, or scam, spam accounts . . . I do think it was not correct to ban Donald Trump," Musk said at FT Live's Future of the Car conference. "I think that was a mistake, because it alienated a large part of the country and did not ultimately result in Donald Trump not having a voice."

---

I think I said it above... now it's happening. Musk has paused his acquisition of Twitter!!

It's time to get a bargain on this deal! They have nothing to offer!

Biden Disinformation Czar Calls on Twitter to Allow Verified Users to Edit Other Users' Tweets

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"There are a lot of people who shouldn't be verified, who aren't legit, in my opinion. I mean, they're real people but they aren't trustworthy," began Jankowicz, who went on to propose that verified users be able to "essentially edit Twitter… by add[ing] context to certain tweets," Jankowicz said in a video obtained by The Post Millenial.

---

---

LOL This applies to virtually everyone in the Biden administration. "I mean, they're real people but they aren't trustworthy" to use the Czar's line of thinking.

Twitter stock dropped yesterday. Musk trying to get a better deal.

The lawsuits should start coming out against the Twitter board and Management team. They appear to have mislead their shareholders about the number of users!

caryking said:

---

Twitter stock dropped yesterday. Musk trying to get a better deal.

The lawsuits should start coming out against the Twitter board and Management team. They appear to have mislead their shareholders about the number of users!

---

Have you seen the new Project Veritas video .......released yesterday?

I can't comment on the validity of it and I'm sure lawyers can talk a circle around anything, but saw this and it sounds like the due diligence was completed ahead of the offer and no longer contingent on future due diligence:

Musk waived business due diligence in making his offer, and the Twitter board quite clearly relied on that waiver in accepting it. pic.twitter.com/NwumSqlGa2

— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) May 17, 2022

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/musk-promises-to-loosen-speech-rules-at-twitter-all-staff-meeting/

Quote:

---

Elon Musk held an all-staff meeting with Twitter employees on Thursday, his first as he prepares to take control of the company following a deal for its complete purchase.

During the meeting, the content of which was first reported by Bloomberg, Musk said that he would permit a wide range of views on the platform, including content that could be described as "extreme" but was lawful.

However, Musk distinguished the permissiveness of speech from its amplification, whereby Twitter promotes tweets that gain considerable online traffic. He suggested that Twitter, while permitting speech that offends broad sentiments (using the example of Holocaust denial), may not amplify such content even as it gains popularity.

"There's freedom of speech and freedom of reach," he said. "I think people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things that are in the bounds of the law but that don't get amplified and don't get a ton of reach."

Musk also described his business plan for Twitter to grow its user base to 1 billion people and implement a subscription model with special features (e.g., verification of accounts) for paying users while still maintaining access to all content for non-paying users.

---

Seems like he's not as big on free speech as some think

https://www.reuters.com/technology/spacex-fires-employees-involved-letter-rebuking-musk-nyt-2022-06-17/?taid=62ac380b5272ff0001d0fc4f&utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Trending+Content&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter

Free speech does not mean freedom from consequences. As I understand Musk's position on speech, he is referring to censorship. If you say something many people disagree with, you won't be kicked off the Twitter platform but you might be fined or even lose your job. See Jack Del Rio. See the Washington Post guy who retweeted the "All women are bi joke" and was suspended for one month. A female employee of the Post lost her mind and started criticizing the colleague on Twitter. Eventually, the Post told her to pipe down and then she really went ballistic. Her unwillingness to accept redirection resulted in her dismissal from the Post. As far as I know, she is still welcome to make comments on Twitter. She just has to make them without financial compensation from the Post.

Publicly criticizing your boss is ill-advised and should only be undertaken if you have solid backup plans because it usually ends badly for the complainant.

PackFansXL said:

---

Free speech does not mean freedom from consequences. As I understand Musk's position on speech, he is referring to censorship. If you say something many people disagree with, you won't be kicked off the Twitter platform but you might be fined or even lose your job. See Jack Del Rio. See the Washington Post guy who retweeted the "All women are bi joke" and was suspended for one month. A female employee of the Post lost her mind and started criticizing the colleague on Twitter. Eventually, the Post told her to pipe down and then she really went ballistic. Her unwillingness to accept redirection resulted in her dismissal from the Post. As far as I know, she is still welcome to make comments on Twitter. She just has to make them without financial compensation from the Post.

Publicly criticizing your boss is ill-advised and should only be undertaken if you have solid backup plans because it usually ends badly for the complainant.

---

Big difference in a private company versus a public forum!

Quote:

---

Twitter's board of directors on Tuesday unanimously recommended that its shareholders approve the company's proposed $44 billion sale to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, according to a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The board unanimously "determined that the merger agreement is advisable and the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, advisable and in the best interests of Twitter and its stockholders," according to the filing.

Musk wrote in a recent SEC filing that he had invested in Twitter because he believes in its "potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe, and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy."

"Twitter has extraordinary potential," he added. "I will unlock it."

---

Elon terminates offer to buy Twitter. The lawsuits at the Board and Management Staff fourth coming!

Elon Has Terminated his Twitter buyout

Womp womphttps://t.co/WkmjyvTbVg

— Tim Pool 🇺🇸 (@Timcast) July 8, 2022

Left can't handle it. What a bunch of whiners.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/elon-musks-twitter-takeover-makes-left-lose-gates-hell-opened

😂😂😂😂😂 pic.twitter.com/Mz1EQawufI

— FreedomBob22 (@FreedomBob22) October 28, 2022

We shall see what Musk does. I'm not entirely sold on him balancing it out as much as we'd hope on Twitter.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/10/elon-musk-and-the-third-era-of-social-media/

Docs show Facebook and Twitter closely collaborating w/ Dept of Homeland Security, FBI to police “disinfo.” Plans to expand censorship on topics like withdrawal from Afghanistan, origins of COVID, info that undermines trust in financial institutions. https://t.co/Zb3zmI1dQF

— Lee Fang (@lhfang) October 31, 2022

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/censorship-facebook-cia-fbi-cola/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=e05509d1-c79c-4bbf-a561-6fe664895c6e

Facebook hired former CIA and FBI to assist with censorship and controlling "the narrative".

LOLed at that one. And all this time I didn't think you had a sense of humor.

Uhhhhh……yes it does

Free speech does not include spreading misinformation to downplay political violence.

— Senator Dick Durbin (@SenatorDurbin) November 1, 2022

wolf howl said:

---

We shall see what Musk does. I'm not entirely sold on him balancing it out as much as we'd hope on Twitter.

---

I hate when I'm right about this stuff.

If this is who Elon is leaning on, absolutely NOTHING will change. The guy in charge of this from Twitter called Trump a nazi while he was in the White House.

Keep your Gettr and Truth Social accounts for sure.

Surprised at all the whining about having to pay Twitter $8 / month for blue check mark with other benefits rolled in. Twitter is a business and if you don't like it, you can still use twitter free or go elsewhere.

Reading Twitter the last few days makes me realize way too many people take Twitter extremely seriously.