Daviewolf83 said:
Civilized said:
ncsualum05 said:
King Leary said:
Somebody I know got COVID about a month ago and recovered pretty quickly.
They work in healthcare and ended up getting the vaccine last week. Keep in mind that this person is very young and presumably already has antibodies.
That's a waste of a vaccine IMO and indicative of how terrible our vaccine rollout has been. Anybody under 40 years old had no business being offered a vaccine until everyone over 65 has been offered one.
Yeah ***. Anyone who has covid in the last 3 months doesn't need this vaccine. Get in the back of the line. Particularly if you don't have any health risks... but hell even if you do you've already got some natural protection for a while!
Do they know how long natural antibodies last vs. vaccine antibodies?
In a healthcare setting I could see them wanting to err on the side of caution with more predictable antibody development. Also they may not have the ability to confirm a healthcare worker's past COVID diagnosis. Finally, even if they can confirm a past COVID diagnosis, how do they handle healthcare workers that had COVID several months ago? 90 days ago? 60 days ago? What if the healthcare worker had a false positive?
The uncertainties regarding their antibody levels, the timing of their infection, etc. likely dictate they just standardize the approach and give them to everyone in a healthcare setting.
I don't see the need to skin vaccinations for healthcare workers too thin given some of theses vagaries. They're vitally important for our continued function.
I found this information on the CDC's website with regards to the need to get a vaccine if you already had Covid-19:
"If I have already had COVID-19 and recovered, do I still need to get vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine?"
"Yes. Due to the severe health risks associated with COVID-19 and the fact that re-infection with COVID-19 is possible, vaccine should be offered to you regardless of whether you already had COVID-19 infection. CDC is providing recommendations to federal, state, and local governments about who should be vaccinated first."
"At this time, experts do not know how long someone is protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19. The immunity someone gains from having an infection, called natural immunity, varies from person to person. Some early evidence suggests natural immunity may not last very long.
We won't know how long immunity produced by vaccination lasts until we have more data on how well the vaccines work."
"Both natural immunity and vaccine-induced immunity are important aspects of COVID-19 that experts are trying to learn more about, and CDC will keep the public informed as new evidence becomes available."
Reference: Facts about Covid-19 vaccines
CDC leaning on propaganda not science.
Again, all about risk factors and maximizing current inventory. Most evidence suggests natural immunity is long lasting and the number of re-infections have been infinitesimal when compared with the number of infected people. Now certainly there are outliers, but if someone had a confirmed (and I will go so far as to say symptomatic) case of COVID, using a vaccine on them in the short term is a waste unless there are additional underlying circumstances.
But to infer that natural immunity is not long lasting is super disingenuous, especially since we know a lot more about natural immunity to COVID than the effectiveness of the vaccines. And most studies have NOT shown natural immunity not to last long. It should certainly last long enough that these people do not need to be at the front.
In the absolute short term, you MAXIMIZE effectiveness. And that is people who are at risk, expose at risk people, and have not actually had COVID. THEN you can circle back.
You can go ahead and vaccinate healthcare/LTC workers (who may have already had it) of course if you want to try and double the efforts there, but beyond that... most people who have had COVID should be at the very end of the line, IF they actually want it.