DrummerboyWolf said:

---

First a video from WarRoom and it's Steve Bannon talking with Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips of 2000 Mules. On Monday those two released information from Georgia and how it was stolen. They have the receipts and they are getting ready to release copies of checks paid to the mules and who supplied those checks. This video goes over what they found and takes about 20 minutes.

Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips (@onwardsocial) discuss their "2000 Mules" court case & how the Georgia election was stolen with Steve Bannon on the eve of their hearing in federal court in Atlanta, which just happens to be at the same time President @realDonaldTrump is… pic.twitter.com/Hq9QCVFZLe

— Lisa Mei (@TheNotoriousLMC) August 23, 2023

Here is an overview and timeline of what happened.

https://open.ink/georgia

And here is a summary of their numbers.

https://open.ink/the-aftermath

This is just one State and Trump won that State and he contesting that and now they are trying to throw him in jail when he was right about this as he always is.

There are some on here that say there is not any consequential evidence that would overturn the election. Well here it is and get ready for more.

---

Pack00 said:

---

If these numbers are accurate and can be proven...then Trump's lawyers could use these as a defense in their case against Georgia.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Are you talking about the Truth to Vote people? That was their choice to be arrested for contempt, they didn't respond to a court order.

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

Actually, I've tried to debate a number of people on issues. Typically, responses like your, are the most compelling ideal brought forward. In essence, nothing!

You all can try and character assassinate all you want (Steve Bannon); however, nowhere are you trying to deal with the issues at hand. The "Q" people (I'm not one) have their place, just like the BLM did, for some. I personally don't support the thinking of "Q" stuff (believe me, I have a friend that's a huge "Q" supporter), because, what is shown is so cryptic and broad reaching, that any tarot card reader could come up with the same.

Now, look at your response… just like the FB and BB forums, you're trying to demean posters…. Why do you even engage? If you think things, like your last sentence, and you want to make those people look stupid, you probably should just stay away.

Does it make you feel good to demean others?

---

Civilized said:

---

What exactly did Smapty say that was out of line?

We should be encouraging people to post in here by discussing their post and not attacking them, unless we want the Water Cooler politics threads to be even more Deadsville/4-chan-lite than they already are.

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Are you talking about the Truth to Vote people? That was their choice to be arrested for contempt, they didn't respond to a court order.

---

Wasn't it something about a name that didn't want to divulge?

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

Actually, I've tried to debate a number of people on issues. Typically, responses like your, are the most compelling ideal brought forward. In essence, nothing!

You all can try and character assassinate all you want (Steve Bannon); however, nowhere are you trying to deal with the issues at hand. The "Q" people (I'm not one) have their place, just like the BLM did, for some. I personally don't support the thinking of "Q" stuff (believe me, I have a friend that's a huge "Q" supporter), because, what is shown is so cryptic and broad reaching, that any tarot card reader could come up with the same.

Now, look at your response… just like the FB and BB forums, you're trying to demean posters…. Why do you even engage? If you think things, like your last sentence, and you want to make those people look stupid, you probably should just stay away.

Does it make you feel good to demean others?

---

I understand that the persecuted victim thing is the core of being a conservative these days, but please. Literally every other post in the Water Cooler refers to "Commie Libtard Marxists", so I think you can handle me pointing out that there's an ACTUAL thread on here insisting the world is flat! Sorry though, you don't deserve an "I have an opinion too!" participation trophy for believing things that require a 3rd Grade science education to clearly disprove.

But forget the extremes like Q or Flat Earthers... they're a symptom of a more general problem: For decades you guys have been subjected to the message "you can't trust anybody but us". When people with critical thinking skills hear that, they usually run the other way, but you guys believed it. So now here we are, where literally the only things you believe are conspiracy theories fed to you by your trusted info bubble. Sorry, Infowars or Steve Bannon (who was convicted of running a "Build the Wall" scam and pocketing the money) actually have MUCH stronger incentives to feed you crap than the New York Times. But it's what you want to hear, so now Sleepy Joe being a senile zombie who is also a criminal mastermind pocketing billions from China while he rides the train to work makes perfect sense to you. Just stay outraged!

Anyway, why did I bother commenting? I guess because it's an unfortunate quirk of humanity that the people who have the least idea how things actually work tend to be the angriest and most vocal. Which is why this Water Cooler is basically a toxic waste dump. But for the health of our society I think it's important for other folks to chime in once in a while, to remind everyone that a lot of folks out here actually don't buy your nonsense.

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

Actually, I've tried to debate a number of people on issues. Typically, responses like your, are the most compelling ideal brought forward. In essence, nothing!

You all can try and character assassinate all you want (Steve Bannon); however, nowhere are you trying to deal with the issues at hand. The "Q" people (I'm not one) have their place, just like the BLM did, for some. I personally don't support the thinking of "Q" stuff (believe me, I have a friend that's a huge "Q" supporter), because, what is shown is so cryptic and broad reaching, that any tarot card reader could come up with the same.

Now, look at your response… just like the FB and BB forums, you're trying to demean posters…. Why do you even engage? If you think things, like your last sentence, and you want to make those people look stupid, you probably should just stay away.

Does it make you feel good to demean others?

---

I understand that the persecuted victim thing is the core of being a conservative these days, but please. Literally every other post in the Water Cooler refers to "Commie Libtard Marxists", so I think you can handle me pointing out that there's an ACTUAL thread on here insisting the world is flat! Sorry though, you don't deserve an "I have an opinion too!" participation trophy for believing things that require a 3rd Grade science education to clearly disprove.

But forget the extremes like Q or Flat Earthers... they're a symptom of a more general problem: For decades you guys have been subjected to the message "you can't trust anybody but us". When people with critical thinking skills hear that, they usually run the other way, but you guys believed it. So now here we are, where literally the only things you believe are conspiracy theories fed to you by your trusted info bubble. Sorry, Infowars or Steve Bannon (who was convicted of running a "Build the Wall" scam and pocketing the money) actually have MUCH stronger incentives to feed you crap than the New York Times. But it's what you want to hear, so now Sleepy Joe being a senile zombie who is also a criminal mastermind pocketing billions from China while he rides the train to work makes perfect sense to you. Just stay outraged!

Anyway, why did I bother commenting? I guess because it's an unfortunate quirk of humanity that the people who have the least idea how things actually work tend to be the angriest and most vocal. Which is why this Water Cooler is basically a toxic waste dump. But for the health of our society I think it's important for other folks to chime in once in a while, to remind everyone that a lot of folks out here actually don't buy your nonsense.

---

Thank you for letting me know how you feel!!! Perhaps you are one of those that can critically think; however, I probably wouldn't know anyway, right?

I guess you have a better understanding of how things work…. Well, I guess it's really amazing how I've been as successful, as I've been, with my lack of…

Victimhood? Ok, I guess I'm guilty of your charge (assuming that was directed at me)

Would you like to have lunch sometime so can get to know me?

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

Actually, I've tried to debate a number of people on issues. Typically, responses like your, are the most compelling ideal brought forward. In essence, nothing!

You all can try and character assassinate all you want (Steve Bannon); however, nowhere are you trying to deal with the issues at hand. The "Q" people (I'm not one) have their place, just like the BLM did, for some. I personally don't support the thinking of "Q" stuff (believe me, I have a friend that's a huge "Q" supporter), because, what is shown is so cryptic and broad reaching, that any tarot card reader could come up with the same.

Now, look at your response… just like the FB and BB forums, you're trying to demean posters…. Why do you even engage? If you think things, like your last sentence, and you want to make those people look stupid, you probably should just stay away.

Does it make you feel good to demean others?

---

I understand that the persecuted victim thing is the core of being a conservative these days, but please. Literally every other post in the Water Cooler refers to "Commie Libtard Marxists", so I think you can handle me pointing out that there's an ACTUAL thread on here insisting the world is flat! Sorry though, you don't deserve an "I have an opinion too!" participation trophy for believing things that require a 3rd Grade science education to clearly disprove.

But forget the extremes like Q or Flat Earthers... they're a symptom of a more general problem: For decades you guys have been subjected to the message "you can't trust anybody but us". When people with critical thinking skills hear that, they usually run the other way, but you guys believed it. So now here we are, where literally the only things you believe are conspiracy theories fed to you by your trusted info bubble. Sorry, Infowars or Steve Bannon (who was convicted of running a "Build the Wall" scam and pocketing the money) actually have MUCH stronger incentives to feed you crap than the New York Times. But it's what you want to hear, so now Sleepy Joe being a senile zombie who is also a criminal mastermind pocketing billions from China while he rides the train to work makes perfect sense to you. Just stay outraged!

Anyway, why did I bother commenting? I guess because it's an unfortunate quirk of humanity that the people who have the least idea how things actually work tend to be the angriest and most vocal. Which is why this Water Cooler is basically a toxic waste dump. But for the health of our society I think it's important for other folks to chime in once in a while, to remind everyone that a lot of folks out here actually don't buy your nonsense.

---

Thank you for letting me know how you feel!!! Perhaps you are one of those that can critically think; however, I probably wouldn't know anyway, right?

I guess you have a better understanding of how things work…. Well, I guess it's really amazing how I've been as successful, as I've been, with my lack of…

Victimhood? Ok, I guess I'm guilty of your charge (assuming that was directed at me)

Would you like to have lunch sometime so can get to know me?

---

After graduating from State about 20 years ago I left North Cackalacky to work on Wall St (just in time for 9/11). I head back to visit my parents a couple times a year, but otherwise the odds of us grabbing lunch are pretty low, unfortunately.

---

packgrad said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

Actually, I've tried to debate a number of people on issues. Typically, responses like your, are the most compelling ideal brought forward. In essence, nothing!

You all can try and character assassinate all you want (Steve Bannon); however, nowhere are you trying to deal with the issues at hand. The "Q" people (I'm not one) have their place, just like the BLM did, for some. I personally don't support the thinking of "Q" stuff (believe me, I have a friend that's a huge "Q" supporter), because, what is shown is so cryptic and broad reaching, that any tarot card reader could come up with the same.

Now, look at your response… just like the FB and BB forums, you're trying to demean posters…. Why do you even engage? If you think things, like your last sentence, and you want to make those people look stupid, you probably should just stay away.

Does it make you feel good to demean others?

---

I understand that the persecuted victim thing is the core of being a conservative these days, but please. Literally every other post in the Water Cooler refers to "Commie Libtard Marxists", so I think you can handle me pointing out that there's an ACTUAL thread on here insisting the world is flat! Sorry though, you don't deserve an "I have an opinion too!" participation trophy for believing things that require a 3rd Grade science education to clearly disprove.

But forget the extremes like Q or Flat Earthers... they're a symptom of a more general problem: For decades you guys have been subjected to the message "you can't trust anybody but us". When people with critical thinking skills hear that, they usually run the other way, but you guys believed it. So now here we are, where literally the only things you believe are conspiracy theories fed to you by your trusted info bubble. Sorry, Infowars or Steve Bannon (who was convicted of running a "Build the Wall" scam and pocketing the money) actually have MUCH stronger incentives to feed you crap than the New York Times. But it's what you want to hear, so now Sleepy Joe being a senile zombie who is also a criminal mastermind pocketing billions from China while he rides the train to work makes perfect sense to you. Just stay outraged!

Anyway, why did I bother commenting? I guess because it's an unfortunate quirk of humanity that the people who have the least idea how things actually work tend to be the angriest and most vocal. Which is why this Water Cooler is basically a toxic waste dump. But for the health of our society I think it's important for other folks to chime in once in a while, to remind everyone that a lot of folks out here actually don't buy your nonsense.

---

Thank you for letting me know how you feel!!! Perhaps you are one of those that can critically think; however, I probably wouldn't know anyway, right?

I guess you have a better understanding of how things work…. Well, I guess it's really amazing how I've been as successful, as I've been, with my lack of…

Victimhood? Ok, I guess I'm guilty of your charge (assuming that was directed at me)

Would you like to have lunch sometime so can get to know me?

---

After graduating from State about 20 years ago I left North Cackalacky to work on Wall St (just in time for 9/11). I head back to visit my parents a couple times a year, but otherwise the odds of us grabbing lunch are pretty low, unfortunately.

---

Well, assuming you still live in the city, that might be a possibility. My daughter lives in Lenox Hill (UES) and I visit her frequently.

---

Like I said at the outset, at this point most of y'all are pretty unreachable. We're just not conversing in the same reality any more. So honestly, I can't imagine it'd be a very fun lunch for either of us.

---

You fit the Yankee stereotype well.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

packgrad said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

The fact that they are trying to throw people in prison for questioning the 2020 "election" is prima facie evidence that the "election" WAS, in fact, fraudulent and rigged.

They are now crucifying Trump, Rudy Giuliani, and others who called out the obvious fact that the election was fraudulent, and trying to throw them in prison.

For how many years have Democrats whined and claimed that elections were fraudulent and rigged?? From Al Gore in 2000, Hillary in 2016, to whacko Stacey Abrams recently in Georgia of all places.

---

Do you believe that claiming that an election result not in your favor is fraudulent make Gore, Clinton, and Abrams more worthy of political office, such as President of Governor?

I know you and many others here believe there is obvious fact that the 2020 election was fraudulent, but frankly every lawful patch to challenging that election ended in a dead end. The difference between Trump and the three democrats you mention is that yes, they continued to ***** about it, but they didn't come up with a hairbrained plan to try and usurp the United States Constitution to remain in power.

---

I have been consistent in saying that the election has reasonable evidence to say, it was not accurate. Whether it was, or not, is just an opinion of mine, just like yours or anyone else.

As much as you and/or Civ's continuous commentary on all the courts turning down these complaints, it still doesn't invalidate the evidence.

Regarding the hare-brained plan, well… that just your opinion. We know a couple of of things that are facts:

Trump left the White House on the day he should have.
Biden walked into the White House on the day he should have.

All the other stuff is purely conjecture, at best…

---

Yes, that's exactly what it does. Having your evidence unanimously laughed out of dozens of separate courts run by conservative judges means that your "evidence" was a steaming pile of crap. Full stop.

Your world view apparently requires that the entire U.S. court system is part of a vast conspiracy that can't be trusted, along with the entire (notoriously conservative) FBI, the entire (notoriously conservative) CIA, and of course all scientists and experts. And that's all far more likely to you than Trump just being an f'ing con man?

Sorry man, you guys have been completely insulated from reality. That's a cult.

---

A new name has entered the ring! I've not seen this person before…

As I've said many times… the only cult of personality, we have in the great country, are the maniacs, with TDS! It shows by the amount of frivolous indictments we have. Don't ask me… ask one of your own… Deshowitz!

Now, regarding the lawsuits thrown out… I agree, a number of them probably didn't come with proper procedural evidence, timing, etc…. That said, I have yet to see a case thrown out that is supported by evidence like 2000 mules. In fact, the justice department put those people in jail for some reason. They're out now and trying to see get their evidence in court, down in Fulton County, at the same time, that hag indicted Trump.

I will say it again, and for this new knucklehead to hear me…. The evidence looks ugly; however, I don't know where the truth is and neither do you, or anyone else, on this board. So, as it all plays out, it will be what it is…. Either way, I'm ok!

Now, do us all a favor and get back in your hole you dug out of….

---

Lol, gladly! That comment was actually for people who don't usually post in the water cooler. Having a "debate" with folks who's entire source of truth is constructed from conspiracy theories pulled from Steve Bannon's ass is a waste of energy. Before you know it you're trying to explain to them why the Earth couldn't possibly be flat.

---

Actually, I've tried to debate a number of people on issues. Typically, responses like your, are the most compelling ideal brought forward. In essence, nothing!

You all can try and character assassinate all you want (Steve Bannon); however, nowhere are you trying to deal with the issues at hand. The "Q" people (I'm not one) have their place, just like the BLM did, for some. I personally don't support the thinking of "Q" stuff (believe me, I have a friend that's a huge "Q" supporter), because, what is shown is so cryptic and broad reaching, that any tarot card reader could come up with the same.

Now, look at your response… just like the FB and BB forums, you're trying to demean posters…. Why do you even engage? If you think things, like your last sentence, and you want to make those people look stupid, you probably should just stay away.

Does it make you feel good to demean others?

---

I understand that the persecuted victim thing is the core of being a conservative these days, but please. Literally every other post in the Water Cooler refers to "Commie Libtard Marxists", so I think you can handle me pointing out that there's an ACTUAL thread on here insisting the world is flat! Sorry though, you don't deserve an "I have an opinion too!" participation trophy for believing things that require a 3rd Grade science education to clearly disprove.

But forget the extremes like Q or Flat Earthers... they're a symptom of a more general problem: For decades you guys have been subjected to the message "you can't trust anybody but us". When people with critical thinking skills hear that, they usually run the other way, but you guys believed it. So now here we are, where literally the only things you believe are conspiracy theories fed to you by your trusted info bubble. Sorry, Infowars or Steve Bannon (who was convicted of running a "Build the Wall" scam and pocketing the money) actually have MUCH stronger incentives to feed you crap than the New York Times. But it's what you want to hear, so now Sleepy Joe being a senile zombie who is also a criminal mastermind pocketing billions from China while he rides the train to work makes perfect sense to you. Just stay outraged!

Anyway, why did I bother commenting? I guess because it's an unfortunate quirk of humanity that the people who have the least idea how things actually work tend to be the angriest and most vocal. Which is why this Water Cooler is basically a toxic waste dump. But for the health of our society I think it's important for other folks to chime in once in a while, to remind everyone that a lot of folks out here actually don't buy your nonsense.

---

Thank you for letting me know how you feel!!! Perhaps you are one of those that can critically think; however, I probably wouldn't know anyway, right?

I guess you have a better understanding of how things work…. Well, I guess it's really amazing how I've been as successful, as I've been, with my lack of…

Victimhood? Ok, I guess I'm guilty of your charge (assuming that was directed at me)

Would you like to have lunch sometime so can get to know me?

---

After graduating from State about 20 years ago I left North Cackalacky to work on Wall St (just in time for 9/11). I head back to visit my parents a couple times a year, but otherwise the odds of us grabbing lunch are pretty low, unfortunately.

---

Well, assuming you still live in the city, that might be a possibility. My daughter lives in Lenox Hill (UES) and I visit her frequently.

---

Like I said at the outset, at this point most of y'all are pretty unreachable. We're just not conversing in the same reality any more. So honestly, I can't imagine it'd be a very fun lunch for either of us.

---

You fit the Yankee stereotype well.

---

Lol, that's funny, considering everyone around here still can't understand my accent half the time.

---

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp admits Voting Machines can be Hacked!

“If you give anybody a voting machine they can be hacked.”

He then thanks the person for video recording the conversation, but then argues that we have transparency in our elections. 😂

This Video… pic.twitter.com/Y27nCNmo6D

— UltraMJTruth (@MJTruthUltra) August 27, 2023