packofwolves said:
Civilized said:
packofwolves said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
packofwolves said:
Civilized said:
packgrad said:
I guess libs and pretindependents don't want to talk about collusion now.
There's nothing to talk about yet. A confidential informant getting an uncorroborated story from a Burisma executive isn't actionable.
Form a bipartisan congressional commission or appoint a special prosectuor and investigate the **** out of it and report back.
Sure, Biden's DOJ will jump right on it and assign a special prosecutor.
Independent civ should be aware that the fbi suppressed the information and worked with social media companies to suppress the information. But, NOW they should investigate according to independent civ. Lol. Sheep.
Whatever it takes!!!
ZZZZZzzzzzzzzz
Just more of your favorite excuses about how the poor Pubs are victimized by the meanie media and the gestapo.
What's stopping the Republican-led House of Representatives from initiating an investigation, subpoena-ing the **** out of people, and diving into it?
Come on, you know the US House can't assign a special counsel. They could pass a law but you also know that's a non-starter in the Senate. Also Biden can veto it.
Biden's DOJ has to assign special counsel and you know that's not happening either. Nor will the FBI investigate it. But it is their job to do it.
Go back to putting your head in the sand.
Two separate issues. I'm saying if you think the justice department won't investigate it then what about the House?
The House can investigate on their own. They don't need permission.
Does it concern you that such serious allegations are not being investigated by the DOJ or FBI? Especially knowing the informant is credible per the FBI?
No it doesn't concern me yet. The FBI document doesn't come close to proving anything, and it's not new information.
That form is used to report unverified information. It's one informant saying that someone said that the Burisma exec made the accusation. Great, the informant is trustworthy. But he's still reporting what someone said someone else said, not reporting firsthand information.
Also, the information isn't new. Trump and Guiliani have been pushing the underlying accusation - that the Bidens were bribed with $10 mil from Burisma - for years. This isn't a new accusation and it's been explored before.
Now, multiple informants? Multiple executives? Multiple companies? New information? Incriminating accounting records? Patterns of evidence? And the DOJ or FBI still seeming to look the other way as the evidence mounts? Yeah that would start to concern me.
Can the DOJ or FBI be nudged politically? Yeah, for sure. Can you get a bunch of lifer law officers to look the other way indefinitely as evidence and political pressure mount to investigate something that looks like it clearly needs investigating? I'm doubtful of that scenario and more trusting than you are that if an investigation is warranted the justice department won't be able to hold the flood gates shut interminably at the behest of the Biden administration.
