That is the misinformation that's been supported by people in the media. Take a look at the changes that happened in Wisconsin for instance. You will see your statement is just fundamentally untrue!Civilized said:caryking said:Civ, you have an opinion based on a court. I get it. It's a sound place to be. Regardless, evidence is evidence that would be played out in a court, if a court would actually hear the evidence. That said, all of this, in my opinion, should be used to have state legislatures make new election laws to clean up the process. If that happens, which I'm not sure it will, then on to the next election.Civilized said:Werewolf said:
https://americasvoice.news/video/7jC7LHhkYqpfOmA
Here''s a clip of an interview of an Arizona candidate for Secretary of State. He speaks of 200,000+ ballots in AZ that were supposedly mailed ........NOT folded. A ballot doesn't fit in the envelop unfolded. He also speaks of 900,000 ballots without proper chain of custody. He speaks of security guard at counting center in Phoenix finding tables of ballots being prepared in a cordoned back room… They discuss safe houses and mules shown in 2000 MULES.
FoxNEWS and Newsmax do not provide uncensored news………..they provide CENSORED news. Even Tucker Carlson's show would not allow the words "2000 MULES" to be spoken.
REAL AMERICA's VOICE and ONE AMERICA NEWS……….to find tru
Rudy Giuliani and Sid Powell spoke of things that made them look like circus clowns too.
Massive chasm between speaking of something and there being actual evidence of something.
Morning Cary!
The fundamental disconnect here is that there's all this talk of "cleaning up the process" when there's not really evidence it's "dirty."
If you're not seeing evidence of fraud and courts aren't either, "cleaning up the process" reads more like "limiting voter access to the polls because we lost the last election" than truly well-intentioned efforts to improve election security.
Younger people, low-income people, minorities, and those without access to transportation are those most impacted by hollow attempts to "clean up" a process that's not dirty. Who do younger, lower-income, minority voters typically vote for? That's where so much of the distrust originates about the motivations to "clean up" the process. It's not demonstrably "dirty," and the people whose access to polls gets more restricted don't help the party that wants to "clean up" the process.
Voter ID laws are fine and supportable if implemented in a way that's not regressive.
Beyond that what, specifically, are we really talking about?
Mail-in and absentee ballots weren't new to the 2020 election. They've been around for decades, with there being no evidence that they consequentially increase spoiled or fraudulent votes.
Also, whatever issues do occur don't help one party over the other. Of the 16 states where more than half of voters voted by mail in the last presidential election, Trump won nine.
The only thing that changed in 2020 was the rhetoric surrounding mail-in. Unsurprisingly, Trump's myriad repeated falsehoods about the security of mail-in (and election fraud in general) has left the American public, especially tens of millions on the right, with a false sense of how secure mail-in/absentee balloting, and our elections generally, are.
“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”
Joe Biden