Civilized said:SupplyChainPack said:
That's the beauty of cheating by mail - it's next to impossible to prove.
How do election officials know that Aunt Sally, who is suffering from dementia, didn't really fill out that ballot? How do they know that John Smith, who moved to Fl 5 years ago but is still on the voter roles in his old state, didn't actually fill out that ballot that was delivered to his old address, but the guy who lived there filled it out for him?
That's just scratching the surface. There are numerous ways that somebody who is Godless and dishonest could and would commit voter fraud in a large scale mail in scheme
And let's face it, liberal Democrats are Godless, dishonest people. They WILL cheat in an election in which the opportunity to cheat is as easy as picking wildflowers in July.
And even if it does, why is that potential fraud more likely to result in favor for one candidate over another? Isn't it roughly equally likely that wayward ballots wind up in the hands of a Republican than of a Democrat?
That's like saying Mother Theresa and Hitler both have opportunity to commit mass murder and get away with it.
On the one hand, you really don't have to worry about it, on the other there no doubt that a great deal of blood will be shed.
Those who are Godless, dishonest, and amoral will tend to cheat, when given an easy opportunity. It's just a matter of common sense.