TRUMP 2024

866,205 Views | 9914 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by Civilized
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 7:23a, 2/10/25
Werewolf said:
#Sieve, whatcha think, AI?
Maybe this is a poll not faked?
Every news site out there says Melania was not at the Super Bowl.
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:01a, 2/10/25
My all time favorite economist…

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DCk57ikt8ch/?igsh=NDBvcnlmN3pwcjZj
Reply Quote
3
El Lobo Loco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 8:59a, 2/10/25
caryking said:
Werewolf said:
#Sieve, whatcha think, AI?
Maybe this is a poll not faked?
Every news site out there says Melania was not at the Super Bowl.
Are those the same sites that told us Biden knew where he was at all times?

Just saying....
Reply Quote
4
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 9:06a, 2/10/25
caryking said:
Werewolf said:
#Sieve, whatcha think, AI?
Maybe this is a poll not faked?
Every news site out there says Melania was not at the Super Bowl.
That clip was not from the Super Bowl. I don't know whether she was there or not. I didn't see her. But that clip is from the CFB Playoff a few years ago.
Reply Quote
1
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:26a, 2/10/25
LOL at that "one Hawaiian judge" who thinks they rule the country and can invalidate everything Trump does...

https://instagr.am/p/DF5SRKyMDMR
Reply Quote
1
FlossyDFlynt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 10:33a, 2/10/25
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet
Reply Quote
5
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlossyDFlynt • 10:35a, 2/10/25
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?
Reply Quote
FlossyDFlynt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 10:38a, 2/10/25
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?


And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.
Reply Quote
4
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlossyDFlynt • 10:44a, 2/10/25
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?


And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.

OK. What's your point? The National Archivist manages records; they serve no function with regard to checking executive overreach.

Did Biden act on anything? Were his actions reviewed by courts? What did the courts say? What did Biden do then?

Reply Quote
El Lobo Loco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlossyDFlynt • 10:55a, 2/10/25
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?


And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.
Odds are that Biden had no knowledge of this social media post. Most likely created and posted by an intern.
Reply Quote
5
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:08a, 2/10/25
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 11:33a, 2/10/25
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?


And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.

OK. What's your point? The National Archivist manages records; they serve no function with regard to checking executive overreach.

Did Biden act on anything? Were his actions reviewed by courts? What did the courts say? What did Biden do then?
Are you really going to use that commentary? Whatever..
Reply Quote
4
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 11:35a, 2/10/25
packgrad said:
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Wait, so you didn't win the culture war?

By the looks of about 100% of the Super Bowl commercials I'd say you lost pretty badly.
Reply Quote
FlossyDFlynt
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 11:36a, 2/10/25
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?


And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.

OK. What's your point? The National Archivist manages records; they serve no function with regard to checking executive overreach.

Did Biden act on anything? Were his actions reviewed by courts? What did the courts say? What did Biden do then?

My point is that anyone from the last administration has zero room to talk about the rule of law. Heres another fun example:


As for what Vance said...whatever? Its going to end up in the Supreme Court here very shortly, so Ill just let it play out
Reply Quote
5
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:53a, 2/10/25
Reply Quote
3
wolf5
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 12:12p, 2/10/25
SmaptyWolf said:
packgrad said:
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Wait, so you didn't win the culture war?

By the looks of about 100% of the Super Bowl commercials I'd say you lost pretty badly.



Just so much losing.
Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlossyDFlynt • 12:17p, 2/10/25
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?

And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.

OK. What's your point? The National Archivist manages records; they serve no function with regard to checking executive overreach.

Did Biden act on anything? Were his actions reviewed by courts? What did the courts say? What did Biden do then?

My point is that anyone from the last administration has zero room to talk about the rule of law. Heres another fun example:

As for what Vance said...whatever? Its going to end up in the Supreme Court here very shortly, so Ill just let it play out

You seem to be missing the part where the courts checked Biden's power with his first debt relief attempt, so he found a different, more directed, legal way to accomplish some of the same things.

That's how this all works. Presidents sometimes overreach, courts check their power, and if they want the Presidents can then figure out a different, legal way to accomplish what they're trying to accomplish.

Vance seems to be flailing on the history chapter where yes, it is definitely and obviously the courts that decide whether a President is overreaching.

Just like the courts did in Trump's first term with his overreach on immigration (travel ban); DACA; family separation; census citizenship questions; border wall funding; Presidential financial record shielding; Presidential records release under subpoena; TPS for immigrants; and COVID voting logistics.
Reply Quote
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 12:22p, 2/10/25
SmaptyWolf said:
packgrad said:
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Wait, so you didn't win the culture war?

By the looks of about 100% of the Super Bowl commercials I'd say you lost pretty badly.
Boy, you commie libtards are just doubling down on stupidity, aren't you?

There was a referendum on the culture war about three months ago in November. And your cultural Marxist DemonRat agenda LOST.

Keep it up. Keep thinking you are "winning". Keep pushing your baby murder, drag queen story time, cut your son's p**** and your daughter's breasts off, pro open border illegal alien invasion, race baiting and race division DEI agenda.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:24p, 2/10/25
MIght be some surprises for some here with GWB


Reply Quote
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GuerrillaPack • 12:25p, 2/10/25
GuerrillaPack said:
SmaptyWolf said:
packgrad said:
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Wait, so you didn't win the culture war?

By the looks of about 100% of the Super Bowl commercials I'd say you lost pretty badly.
Boy, you commie libtards are just doubling down on stupidity, aren't you?

There was a referendum on the culture war about three months ago in November. And your cultural Marxist DemonRat agenda LOST.

Keep it up. Keep thinking you are "winning". Keep pushing your baby murder, drag queen story time, cut your son's p**** and your daughter's breasts off agenda.


Super Bowl commercials made conservatives lose pretty badly? LOLOLOL. What in the **** is that mouth breathing moron and his pal talking about? Hilarious.

Those boys are so desperate for a win it's pitiful.
Reply Quote
6
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:28p, 2/10/25
#SIeve;

Q: what's a Manchurian candidate?

A: Manchurian candidate is a person, especially a politician, being used as a puppet by an enemy power. The term is commonly used to indicate disloyalty or corruption, whether intentional or unintentional.

Reply Quote
1 edit
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 12:32p, 2/10/25
packgrad said:
caryking said:
Werewolf said:
#Sieve, whatcha think, AI?
Maybe this is a poll not faked?
Every news site out there says Melania was not at the Super Bowl.
That clip was not from the Super Bowl. I don't know whether she was there or not. I didn't see her. But that clip is from the CFB Playoff a few years ago.
Maybe this one show's what was intended.

Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 12:35p, 2/10/25
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Civilized said:


Well said, Pete.
His boss tried to amend the constitution with a tweet

Really? What tweet?

And what happened after that?

And what happened after was the National Archivist corrected him and didnt change a thing.

OK. What's your point? The National Archivist manages records; they serve no function with regard to checking executive overreach.

Did Biden act on anything? Were his actions reviewed by courts? What did the courts say? What did Biden do then?

My point is that anyone from the last administration has zero room to talk about the rule of law. Heres another fun example:

As for what Vance said...whatever? Its going to end up in the Supreme Court here very shortly, so Ill just let it play out

You seem to be missing the part where the courts checked Biden's power with his first debt relief attempt, so he found a different, more directed, legal way to accomplish some of the same things.

That's how this all works. Presidents sometimes overreach, courts check their power, and if they want the Presidents can then figure out a different, legal way to accomplish what they're trying to accomplish.

Vance seems to be flailing on the history chapter where yes, it is definitely and obviously the courts that decide whether a President is overreaching.

Just like the courts did in Trump's first term with his overreach on immigration (travel ban); DACA; family separation; census citizenship questions; border wall funding; Presidential financial record shielding; Presidential records release under subpoena; TPS for immigrants; and COVID voting logistics.
This is exactly why I say: elections have consequences. So, roll on DOGE...
Reply Quote
3
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 12:35p, 2/10/25
packgrad said:
GuerrillaPack said:
SmaptyWolf said:
packgrad said:
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Wait, so you didn't win the culture war?

By the looks of about 100% of the Super Bowl commercials I'd say you lost pretty badly.
Boy, you commie libtards are just doubling down on stupidity, aren't you?

There was a referendum on the culture war about three months ago in November. And your cultural Marxist DemonRat agenda LOST.

Keep it up. Keep thinking you are "winning". Keep pushing your baby murder, drag queen story time, cut your son's p**** and your daughter's breasts off agenda.


Super Bowl commercials made conservatives lose pretty badly? LOLOLOL. What in the **** is that mouth breathing moron and his pal talking about? Hilarious.

Those boys are so desperate for a win it's pitiful.
It's hilarious. Libtards are in their own echo chamber of raving lunatics, and therefore think they are "in the majority". They think that because ~90% of big companies (and Marxist-run universities, and far Left run Lamestream media) are pushing a far-Left agenda, that they are "winning the culture war".

These people are the most gullible, braindead morons who have ever lived on the earth in world history. We have all the knowledge of the universe at our fingertips a search away, and these 75 IQ neanderthals are able to be brainwashed by their Satanic commie overlords into actually believing that there are 70 genders, and unborn children "are not human beings but only clumps of cells", and that cutting your sons p***** off and having a drag queen giving them a lap dance is a great idea.
Reply Quote
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GuerrillaPack • 12:41p, 2/10/25
"culture war" is a single battlefield. General Flynn minces no words and gets down to very simple language to get to the brass tacks of it all. We should all take heed when he speaks as one of a handful of the premier military intelligence minds in the world. ........and, "Fight for Humanity" is not just politics

"This is how I view the @DOGEteam in this fight for humanity! Go get'm @elonmusk"
Reply Quote
jkpackfan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to packgrad • 12:55p, 2/10/25
packgrad said:
GuerrillaPack said:
SmaptyWolf said:
packgrad said:
Reading social media today, there's a correlation between those who liked the Super Bowl halftime performance and those with TDS, excluding those under voting age.
Wait, so you didn't win the culture war?

By the looks of about 100% of the Super Bowl commercials I'd say you lost pretty badly.
Boy, you commie libtards are just doubling down on stupidity, aren't you?

There was a referendum on the culture war about three months ago in November. And your cultural Marxist DemonRat agenda LOST.

Keep it up. Keep thinking you are "winning". Keep pushing your baby murder, drag queen story time, cut your son's p**** and your daughter's breasts off agenda.


Super Bowl commercials made conservatives lose pretty badly? LOLOLOL. What in the **** is that mouth breathing moron and his pal talking about? Hilarious.

Those boys are so desperate for a win it's pitiful.
JC what an idiot. So glad I have him on ignore
Reply Quote
4
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:12p, 2/10/25
ok, this is funny...


Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:17p, 2/10/25
#Sieve, it's the very tiny tip of the iceberg. TINY, Sieve.
Reply Quote
5
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:18p, 2/10/25
#SIeve, here's that letter, T, showing up once again.

Reply Quote
3
Werewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:21p, 2/10/25
#Sieve, you, #Nappy and #Gobbler have fought hard to stop #MAGA and Trump. When do you move aside?
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
hokiewolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:25p, 2/10/25
Good podcast explaining the decentralization of Mexican drug trafficking
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-connect-with-johnny-mitchell/id1646502645?i=1000690606053
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Reply Quote
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:33p, 2/10/25
https://instagr.am/p/DF53AMwSKUr
Reply Quote
1
SmaptyWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 2:59p, 2/10/25
Werewolf said:
#Sieve, it's the very tiny tip of the iceberg. TINY, Sieve.
Leaving aside Elon's endless firehose of conspiratorial nonsense, I think we will all sleep better knowing that a team of 20 year old DOGEbags now have access to all of your personal data.
Reply Quote
1 edit
GuerrillaPack
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SmaptyWolf • 3:09p, 2/10/25
SmaptyWolf said:

Leaving aside Elon's endless firehose of conspiratorial nonsense, I think we will all sleep better knowing that a team of 20 year old DOGEbags now have access to all of your personal data.
Can you do anything other than parrot the lame false arguments of hacks and frauds like Pocahontas, Bernie, and the commie libtard talking head puppets in the Lamestream media?

Trump and the Executive Branch 100% have full Constitutional authority to audit other parts of the executive branch of government. And Trump can hire WHOEVER he wants to head other sub-agencies of the executive branch (with advise and consent of Senate where needed).

The Treasury Department is part of the Executive Branch of the Federal government.

In what universe does the Executive Branch not have authority to audit itself??? In commie Democrat coo-coo land.
Reply Quote
4
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Werewolf • 3:58p, 2/10/25
Werewolf said:
#Sieve, it's the very tiny tip of the iceberg. TINY, Sieve.

I'm glad to see Musk has turned into a full-blown conspiracy theorist loon. Fits right in with his VP Trump.

I look forward to the day where DOGE publishes their findings from the Social Security database showing that Democrats are receiving the lion's share illegal benefits.

Of course, we all know that's not going to happen and this is more gas can bull**** from Musk that he's lobbing into the campfire just for fun.
Reply Quote
1
First Page Last Page
Page 282 of 284 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.