TRUMP 2024

2,195,919 Views | 19426 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by packgrad
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

I bet things like this don't show up in Civ's propaganda piece.




Lay it out for us man. Stop beating around the bush.

Every study that's ever been done has said basically the same thing but you evidently have insider info.

So what percentage of fatal violence by extremists is perpetrated by left-wing loons vs. right-wing loons?

What percentage of non-fatal violence?

Put a number on it.


You put up a bull**** study, right? Can you admit that? Let's stop beating around the bush. Are you a propagandist? Was the study you put up accurate?

Own your position. Let's see where you stand. I think you're a lying propagandist. Prove me wrong.

I love how it took me 5 minutes to debunk your propaganda. Bet you didn't even read it. lol.


You mean Fox News put up the study and then the Administration embarrassingly misinterpreted it.

You can slice the numbers however you want; they always show the same thing. There is a mountain of evidence out there.

Here's a challenge for you: if it's so clear the study is bull****, then go find a study from any sort of reputable source (i.e. not Werewolf) that shows something different.

If it's so clearly bull**** and the numbers are so clearly skewed, surely there's a study somewhere out there to back you up right? Somewhere? Anywhere?

We both know that study doesn't exist, because that's not what any of the numbers show.


Are you saying the numbers aren't CLEARLY bull***** I literally laid it out for you with just the police murders and the Nashville ****** shooting. Are you really that much of a lying propagandist?

Are their number correct, Civ? **** every other study you claim says the same thing. Just answer this one study. Are they correct?

Take the L, Civ. This was way too easy. Perhaps you should read what you post instead of just being a minion.

SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking said:

I personally don't red these study's as I've lost complete faith in them. That said, we can do our own study by listing all the recent violent (define that word how you want) attacks and let's see how the numbers fall.

Who wants to start the list?

Civ, Smapty, start the list and we can go from there…

That's MAGA in a nutshell. You guys were easy marks and have been completely captured. There is no amount of data you would ever trust, because by definition anyone who speaks ill of Dear Leader is part of the conspiracy.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SmaptyWolf said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

I bet things like this don't show up in Civ's propaganda piece.




Lay it out for us man. Stop beating around the bush.

Every study that's ever been done has said basically the same thing but you evidently have insider info.

So what percentage of fatal violence by extremists is perpetrated by left-wing loons vs. right-wing loons?

What percentage of non-fatal violence?

Put a number on it.


You put up a bull**** study, right? Can you admit that? Let's stop beating around the bush. Are you a propagandist? Was the study you put up accurate?

Own your position. Let's see where you stand. I think you're a lying propagandist. Prove me wrong.

I love how it took me 5 minutes to debunk your propaganda. Bet you didn't even read it. lol.


You mean Fox News put up the study and then the Administration embarrassingly misinterpreted it.

You can slice the numbers however you want; they always show the same thing. There is a mountain of evidence out there.

Here's a challenge for you: if it's so clear the study is bull****, then go find a study from any sort of reputable source (i.e. not Werewolf) that shows something different.

If it's so clearly bull**** and the numbers are so clearly skewed, surely there's a study somewhere out there to back you up right? Somewhere? Anywhere?

We both know that study doesn't exist, because that's not what any of the numbers show.


Are you saying the numbers aren't CLEARLY bull***** I literally laid it out for you with just the police murders and the Nashville ****** shooting. Are you really that much of a lying propagandist?

Are their number correct, Civ? **** every other study you claim says the same thing. Just answer this one study. Are they correct?

Take the L, Civ. This was way too easy. Perhaps you should read what you post instead of just being a minion.




I know math is hard to you woke fools. It's pretty simple though(10+7 Does not equal 13, and that only includes the police and the Nashville ******), but keep believing the "study"/propaganda. I'm glad you're doubling down on stupidity to emphasize who you truly are though, cultist.

Send me another study I can dismantle in 5 minutes, sheep.
SmaptyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

SmaptyWolf said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

Civilized said:

packgrad said:

I bet things like this don't show up in Civ's propaganda piece.




Lay it out for us man. Stop beating around the bush.

Every study that's ever been done has said basically the same thing but you evidently have insider info.

So what percentage of fatal violence by extremists is perpetrated by left-wing loons vs. right-wing loons?

What percentage of non-fatal violence?

Put a number on it.


You put up a bull**** study, right? Can you admit that? Let's stop beating around the bush. Are you a propagandist? Was the study you put up accurate?

Own your position. Let's see where you stand. I think you're a lying propagandist. Prove me wrong.

I love how it took me 5 minutes to debunk your propaganda. Bet you didn't even read it. lol.


You mean Fox News put up the study and then the Administration embarrassingly misinterpreted it.

You can slice the numbers however you want; they always show the same thing. There is a mountain of evidence out there.

Here's a challenge for you: if it's so clear the study is bull****, then go find a study from any sort of reputable source (i.e. not Werewolf) that shows something different.

If it's so clearly bull**** and the numbers are so clearly skewed, surely there's a study somewhere out there to back you up right? Somewhere? Anywhere?

We both know that study doesn't exist, because that's not what any of the numbers show.


Are you saying the numbers aren't CLEARLY bull***** I literally laid it out for you with just the police murders and the Nashville ****** shooting. Are you really that much of a lying propagandist?

Are their number correct, Civ? **** every other study you claim says the same thing. Just answer this one study. Are they correct?

Take the L, Civ. This was way too easy. Perhaps you should read what you post instead of just being a minion.




I know math is hard to you woke fools. It's pretty simple though(10+7 Does not equal 13, and that only includes the police and the Nashville ******), but keep believing the "study"/propaganda. I'm glad you're doubling down on stupidity to emphasize who you truly are though, cultist.

Send me another study I can dismantle in 5 minutes, sheep.

Lol, this is called "getting high on your own supply". Like you guys always do, you pretended the Nashville shooter was Antifa or something just because they were trans... but there's no evidence of the shooter's ideology at all in their motivation. Now you think that's somehow slam dunk evidence that the left wing shooter counter is off? Riiiiiight!

Anyway, I've got bad news for you... a BUNCH of right wingers are trans, they're just battling it and driving themselves crazy. I suspect a few of them are here with us in the Water Cooler, given how often this topic comes up.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Look, another leftist lying. That tweet was perfect you guys. Lie, lie, lie.

Clowns.
First Page Refresh
Page 556 of 556
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.