The Biden Administration

156,092 Views | 3279 Replies | Last: 36 min ago by Oldsouljer
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Biden regime and the DNC will now be working with censors ("fact checkers") to censor social media and even your private text messages, on information and views on vaccines and other critical issues that counter their agenda.

https://instagr.am/p/CRSJkyXFrLl
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Biden had to go to Philadelphia to defend the legitimacy of his Presidency!!! Hang on Joe... your legitimacy is in question and those states are making big moves to prove you right or wrong!
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.cnsnews.com/article/washington/terence-p-jeffrey/federal-taxes-and-spending-set-records-through-june

Will this ever get under control?

FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, neither party is interested in fixing it
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
When you say neither party is interested in fixing... well, I agree. The establishment class (elites) in Washington are the real problem. I think one side is all about crippling the economy purposely and the other side cares more about their own pocket than they do ours...

Guess what? We elected them! I still encourage you to watch the video I posted as that will lay out how the whole system is screwed up. The Republican Party is controlled opposition, at least the leadership is.
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
When you say neither party is interested in fixing... well, I agree. The establishment class (elites) in Washington are the real problem. I think one side is all about crippling the economy purposely and the other side cares more about their own pocket than they do ours...

Guess what? We elected them! I still encourage you to watch the video I posted as that will lay out how the whole system is screwed up. The Republican Party is controlled opposition, at least the leadership is.
100% correct. At the grassroots level, Republicans truly do want to dramatically shrink the size, power, and spending of government, and totally eliminate deficits and debt. And they truly do want to crack down hard on and stop illegal immigration. But, as you said, the higher levels of the party are infiltrated and controlled by "RINOs" or "elitists" or whatever you want to call them -- who are actually closet Leftists and betray their conservative supporters by promoting policies that advance the socialist and "globalist" (New World Order) agendas. That's why, for instance, the Republicans did not repeal Obamacare in the first few years of Trump's Presidency...and why Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush (and John McCain) supported amnesty for illegal aliens. Just yesterday, I saw that Republican Senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn (TX) are now supporting the DACA amnesty for illegals and trying to team up with the Democrats to pass a bill for it.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

pineknollshoresking said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
When you say neither party is interested in fixing... well, I agree. The establishment class (elites) in Washington are the real problem. I think one side is all about crippling the economy purposely and the other side cares more about their own pocket than they do ours...

Guess what? We elected them! I still encourage you to watch the video I posted as that will lay out how the whole system is screwed up. The Republican Party is controlled opposition, at least the leadership is.
100% correct. At the grassroots level, Republicans truly do want to dramatically shrink the size, power, and spending of government, and totally eliminate deficits and debt. And they truly do want to crack down hard on and stop illegal immigration. But, as you said, the higher levels of the party are infiltrated and controlled by "RINOs" or "elitists" or whatever you want to call them -- who are actually closet Leftists and betray their conservative supporters by promoting policies that advance the socialist and "globalist" (New World Order) agendas. That's why, for instance, the Republicans did not repeal Obamacare in the first few years of Trump's Presidency...and why Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush (and John McCain) supported amnesty for illegal aliens. Just yesterday, I saw that Republican Senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn (TX) are now supporting the DACA amnesty for illegals and trying to team up with the Democrats to pass a bill for it.
Tillis has to be one of the worst Senators in Washington! He is a Karl Rove hack! Bought and paid for by the Republican Elites! All they want is cheap labor for the constituents here and outsource everything else to China!

They all do this to line their pockets!
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
The can will be kicked until we are truly in crisis.

But with the looming insolvency of SS, and Medicare/Medicaid, we might be there sooner than we'd like.
cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
The can will be kicked until we are truly in crisis.

But with the looming insolvency of SS, and Medicare/Medicaid, we might be there sooner than we'd like.
Gotta love Social Security.

All the government had to do was take that money and put it in an individual savings accounts for each person in the amount that they contributed and then invested it in any fund that was tied to the market. The market has historically grown by 3% annually and everyone who paid into that particular system wouldn't have any sort of issue with retiring and then getting their money. Spouses should get the money of someone if they died, and if both people were dead then that money should go to any surviving children. It would of been that simple but the government is incapable of any type of logical thinking. Instead they spend it without thinking.

I did a little bit of math and without calculating and of the interest I would have made off of the money I should be looking at between 350k-400k just off of what the government takes from me if i decided to retire at 65. if you calculate the 3% a year return on average I should have over 700k that I should be able to collect in social security. Even if you take that money and break it out evenly on the assumption that I would live to 100 with the interest i should be looking at between 30k-32k a year just on my social security. Instead the government gets involved and i would get 12k-13k a year.

What a damn joke man.

I can break out Medicate/medicaid as well....but i think i've made my point on just the social security issue
PackFansXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/joe-biden-talks-down-democracy/

Quote:

'We're facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That's not hyperbole. Since the Civil War." The president of the United States, a man long known for hyperbole, doth protest too much. Biden's speech Tuesday at the National Constitution Center yet again invoked the January 6 riot at the Capitol, but his theme was that new voting and election laws passed by Republican state legislatures are a "21st century Jim Crow assault" on voting rights. This is irresponsible and dishonest; worse, it is dangerous.
Quote:

One of the few specifics offered in his speech was the claim that, "in Texas . . . [the] Republican-led state legislature wants to allow partisan poll watchers to intimidate voters and imperil impartial poll workers." The Texas law does no such thing; indeed, the current draft of the bill requires poll watchers to take an oath "that I will not disrupt the voting process or harass voters in the discharge of my duties."

President "Unity" lies with impunity. Democrats have called the filibuster "racist" and then choose to flee Texas to avoid their elected duty to vote in the Texas Special Session. What an incredible mess our politics have become.
packofwolves
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So now we have the government censoring Facebook. How can anyone think this is ok?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/biden-flagging-facebook-posts-covid
jkpackfan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packofwolves said:

So now we have the government censoring Facebook. How can anyone think this is ok?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/biden-flagging-facebook-posts-covid
Blows my mind and makes my blood pressure go sky high. The same people that for 4 years called Trump and his followers fascists are all of a sudden silent while there might actually be fascism.
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
The can will be kicked until we are truly in crisis.

But with the looming insolvency of SS, and Medicare/Medicaid, we might be there sooner than we'd like.
Actually, the debt ceiling is around the corner (a couple of months). Watch... the Democrats and the MSM will say the Republicans are putting the credit of the US at risk. Ask yourself this, didn't they say that during the Obama admin. What changed? Nothing got fixed, and it will not again, unless you call your congressional people and tell them to stop the damn spending and don't increase the debt ceiling. It's the only thing we have left!!!

Remember, the US credit is you, it's me, it's everyone here... We can't afford to extend the debt ceiling!
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's the day count, storm?
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
6?
TheStorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and counting...
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboypack02 said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
The can will be kicked until we are truly in crisis.

But with the looming insolvency of SS, and Medicare/Medicaid, we might be there sooner than we'd like.
Gotta love Social Security.

All the government had to do was take that money and put it in an individual savings accounts for each person in the amount that they contributed and then invested it in any fund that was tied to the market. The market has historically grown by 3% annually and everyone who paid into that particular system wouldn't have any sort of issue with retiring and then getting their money. Spouses should get the money of someone if they died, and if both people were dead then that money should go to any surviving children. It would of been that simple but the government is incapable of any type of logical thinking. Instead they spend it without thinking.

I did a little bit of math and without calculating and of the interest I would have made off of the money I should be looking at between 350k-400k just off of what the government takes from me if i decided to retire at 65. if you calculate the 3% a year return on average I should have over 700k that I should be able to collect in social security. Even if you take that money and break it out evenly on the assumption that I would live to 100 with the interest i should be looking at between 30k-32k a year just on my social security. Instead the government gets involved and i would get 12k-13k a year.

What a damn joke man.

I can break out Medicate/medicaid as well....but i think i've made my point on just the social security issue


The biggest scam was selling SS as a retirement system you "pay into" to receive your benefit. It is and always has been a direct wealth transfer from workers to retirees.

If it was a valid investment, it's a terrible one. You've gone through the numbers already but it's about the worst way you could save money. Individual retirement accounts that were set up automatically and could be opted out of would function much, much better for the vast majority
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
The can will be kicked until we are truly in crisis.

But with the looming insolvency of SS, and Medicare/Medicaid, we might be there sooner than we'd like.
Actually, the debt ceiling is around the corner (a couple of months). Watch... the Democrats and the MSM will say the Republicans are putting the credit of the US at risk. Ask yourself this, didn't they say that during the Obama admin. What changed? Nothing got fixed, and it will not again, unless you call your congressional people and tell them to stop the damn spending and don't increase the debt ceiling. It's the only thing we have left!!!

Remember, the US credit is you, it's me, it's everyone here... We can't afford to extend the debt ceiling!


Eh, the debt ceiling is something that should not exist in a responsible, well functioning government. However we don't have that government so I get why it exists. It's one of the only bargaining chips to be had by those wanting less spending.

Very few in congress actually care anymore. Many talk about fiscal responsibility only when in the minority and don't govern that way.

cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

cowboypack02 said:

IseWolf22 said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

No, neither party is interested in fixing it
The can will be kicked until we are truly in crisis.

But with the looming insolvency of SS, and Medicare/Medicaid, we might be there sooner than we'd like.
Gotta love Social Security.

All the government had to do was take that money and put it in an individual savings accounts for each person in the amount that they contributed and then invested it in any fund that was tied to the market. The market has historically grown by 3% annually and everyone who paid into that particular system wouldn't have any sort of issue with retiring and then getting their money. Spouses should get the money of someone if they died, and if both people were dead then that money should go to any surviving children. It would of been that simple but the government is incapable of any type of logical thinking. Instead they spend it without thinking.

I did a little bit of math and without calculating and of the interest I would have made off of the money I should be looking at between 350k-400k just off of what the government takes from me if i decided to retire at 65. if you calculate the 3% a year return on average I should have over 700k that I should be able to collect in social security. Even if you take that money and break it out evenly on the assumption that I would live to 100 with the interest i should be looking at between 30k-32k a year just on my social security. Instead the government gets involved and i would get 12k-13k a year.

What a damn joke man.

I can break out Medicate/medicaid as well....but i think i've made my point on just the social security issue


The biggest scam was selling SS as a retirement system you "pay into" to receive your benefit. It is and always has been a direct wealth transfer from workers to retirees.

If it was a valid investment, it's a terrible one. You've gone through the numbers already but it's about the worst way you could save money. Individual retirement accounts that were set up automatically and could be opted out of would function much, much better for the vast majority
True

The problem is that without some form of SS 60-65% of elderly people no longer working would have absolutely any income and would end up either living with children, in assisted living facilities, or homeless.

There are three issues in play.

  • The first is that the government is run by a bunch of idiots who can't manage anything and are more than happy to give away money with no thought at all because it isn't their money. I promise you that these politicians aren't spending money out of their own pockets the same way.
  • The second is that people have no financial literacy. People have no idea how the market works, compounding interest, savings accounts, or budgeting and not living from check to check. People at large seem to think that they should be able to take a low paying job and be given enough money for that job to have the type of lifestyle that they want. Everyone yells to raise the minimum wage to 15 an hour but the reality is that what they do isn't worth 15 an hour. People aren't going out and getting life skills to make them more than the minimum wage that they are making. Because of this people aren't able to put together their own retirement.
  • Politicians have no problem buying votes with other people's money, which is what was done with social security. The offer of "free" money regardless of what you have done for the rest of your life really gets people to vote a certain way

wolfman18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfman18 said:


That right there is going to allow Trump to win the lawsuit against the Tech Company's. The Supreme Court has frowned upon the government suggesting company's do things. This is going to allow Trumps legal team to assert these tech company's (even though private) are doing pseudo government work.

This one is going to be really interesting...
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
wolfman18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

wolfman18 said:


That right there is going to allow Trump to win the lawsuit against the Tech Company's. The Supreme Court has frowned upon the government suggesting company's do things. This is going to allow Trumps legal team to assert these tech company's (even though private) are doing pseudo government work.

This one is going to be really interesting...
He's gotta file the lawsuit in the right state first
Packchem91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfman18 said:


It's one thing for Twitter or FB to decide who to ban.....seems like a whole different (and scary) can of worms if the government starts telling them to do so?
PackFansXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/07/the-biden-ministry-of-truth/

Quote:

It boggles the mind that we're hearing such proposals made with a straight face in an era when chief executives are themselves such prodigious liars. A Ministry of Truth under the control of a guy who says voting in the U.S. in 2021 is worse than it was under Jim Crow? Are we turning into China, where artists are under standing orders to "adhere to correct views of history, the nation, the country, and culture"?

If the government can work with Facebook, there is nothing stopping it from also working with Google, Twitter, Apple, CNN, and the New York Times to enforce its vision of the truth. What Psaki is suggesting amounts to the White House's asserting the right to censor any information it doesn't like.

Labeling assertions "disinformation" is in most cases simply begging the question; virtually everything is disputed. Liberals used to grasp that the way to win an argument is to have the facts on your side, not appeal to an authority figure to gag your opponent.
Quote:

Whenever politicians ring the alarm bell, it's almost always because they want more power. Shame on the many journalists who are nodding vigorously along as the White House proposes to shred the First Amendment.
This administration becomes more Orwellian by the day.
wolfman18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep essentially you'll have a media cartel
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfman18 said:


Yea...this is straight out of 1930's Germany.
Packchem91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfman18 said:

Yep essentially you'll have a media cartel
Maybe this one will blow up on Psaki with the MSM.....but I'm trying to imagine the ****-show that would have ensued if one of Trump's press secretary's had said that same thing. Can you imagine the MSM getting worried their own use of the SM accounts may get restricted by a Trumpian presidency?
They would have rightly had a field day of ripping the lunacy of the government driving that.
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

wolfman18 said:


Yea...this is straight out of 1930's Germany.
Exactly right. Anybody who pays attention could have seen this coming.

The hearing yesterday in Arizona proved fraud without a shadow of a doubt. Now more states are going to do a forensic audit. So buckle up for the next few months. The media will try to distract you with lots of false flags. Hopefully some of the people on the left will wake up and see what is happening to our Republic.

Patrick Byrne, a noted Libertarian and former CEO of Overstock.com says that Arizona should recall it's electors.

https://rumble.com/vjwv4j-patrick-byrne-calls-on-arizona-to-recall-their-electors.html
Being an N. C. State Fan Builds Great Character
FlossyDFlynt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yea, my thought wasnt about Arizona at all, but the government trying to control information. I cannot think of one example of a good outcome where the government is controlling the message to its people without freedom to express an "opposing" view.

Biden and his administration are going down a very Orwellian path with this notion
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FlossyDFlynt said:

Yea, my thought wasnt about Arizona at all, but the government trying to control information. I cannot think of one example of a good outcome where the government is controlling the message to its people without freedom to express an "opposing" view.

Biden and his administration are going down a very Orwellian path with this notion
Oh I know, I was just adding the Arizona thing in because I did not see anything posted about it.

This is complete Nazi Germany of the 30's. Psaki said today that if one social media platform bans you then all should ban you for disinformation. Funny how these government shills want to be the arbiter of what you can and can't say. Our whole Bill of Rights are under attack, but right now they are going hard after the 1st and 2nd amendments. I will not comply.
Being an N. C. State Fan Builds Great Character
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrummerboyWolf said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Yea, my thought wasnt about Arizona at all, but the government trying to control information. I cannot think of one example of a good outcome where the government is controlling the message to its people without freedom to express an "opposing" view.

Biden and his administration are going down a very Orwellian path with this notion
Oh I know, I was just adding the Arizona thing in because I did not see anything posted about it.

This is complete Nazi Germany of the 30's. Psaki said today that if one social media platform bans you then all should ban you for disinformation. Funny how these government shills want to be the arbiter of what you can and can't say. Our whole Bill of Rights are under attack, but right now they are going hard after the 1st and 2nd amendments. I will not comply.
There is no reason to post anything about the election... if you do, you will cast out as a maniac, conspiracy theorist, etc, etc, etc... Biden won! He won fair and square!,,. follow the words of the almighty and conform!

Actually, I am following it closely. Things are happening in all the swing states. We are in for a very interesting time. Remember, people will say that the election can't be pulled down; however, nothing says a state can't call back Senators. You can bet everything in your personal portfolio that the Dems do not, rightfully, control the US Senate and probably not he US House!!!

Like I said above... Trump will win his lawsuit. My understanding is that they filed in the southern district of Florida (don't know the circuit). Justice Thomas presides over that circuit. He has written a lot of opinions showing he is willing to take up this case.
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
cowboypack02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pineknollshoresking said:

DrummerboyWolf said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Yea, my thought wasnt about Arizona at all, but the government trying to control information. I cannot think of one example of a good outcome where the government is controlling the message to its people without freedom to express an "opposing" view.

Biden and his administration are going down a very Orwellian path with this notion
Oh I know, I was just adding the Arizona thing in because I did not see anything posted about it.

This is complete Nazi Germany of the 30's. Psaki said today that if one social media platform bans you then all should ban you for disinformation. Funny how these government shills want to be the arbiter of what you can and can't say. Our whole Bill of Rights are under attack, but right now they are going hard after the 1st and 2nd amendments. I will not comply.
There is no reason to post anything about the election... if you do, you will cast out as a maniac, conspiracy theorist, etc, etc, etc... Biden won! He won fair and square!,,. follow the words of the almighty and conform!

Actually, I am following it closely. Things are happening in all the swing states. We are in for a very interesting time. Remember, people will say that the election can't be pulled down; however, nothing says a state can't call back Senators. You can bet everything in your personal portfolio that the Dems do not, rightfully, control the US Senate and probably not he US House!!!

Like I said above... Trump will win his lawsuit. My understanding is that they filed in the southern district of Florida (don't know the circuit). Justice Thomas presides over that circuit. He has written a lot of opinions showing he is willing to take up this case.


I hate to be the one to say it but states aren't going to pull back senators or anyone else. If the GOP had a single ounce of fight in them they'd of done something months ago while the vote certification was going on. They didn't and my guess is that most of the GOP politicians are more that happy that Biden is in office. Gives them something to fundraise on and another excuse for why they don't do anything their voters want them to
caryking
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboypack02 said:

pineknollshoresking said:

DrummerboyWolf said:

FlossyDFlynt said:

Yea, my thought wasnt about Arizona at all, but the government trying to control information. I cannot think of one example of a good outcome where the government is controlling the message to its people without freedom to express an "opposing" view.

Biden and his administration are going down a very Orwellian path with this notion
Oh I know, I was just adding the Arizona thing in because I did not see anything posted about it.

This is complete Nazi Germany of the 30's. Psaki said today that if one social media platform bans you then all should ban you for disinformation. Funny how these government shills want to be the arbiter of what you can and can't say. Our whole Bill of Rights are under attack, but right now they are going hard after the 1st and 2nd amendments. I will not comply.
There is no reason to post anything about the election... if you do, you will cast out as a maniac, conspiracy theorist, etc, etc, etc... Biden won! He won fair and square!,,. follow the words of the almighty and conform!

Actually, I am following it closely. Things are happening in all the swing states. We are in for a very interesting time. Remember, people will say that the election can't be pulled down; however, nothing says a state can't call back Senators. You can bet everything in your personal portfolio that the Dems do not, rightfully, control the US Senate and probably not he US House!!!

Like I said above... Trump will win his lawsuit. My understanding is that they filed in the southern district of Florida (don't know the circuit). Justice Thomas presides over that circuit. He has written a lot of opinions showing he is willing to take up this case.


I hate to be the one to say it but states aren't going to pull back senators or anyone else. If the GOP had a single ounce of fight in them they'd of done something months ago while the vote certification was going on. They didn't and my guess is that most of the GOP politicians are more that happy that Biden is in office. Gives them something to fundraise on and another excuse for why they don't do anything their voters want them to
Cowboy, you're probably right; however, the Senate in Arizona looks to be damn adamant to fix their election. I guess we will see how far there're willing to go... The lady Senator (can't think of her name) appears to have bigger balls than the men.

Also, keep an eye on Doug Mastriano in PA. Former military guy who is all but daring people to get in his way!

At the end of the day, we will ultimately see if they are serious. One think for sure... they have the receipts!! As much as the "Biden Fan Club" here doesn't wants to believe,.. Biden is truly illegitimate and he didn't get 80M votes and lost!!!!
The dissenting opinion has been sidelined!!!!!
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well I guess Jen should be banned from all social media too.

https://gab.com/MajorPatriot/posts/106596287659887010
Being an N. C. State Fan Builds Great Character
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://instagr.am/p/CRcSd2gtg_c
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.