Smapty, you're projecting significantly on the yes men. These people did an interview that I thought was fairly responsible. They are putting their names out there for what?SmaptyWolf said:You're confusing the DOGE yes-men that Elon has placed at the various agencies to "co-run" them. Those are at least adults. The team of hackers he has going from department to department are most definitely a bunch of kids with checkered pasts more than happy to rummage through systems that they may or may not have legal access to in order to find "fraud".caryking said:Smapty, did you see my post above on the actual people on the DOGE team. These people are serious people. Not some random kids in the woods...SmaptyWolf said:Again, is this a serious question?Werewolf said:
Back to my 2nd and last question:
Is the young Doge team in on Elon's lie? Or is the team just a front, a fake?
I'm assuming the consensus of the 3 of you is that the $37T resulted from the billionaire class tax breaks? Or for some other reason?
It's a mystery for the ages how you can, on one hand, believe that the most likely explanation for a massive flood is the Illuminati controlling the weather, but then can't possibly see how Elon might have hand picked a bunch of loyal kids to do his dirty work.
Ironically, it sure seems like it's you (and Cary, etc) who have Trump Derangement Syndrome... anything involving Dear Leader completely shuts down your "discernment".
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5218847-meet-the-doge-team/
Incidentally, any technical person who's ever been involved in any kind of merger and tried to sort through another company's databases and code knows how absolutely absurd it is to claim that they found massive fraud in (let alone could even comprehend) these gigantic databases and ancient COBOL(!!!) systems in a matter of weeks. I don't care how elite they claim to be.
As expected, when they do release "findings" it's comical, which of course forces Elon to double down.
Yes, we have a number of youthful people that may be doing the technical work. In today's world, with today's technology, they probably understand it better than you or I. BTW, I have no idea what type of database this stuff sit on; furthermore, I have no idea what language is being used on these systems.
Now, some of this AI I'm starting to see can easily sift through this stuff at rates we've never seen before. So, please don't underestimate the capabilities of others. It's not a very appealing trait…