packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I bet things like this don't show up in Civ's propaganda piece.

Manhattan DA Bragg’s office quietly drops case against NYC woman who sucker-punched pro-life activist, blames ‘unacceptable error’ https://t.co/2JlJi4lhtb pic.twitter.com/mXJTkEWKu1

— New York Post (@nypost) September 27, 2025

---

Lay it out for us man. Stop beating around the bush.

Every study that's ever been done has said basically the same thing but you evidently have insider info.

So what percentage of fatal violence by extremists is perpetrated by left-wing loons vs. right-wing loons?

What percentage of non-fatal violence?

Put a number on it.

---

You put up a bull**** study, right? Can you admit that? Let's stop beating around the bush. Are you a propagandist? Was the study you put up accurate?

Own your position. Let's see where you stand. I think you're a lying propagandist. Prove me wrong.

I love how it took me 5 minutes to debunk your propaganda. Bet you didn't even read it. lol.

---

You mean Fox News put up the study and then the Administration embarrassingly misinterpreted it.

You can slice the numbers however you want; they always show the same thing. There is a mountain of evidence out there.

Here's a challenge for you: if it's so clear the study is bull****, then go find a study from any sort of reputable source (i.e. not Werewolf) that shows something different.

If it's so clearly bull**** and the numbers are so clearly skewed, surely there's a study somewhere out there to back you up right? Somewhere? Anywhere?

We both know that study doesn't exist, because that's not what any of the numbers show.

---

Are you saying the numbers aren't CLEARLY bull***** I literally laid it out for you with just the police murders and the Nashville ****** shooting. Are you really that much of a lying propagandist?

Are their number correct, Civ? **** every other study you claim says the same thing. Just answer this one study. Are they correct?

Take the L, Civ. This was way too easy. Perhaps you should read what you post instead of just being a minion.

---

caryking said:

---

I personally don't red these study's as I've lost complete faith in them. That said, we can do our own study by listing all the recent violent (define that word how you want) attacks and let's see how the numbers fall.

Who wants to start the list?

Civ, Smapty, start the list and we can go from there…

---

That's MAGA in a nutshell. You guys were easy marks and have been completely captured. There is no amount of data you would ever trust, because by definition anyone who speaks ill of Dear Leader is part of the conspiracy.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I bet things like this don't show up in Civ's propaganda piece.

Manhattan DA Bragg’s office quietly drops case against NYC woman who sucker-punched pro-life activist, blames ‘unacceptable error’ https://t.co/2JlJi4lhtb pic.twitter.com/mXJTkEWKu1

— New York Post (@nypost) September 27, 2025

---

Lay it out for us man. Stop beating around the bush.

Every study that's ever been done has said basically the same thing but you evidently have insider info.

So what percentage of fatal violence by extremists is perpetrated by left-wing loons vs. right-wing loons?

What percentage of non-fatal violence?

Put a number on it.

---

You put up a bull**** study, right? Can you admit that? Let's stop beating around the bush. Are you a propagandist? Was the study you put up accurate?

Own your position. Let's see where you stand. I think you're a lying propagandist. Prove me wrong.

I love how it took me 5 minutes to debunk your propaganda. Bet you didn't even read it. lol.

---

You mean Fox News put up the study and then the Administration embarrassingly misinterpreted it.

You can slice the numbers however you want; they always show the same thing. There is a mountain of evidence out there.

Here's a challenge for you: if it's so clear the study is bull****, then go find a study from any sort of reputable source (i.e. not Werewolf) that shows something different.

If it's so clearly bull**** and the numbers are so clearly skewed, surely there's a study somewhere out there to back you up right? Somewhere? Anywhere?

We both know that study doesn't exist, because that's not what any of the numbers show.

---

Are you saying the numbers aren't CLEARLY bull***** I literally laid it out for you with just the police murders and the Nashville ****** shooting. Are you really that much of a lying propagandist?

Are their number correct, Civ? **** every other study you claim says the same thing. Just answer this one study. Are they correct?

Take the L, Civ. This was way too easy. Perhaps you should read what you post instead of just being a minion.

---

---

I know math is hard to you woke fools. It's pretty simple though(10+7 Does not equal 13, and that only includes the police and the Nashville ******), but keep believing the "study"/propaganda. I'm glad you're doubling down on stupidity to emphasize who you truly are though, cultist.

Send me another study I can dismantle in 5 minutes, sheep.

packgrad said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

I bet things like this don't show up in Civ's propaganda piece.

Manhattan DA Bragg’s office quietly drops case against NYC woman who sucker-punched pro-life activist, blames ‘unacceptable error’ https://t.co/2JlJi4lhtb pic.twitter.com/mXJTkEWKu1

— New York Post (@nypost) September 27, 2025

---

Lay it out for us man. Stop beating around the bush.

Every study that's ever been done has said basically the same thing but you evidently have insider info.

So what percentage of fatal violence by extremists is perpetrated by left-wing loons vs. right-wing loons?

What percentage of non-fatal violence?

Put a number on it.

---

You put up a bull**** study, right? Can you admit that? Let's stop beating around the bush. Are you a propagandist? Was the study you put up accurate?

Own your position. Let's see where you stand. I think you're a lying propagandist. Prove me wrong.

I love how it took me 5 minutes to debunk your propaganda. Bet you didn't even read it. lol.

---

You mean Fox News put up the study and then the Administration embarrassingly misinterpreted it.

You can slice the numbers however you want; they always show the same thing. There is a mountain of evidence out there.

Here's a challenge for you: if it's so clear the study is bull****, then go find a study from any sort of reputable source (i.e. not Werewolf) that shows something different.

If it's so clearly bull**** and the numbers are so clearly skewed, surely there's a study somewhere out there to back you up right? Somewhere? Anywhere?

We both know that study doesn't exist, because that's not what any of the numbers show.

---

Are you saying the numbers aren't CLEARLY bull***** I literally laid it out for you with just the police murders and the Nashville ****** shooting. Are you really that much of a lying propagandist?

Are their number correct, Civ? **** every other study you claim says the same thing. Just answer this one study. Are they correct?

Take the L, Civ. This was way too easy. Perhaps you should read what you post instead of just being a minion.

---

---

I know math is hard to you woke fools. It's pretty simple though(10+7 Does not equal 13, and that only includes the police and the Nashville ******), but keep believing the "study"/propaganda. I'm glad you're doubling down on stupidity to emphasize who you truly are though, cultist.

Send me another study I can dismantle in 5 minutes, sheep.

---

Lol, this is called "getting high on your own supply". Like you guys always do, you pretended the Nashville shooter was Antifa or something just because they were trans... but there's no evidence of the shooter's ideology at all in their motivation. Now you think that's somehow slam dunk evidence that the left wing shooter counter is off? Riiiiiight!

Anyway, I've got bad news for you... a BUNCH of right wingers are trans, they're just battling it and driving themselves crazy. I suspect a few of them are here with us in the Water Cooler, given how often this topic comes up.

Look, another leftist lying. That tweet was perfect you guys. Lie, lie, lie.

Clowns.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/illegal-alien-arrested-ice-found-registered-active-democrat-voter-blue-state?dicbo=v2-hI4vKoG

Just more of the same...

TheStorm said:

---

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/illegal-alien-arrested-ice-found-registered-active-democrat-voter-blue-state?dicbo=v2-hI4vKoG

Just more of the same...

---

More of the same on Fox News? This is all very surprising.

What in the bloody hell is Trump prattling on about other than how much everyone loves his signature and how many fake wars he ended and perfectly non-authoritarian ideas like "the war within" and being sorry that all the enemies within don't wear uniforms so the military can't identify them and "take them out?"

They called all the top brass into the same room from all around the world for Trump to deliver a rambling, incoherent stump campaign speech for 2028 and for Hesgeth to lambast fat generals and soldiers?

Shocking. I'm shocked.

What a colossally unserious bunch.

Remarkable how you hyperventilate nearly everyday about something Trump and then you have the gall to say "What a colossally unserious bunch."

Mentally
Ill

Civilized said:

---

What in the bloody hell is Trump prattling on about other than how much everyone loves his signature and how many fake wars he ended and perfectly non-authoritarian ideas like "the war within" and being sorry that all the enemies within don't wear uniforms so the military can't identify them and "take them out?"

They called all the top brass into the same room from all around the world for Trump to deliver a rambling, incoherent stump campaign speech for 2028 and for Hesgeth to lambast fat generals and soldiers?

Shocking. I'm shocked.

What a colossally unserious bunch.

---

You have no idea what was said behind the scenes or in confidence but keep on outraging. One day you'll convince everyone Trump bad. Trump real bad. Trump real real bad.

Ever notice how you can't talk about democrats or their ideas/policies?

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

What in the bloody hell is Trump prattling on about other than how much everyone loves his signature and how many fake wars he ended and perfectly non-authoritarian ideas like "the war within" and being sorry that all the enemies within don't wear uniforms so the military can't identify them and "take them out?"

They called all the top brass into the same room from all around the world for Trump to deliver a rambling, incoherent stump campaign speech for 2028 and for Hesgeth to lambast fat generals and soldiers?

Shocking. I'm shocked.

What a colossally unserious bunch.

---

You have no idea what was said behind the scenes or in confidence but keep on outraging. One day you'll convince everyone Trump bad. Trump real bad. Trump real real bad.

Ever notice how you can't talk about democrats or their ideas/policies?

---

Why would we talk about Democrats at this point? Republicans control the Presidency, Congress, and SC. As you like to say, it's your circus. These are your clowns. Own it.

And stop sane-washing. There is zero reason to believe what was said behind the scenes was 4D chess when what's said in front of the curtain is so laughably shallow.

Once it a while it would be nice for what's being said on the big stage to be cogent and inspirational and sensible rather than the addled ramblings of a petulant and petty narcissist.

It's gaslighting of the highest order to act like that's too high a bar to clear.

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

hokiewolf said:

---

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

---

You're talking about intent.

I'm talking about execution.

Sounds like we agree Trump's execution of the address was the typical blundering carnival barker we've all grown to know and love so much.

And no, the previous administration didn't "tell everyone that the main mission of the DoD was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military."

That's ridiculous hyperbole.

Just say DEI was a focus of the last administration throughout government, including the military, and this Administration is cutting that out entirely.

That's accurate.

But I'm pretty sure a lot of the fluff in this address, especially by Hesgeth, like Fatty McFatterton generals walking around the Pentagon, gender-specific PT, loosening disciplinary standards, and walking back anti-hazing rules, put in place to improve mental health and reduce suicides in the military, had nothing to do with DEI.

Poor civ.... no more woke **** in the military so he's crying. It's good to have real men back in charge.

Inject directly into my veins. 👇👇

“No more identity months, DEI offices, dudes in dresses, no more climate change worship, no more division, distraction or gender delusion, no more debris. I've said before and will say again, we are done with that shit”pic.twitter.com/5SXFVtZzAt

— C3 (@C_3C_3) September 30, 2025

“Done with that shit” pic.twitter.com/AGHefuVYgU

— the last (@Dronetakeoff0) September 30, 2025

No man, Lloyd Austin literally had a press conference, in between his secret stays in hospitals.

Civilized said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

What in the bloody hell is Trump prattling on about other than how much everyone loves his signature and how many fake wars he ended and perfectly non-authoritarian ideas like "the war within" and being sorry that all the enemies within don't wear uniforms so the military can't identify them and "take them out?"

They called all the top brass into the same room from all around the world for Trump to deliver a rambling, incoherent stump campaign speech for 2028 and for Hesgeth to lambast fat generals and soldiers?

Shocking. I'm shocked.

What a colossally unserious bunch.

---

You have no idea what was said behind the scenes or in confidence but keep on outraging. One day you'll convince everyone Trump bad. Trump real bad. Trump real real bad.

Ever notice how you can't talk about democrats or their ideas/policies?

---

Why would we talk about Democrats at this point? Republicans control the Presidency, Congress, and SC. As you like to say, it's your circus. These are your clowns. Own it.

And stop sane-washing. There is zero reason to believe what was said behind the scenes was 4D chess when what's said in front of the curtain is so laughably shallow.

Once it a while it would be nice for what's being said on the big stage to be cogent and inspirational and sensible rather than the addled ramblings of a petulant and petty narcissist.

It's gaslighting of the highest order to act like that's too high a bar to clear.

---

Listen brother I know you don't know much about things like this but I do. Your President Trump and Secretary Hegseth wanted to talk to 3-4 generals. They invited a lot more to a meeting as cover so outside observers could not know who (which command) they were calling in.

They are not going to discuss big plans with 100's of people. They talk with a very few and then the information goes down the chain of command when needed.

As I said earlier, there is NO WAY you or anyone else has any idea what was said behind the scenes and who was involved.

Feel free to keep outraging but you are barking up the wrong tree. Please believe that.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

---

So a raging alcoholic Fox News host pretending to be a Secretary of Defense, on stage lecturing everyone about military readiness. Yeah sure, why not?

---

Let us know when you do anything in your life comparable to your Secretary of Defense. That dude would take your lunch money.

Why DEI might actually be a good idea lol

The former deputy director of Joe Biden's "Office of Gun Violence Prevention" gets very confused when Josh Hawley reads from his own report which says we should defund the police and invest in "safe-space initiatives led by two-spirit, trans people."pic.twitter.com/lkOXmV1C5t

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 30, 2025

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

---

So a raging alcoholic Fox News host pretending to be a Secretary of Defense, on stage lecturing everyone about military readiness. Yeah sure, why not?

---

Let us know when you do anything in your life comparable to your Secretary of Defense. That dude would take your lunch money.

---

He was a captain in the National Guard. With a drinking problem. Literally his only qualification to be Secretary of Defense is that he kissed Trump's ass profusely on Fox News, said a lot of loony stuff, and was sufficiently morally compromised to be part of the team.

He's literally a walking billboard for why DEI might actually be a good idea... it was never about hiring unqualified minorities, it's about highly qualified minorities getting passed over by unqualified good ol' boys.

---

He deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Have you ever been either of those places?

Love it. Democrats have empowered their cult for too long to attack law enforcement and to harbor criminals. These people are 100% the enemy within. Let's start taking out the trash and make America great again.

And **** bububut what about when they get power and do it?!?! They ****ing have already. For a long time the quiet majority have bit their tongues while saying if things don't change a reckoning is coming.

Welcome to the reckoning.

packgrad said:

---

Love it. Democrats have empowered their cult for too long to attack law enforcement and to harbor criminals. These people are 100% the enemy within. Let's start taking out the trash and make America great again.

And **** bububut what about when they get power and do it?!?! They ****ing have already. For a long time the quiet majority have bit their tongues while saying if things don't change a reckoning is coming.

Welcome to the reckoning.

---

Well said brother. It's past time to kit up and crack some skulls. I'd start with Antifa. They want a revolution? They want a war? Let's give it to them. Let's give them a war they'll never forget, so help me God.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

---

So a raging alcoholic Fox News host pretending to be a Secretary of Defense, on stage lecturing everyone about military readiness. Yeah sure, why not?

---

Let us know when you do anything in your life comparable to your Secretary of Defense. That dude would take your lunch money.

---

He was a captain in the National Guard. With a drinking problem. Literally his only qualification to be Secretary of Defense is that he kissed Trump's ass profusely on Fox News, said a lot of loony stuff, and was sufficiently morally compromised to be part of the team.

He's literally a walking billboard for why DEI might actually be a good idea... it was never about hiring unqualified minorities, it's about highly qualified minorities getting passed over by unqualified good ol' boys.

---

He deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Have you ever been either of those places?

---

So being deployed to Iraq as a 2nd Lieutenant qualifies you to run the biggest and most sophisticated military on Planet Earth?

Oh I forgot, the Trump Admin is just a reality show, and he's a TV personality. Of course he's qualified!

Usual suspects are spinning with their faux outrage over nothing, per usual. Must be to hide the fact their leadership is trying to shut down the government so they can fund healthcare for illegals. Dems prioritize illegals/votes over Americans. Their constituents are too stupid to realize it.

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

---

So a raging alcoholic Fox News host pretending to be a Secretary of Defense, on stage lecturing everyone about military readiness. Yeah sure, why not?

---

Let us know when you do anything in your life comparable to your Secretary of Defense. That dude would take your lunch money.

---

He was a captain in the National Guard. With a drinking problem. Literally his only qualification to be Secretary of Defense is that he kissed Trump's ass profusely on Fox News, said a lot of loony stuff, and was sufficiently morally compromised to be part of the team.

He's literally a walking billboard for why DEI might actually be a good idea... it was never about hiring unqualified minorities, it's about highly qualified minorities getting passed over by unqualified good ol' boys.

---

He deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Have you ever been either of those places?

---

So being deployed to Iraq as a 2nd Lieutenant qualifies you to run the biggest and most sophisticated military on Planet Earth?

Oh I forgot, the Trump Admin is just a reality show, and he's a TV personality. Of course he's qualified!

---

Hey, at least he shows up to work and people know where he's at. Couldn't say that about Lloyd Austin

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Regardless of what you think of the speech, which was typical Trump so I'm not sure why anyone is surprised.

But what you are ignoring is that the previous administration told everyone that the main mission of the Department of Defense (and now War) was to advance the cause of minorities and LGBTQ in the military into advanced positions.

I happen to think that a meeting of your top people to reorient the direction of your Department is perfectly fine.

---

So a raging alcoholic Fox News host pretending to be a Secretary of Defense, on stage lecturing everyone about military readiness. Yeah sure, why not?

---

Let us know when you do anything in your life comparable to your Secretary of Defense. That dude would take your lunch money.

---

He was a captain in the National Guard. With a drinking problem. Literally his only qualification to be Secretary of Defense is that he kissed Trump's ass profusely on Fox News, said a lot of loony stuff, and was sufficiently morally compromised to be part of the team.

He's literally a walking billboard for why DEI might actually be a good idea... it was never about hiring unqualified minorities, it's about highly qualified minorities getting passed over by unqualified good ol' boys.

---

He deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. Have you ever been either of those places?

---

So being deployed to Iraq as a 2nd Lieutenant qualifies you to run the biggest and most sophisticated military on Planet Earth?

Oh I forgot, the Trump Admin is just a reality show, and he's a TV personality. Of course he's qualified!

---

Hegseth: "Should our enemies choose foolishly to challenge us, they will be crushed by the violence, precision, and ferocity of the War Department. To our enemies, FAFO." pic.twitter.com/OXcjUOQyDs

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 30, 2025

Pipe down and stand at attention Smapty, the big dog is on stage.

Admire that main character energy.

Can you imagine being a decorated general that's served for decades and having to maintain your decorum being called fat and getting talked down to by a drunk Fox News host?