all I've ever wanted is to follow the law so yesWerewolf said:
We agree?
Werewolf said:
Reminds me of #daSieve and #daNappy complaining about Trump, tariffs and such; it's not hard to understand.I love the new Sydney Sweeney ads for American Eagle.
— Nicole Arbour (@NicoleArbour) July 29, 2025
Normal hot girls are BACK!
Not porn
Not trans
Not gay
Not obese to make a point
Not wearing a headscarf to be inclusive
Not political
Just a hot girl in jeans.
The world is healing… pic.twitter.com/Cy6BCLb2YOOf course an overweight woman with a septum ring doesn’t like the American Eagle ad that’s featuring Sydney Sweeney either.
— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) July 28, 2025
Has any attractive woman actually criticized this ad?
Honest question.pic.twitter.com/CsdzfQKWv5
This is #Sieve and #Nappy's America. We saw it up close for 8 yrs of Obama and the last 4 yrs with Biden.BREAKING - It’s been revealed a gay couple who crowdfunded their surrogacy journey now has custody of a baby boy, despite one partner Brandon Keith Riley Mitchell being a convicted child sex offender, using a Pennsylvania surrogacy loophole that bypasses state adoption… pic.twitter.com/XkSRSNnpTs
— Right Angle News Network (@Rightanglenews) July 28, 2025
The Durham Report is in 2 parts. One classified report and one unclassified report.
— Debbie Dooley (@Crimsontider) May 16, 2023
Rumor is the classified report includes recommendations for 30+ folks to be charged.
The Unclassified Report has been released.
Congress needs to get the classified report and hold hearings…
JOHN SOLOMON: Obama knew. Brennan knew. The FBI knew.
— Bannon’s WarRoom (@Bannons_WarRoom) July 29, 2025
And they still launched Hillary's Russia hoax.
Trump is declassifying the Durham Annex, and it could blow this thing wide open.@jsolomonReports pic.twitter.com/veXUmok3lw
“BOMBSHELL” 💥
— Patri0tsareinContr0l (@Patri0tContr0l) July 30, 2025
John Solomon announces Chuck Grassley will release the Durham Annex as early as tomorrow, saying he believes it will show FBI officials KNEW the Clinton campaign planned the entire Russia collusion hoax AND that they agreed to be co-conspirators 👀
Hillary can’t… pic.twitter.com/aKAKDHo19s
‼️MILITARY TRIBUNALS INBOUND‼️
— Grasshopper (@17Grasshopper) July 25, 2025
OBAMA'S PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY:
LIMITED TO CIVILIAN COURTS!
‼️ IMMUNITY FROM TRUMP V. UNITED STATES (2024) SHIELDS FORMER PRESIDENTS FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IN CIVILIAN COURTS FOR OFFICIAL ACTS—‼️BUT MILITARY TRIBUNALS ARE A DIFFERENT BEAST‼️… pic.twitter.com/v6H28VSwpA
hokiewolf said:Werewolf said:Guess what?
— Mia Evans (@Mia_Evans0603) July 29, 2025
The United States of America voters elected President Trump, a Republican House and a Republican Senate.
The Congress passed a bill, and the President signed it - defunding Planned Parenthood.
Judge Talwani is subverting all of that. Alone. She just blocked it.… pic.twitter.com/JCkuiPSzpf
this isn't following the law
Oh yeah, I do recall you applauding the 2023 Texas Court decision blocking access to the abortion medication, because it's almost the exact same type of judicial Olympics in the ruling reasoning.SmaptyWolf said:hokiewolf said:Werewolf said:Guess what?
— Mia Evans (@Mia_Evans0603) July 29, 2025
The United States of America voters elected President Trump, a Republican House and a Republican Senate.
The Congress passed a bill, and the President signed it - defunding Planned Parenthood.
Judge Talwani is subverting all of that. Alone. She just blocked it.… pic.twitter.com/JCkuiPSzpf
this isn't following the law
A federal judge alone deciding if a new law, especially one signed by Dear Leader, is unconstitutional?! What is the anti-American craziness?!?!
Man, our country is definitely paying the price for you guys sleeping through Civics class.
hokiewolf said:Oh yeah, I do recall you applauding the 2023 Texas Court decision blocking access to the abortion medication, because it's almost the exact same type of judicial Olympics in the ruling reasoning.SmaptyWolf said:hokiewolf said:Werewolf said:Guess what?
— Mia Evans (@Mia_Evans0603) July 29, 2025
The United States of America voters elected President Trump, a Republican House and a Republican Senate.
The Congress passed a bill, and the President signed it - defunding Planned Parenthood.
Judge Talwani is subverting all of that. Alone. She just blocked it.… pic.twitter.com/JCkuiPSzpf
this isn't following the law
A federal judge alone deciding if a new law, especially one signed by Dear Leader, is unconstitutional?! What is the anti-American craziness?!?!
Man, our country is definitely paying the price for you guys sleeping through Civics class.
This was the real Russian conspiracy.
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) July 30, 2025
“Brennan briefed Obama in July 2016 that Hillary would invent the Russian collusion theory. Then he overruled the CIA and inserted the debunked Steele dossier. That helped derail Trump’s presidency—and the media never bothered to ask why.”--… pic.twitter.com/56WlPASbMZ
Obama’s DOJ was for Sale:
— C3 (@C_3C_3) July 22, 2025
Hillary pays Perkins Coie, Perkins Coie pays Fusion GPS, Fusion GPS pays Nellie Ohr...
Nellie is married to Bruce of the DOJ.
Hillary’s $ used to buy a fake Dossier to FRAME Trump ended up in the bank account of Bruce Ohr, #4 at the DOJ.
Obamagate. pic.twitter.com/6sLsnNyeuP
Yea, I had to look up the “blue slip tradition” President Trump is urging Senator Grassley to do.@ChuckGrassley pic.twitter.com/eFzpKevR9O
— 𝐂𝐂 (@ChatByCC) July 29, 2025
hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Werewolf said:
We'll know who is with the traitors .....it won't be much longer. Traitors themselves.......CIA director teases soon-to-be-released Durham report 'classified annex' on origins of Russia probe | Just The News https://t.co/poTjU4nb4g
— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) July 27, 2025
— Jack Straw (@JackStr42679640) July 31, 2025
Werewolf said:
a plea deal ? in exchange for what? :-)— Jack Straw (@JackStr42679640) July 31, 2025
Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
Pew Research is showing some incredible partisan swings from 2023 to 2025.
— Christian Heiens 🏛 (@ChristianHeiens) July 30, 2025
18-29 Men: 🔴R+44
18-29 Women: 🔴R+14
30-49 Men: 🔴R+15
30-49 Women: 🔵D+3
50-64 Men: 🔴R+3
50-64 Women: 🔴R+1
65+ Men: 🔵D+6
65+ Women: 🔵D+2 pic.twitter.com/YI6T2lpFqx
Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Break it down however you want.
Demonstrate how middle and lower-class Americans (using some normal, accepted definition) benefit from tariff fuzzy math "surplus" and the BBB.
Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Break it down however you want.
Demonstrate how middle and lower-class Americans (using some normal, accepted definition) benefit from tariff fuzzy math "surplus" and the BBB.
You do not have to answer but I was specifically asking for your definition. Again, if not interested in sharing that is fine.
For me I define wealth as net-worth not income. Due to my goals and also seeing individuals with high incomes have a lot more liabilities than assets.
Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Break it down however you want.
Demonstrate how middle and lower-class Americans (using some normal, accepted definition) benefit from tariff fuzzy math "surplus" and the BBB.
You do not have to answer but I was specifically asking for your definition. Again, if not interested in sharing that is fine.
For me I define wealth as net-worth not income. Due to my goals and also seeing individuals with high incomes have a lot more liabilities than assets.
Yes, these tax cuts are going to help high earners more than the subset of folks with significant wealth but little income.
The broader point is Trump and his acolytes want to celebrate some sort of alleged treasury surplus when the reality is very few Americans feel that, either via tangible benefits or even indirectly via a more balanced budget/reduced deficit since in concert with the tax cuts, the deficit is ballooning.
Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Break it down however you want.
Demonstrate how middle and lower-class Americans (using some normal, accepted definition) benefit from tariff fuzzy math "surplus" and the BBB.
You do not have to answer but I was specifically asking for your definition. Again, if not interested in sharing that is fine.
For me I define wealth as net-worth not income. Due to my goals and also seeing individuals with high incomes have a lot more liabilities than assets.
Yes, these tax cuts are going to help high earners more than the subset of folks with significant wealth but little income.
The broader point is Trump and his acolytes want to celebrate some sort of alleged treasury surplus when the reality is very few Americans feel that, either via tangible benefits or even indirectly via a more balanced budget/reduced deficit since in concert with the tax cuts, the deficit is ballooning.
So not going to answer? Your choice, but just being clear.
A surplus like a deficit is tangible. The deficit has been ballooning for decades, not like either side has done anythign about it. Not exactly sure what you would expect Americans to feel about a surplus or a deficit.
Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Break it down however you want.
Demonstrate how middle and lower-class Americans (using some normal, accepted definition) benefit from tariff fuzzy math "surplus" and the BBB.
You do not have to answer but I was specifically asking for your definition. Again, if not interested in sharing that is fine.
For me I define wealth as net-worth not income. Due to my goals and also seeing individuals with high incomes have a lot more liabilities than assets.
Yes, these tax cuts are going to help high earners more than the subset of folks with significant wealth but little income.
The broader point is Trump and his acolytes want to celebrate some sort of alleged treasury surplus when the reality is very few Americans feel that, either via tangible benefits or even indirectly via a more balanced budget/reduced deficit since in concert with the tax cuts, the deficit is ballooning.
So not going to answer? Your choice, but just being clear.
A surplus like a deficit is tangible. The deficit has been ballooning for decades, not like either side has done anythign about it. Not exactly sure what you would expect Americans to feel about a surplus or a deficit.
I thought I just answered, man. I said high earners will benefit the most. "High earners" mainly refers to those that report very signficant taxable income in a given year.
To be even more pedantic, let's further explain that "high earners" partially overlaps, but not fully, with the wealthy, who may not have high incomes on paper due to having retired; receiving most of their compensation in company stock; or any number of other reasons. Some number of those wealthy folks also stand to benefit from Trump's tax cuts in different but still signficant ways, like via business ownership tax advantages.
I would expect Americans to not be celebrating the way some on here are, and the way Trump apparently wants most Americans to, about his alleged trade deal/tariff surplus "winning" when that brand of "winning" doesn't help Americans in the lower 90%-95% of income-earners.
Again the broader point is that tariffs are Trump's thing. It's a huge part of his platform, and a huge component of his economic plan. But again, which Americans does that economic plan (tariffs plus tax cuts plus hits to the social safety net and entitlements) stand to benefit?
The GDP growth is because of all the inventory stock up on the 1st quarter.Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Cthepack said:Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The merits of that "surplus" analysis notwithstanding, how is that likely mythical "surplus" helping non-wealthy Americans?
What specifically are we celebrating?
That the mythical surplus inadequately offsets the tax breaks for the rich and resultant deficit increase from the bloated BBB?
For context, how are you defining non-wealthy Americans? Is it net worth or income or both? What is the threshold of being wealthy?
Break it down however you want.
Demonstrate how middle and lower-class Americans (using some normal, accepted definition) benefit from tariff fuzzy math "surplus" and the BBB.
You do not have to answer but I was specifically asking for your definition. Again, if not interested in sharing that is fine.
For me I define wealth as net-worth not income. Due to my goals and also seeing individuals with high incomes have a lot more liabilities than assets.
Yes, these tax cuts are going to help high earners more than the subset of folks with significant wealth but little income.
The broader point is Trump and his acolytes want to celebrate some sort of alleged treasury surplus when the reality is very few Americans feel that, either via tangible benefits or even indirectly via a more balanced budget/reduced deficit since in concert with the tax cuts, the deficit is ballooning.
So not going to answer? Your choice, but just being clear.
A surplus like a deficit is tangible. The deficit has been ballooning for decades, not like either side has done anythign about it. Not exactly sure what you would expect Americans to feel about a surplus or a deficit.
I thought I just answered, man. I said high earners will benefit the most. "High earners" mainly refers to those that report very signficant taxable income in a given year.
To be even more pedantic, let's further explain that "high earners" partially overlaps, but not fully, with the wealthy, who may not have high incomes on paper due to having retired; receiving most of their compensation in company stock; or any number of other reasons. Some number of those wealthy folks also stand to benefit from Trump's tax cuts in different but still signficant ways, like via business ownership tax advantages.
I would expect Americans to not be celebrating the way some on here are, and the way Trump apparently wants most Americans to, about his alleged trade deal/tariff surplus "winning" when that brand of "winning" doesn't help Americans in the lower 90%-95% of income-earners.
Again the broader point is that tariffs are Trump's thing. It's a huge part of his platform, and a huge component of his economic plan. But again, which Americans does that economic plan (tariffs plus tax cuts plus hits to the social safety net and entitlements) stand to benefit?
I do not see making $150k a year as "Wealthy" but that is what the top 10% in the US make. But at least now I have context when you talk about the wealthy. Thanks.
hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The GDP growth is because of all the inventory stock up on the 1st quarter.
Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The GDP growth is because of all the inventory stock up on the 1st quarter.
Honest question are you just trolling? I would understand seeing some of the names you are called.
I will preface this by saying there are lots of variables that go into our GDP calculation.
But hokie, you first say that tariffs reduce the GDP growth, but then say GDP grew in the second quarter due to reduced imports, when one of the main things tariffs do is to reduce imports.
I'm not trolling, it's certainly a thought topic to digest all the nuances. I think, that tariffs haven't hit GDP yet. I think that will be in a future quarter.Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Oldsouljer said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:Cthepack said:hokiewolf said:
Lol. RevenuesWELCOME TO THE GOLDEN AGE ✨
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 29, 2025
Thanks to the leadership of @POTUS, the U.S. has generated over $150B in tariff revenues within the past 6 months. 💸 pic.twitter.com/f0nHQeXPtH
Come on Hokie, you are better than this.
What do the letters IRS stand for?
Prefect! Lets not act like this is anything but transferring money from private businesses and US citizens to the federal government via tax.
For some reason, Republicans have given up on the idea that private business is more efficient than the federal government.
But to sit here and pretend tariffs are not a tax increase, whether on consumers or businesses is getting old.
You keep saying this but I have not seen anyone claim differently. Maybe you have since you spend so much time talking about it.
Huh? People here keep celebrating these turrible tariff deals that aren't deals at all.
Prolly celebrating the income that comes with them for the time being u til the deals are reached.
tariffs reduce the GDP growth, not increase it.
Was speaking of revenue for the Treasury, not GDP. Supposedly, there was a historic surplus this past quarter, though I don't think that term is defined well enough to have meaning, in this instance. But that's what they'd be celebrating.
The GDP growth is because of all the inventory stock up on the 1st quarter.
Honest question are you just trolling? I would understand seeing some of the names you are called.
I will preface this by saying there are lots of variables that go into our GDP calculation.
But hokie, you first say that tariffs reduce the GDP growth, but then say GDP grew in the second quarter due to reduced imports, when one of the main things tariffs do is to reduce imports.