TRUMP 2024

2,652,731 Views | 23703 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Gulfstream4
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spot on.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gulfstream4 said:

Werewolf said:

For the most part, friend, I'm way past debate.....

EDIT: This is long overdue!



Why is this dangerous rhetoric okay with our liberal friends?


Gulf, the Us Military is the only way. Insurrection Act and military-supervised mid-term elections. The declass continues....and there will be no viable Democrat Party beyond 2026 midterms.
eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

SmaptyWolf said:

jkpackfan said:

New footage and it's looking worse. Hopefully this is a lesson for those that think this is all fun and games.



By the way, of course the White House released this phone footage from the shooter, apparently not realizing that it makes him look even guiltier.
  • It shows he had a prior motive, even as the driver told him point blank that she wasn't mad at him.
  • He literally films with his own phone that she's turning her steering wheel AWAY from him. He saw it clearly.
  • Right after shooting her in the face you can hear him say "fu**ing bit**!"



He probably knew you were going to watch and wanted to give you a shout out.

Lying libs. An enemy to the country.


Notice you never mention the details, you attack the messenger
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

packgrad said:

SmaptyWolf said:

jkpackfan said:

New footage and it's looking worse. Hopefully this is a lesson for those that think this is all fun and games.



By the way, of course the White House released this phone footage from the shooter, apparently not realizing that it makes him look even guiltier.
  • It shows he had a prior motive, even as the driver told him point blank that she wasn't mad at him.
  • He literally films with his own phone that she's turning her steering wheel AWAY from him. He saw it clearly.
  • Right after shooting her in the face you can hear him say "fu**ing bit**!"



He probably knew you were going to watch and wanted to give you a shout out.

Lying libs. An enemy to the country.


Notice you never mention the details, you attack the messenger


Do you think his post mentioned the details? I've made multiple posts with the video. You just want to lie about what happened. You don't care about the truth. Quit lying.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!
eljefe444
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"
Gulfstream4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:




I have to hand it to democrats, they do what they are told and they don't dare step out of line.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time one of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.
im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
#Gobbler, I'm tired and it's late....too much to read tonight. As I posted above, I'm ready to get this thing done....I've posted it before. The military is the only way. That's where this will go...I don't know precisely how but it does. US Military insurrection act and long term occupation of About 14 US cities. Juan says so. ;-)
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"

The ****ing ***** tried to run him over, prude. I think those not mentally ill will give him some grace on his language.

These sheep trying to feign outrage about this is so typical and hilarious.

Oldsouljer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.

im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.

I'd like to see an example of something he's posted here that explicitly gives evidence to this allegation.
CALS grad

“Regulars, by God!”
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's getting desperate for attention. Pulling the R card. lol.
Werewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.

im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.

I'd like to see an example of something he's posted here that explicitly gives evidence to this allegation.


I'm apparently getting to #daGobbler. Was antisemitism and now I'm racist. Such a sad excuse.... he routinely demonstrates it
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.

im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.

I'd like to see an example of something he's posted here that explicitly gives evidence to this allegation.
If you don't question stopping US Citizens for no probable cause other than they are of Latino decent and demanding ID, then you're in agreement with that tactic. I can't think of another reason why that would be an option for enforcement of a policy other than racial profiling.

But hey, I might be wrong, but that's how I interpret the 4th amendment.

Do you think it's good enforcement of policy to harass people in school pickup lines and at their places of work or try to kick their door down? Is that how we capture and deport the worst of the worse?

Go read Justice Kavanaugh first opinion on 4th amendment rights and then read his second where he basically admits he ****ed up and ICE has taken it too far.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.

im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.

I'd like to see an example of something he's posted here that explicitly gives evidence to this allegation.

If you don't question stopping US Citizens for no probable cause other than they are of Latino decent and demanding ID, then you're in agreement with that tactic. I can't think of another reason why that would be an option for enforcement of a policy other than racial profiling.

But hey, I might be wrong, but that's how I interpret the 4th amendment.

Do you think it's good enforcement of policy to harass people in school pickup lines and at their places of work or try to kick their door down? Is that how we capture and deport the worst of the worse?



Trump has broken this liberal.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.

im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.

I'd like to see an example of something he's posted here that explicitly gives evidence to this allegation.

If you don't question stopping US Citizens for no probable cause other than they are of Latino decent and demanding ID, then you're in agreement with that tactic. I can't think of another reason why that would be an option for enforcement of a policy other than racial profiling.

But hey, I might be wrong, but that's how I interpret the 4th amendment.

Do you think it's good enforcement of policy to harass people in school pickup lines and at their places of work or try to kick their door down? Is that how we capture and deport the worst of the worse?



Trump has broken this liberal.
populism has broken you.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

Oldsouljer said:

hokiewolf said:

Werewolf said:

eljefe444 said:

Werewolf said:

packgrad said:

I think this is a good plan.



Too damn funny, and spot on!


Guess I'm a prude for not finding humor about imagining driving into a crowd of people and the killing of a person with shots fired from the side of a vehicle and immediately calling the deceased a "fxxing bxxch"


Next time once of you block a street to try to drag some law abiding citizen out of their car or pelt it with rocks, you will get what you deserve by that driver.....and that is to get your a$$ run over... of course you don't get the comparison, I'm certain.

im fairly certain the only people injured or killed so far in ICE shooting incidents with protesters are Marimar Martinez (who was shot 5 times after ICE rammed her vehicle and then they lied about it) and now Renee Good.

I would also be more than happy to post for you all the times ICE arrested and detained US Citizens without probable cause except they were brown people. Treated them like **** because they can.

So, if you're wondering why most reasonable people are angry, this is why. But, you like to point at the most obvious agitators and paint a broad brush that they represent everyone who has a disagreement or a concern or even question with how this immigration policy is being carried out. It's flat out garbage man.

How about JD Vance saying they are going to go door to door to arrest illegals? How constitutional is that? When the next democrat becomes president are you going to cheer them on when they go door to door to take away your guns? Because you've just cracked that door open by pissing away our 4th amendment rights.

Should you have been arrested on January 6? Well if you had listened to the government in charge then, then I guess you should have.

There are serious issues with this policy and you choose to ignore them because you want less brown people in this country, by any means necessary, whether they are legally here or not.

I'd like to see an example of something he's posted here that explicitly gives evidence to this allegation.

If you don't question stopping US Citizens for no probable cause other than they are of Latino decent and demanding ID, then you're in agreement with that tactic. I can't think of another reason why that would be an option for enforcement of a policy other than racial profiling.

But hey, I might be wrong, but that's how I interpret the 4th amendment.

Do you think it's good enforcement of policy to harass people in school pickup lines and at their places of work or try to kick their door down? Is that how we capture and deport the worst of the worse?



Trump has broken this liberal.

populism has broken you.

Whatever, liberal. Keep calling all of your -isms. Your true colors are showing. The jig is up.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Presumably the administration leaked this to be exculpatory but this looks awful for the agent.

Through the windshield as viewed from his own footage the agent can clearly see her backing up and then turning the wheel to the right, away from him, prior to shooting her in the face three times.

If you're trying to ram somebody, why back up to give yourself some space and then turn the wheel away from them?

Then calling her a "****ing *****" seconds after mortally wounding her?

The optics of this are horrible for the agent.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For the betas feigning outrage

packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.
yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.

If she had tried to run over him too, he probably would have. And you would have excused it or said she didn't mean to, liberal.

I'm sorry all of the liberal lies have been debunked. Clutch your pearls about his bad language too, because words hurt and whatnot.

Keep trying for a win, Dave.
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Great summary of why this agent provocatively circling her car filming it with his cell phone which put him near the front of her car as she pulled away isn't justification to use deadly force.

The agent clearly escalated the situation unnecessarily, used poor and provocative tactics, and created the very danger people are now claiming justified deadly force. All of this is in violation of the jeopardy doctrine and is going to be hammered at trial.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.

If she had tried to run over him too, he probably would have. And you would have excused it or said she didn't mean to, liberal.

Keep trying for a win, Dave.
you obviously don't read very well. We know who is at fault, it is the driver. It's perfectly okay however to debate whether the use of force was justified or not . That's for the investigation to decide.

Sorry I got it wrong on thinking the lady didn't see the officer, it seemed reasonable based on the videos available l, but instead she was trying to descalate the situation, which btw the ICE agents could have also done once she started letting cars through.

BTW, are ICE agents trained to shoot at moving vehicles? I bet that agent at the drivers door is thankful he didn't get a bullet to the head too.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

Good luck trying to convince a jury she was "flooring it straight at him" with the mountain of video evidence showing she didn't floor it and she turned the wheel hard to the right, away from him.

Which do you think looks worse, her seeing him through the windshield and turning the wheel hard away from him, or him seeing her turn the wheel to point the car opposite his direction and shooting her in the face three times anyway?
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.

If she had tried to run over him too, he probably would have. And you would have excused it or said she didn't mean to, liberal.

Keep trying for a win, Dave.

you obviously don't read very well. We know who is at fault, it is the driver. It's perfectly okay however to debate whether the use of force was justified or not . That's for the investigation to decide.

Sorry I got it wrong on thinking the lady didn't see the officer, it seemed reasonable based on the videos available l, but instead she was trying to descalate the situation, which btw the ICE agents could have also done once she started letting cars through.

BTW, are ICE agents trained to shoot at moving vehicles? I bet that agent at the drivers door is thankful he didn't get a bullet to the head too.

lol at she was trying to deescalate the situation. More lies from Dave!!
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.

If she had tried to run over him too, he probably would have. And you would have excused it or said she didn't mean to, liberal.

Keep trying for a win, Dave.

you obviously don't read very well. We know who is at fault, it is the driver. It's perfectly okay however to debate whether the use of force was justified or not . That's for the investigation to decide.

Sorry I got it wrong on thinking the lady didn't see the officer, it seemed reasonable based on the videos available l, but instead she was trying to descalate the situation, which btw the ICE agents could have also done once she started letting cars through.

BTW, are ICE agents trained to shoot at moving vehicles? I bet that agent at the drivers door is thankful he didn't get a bullet to the head too.

lol at she was trying to deescalate the situation. More lies from Dave!!
"im not mad at you"
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

Good luck trying to convince a jury she was "flooring it straight at him" with the mountain of video evidence showing she didn't floor it and she turned the wheel hard to the right, away from him.

Which do you think looks worse, her seeing him through the windshield and turning the wheel hard away from him, or him seeing her turn the wheel to point the car opposite his direction and shooting her in the face three times anyway?

Good luck proving she didn't back up and put him directly in front of the vehicle, and floor it. I think it looks worse that you, Dave, and a couple other liberals on here continue with lie after lie like the minion fools you are.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.

If she had tried to run over him too, he probably would have. And you would have excused it or said she didn't mean to, liberal.

Keep trying for a win, Dave.

you obviously don't read very well. We know who is at fault, it is the driver. It's perfectly okay however to debate whether the use of force was justified or not . That's for the investigation to decide.

Sorry I got it wrong on thinking the lady didn't see the officer, it seemed reasonable based on the videos available l, but instead she was trying to descalate the situation, which btw the ICE agents could have also done once she started letting cars through.

BTW, are ICE agents trained to shoot at moving vehicles? I bet that agent at the drivers door is thankful he didn't get a bullet to the head too.

lol at she was trying to deescalate the situation. More lies from Dave!!

"im not mad at you"

Deescalation!! lol.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

hokiewolf said:

packgrad said:

Civ's link, that had already been posted by others, also shows how he and Dave were wrong about "she didn't even see him". She knew he was there.

Also like how he glosses over the lesbian white women trying to antagonize the officer. Antagonize him, then floor it straight at him, and he's not supposed to think she's trying to kill him. Oh, to be a lying liberal.

Such an easily prevented situation for normal people.

yeah man, probably should've shot the wife too, words hurt and whatnot.

If she had tried to run over him too, he probably would have. And you would have excused it or said she didn't mean to, liberal.

Keep trying for a win, Dave.

you obviously don't read very well. We know who is at fault, it is the driver. It's perfectly okay however to debate whether the use of force was justified or not . That's for the investigation to decide.

Sorry I got it wrong on thinking the lady didn't see the officer, it seemed reasonable based on the videos available l, but instead she was trying to descalate the situation, which btw the ICE agents could have also done once she started letting cars through.

BTW, are ICE agents trained to shoot at moving vehicles? I bet that agent at the drivers door is thankful he didn't get a bullet to the head too.

lol at she was trying to deescalate the situation. More lies from Dave!!

"im not mad at you"

Deescalation!! lol.
There have only been two people shot in ICE protests. How many of them were ICE Agents. Guess what's going to happen, more people are going to continue to be shot by ICE Agents. Seems like that's not an issue for you. That's fine. I question it.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?

hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's not question this.

In some cases, the victims survived, including a woman who suffered multiple bullet wounds in an incident in Chicago in October. The Border Patrol officer who shot her appeared to brag about it in a text message, later presented in court evidence. The message reportedly read, "I fired 5 rounds, and she had 7 holes. Put that in your book boys."
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:




Tell that to the jury too, I'm sure it will help.

Would help more though if Renee Good's demeanor seconds before being shot didn't look the exact opposite of someone with intentions to Kill Ice.

Or if the ICE agents didn't mutter "****ing *****" seconds after killing her.

First Page Last Page
Page 673 of 678
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.