packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

completely walling in a free country seems oxymoronic

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

completely walling in a free country seems oxymoronic

---

TheStorm said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

completely walling in a free country seems oxymoronic

---

Only the border where the system has been abused... that's not completely walling in anything.

---

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

completely walling in a free country seems oxymoronic

---

That's the point… we aren't a free country anymore. Our freedoms are being eradicated, one by one. I would have a different opinion, perhaps, if we would do away with a number of guarantees. School, health insurance by government, and other things that burden the tax payer.

You know hokie, the libertarian profile of thinking…

---

Why does every Libertarian idea sound like it was thought up in a dorm room at 4am? You'd almost think it was just a long-running scam by rich guys to get their taxes cut.

But I'm sure when you hit 65 you'll refuse Medicare... you know, on principle. Sure you'll be totally uninsurable in our free market health care system, but your stand will help usher in so much freedom for seniors! You'll be a Libertarian hero!

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

How in the world is the cost of a northern border wall justifiable?

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

caryking said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

All this arguing about policies that are proven not to work to curb illegal immigration when the simple solution is to take away the sole reason to immigrate illegally into the United States - the demand to enter the United States legally is higher than the available supply of opportunities to enter the United States legally. Go fix that and you will wipe out illegal entry.

---

Most people that hand-wring over illegal immigration care a lot more about the immigration piece than the illegal piece.

They don't want the immigrants here, legal or not, so increasing opportunities to legally immigrate doesn't solve their real problem.

---

Look at civ playing the "racists!" card. I fondly remember the old days where you pretended to be an independent. Lol.

---

LOLOL. Y'all bang on libs for making everything about race and then turn around and bring racism accusations into a conversation where it wasn't said or implied (by me anyway).

People banging the "build the wall" or anti-immigration drum are almost exclusively focused on the 75% of illegals that flow across our southern border from Mexico/Central/South America. And (aside from the overwhelming majority of those immigrants being white) I wasn't talking about racism because most people that don't want those immigrants flowing in balk at things (fair or unfair) like their impact on the job market, crimes they commit, and taxes they don't pay. Making them legal fixes the tax piece but not the job market or crime pieces.

---

I just want people to come here legally. Really, nothing more or nothing less.

---

So you good with making the immigration process more streamlined and much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

So you good with building walls to help streamline the influx of immigration to make it much quicker and easier to navigate?

---

We've already built walls in locations where they're clearly practicable.

Are you advocating for supplementing that wall in the limited locations where it's practicable to do so, or a truly continuous border wall?

---

Civ, build the wall across the southern and northern border! Will it stop all illegal crossings? No! I think everyone that has looked at this, with any reality, will agree with me.

A) I would add in whatever else is needed to prevent more illegal crossing.
B) I would add in guards that prevent any other illegals. We should not be checking in these illegal; rather, just push them back, into Mexico.
C) anybody coming here, looking for asylum, need to stay in the country they got into, then apply for asylum. Remember, if they came from an impoverished country, they got into Mexico, so Mexico can deal with them and give them asylum.

Point "C" assumes these people are coming from counties other than Mexico.

I start with a single premise…. It's a privilege to be an US Citizen, not a right!

---

How in the world is the cost of a northern border wall justifiable?

---

Quit spending money in Ukraine and other country's and it becomes easily paid for. Also, how much money are you taking into consideration that illegals drain on the system? I'm sure you have that number available, right?

---

96k Georgia maiI in baIIots never maiIed back… but voted. pic.twitter.com/wIB6O35W0U

— Phenomenology (@BerryRazi) October 21, 2023

CLARENCE THOMAS!
Is that what USDebtClock is referring to “Thomas X”

This message on https://t.co/kvMijGnM6W 👇 and Clarence Thomas upcoming case where HE will have sole power to decide if the 2020 / 2022 Elections are invalid due to fraud!?

GINORMOUS! 💥💥💣💣

More on… pic.twitter.com/0K4rG0EpcN

— Santa Surfing (@SantaSurfing) October 25, 2023

What Happens if we show that Trump Won? 👀https://t.co/Wjp1PtVNFl

pic.twitter.com/jyJKzQCIh7

— UltraMJTruth (@MJTruthUltra) November 3, 2023

🐙🐙🐙 The Kraken 🐙🐙🐙

On November 28, 2020, Brannon Howse from Worldview Weekend Broadcast (@WVWOnline) interviewed retired 3 Star Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney (@GeneralMCNews) where he mentioned the “Kraken” which was a widely used term by Attorney @SidneyPowell1.… pic.twitter.com/blotqdWRQA

— Not Op Cue (@NotOpCue) October 21, 2023

TheStorm said:

---

Damn. That's some crazy-ass **** right there...

Someone has just waaaaaay too much time on their hands.

---

Here’s a poll challenger under oath ‘where they got caught’ a white truck full of Robert L. Peters ‘dump’ at Detroit, TCF Rigging Center at 3 o’clock in the AM on 11. 04. 20.

“I don’t know where the ballots came from, I know it was after 3 o’clock in the morning that they came.” https://t.co/faqfIn4qGa pic.twitter.com/JjwO2hhlTl

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) November 2, 2023

Let’s flash back to 2 AM on Nov 4th 2020, how the United States government was overthrown,

Poll watcher under oath:
A: Midnight Trump ahead by 10%,

B: 2 AM monitor down. totally rebooted.

C: Data dump, date breach.

D: America wakes up, the United Sates government overthrown. pic.twitter.com/DgPuRh4V73

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) November 2, 2023

The big news you need to hear about today is Ware County, Georgia.

Dominion machines were seized. Equal number of Trump and Biden votes were forensically analyzed. However, the machines reported 87% for Trump and 113% for Biden. Should be 100% for both.

Stay tuned. This is big.

— Aaron J. Carpenter🇺🇸 (@aaronjcarpenter) December 6, 2020

Corroborated eyewitness testimony under penalty of perjury and obstruction of justice,

— 130,000 - 280,000 completed ballots for the 2020 Presidential election were borrowed from the compassionate State of New York by the battleground, the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. https://t.co/MhiVNtIGCp pic.twitter.com/TrWuZZAa6N

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) November 4, 2023

Here is the CONSPIRACY that overthrew the United States government on November 3, 2020, pic.twitter.com/BMf1VMNZR5

— 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 (@Real_RobN) November 7, 2023

THE COUP DE'TAT OF AMERICA - Italian & US Intelligence Testimony that the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen from President Donald Trump

“Something has happened, we’re watching a coup d’état in the United States of America.”

• China is buying up politicians around the world, buying… pic.twitter.com/IteCxfh1aD

— UltraMJTruth (@MJTruthUltra) November 10, 2023

Chinese “GodMode” Access into US Elections - The Konnech Story - The Pit & the Corrupt FBI

Konnech Inc:
• Provides back office infrastructure systems for election departments throughout the country, including other countries
• Founded by Eugene Yu, a Chinese National

True the… pic.twitter.com/yj665bdhw9

— UltraMJTruth (@MJTruthUltra) November 10, 2023

TheStorm said:

---

Damn. That's some crazy-ass **** right there...

Someone has just waaaaaay too much time on their hands.

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Damn. That's some crazy-ass **** right there...

Someone has just waaaaaay too much time on their hands.

---

Yeah. And yet real life crazy stuff goes on all the time. For example, State legislators in New Hampshire are now discussing a future need for secession when the federal deficit exceeds 40 trillion. What's remarkable about that is that they're only the latest in a string of states that have quietly been preparing for future contingencies. Not saying any of this will play out in my lifetime, but as someone whose financial interests would be massively disrupted if the nation ruptured, it got my attention. And seismic fissures are clearly developing within the US.

---

🚨THREAD: Tucker Carlson on Duplicated Ballots, Falsified Tally Sheets, and Mail-In Ballot Fraud in Fulton County, Georgia

“It now appears there actually was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia, last November (2020). That is not a conspiracy theory. It’s true.… pic.twitter.com/qlyZIhQoX8

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 10, 2023

GEORGIA🚨

Fulton County poll worker Bridget Thorne says thousands of *test ballots* were printed on the same "heavy cardstock" used for actual ballots and left unsecured with no chain of custody.

The *test ballots* were "indistinguishable from live Georgia ballots," and stacks… pic.twitter.com/kmEyRn1qxg

— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) November 10, 2023

Was Ray Epps the victim of right wing conspiracies and speculation?

Or was he being used, like everyone else on January 6th, but for a different purpose? pic.twitter.com/nu8zLJPjaK

— Truth In Media (@Truth_InMedia) November 10, 2023

SmaptyWolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

This is fascinating…

Was Ray Epps the victim of right wing conspiracies and speculation?

Or was he being used, like everyone else on January 6th, but for a different purpose? pic.twitter.com/nu8zLJPjaK

— Truth In Media (@Truth_InMedia) November 10, 2023

---

Of course she gave up the game right at the beginning of the video: "we're not here to prove anything with evidence, we're just going to show you some innuendo and cleverly edited video and let you decide"

Imagine having a worldview that didn't require endless conspiracy theories to make sense.

January 6th insurrection - liberal conspiracy to destroy America
Trump losing election - liberal conspiracy to destroy America
FBI/CIA/judicial system protects Democrats - liberal conspiracy to destroy America
FBI/CIA/judicial system hates Republicans - liberal conspiracy to destroy America
Illegal immigration - liberal conspiracy to destroy America
Covid is actually bad - global conspiracy to destroy America
Vaccines actually work - global conspiracy to destroy America
Global warming real - global conspiracy to destroy America

I'm sure there are many more.

---