^ yup, good catch
Like I said before...high risk, medium reward type IMO. The kid can play....the kid knows he can play.ge_traveler said:
Anxiously waiting on Dun's comments on the Harris commitment.
williewolf said:
how does harris committ affect leque recruitment?
.........scholarship slots are already limited and seemingly several good players in the area next year - leque, moore, withers, trey, etc.
I see what you are saying Dun and you know I trust your judgement.Dunlow66 said:Like I said before...high risk, medium reward type IMO. The kid can play....the kid knows he can play.ge_traveler said:
Anxiously waiting on Dun's comments on the Harris commitment.
I will say what I said about Al Freeman, maybe the staff can get something from this guy, but not really a kid that screams 'NC State' to me. JMO
Former Baylor guard.FlockaWolf said:
Apparently we have offered another PG for 2018, Wendell Mitchell, out of Trinity Valley CC.
MJ has charges dismissed, so I am not sure where they are going to get the scholarships for guys like Simon or Lecque which is unfortunate because I thought we were in the mix for bothWolfpackSI said:
Guess the staff is moving on from Simon/Lecque.
We need shooters but just keep bringing in players that can't shoot the 3-ball. Shot Wendell is 28% from 3.
3.5 yearsstate95 said:
How much eligibility does Harris have left? I believe he can play next spring. But will he be a freshman still or a sophomore? I can't find anything on the rules of mid-year transfers.
I may be wrong but I thought he could play next ACC season and then had 3 more. Not 100% sure though. I do agree about the mid-year transfers though.wufpack7 said:
No such thing as a half year of eligibility. He has three years left after this season. If he plays after first semester next season, that will also use a year of eligibility and he will have 2 remaining after that. I don't know why these mid-year transfers seem to be more popular recently, unless a redshirt or an NCAA exception or a "transfer down" is involved it essentially takes a year of eligibility away from you. I guess so many guys are delusional enough to believe that they are not 4-year players, they don't care.
CedarMaronite said:
do we have any chance with khavon moore or jarius hamilton ( I suppose not jarius)...i would flat out love to land funderburke
I would have thought so too... second half of next season finishing off his first full season of playing and all that. But that's applying the "common sense" approach... I don't know if there are nuances rule-wise such as suggested above, but I could see that potentially being the case now that someone (wufpack7 here) has brought it up and spelled it out in that manner.wkdbigpckfan said:I may be wrong but I thought he could play next ACC season and then had 3 more. Not 100% sure though. I do agree about the mid-year transfers though.wufpack7 said:
No such thing as a half year of eligibility. He has three years left after this season. If he plays after first semester next season, that will also use a year of eligibility and he will have 2 remaining after that. I don't know why these mid-year transfers seem to be more popular recently, unless a redshirt or an NCAA exception or a "transfer down" is involved it essentially takes a year of eligibility away from you. I guess so many guys are delusional enough to believe that they are not 4-year players, they don't care.
They have been on him for a while. No surprise after Miss State dropped out and Maryland looks like they will not have the spot(thanks to an injury to a SF who was considered an 'early entrant' candidate next season) Hamilton wantedNCStateFanForLife said:CedarMaronite said:
do we have any chance with khavon moore or jarius hamilton ( I suppose not jarius)...i would flat out love to land funderburke
Jarius Hamilton commits to BC today.
Hamilton's brother also transferring from Georgia State to join him at BC.
Saves a redshirt for later. Guys who are ready to transfer mid-season of their first year on campus...well, they probably need to keep their options open for future transfers.wufpack7 said:
No such thing as a half year of eligibility. He has three years left after this season. If he plays after first semester next season, that will also use a year of eligibility and he will have 2 remaining after that. I don't know why these mid-year transfers seem to be more popular recently, unless a redshirt or an NCAA exception or a "transfer down" is involved it essentially takes a year of eligibility away from you. I guess so many guys are delusional enough to believe that they are not 4-year players, they don't care.
Note: I saw on another thread that James has confirmed what wufpack7 has posted above regarding remaining eligibility.TheStorm said:I would have thought so too... second half of next season finishing off his first full season of playing and all that. But that's applying the "common sense" approach... I don't know if there are nuances rule-wise such as suggested above, but I could see that potentially being the case now that someone (wufpack7 here) has brought it up and spelled it out in that manner.wkdbigpckfan said:I may be wrong but I thought he could play next ACC season and then had 3 more. Not 100% sure though. I do agree about the mid-year transfers though.wufpack7 said:
No such thing as a half year of eligibility. He has three years left after this season. If he plays after first semester next season, that will also use a year of eligibility and he will have 2 remaining after that. I don't know why these mid-year transfers seem to be more popular recently, unless a redshirt or an NCAA exception or a "transfer down" is involved it essentially takes a year of eligibility away from you. I guess so many guys are delusional enough to believe that they are not 4-year players, they don't care.
Interesting. Thanks. It'll be interesting to see if Keatts plays him next year or holds him out to space out scholarship PGsTheStorm said:Note: I saw on another thread that James has confirmed what wufpack7 has posted above regarding remaining eligibility.TheStorm said:I would have thought so too... second half of next season finishing off his first full season of playing and all that. But that's applying the "common sense" approach... I don't know if there are nuances rule-wise such as suggested above, but I could see that potentially being the case now that someone (wufpack7 here) has brought it up and spelled it out in that manner.wkdbigpckfan said:I may be wrong but I thought he could play next ACC season and then had 3 more. Not 100% sure though. I do agree about the mid-year transfers though.wufpack7 said:
No such thing as a half year of eligibility. He has three years left after this season. If he plays after first semester next season, that will also use a year of eligibility and he will have 2 remaining after that. I don't know why these mid-year transfers seem to be more popular recently, unless a redshirt or an NCAA exception or a "transfer down" is involved it essentially takes a year of eligibility away from you. I guess so many guys are delusional enough to believe that they are not 4-year players, they don't care.
Theres a lot talk that he would be one of the ones to transfer out not sure he really is a Keatts recruitduckfatrules said:
Any word on big men seems like if Yurt and Hicks go we will be very young and thin down there
what is this about Hicks transferring? is that a rumor or a mistype?
Hicks doesnt fit the system, IMO, and wasnt recruited by Keatts. No word on if he will move on or not, but it wouldnt surprise me. Sitting out a little longer could be good for the young man, give him time to fully heal. Still, just conjecture at this pointTheWhiteWolf said:Theres a lot talk that he would be one of the ones to transfer out not sure he really is a Keatts recruitduckfatrules said:
Any word on big men seems like if Yurt and Hicks go we will be very young and thin down there
what is this about Hicks transferring? is that a rumor or a mistype?
Coaches were surprised he was back this yearDunlow66 said:Hicks doesnt fit the system, IMO, and wasnt recruited by Keatts. No word on if he will move on or not, but it wouldnt surprise me. Sitting out a little longer could be good for the young man, give him time to fully heal. Still, just conjecture at this pointTheWhiteWolf said:Theres a lot talk that he would be one of the ones to transfer out not sure he really is a Keatts recruitduckfatrules said:
Any word on big men seems like if Yurt and Hicks go we will be very young and thin down there
what is this about Hicks transferring? is that a rumor or a mistype?